(06-11-2018 01:35 PM)Pony94 Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:33 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-09-2018 01:04 PM)CougarRed Wrote: [ -> ] (06-09-2018 11:17 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote: [ -> ]Actual Results:
1. Cincinnati
2. Wichita State
3. Houston
Um, Houston and Wichita St tied for second. Then Houston beat them in the semifinals.
lol these coogs are so damn sensitive.
They prefer to be called Dem Coogs
Noted. Thanks for the tip.
(06-11-2018 01:35 PM)Pony94 Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:33 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-09-2018 01:04 PM)CougarRed Wrote: [ -> ] (06-09-2018 11:17 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote: [ -> ]Actual Results:
1. Cincinnati
2. Wichita State
3. Houston
Um, Houston and Wichita St tied for second. Then Houston beat them in the semifinals.
lol these coogs are so damn sensitive.
They prefer to be called Dem Coogs
I thought it was Teh Coogs.
(06-11-2018 01:36 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-10-2018 09:49 AM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ]83 we were tied for second that's what joprior was trying to say earlie.. we didn't finish 3rd regardless of whatever random order the AAC website decided to organize it
It's 2a 2b.. not 2 and 3
Stop being an idiot.
being an idiot = stating facts???
noted.
(06-11-2018 01:49 PM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:36 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-10-2018 09:49 AM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ]83 we were tied for second that's what joprior was trying to say earlie.. we didn't finish 3rd regardless of whatever random order the AAC website decided to organize it
It's 2a 2b.. not 2 and 3
Stop being an idiot.
being an idiot = stating facts???
noted.
Then I guess the league’s official website is devoid of facts too.
You lost the tiebreaker but had a better postseason. Why can’t you be a normal fanbase and accept this? I guess the lack of postseason has gotten you guys a case of the insecure jitters. Jesus.
(06-11-2018 01:51 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:49 PM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:36 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-10-2018 09:49 AM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ]83 we were tied for second that's what joprior was trying to say earlie.. we didn't finish 3rd regardless of whatever random order the AAC website decided to organize it
It's 2a 2b.. not 2 and 3
Stop being an idiot.
being an idiot = stating facts???
noted.
Then I guess the league’s official website is devoid of facts too.
You lost the tiebreaker but had a better postseason. Why can’t you be a normal fanbase and accept this? I guess the lack of postseason has gotten you guys a case of the insecure jitters. Jesus.
as a WSU you fan you should not be not talking about insecurity...Do you remember the mid season breakdown that all you WSU fans had because of a few losses to some solid teams....
(06-11-2018 01:54 PM)Huskypride Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:51 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:49 PM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:36 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-10-2018 09:49 AM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ]83 we were tied for second that's what joprior was trying to say earlie.. we didn't finish 3rd regardless of whatever random order the AAC website decided to organize it
It's 2a 2b.. not 2 and 3
Stop being an idiot.
being an idiot = stating facts???
noted.
Then I guess the league’s official website is devoid of facts too.
You lost the tiebreaker but had a better postseason. Why can’t you be a normal fanbase and accept this? I guess the lack of postseason has gotten you guys a case of the insecure jitters. Jesus.
as a WSU you fan you should not be not talking about insecurity...Do you remember the mid season breakdown that all you WSU fans had because of a few losses to some solid teams....
As a UCONN fan, I cannot not will I criticize other schools' fan reactions to under-performance.
(06-11-2018 02:00 PM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:54 PM)Huskypride Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:51 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:49 PM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:36 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ]Stop being an idiot.
being an idiot = stating facts???
noted.
Then I guess the league’s official website is devoid of facts too.
You lost the tiebreaker but had a better postseason. Why can’t you be a normal fanbase and accept this? I guess the lack of postseason has gotten you guys a case of the insecure jitters. Jesus.
as a WSU you fan you should not be not talking about insecurity...Do you remember the mid season breakdown that all you WSU fans had because of a few losses to some solid teams....
As a UCONN fan, I cannot not will I criticize other schools' fan reactions to under-performance.
fine...but we had in my defense we had a much better excuse to freak out
(06-11-2018 01:51 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:49 PM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:36 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-10-2018 09:49 AM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ]83 we were tied for second that's what joprior was trying to say earlie.. we didn't finish 3rd regardless of whatever random order the AAC website decided to organize it
It's 2a 2b.. not 2 and 3
Stop being an idiot.
being an idiot = stating facts???
noted.
Then I guess the league’s official website is devoid of facts too.
You lost the tiebreaker but had a better postseason. Why can’t you be a normal fanbase and accept this? I guess the lack of postseason has gotten you guys a case of the insecure jitters. Jesus.
i already posted a link from the official site saying we finished tied for second
you realize seeding tie breakers for the aac tournment have absolutely nothing to do with conference standings???
if 2 teams are undefeated there is a tie breaker for seeding, but they are still co-champions
you need to re-read the aac rules
it is a factual statement that we tied for second..there is no tie breakers for conference finish beyond head to head
Quote:The Cougars tied for second-place in The American
http://theamerican.org/news/2018/3/6/men...ath=mbball
(06-11-2018 02:02 PM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:51 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:49 PM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:36 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-10-2018 09:49 AM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ]83 we were tied for second that's what joprior was trying to say earlie.. we didn't finish 3rd regardless of whatever random order the AAC website decided to organize it
It's 2a 2b.. not 2 and 3
Stop being an idiot.
being an idiot = stating facts???
noted.
Then I guess the league’s official website is devoid of facts too.
You lost the tiebreaker but had a better postseason. Why can’t you be a normal fanbase and accept this? I guess the lack of postseason has gotten you guys a case of the insecure jitters. Jesus.
i already posted a link from the official site saying we finished tied for second
you realize seeding tie breakers for the aac tournment have absolutely nothing to do with conference standings???
if 2 teams are undefeated there is a tie breaker for seeding, but they are still co-champions
you need to re-read the aac rules
it is a factual statement that we tied for second..there is no tie breakers for conference finish beyond head to head
Quote:The Cougars tied for second-place in The American
http://theamerican.org/news/2018/3/6/men...ath=mbball
Saying tied for 2nd is fair ..Regular season results are either 2.WSU 3.UH, or 2.WSU 2.UH depending on whether you are accounting for the tiebreaker or not. In no way, shape or form can you say regular season rankings 2.UH 3. WSU and be correct. (not something you said, but other UH posters)
Everything that happened after that is irrelevant for regular season rankings which is what was the topic of discussion.
(06-11-2018 01:54 PM)Huskypride Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:51 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:49 PM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:36 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-10-2018 09:49 AM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ]83 we were tied for second that's what joprior was trying to say earlie.. we didn't finish 3rd regardless of whatever random order the AAC website decided to organize it
It's 2a 2b.. not 2 and 3
Stop being an idiot.
being an idiot = stating facts???
noted.
Then I guess the league’s official website is devoid of facts too.
You lost the tiebreaker but had a better postseason. Why can’t you be a normal fanbase and accept this? I guess the lack of postseason has gotten you guys a case of the insecure jitters. Jesus.
as a WSU you fan you should not be not talking about insecurity...Do you remember the mid season breakdown that all you WSU fans had because of a few losses to some solid teams....
I had a mid season breakdown? I recall two people at most having that reaction. This Houston is 2nd thing is an epidemic.
Apples to oranges all the way around.
(06-11-2018 03:43 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 02:02 PM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:51 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:49 PM)pesik Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:36 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ]Stop being an idiot.
being an idiot = stating facts???
noted.
Then I guess the league’s official website is devoid of facts too.
You lost the tiebreaker but had a better postseason. Why can’t you be a normal fanbase and accept this? I guess the lack of postseason has gotten you guys a case of the insecure jitters. Jesus.
i already posted a link from the official site saying we finished tied for second
you realize seeding tie breakers for the aac tournment have absolutely nothing to do with conference standings???
if 2 teams are undefeated there is a tie breaker for seeding, but they are still co-champions
you need to re-read the aac rules
it is a factual statement that we tied for second..there is no tie breakers for conference finish beyond head to head
Quote:The Cougars tied for second-place in The American
http://theamerican.org/news/2018/3/6/men...ath=mbball
Saying tied for 2nd is fair ..Regular season results are either 2.WSU 3.UH, or 2.WSU 2.UH depending on whether you are accounting for the tiebreaker or not. In no way, shape or form can you say regular season rankings 2.UH 3. WSU and be correct. (not something you said, but other UH posters)
Everything that happened after that is irrelevant for regular season rankings which is what was the topic of discussion.
UH was the 3 seed. That’s all there is to it. Unless we split the conference title, there’s no point in arguing a tie for second.
In the first year of the AAC we finished tied for 3rd at 12-6 with UConn and Memphis but I'm claiming third alone because we swept the national champs, so
BTW, arguing over who gets second is awesome, and a very productive way to spend your time.
(06-11-2018 07:04 PM)Moody Magic Wrote: [ -> ]In the first year of the AAC we finished tied for 3rd at 12-6 with UConn and Memphis but I'm claiming third alone because we swept the national champs, so
BTW, arguing over who gets second is awesome, and a very productive way to spend your time.
You actually finished in a 3 way tie for 2nd since Louisville's wins ended up being #FAKENEWS.
(06-11-2018 07:04 PM)Moody Magic Wrote: [ -> ]In the first year of the AAC we finished tied for 3rd at 12-6 with UConn and Memphis but I'm claiming third alone because we swept the national champs, so
BTW, arguing over who gets second is awesome, and a very productive way to spend your time.
Everyone wants to be the first loser.
(06-11-2018 01:39 PM)HuskyU Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:35 PM)Pony94 Wrote: [ -> ] (06-11-2018 01:33 PM)ShockerFever Wrote: [ -> ] (06-09-2018 01:04 PM)CougarRed Wrote: [ -> ] (06-09-2018 11:17 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote: [ -> ]Actual Results:
1. Cincinnati
2. Wichita State
3. Houston
Um, Houston and Wichita St tied for second. Then Houston beat them in the semifinals.
lol these coogs are so damn sensitive.
They prefer to be called Dem Coogs
I thought it was Teh Coogs.
It's Teh Rivalry between Dem Coogs and The Hurricane.
You Coog'd it.
Dooley and Chillious are doing really impressive work on the recruiting trail for ECU.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media2.giphy.com/media/3o7btQDFlvGcv8PXt6/giphy.gif)
![[Image: BnlQemo9zCEx.gif]](http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/mp/BnlQemo9zCEx.gif)
