(10-14-2022 10:37 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:25 AM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ]Only because she's not useful as a scapegoat to the Republicans anymore. Donald Trump saw to that with his Fake News email-gate stunt that got him the White House
No. It's simply because she's nothing but an old hateful hag.
And even as an old, hateful hag, I would still prefer her over any other democrat--except possibly Bill, whose eligibility has expired.
(10-14-2022 10:37 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:25 AM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:18 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:01 AM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-13-2022 02:51 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote: [ -> ]Thats it, this will surely get him arrested! 
Hey maybe you guys should have another Benghazi trial when this all blows over. I'm sure it will get Hillary Clinton this time.
She's old (hag) news.
Only because she's not useful as a scapegoat to the Republicans anymore. Donald Trump saw to that with his Fake News email-gate stunt that got him the White House
No. It's simply because she's nothing but an old hateful hag.
Oh ok that makes it alright. Trump gets a pass for making fake news for his own gain because you think she's an old hateful hag that had it coming.
Are we really comparing what happened in Benghazi to Trump keeping some documents?
You would have to be messed up in the head to compare those two things.
(10-14-2022 10:32 AM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:28 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:25 AM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:18 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:01 AM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ]Hey maybe you guys should have another Benghazi trial when this all blows over. I'm sure it will get Hillary Clinton this time.
She's old (hag) news.
Only because she's not useful as a scapegoat to the Republicans anymore. Donald Trump saw to that with his Fake News email-gate stunt that got him the White House
cry more b*tch.
Can't, I'm saving room for your tears when Trump's wardrobe matches his skin tone
that sounds like a bet to me...
(10-14-2022 12:21 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ]Are we really comparing what happened in Benghazi to Trump keeping some documents?
You would have to be messed up in the head to compare those two things.
I know right, it's not like Hillary was trying to sell national secrets to our enemies. Good point.
(10-14-2022 12:25 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:21 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ]Are we really comparing what happened in Benghazi to Trump keeping some documents?
You would have to be messed up in the head to compare those two things.
I know right, it's not like Hillary was trying to sell national secrets to our enemies. Good point.
Correct. Her stupid ass gave it to them for free on her f*cked up illegal server.
(10-14-2022 12:25 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:21 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ]Are we really comparing what happened in Benghazi to Trump keeping some documents?
You would have to be messed up in the head to compare those two things.
I know right, it's not like Hillary was trying to sell national secrets to our enemies. Good point.
And, then you double-down on the deaths of Americans, to try to score a sick political point.
Classy.
(10-14-2022 12:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:25 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:21 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ]Are we really comparing what happened in Benghazi to Trump keeping some documents?
You would have to be messed up in the head to compare those two things.
I know right, it's not like Hillary was trying to sell national secrets to our enemies. Good point.
And, then you double-down on the deaths of Americans, to try to score a sick political point.
Classy.
Lmao cry me a river. Trump killed American soldiers in his first month in office and you all didn't say ****. "death of Americans" as if you all didn't cheer the deaths of Americans in blue states when COVID started.
(10-14-2022 01:02 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:25 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:21 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ]Are we really comparing what happened in Benghazi to Trump keeping some documents?
You would have to be messed up in the head to compare those two things.
I know right, it's not like Hillary was trying to sell national secrets to our enemies. Good point.
And, then you double-down on the deaths of Americans, to try to score a sick political point.
Classy.
Lmao cry me a river. Trump killed American soldiers in his first month in office and you all didn't say ****. "death of Americans" as if you all didn't cheer the deaths of Americans in blue states when COVID started.
And a triple-down, with outright lies sprinkled in. Nice.
At least you're consistent.
(10-14-2022 01:23 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 01:02 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:25 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:21 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ]Are we really comparing what happened in Benghazi to Trump keeping some documents?
You would have to be messed up in the head to compare those two things.
I know right, it's not like Hillary was trying to sell national secrets to our enemies. Good point.
And, then you double-down on the deaths of Americans, to try to score a sick political point.
Classy.
Lmao cry me a river. Trump killed American soldiers in his first month in office and you all didn't say ****. "death of Americans" as if you all didn't cheer the deaths of Americans in blue states when COVID started.
And a triple-down, with outright lies sprinkled in. Nice.
At least you're consistent.
That's what happens when someone is wildly and blindly grasping at straws for something / anything.
Y’all, I’ve been buckled up for quite a while for this. Can I unbuckle for a few and go to the restroom and take a shower? I promise I won’t miss any peer-reviews on this.
(10-14-2022 12:06 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:37 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:25 AM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:18 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:01 AM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ]Hey maybe you guys should have another Benghazi trial when this all blows over. I'm sure it will get Hillary Clinton this time.
She's old (hag) news.
Only because she's not useful as a scapegoat to the Republicans anymore. Donald Trump saw to that with his Fake News email-gate stunt that got him the White House
No. It's simply because she's nothing but an old hateful hag.
Oh ok that makes it alright. Trump gets a pass for making fake news for his own gain because you think she's an old hateful hag that had it coming.
As others have pointed out, there are lots of differences that make your Hillary/Donald comparison absurd, Kruciff. But for purposes of this particular thread, only one difference matters:
Hillary Clinton faced deserved political blowback for lying about the cause of death of Americans under her protection. Lucky for her, she is a Democrat. If she were a Republican she clearly would have faced impeachment proceedings if not a prosecution.
Donald Trump, on the other hand, had his home raided by gov’t thugs, simply for not cooperating with librarian-level concerns.
That you cannot see the discrepancy involved here says little good about you.
(10-15-2022 06:43 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:06 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:37 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:25 AM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:18 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote: [ -> ]She's old (hag) news.
Only because she's not useful as a scapegoat to the Republicans anymore. Donald Trump saw to that with his Fake News email-gate stunt that got him the White House
No. It's simply because she's nothing but an old hateful hag.
Oh ok that makes it alright. Trump gets a pass for making fake news for his own gain because you think she's an old hateful hag that had it coming.
As others have pointed out, there are lots of differences that make your Hillary/Donald comparison absurd, Kruciff. But for purposes of this particular thread, only one difference matters:
Hillary Clinton faced deserved political blowback for lying about the cause of death of Americans under her protection. Lucky for her, she is a Democrat. If she were a Republican she clearly would have faced impeachment proceedings if not a prosecution.
Donald Trump, on the other hand, had his home raided by gov’t thugs, simply for not cooperating with librarian-level concerns.
That you cannot see the discrepancy involved here says little good about you.
You guys launched
ten (10) investigations over the course of
three (3) years into Hillary Clinton that all magically disappeared a month after the 2016 election, with none of the claims you are making proven.
Back to my original point though, with the above in mind, I find it laughable that you guys are dismissing these investigations, wondering if "Trump will be charged today" when he's now in the very same position you all wish Hillary Clinton was in. I guess irony is the correct word.
(10-15-2022 07:21 AM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ]You guys launched ten (10) investigations over the course of three (3) years into Hillary Clinton that all magically disappeared a month after the 2016 election, with none of the claims you are making proven.
Back to my original point though, with the above in mind, I find it laughable that you guys are dismissing these investigations, wondering if "Trump will be charged today" when he's now in the very same position you all wish Hillary Clinton was in. I guess irony is the correct word.
That's politics. And if you think that multiple "investigations" are unique to Hillary - - who is one of filthiest grifters to slither through our gov't in modern times - - then your perspective truly is bent.
Repeating myself, that you also do not see a difference between political investigations and a gov't-backed raid of a political enemy's residence puts you squarely in the authoritarian bucket. You should be ashamed. But as a progressive I doubt you see anything wrong with it.
(10-15-2022 07:21 AM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2022 06:43 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:06 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:37 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 10:25 AM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ]Only because she's not useful as a scapegoat to the Republicans anymore. Donald Trump saw to that with his Fake News email-gate stunt that got him the White House
No. It's simply because she's nothing but an old hateful hag.
Oh ok that makes it alright. Trump gets a pass for making fake news for his own gain because you think she's an old hateful hag that had it coming.
As others have pointed out, there are lots of differences that make your Hillary/Donald comparison absurd, Kruciff. But for purposes of this particular thread, only one difference matters:
Hillary Clinton faced deserved political blowback for lying about the cause of death of Americans under her protection. Lucky for her, she is a Democrat. If she were a Republican she clearly would have faced impeachment proceedings if not a prosecution.
Donald Trump, on the other hand, had his home raided by gov’t thugs, simply for not cooperating with librarian-level concerns.
That you cannot see the discrepancy involved here says little good about you.
You guys launched ten (10) investigations over the course of three (3) years into Hillary Clinton that all magically disappeared a month after the 2016 election, with none of the claims you are making proven.
Back to my original point though, with the above in mind, I find it laughable that you guys are dismissing these investigations, wondering if "Trump will be charged today" when he's now in the very same position you all wish Hillary Clinton was in. I guess irony is the correct word.
How many of those "investigations" found out that Hillary had not turned her emails over as required by law? Funny how some of you guys jerk off on saying Trump had stuff that didnt belong to him at Maralargo, which is a legitmate matter of debate of multiple laws, yet Hillary openly broke the law.
None of those investigations found that.
None of those investigations found she used an illegal server that contained classified information that was hacked by foreign governments.
So, sorry, we dont count sham investigations.
(10-15-2022 07:42 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote: [ -> ] (10-15-2022 07:21 AM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ]You guys launched ten (10) investigations over the course of three (3) years into Hillary Clinton that all magically disappeared a month after the 2016 election, with none of the claims you are making proven.
Back to my original point though, with the above in mind, I find it laughable that you guys are dismissing these investigations, wondering if "Trump will be charged today" when he's now in the very same position you all wish Hillary Clinton was in. I guess irony is the correct word.
That's politics. And if you think that multiple "investigations" are unique to Hillary - - who is one of filthiest grifters to slither through our gov't in modern times - - then your perspective truly is bent.
Repeating myself, that you also do not see a difference between political investigations and a gov't-backed raid of a political enemy's residence puts you squarely in the authoritarian bucket. You should be ashamed. But as a progressive I doubt you see anything wrong with it.
You talking to someone who thinks Hillary is innocent.
(10-14-2022 01:02 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:25 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:21 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ]Are we really comparing what happened in Benghazi to Trump keeping some documents?
You would have to be messed up in the head to compare those two things.
I know right, it's not like Hillary was trying to sell national secrets to our enemies. Good point.
And, then you double-down on the deaths of Americans, to try to score a sick political point.
Classy.
Lmao cry me a river. Trump killed American soldiers in his first month in office and you all didn't say ****. "death of Americans" as if you all didn't cheer the deaths of Americans in blue states when COVID started.
Pray tell, how did a political novice in just one month have soldiers in place to be killed? Enlighten us Boy Wonder.
Most likely, his predecessor who had these soldiers in harm's way. But, of course you would never accuse your heroes of Benghazi or Afghanistan.
They've got 2 weeks or it's nothing for a couple years.
(10-16-2022 10:49 AM)BlueDragon Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 01:02 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:25 PM)Kruciff Wrote: [ -> ] (10-14-2022 12:21 PM)oruvoice Wrote: [ -> ]Are we really comparing what happened in Benghazi to Trump keeping some documents?
You would have to be messed up in the head to compare those two things.
I know right, it's not like Hillary was trying to sell national secrets to our enemies. Good point.
And, then you double-down on the deaths of Americans, to try to score a sick political point.
Classy.
Lmao cry me a river. Trump killed American soldiers in his first month in office and you all didn't say ****. "death of Americans" as if you all didn't cheer the deaths of Americans in blue states when COVID started.
Pray tell, how did a political novice in just one month have soldiers in place to be killed? Enlighten us Boy Wonder.
Most likely, his predecessor who had these soldiers in harm's way. But, of course you would never accuse your heroes of Benghazi or Afghanistan.
I'm so tired of re-sharing this link.
Raid on Yakla
Literally, the first thing he did in office.
Long story short, Trump took the keys to the U.S. family car, did some donuts, a soldier and civilians died, more were injured, military equipment was lost, and nothing was accomplished.
But you, like every other person that i've posted this for, will completely ignore it.