(06-24-2022 05:10 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Just provide universal prenatal and maternal care and be done with it.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

Would be nice but the right does not care about that

(06-24-2022 05:13 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 05:10 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Just provide universal prenatal and maternal care and be done with it.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

Would be nice but the right does not care about that

Yeah, the side fighting to murder babies are the ones who truly care about the children.

(06-24-2022 05:13 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 05:10 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Just provide universal prenatal and maternal care and be done with it.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

Would be nice but the right does not care about that

You do know there are programs that do this now....right idiot?

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

Hey assclowns

Is this is a threat to women's Healthcare why not mandate IUDs for women?

Vaccinate women against pregnancy

Right? Don't be afraid.... answer leftists


Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

Savage

(06-24-2022 03:30 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 03:21 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 03:16 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 02:08 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 12:50 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  861 versus millions of dead babies? I'll still take those odds.

Tell me Satan, how many of them would still be alive if they only used contraception during sex? Probably all of them, huh?

Congratulations, you are a proud member of the "Bola de Pendejos Club".

Pretty sure contraception and pregnancy is a 2 way street. Are we going to have an extreme rethinking of the mans financial role in all this from the point of conception? So men should owe child support the day of conception now right?

Yeah we have a provision for that. Its called marriage. I dont think it covers screwing around and getting knocked up.

So is the man not "screwing around" to get that woman knocked up? Is he acting any less irresponsible than the woman?

The man doesnt get pregnant. So yeah. If i thought screwing a woman would get me pregnant i would he super damn careful.

You really dont unferstand tens of thousands of years of evolution. Suckle your soy nipple and cry to someone that gives a shite.

If you are a man dont dump your load in every frickin hoe that will let you.

It aint complicated. Tough break. Your hoe isnt guranteed the right under the Constitution to kill her baby.

Are you sure? Are you a Biologist? Or did you simply stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night?

I’m really surprised no one else asked

Agreed…

Its the man’s responsibility to control himself. If he can’t control himself, since Just Say No doesn’t work for intercourse anymore than it does for drugs, the man is just as responsible to prevent pregnancy as the woman, more so in my opinion.

Men need to become men again. The first step to that is honoring women and our future wives. Perhaps if men learned to honor the women in our lives beginning with our mothers and our sisters continuing to our girlfriends and wives, woman would learn how to honor themselves again.

Young men need to be marriage material. Men need to be introspective and work on themselves instead of expecting their women to raise them.

Most importantly fathers need to raise Godly men and Mothers need to raise Godly women. If we could do that, everything else would take care of itself.

(06-24-2022 09:35 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  The one good thing about the leak last month may be allowing time for people to process that this was coming, hopefully lessening the likelihood that there will be rioting & violence now in the aftermath of the actual decision.

The zealot wing of the GOP has finally won their long battle to force their moral choices regarding pregnancy on poor women in red states who lack the resources to pursue other options. Enjoy this iteration of the Court while you have it, and remember decisions you celebrate like Bruen yesterday rest on no firmer footing than the 50 year old precedent on precedent of Roe and Casey. Your cherished rights, just like ours, rest on what 5 Justices in a given case interpret them to be.

You loons keep referring to abortion as a right, why?

(06-24-2022 06:24 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:35 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  The one good thing about the leak last month may be allowing time for people to process that this was coming, hopefully lessening the likelihood that there will be rioting & violence now in the aftermath of the actual decision.

The zealot wing of the GOP has finally won their long battle to force their moral choices regarding pregnancy on poor women in red states who lack the resources to pursue other options. Enjoy this iteration of the Court while you have it, and remember decisions you celebrate like Bruen yesterday rest on no firmer footing than the 50 year old precedent on precedent of Roe and Casey. Your cherished rights, just like ours, rest on what 5 Justices in a given case interpret them to be.

You loons keep referring to abortion as a right, why?

Because they've been brainwashed

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

(06-24-2022 09:42 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:33 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  What happens next? Women will die. Others will be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Children will be born into households that cannot and do not want to take care of them.

Women with means will still be able to get to blue states to get the operation performed. This includes the mistresses and the daughters of prominent GOP donors and members of congress.

And lastly, hopefully this motivates the 2/3rds of Americans who did not want to see Roe v Wade overturned to show up to the polls. I still think the Dems are going to take a beating in November but this will definitely blunt it IMO.

As a country we just partially ended the 5 decade long black genocide. Rejoice.

This ^

(06-24-2022 09:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:42 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:34 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:33 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  What happens next? Women will die. Others will be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Children will be born into households that cannot and do not want to take care of them.

Its like some of the low iq people in this nation has never heard of adoption.

Not sure how current these numbers are, but...

Quote:Of the 400,000 children in foster care, approximately 117,000 are waiting to be adopted.

https://www.adoptuskids.org/meet-the-chi...20adopted.

I don't get the left's constant doom and gloom prediction that every woman who doesn't get an abortion, but wanted to, will put the kid up for adoption. Nature wired women to have an instant connection with their baby the moment it is born... I'd say the vast majority of women will decide to keep their babies and love them.

I don't know who you think is the "left", but I said no such thing.

And WTF is a "nature wired woman"?

What a dummy, it's a statement. "Nature wired women to..." As in women are wired by nature... Dohhh

(06-24-2022 09:51 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  Again I will say it -

Anything that upsets even 1 fktard liberal in this country is a great thing!! F each and every last one of them

+3

(06-24-2022 06:19 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 03:30 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 03:21 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 03:16 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 02:08 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Pretty sure contraception and pregnancy is a 2 way street. Are we going to have an extreme rethinking of the mans financial role in all this from the point of conception? So men should owe child support the day of conception now right?

Yeah we have a provision for that. Its called marriage. I dont think it covers screwing around and getting knocked up.

So is the man not "screwing around" to get that woman knocked up? Is he acting any less irresponsible than the woman?

The man doesnt get pregnant. So yeah. If i thought screwing a woman would get me pregnant i would he super damn careful.

You really dont unferstand tens of thousands of years of evolution. Suckle your soy nipple and cry to someone that gives a shite.

If you are a man dont dump your load in every frickin hoe that will let you.

It aint complicated. Tough break. Your hoe isnt guranteed the right under the Constitution to kill her baby.

Are you sure? Are you a Biologist? Or did you simply stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night?

I’m really surprised no one else asked

Agreed…

Its the man’s responsibility to control himself. If he can’t control himself, since Just Say No doesn’t work for intercourse anymore than it does for drugs, the man is just as responsible to prevent pregnancy as the woman, more so in my opinion.

Men need to become men again. The first step to that is honoring women and our future wives. Perhaps if men learned to honor the women in our lives beginning with our mothers and our sisters continuing to our girlfriends and wives, woman would learn how to honor themselves again.

Young men need to be marriage material. Men need to be introspective and work on themselves instead of expecting their women to raise them.

Most importantly fathers need to raise Godly men and Mothers need to raise Godly women. If we could do that, everything else would take care of itself.

100%! Then the N.E.A. takes over (No Education Association) and they don't teach reproductive biology naturally. They teach unnecessary surgical procedures to accommodate what they tell students to try, each other both male and female, thus circumventing solid parental role models who are labeled as ignorant haters for teaching godliness, morality, or anything which doesn't encourage children (minors) to explore and share their erogenous zones, and if pregnancy occurs in the process then the moral issue is no access to abortion, right! Herein is the crux of the Public Education threat. And for those who say it ain't so, I had to address a biology teacher (female) for telling her 14 year old class that they should have sex with other boys and girls to discover their true natures.

(06-24-2022 10:06 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:43 AM)Bronco14 Wrote:  6-3 ruling

Not exactly, more like 5-1-3. Chief Justice Roberts concurred in the ruling, agreeing that the Mississippi law banning abortion after 15 weeks should be upheld, but disagreeing that Roe & Casey should be overturned.

(06-24-2022 09:51 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:35 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  The one good thing about the leak last month may be allowing time for people to process that this was coming, hopefully lessening the likelihood that there will be rioting & violence now in the aftermath of the actual decision.

The zealot wing of the GOP has finally won their long battle to force their moral choices regarding pregnancy on poor women in red states who lack the resources to pursue other options. Enjoy this iteration of the Court while you have it, and remember decisions you celebrate like Bruen yesterday rest on no firmer footing than the 50 year old precedent on precedent of Roe and Casey. Your cherished rights, just like ours, rest on what 5 Justices in a given case interpret them to be.

You keep saying that, but it still isn't true. And repeating over and over isn't going to make it any more true.

The right to bear arms is specifically enumerated in the Constitution. The right to kill babies is not.

And because many of you seem to confuse your preferred interpretation of the text of the Constitution with the only possible interpretation, you fail to recognize that the text of the 2nd Amendment, like much of the Constitution, is vague and subject to interpretation. As I've said, there is plenty in the text for the Court to come down anywhere between zero private ownership of firearms allowed all the way to zero restrictions allowed on private ownership of firearms. It only takes 5 Justices to decide that "a well regulated militia" controls and the right only exists in that context, similarly it only takes 5 Justices to decide that "shall not be infringed" controls and no restrictions are permissible. We know where this Court stands, but this Court will not sit forever.

More BS, SCOTUS ruled on the language of the 2A. As badly as you loons want the constitution to be a fluid document it just isn't. The language is very specific.

(06-24-2022 06:25 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 06:24 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:35 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  The one good thing about the leak last month may be allowing time for people to process that this was coming, hopefully lessening the likelihood that there will be rioting & violence now in the aftermath of the actual decision.

The zealot wing of the GOP has finally won their long battle to force their moral choices regarding pregnancy on poor women in red states who lack the resources to pursue other options. Enjoy this iteration of the Court while you have it, and remember decisions you celebrate like Bruen yesterday rest on no firmer footing than the 50 year old precedent on precedent of Roe and Casey. Your cherished rights, just like ours, rest on what 5 Justices in a given case interpret them to be.

You loons keep referring to abortion as a right, why?

Because they've been brainwashed

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

Or never actually read the Constitution.

(06-24-2022 01:06 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:55 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:53 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:14 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:10 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Abortion is not banned by overturning Roe v Wade

States are now free to make laws

For the moment, but anyone who thinks either side will leave it there is either being dishonest or naive. Most Democrats will push to legislatively legalize abortion nationally, while much of the GOP will push to ban or restrict it nationally. Former VP Pence, desperately trying to regain favor with his zealot base, has already called for banning abortion nationwide in the wake of the decision -

Mike Pence Calls for National Abortion Ban
June 24, 2022 at 10:59 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 32 Comments

Former Vice President Mike Pence praised the Supreme Court’s ruling on abortion, saying, “Today, life won,” the New York Times reports.

He added: “Having been given this second chance for life, we must not rest and must not relent until the sanctity of life is restored to the center of American law in every state in the land.”

https://politicalwire.com/2022/06/24/mik...rtion-ban/

Pence has always been a fundamentalist.

As every genuine Christian should be.

ALL the Apostles and disciples in the NT were. There was no option B.

And there NEVER WILL BE. LUKEWARM is more detestable than any other form of Christianity.

That's right. The Bible is the WORD of GOD; not "some book of philosophy" that "suggests" how we should live.

(06-24-2022 06:34 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:06 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:43 AM)Bronco14 Wrote:  6-3 ruling

Not exactly, more like 5-1-3. Chief Justice Roberts concurred in the ruling, agreeing that the Mississippi law banning abortion after 15 weeks should be upheld, but disagreeing that Roe & Casey should be overturned.

(06-24-2022 09:51 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:35 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  The one good thing about the leak last month may be allowing time for people to process that this was coming, hopefully lessening the likelihood that there will be rioting & violence now in the aftermath of the actual decision.

The zealot wing of the GOP has finally won their long battle to force their moral choices regarding pregnancy on poor women in red states who lack the resources to pursue other options. Enjoy this iteration of the Court while you have it, and remember decisions you celebrate like Bruen yesterday rest on no firmer footing than the 50 year old precedent on precedent of Roe and Casey. Your cherished rights, just like ours, rest on what 5 Justices in a given case interpret them to be.

You keep saying that, but it still isn't true. And repeating over and over isn't going to make it any more true.

The right to bear arms is specifically enumerated in the Constitution. The right to kill babies is not.

And because many of you seem to confuse your preferred interpretation of the text of the Constitution with the only possible interpretation, you fail to recognize that the text of the 2nd Amendment, like much of the Constitution, is vague and subject to interpretation. As I've said, there is plenty in the text for the Court to come down anywhere between zero private ownership of firearms allowed all the way to zero restrictions allowed on private ownership of firearms. It only takes 5 Justices to decide that "a well regulated militia" controls and the right only exists in that context, similarly it only takes 5 Justices to decide that "shall not be infringed" controls and no restrictions are permissible. We know where this Court stands, but this Court will not sit forever.

More BS, SCOTUS ruled on the language of the 2A. As badly as you loons want the constitution to be a fluid document it just isn't. The language is very specific.

Specific---and pretty darn simple.

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


If it was really all about a militia---it would state "the right of the people to form a well regulated militia shall not be infringed". No need to even mention the right to bear arms. That same effort to ignore the specific while concentrating on hidden secret meanings in nebulous penumbra of the Constitution is how we ended up with bad law like Roe vs Wade.

(06-24-2022 05:13 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 05:10 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Just provide universal prenatal and maternal care and be done with it.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

Would be nice but the right does not care about that

I don’t have a problem with universal prenatal. We already have WIC. It cost 4.9 billion last year.

As for maternal care that’s what Planned Parenthood did when it was founded over a century ago as the American Birth Control league. The ABCL morphed into PP and didn’t perform an abortion until 1970.

It cost $530 million last year to fund Planned Parenthood. Ironically Planned Parenthood wasn’t federally funded until 1970. The same year it started doing abortions