![]() |
|
HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - Printable Version +- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com) +-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html) +--- Forum: Lounge (/forum-564.html) +---- Forum: The Spin Room (/forum-540.html) +---- Thread: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls (/thread-949566.html) |
HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - ericsrevenge76 - 06-24-2022 09:23 AM PRAISE GOD! I never thought this would happen. But what follows now in the aftermath? RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - rath v2.0 - 06-24-2022 09:25 AM Sky screaming RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - appst89 - 06-24-2022 09:26 AM What follows is riots, wailing, gnashing of teeth; the complete meltdown of the leftist loons. In other words, not much different from any other day. RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - Eagleaidaholic - 06-24-2022 09:27 AM I see a lot of Leftist run cities burning down for a couple weeks.........again. Which Demicrat politician will go on camera and cry first. Somebody do a poll. I say Schumer. RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - ECUGrad07 - 06-24-2022 09:27 AM "Like the infamous decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, Roe was also egregiously wrong and on a collision course with the Constitution from the day it was decided." Life wins! Liberals can still kill their babies, unfortunately... but they'll have to do it in a blue state! RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - UofMstateU - 06-24-2022 09:28 AM Cheers erupt in front of the supreme court. I guess the liberals havent woke up yet. They had a rough night of crying after skyscreaming all day over the NY conceal carry restriction law being evaporated yesterday. RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - ECUGrad07 - 06-24-2022 09:30 AM RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - UofMstateU - 06-24-2022 09:30 AM hahahahaha A few of the clown show ran down there will quick to scream and cry. RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - Kyle Mack - 06-24-2022 09:31 AM ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - gdunn - 06-24-2022 09:33 AM Wait for Biden to make a push to expand the court now. RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - BobcatEngineer - 06-24-2022 09:33 AM What happens next? Women will die. Others will be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Children will be born into households that cannot and do not want to take care of them. Women with means will still be able to get to blue states to get the operation performed. This includes the mistresses and the daughters of prominent GOP donors and members of congress. And lastly, hopefully this motivates the 2/3rds of Americans who did not want to see Roe v Wade overturned to show up to the polls. I still think the Dems are going to take a beating in November but this will definitely blunt it IMO. RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - UTSAMarineVet09 - 06-24-2022 09:34 AM Historic.... time to get ready for the liberal aftermath. RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - Niner National - 06-24-2022 09:34 AM The wealthy will still get their abortions. This just means more poor babies born to parents that don’t want them or don’t have the means to take care of them. RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - UofMstateU - 06-24-2022 09:34 AM (06-24-2022 09:33 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote: What happens next? Women will die. Others will be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Children will be born into households that cannot and do not want to take care of them. Its like some of the low iq people in this nation has never heard of adoption. RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - Gamenole - 06-24-2022 09:35 AM The one good thing about the leak last month may be allowing time for people to process that this was coming, hopefully lessening the likelihood that there will be rioting & violence now in the aftermath of the actual decision. The zealot wing of the GOP has finally won their long battle to force their moral choices regarding pregnancy on poor women in red states who lack the resources to pursue other options. Enjoy this iteration of the Court while you have it, and remember decisions you celebrate like Bruen yesterday rest on no firmer footing than the 50 year old precedent on precedent of Roe and Casey. Your cherished rights, just like ours, rest on what 5 Justices in a given case interpret them to be. RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - Eagleaidaholic - 06-24-2022 09:36 AM (06-24-2022 09:30 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: hahahahaha A few of the clown show ran down there will quick to scream and cry. If you believe in Evil, it is right in front of you in this video. Women crying because it just became more difficult to kill and remove mechanically their children from their wombs just because. RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - Kyle Mack - 06-24-2022 09:36 AM (06-24-2022 09:33 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote: What happens next? Women will die. Others will be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Children will be born into households that cannot and do not want to take care of them. LOL how many woman died during childbirth last year, 0? It goes back to the states skyscreamer. RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - solohawks - 06-24-2022 09:38 AM When you make the judicial option the only avenue to legislate an issue, this is what you get RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - Redwingtom - 06-24-2022 09:38 AM (06-24-2022 09:33 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote: What happens next? Women will die. Others will be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Children will be born into households that cannot and do not want to take care of them. Yeah, mostly. Women of means will also be able to travel to Mexico and other countries to get an abortion. Bottom line, babies will still get aborted. You cannot legislate away a societal issue. RE: HISTORY: Roe v Wade falls - Eagleaidaholic - 06-24-2022 09:38 AM (06-24-2022 09:33 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote: What happens next? Women will die. Others will be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Children will be born into households that cannot and do not want to take care of them. So, you think females of child bearing age are too stupid to not get pregnant if they don't want too? No more women will die than do now. That's absurd. |