I hesitate to use the word election - saw this from our old friend from 2016 BUT MAH NATE

Here's a complete list of the hardships you all will face because California won't have complete and final results of a June primary on election night:

Wrong. I won't be able to get salt threads from the libs when the see Spencer Pratt wins. My entertainment is deferred because California is California.

(06-02-2026 01:37 PM)Trojanbybirth Wrote:  Wrong. I won't be able to get salt threads from the libs when the see Spencer Pratt wins. My entertainment is deferred because California is California.

You do know that tonight likely won't determine who will be the next Mayor, right?

Unless one of the 16 get more than 50%, the final election won't be until November. And there's probably zero chance of that not happening.

Also, why would I...or anyone else on this board...give two ***** who the next mayor of Los Angeles is?

(06-02-2026 01:43 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Also, why would I...or anyone else on this board...give two ***** who the next mayor of Los Angeles is?

Because we crave The REEEEEEEE. It has electrolytes.

(06-02-2026 01:45 PM)Trojanbybirth Wrote:  

(06-02-2026 01:43 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Also, why would I...or anyone else on this board...give two ***** who the next mayor of Los Angeles is?

Because we crave The REEEEEEEE. It has electrolytes.

(06-02-2026 01:45 PM)Trojanbybirth Wrote:  

(06-02-2026 01:43 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Also, why would I...or anyone else on this board...give two ***** who the next mayor of Los Angeles is?

Because we crave The REEEEEEEE. It has electrolytes.

you are a great student in the studies how to respond to tard-nation!!!

BTW, go Condoms in the Super!!! …

(06-02-2026 01:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's a complete list of the hardships you all will face because California won't have complete and final results of a June primary on election night:

When But Mah Nate calls you out... Your blue state ballot collection contest sucks

(06-02-2026 12:25 PM)solohawks Wrote:  I hesitate to use the word election - saw this from our old friend from 2016 BUT MAH NATE

C'mon now. Democrats need to know exactly how many votes they need to win so they can "find" them in a car truck or in an "uncounted" bag of "votes". Nothing to see here. This is perfectly normal in a society where even third world nations have enough computing power to count the votes in a day.

(06-02-2026 01:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's a complete list of the hardships you all will face because California won't have complete and final results of a June primary on election night:

Oh snap, that is the same list of things you all have faced while Trump has been President.

(06-02-2026 02:42 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-02-2026 12:25 PM)solohawks Wrote:  I hesitate to use the word election - saw this from our old friend from 2016 BUT MAH NATE

C'mon now. Democrats need to know exactly how many votes they need to win so they can "find" them in a car truck or in an "uncounted" bag of "votes". Nothing to see here. This is perfectly normal in a society where even third world nations have enough computing power to count the votes in a day.

dare I say, “it’s the key to the city?!”

it took the ‘burg 16 fk’n years to eradicate ‘trunk balloting’…

(06-02-2026 02:26 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(06-02-2026 01:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's a complete list of the hardships you all will face because California won't have complete and final results of a June primary on election night:

When But Mah Nate calls you out... Your blue state ballot collection contest sucks

I don't live in California. It's not my state. And yes, there state law does need some overhauling. And I believe there are some proposals on the ballot to do so.

California is trying to be modern and have as much mail in voting as possible because their citizens want that. Currently their law doesn't require certification for like 38 days. They also allow mail in ballots mailed by election day to be received up to a week later. So they're automatically a week behind...and then they do extensive signature matching to make sure the vote is accurate...again...takes time. While this may drag official things out upwards of a month, it doesn't really if the election isn't particularly close. If it's not close, the media can usually tell you on election night who's going to win. But again, it's all moot...the winners don't take their new office the next day...or week...or even the next month.

(06-02-2026 02:42 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-02-2026 12:25 PM)solohawks Wrote:  I hesitate to use the word election - saw this from our old friend from 2016 BUT MAH NATE

C'mon now. Democrats need to know exactly how many votes they need to win so they can "find" them in a car truck or in an "uncounted" bag of "votes". Nothing to see here. This is perfectly normal in a society where even third world nations have enough computing power to count the votes in a day.

I'm sure if you trot out this tired old argument like 5 more times...yeah...no, it will still be ignorant .

(06-02-2026 02:43 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(06-02-2026 01:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's a complete list of the hardships you all will face because California won't have complete and final results of a June primary on election night:

Oh snap, that is the same list of things you all have faced while Trump has been President.

Me? Probably. I'm a rich white guy.

Doesn't really aid the "argument" here for you guys.

(06-02-2026 03:19 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-02-2026 02:43 PM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(06-02-2026 01:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's a complete list of the hardships you all will face because California won't have complete and final results of a June primary on election night:

Oh snap, that is the same list of things you all have faced while Trump has been President.

Me? Probably. I'm a rich white guy.

Just stop.

(06-02-2026 03:16 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-02-2026 02:26 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(06-02-2026 01:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Here's a complete list of the hardships you all will face because California won't have complete and final results of a June primary on election night:

When But Mah Nate calls you out... Your blue state ballot collection contest sucks

I don't live in California. It's not my state. And yes, there state law does need some overhauling. And I believe there are some proposals on the ballot to do so.

California is trying to be modern and have as much mail in voting as possible because their citizens want that. Currently their law doesn't require certification for like 38 days. They also allow mail in ballots mailed by election day to be received up to a week later. So they're automatically a week behind...and then they do extensive signature matching to make sure the vote is accurate...again...takes time. While this may drag official things out upwards of a month, it doesn't really if the election isn't particularly close. If it's not close, the media can usually tell you on election night who's going to win. But again, it's all moot...the winners don't take their new office the next day...or week...or even the next month.

"Extensive"

(06-02-2026 02:42 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-02-2026 12:25 PM)solohawks Wrote:  I hesitate to use the word election - saw this from our old friend from 2016 BUT MAH NATE

C'mon now. Democrats need to know exactly how many votes they need to win so they can "find" them in a car truck or in an "uncounted" bag of "votes". Nothing to see here. This is perfectly normal in a society where even third world nations have enough computing power to count the votes in a day.

Supposedly. But they can call the election a second after polls close. Doesn't make sense to me but it's how it is. Why do we even count the ballots then. In a sporting event they don't declare the winner till after the game is played.

(06-02-2026 02:15 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  you are a great student in the studies how to respond to tard-nation!!!

BTW, go Condoms in the Super!!! …

I learned from watching yall.