More proof they running drugs than a private citizen taking $50k from the FBI in a brown paper bag.

(10-14-2025 04:30 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  They're drug runners. They kill people. F them all, blow them the F up.

Tom is an evil bastich.

He's delusional. If his side had been doing this, he'd be cheering it. (And I would be, too, because this is the right thing to do.) But because it's Trump, he's buttmad. He can spin it however he wants. He's buttmad.

(10-14-2025 04:46 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

That episode of South Park was hilarious!

South Park? I thought that was a pic of Tom and his wife. Oh wait, she left him. I guess it is South Park.

(10-14-2025 04:30 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  They're drug runners. They kill people. F them all, blow them the F up.

Tom is an evil bastich.

I just read some article about green/clay colored fentanyl .. the articled tried to pawn off 'it may fool some thinking it's the ganja' ... I about fell the fk out...


found the article...

https://www.nola.com/news/crime_police/g...49da9.html

Quote:The fentanyl is highly potent and the Sheriff's Office warns that it can easily be mistaken for marijuana or other less potent drugs.

"Because it looks different and looks new, people might not think it's as dangerous," Tangipahoa Sheriff's Office spokesperson Ashley Rodrigue said.

you'd have to be the dumbest mofo on the planet to confuse this with that...

(10-14-2025 06:27 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:49 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:44 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Like when we saw Osama Bin Laden killed?

You think we didn't killed OBL, or that he wasn't a criminal?

I was in Special Ops...trust me they know which boats are criminal

Our guys can read the gauge clusters on the boats and see the tatoos on the bad guys.
The technology we are employing is otherworldly.

(10-14-2025 08:16 PM)450bench Wrote:  Our guys can read the gauge clusters on the boats and see the tatoos on the bad guys.
The technology we are employing is otherworldly.

shhhhhh ... let the dipshites ponder and wander with the release as all they have...

what form of fonzies would we have left if they really had a fk'n clue...

@theSadist

(10-14-2025 07:12 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:49 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:44 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Like when we saw Osama Bin Laden killed?

You think we didn't killed OBL, or that he wasn't a criminal?

I was in Special Ops...trust me they know which boats are criminal

Yeah, but Tom talked to somebody who knew somebody in Special Ops...

(10-14-2025 08:29 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 07:12 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:49 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:44 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Like when we saw Osama Bin Laden killed?

You think we didn't killed OBL, or that he wasn't a criminal?

I was in Special Ops...trust me they know which boats are criminal

Yeah, but Tom talked to somebody who knew somebody in Special Ops Ed...

fyp

^^

Fat Commie (yes the irony...a fat commie) Tom, you should go ask for a boat ride on one of these vessels youre upset about. Let us know how that goes for you.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I'm surprised Mr. Due Process hasn't dropped in to tell us how wrong this is...

(10-14-2025 11:28 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I'm surprised Mr. Due Process hasn't dropped in to tell us how wrong this is...

Don't tempt him, please? I'm not in the mood right now.

Ha, I knew you were gonna whack my knuckles for that one. :)

(10-15-2025 12:23 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Ha, I knew you were gonna whack my knuckles for that one. :)

As I should. lol

(10-14-2025 03:30 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:24 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:22 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:51 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Well, they claim they know exactly who it is and what they have on board, or they won't hit it, if there is any doubt. They claim they have passed on many more boats than they have hit.

As for the evidence, they don't have an obligation to make it public. I'm sure it's classified to protect sources and methods.

Dude, nobody is asking for classified info to be made public. But don't you feel they at least have a duty to report this information to the appropriate body in Congress?

Wait, you said: "Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?"

Yes, you can present evidence of drugs and criminals without revealing any classified information or the methods used to achieve it.

But there is no obligation to do so. Good grief. You're starting to act like Tanq. I'm out. Blather on.

Where did I say there was any obligation?

That being said, pretty sure there is some required congressional oversight here. And if this is so clearly drug dealers and bad people, it should be pretty easy to show your work. And there's that whole thing about us normally convicting people before we just kill them. And there's also that pesky thing of them not providing any real justification for how they believe they're allowed to kill folks without a basis...this "we're at war" with someone is pretty flimsy IMO.