These never get old.

When do you think they'll get the hint?

Are we eventually going to see the, heck any, evidence of the people they're killing?

(10-14-2025 01:27 PM)gdunn Wrote:  When do you think they'll get the hint?

They are as hapless as Russians on the front. Take off and see if you can make it.

(10-14-2025 02:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Are we eventually going to see the, heck any, evidence of the people they're killing?

What's left as evidence? Nope, you'll just have to trust Hegseth and Trump.

Like when we saw Osama Bin Laden killed?

(10-14-2025 01:27 PM)gdunn Wrote:  When do you think they'll get the hint?

Hopefully not until they have all been suicided....

(10-14-2025 02:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Are we eventually going to see the, heck any, evidence of the people they're killing?

What's left as evidence? Nope, you'll just have to trust Hegseth and Trump.

Well, don't you think they have evidence of either who's on board or the existence of drugs before we just blow up a boat in international waters?

Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?

(10-14-2025 02:44 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Like when we saw Osama Bin Laden killed?

You think we didn't killed OBL, or that he wasn't a criminal?

(10-14-2025 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Are we eventually going to see the, heck any, evidence of the people they're killing?

What's left as evidence? Nope, you'll just have to trust Hegseth and Trump.

Well, don't you think they have evidence of either who's on board or the existence of drugs before we just blow up a boat in international waters?

Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?

My hot-off-the-press info. is that once the Shumer Shutdown is ended that NOAA will be given a directive to perform drug tests on the recently fattened barracuda population off of the Venezuelan coast.

(10-14-2025 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Are we eventually going to see the, heck any, evidence of the people they're killing?

What's left as evidence? Nope, you'll just have to trust Hegseth and Trump.

Well, don't you think they have evidence of either who's on board or the existence of drugs before we just blow up a boat in international waters?

Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?

Well, they claim they know exactly who it is and what they have on board, or they won't hit it, if there is any doubt. They claim they have passed on many more boats than they have hit.

As for the evidence, they don't have an obligation to make it public. I'm sure it's classified to protect sources and methods.

(10-14-2025 02:51 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Are we eventually going to see the, heck any, evidence of the people they're killing?

What's left as evidence? Nope, you'll just have to trust Hegseth and Trump.

Well, don't you think they have evidence of either who's on board or the existence of drugs before we just blow up a boat in international waters?

Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?

Well, they claim they know exactly who it is and what they have on board, or they won't hit it, if there is any doubt. They claim they have passed on many more boats than they have hit.

As for the evidence, they don't have an obligation to make it public. I'm sure it's classified to protect sources and methods.

Dude, nobody is asking for classified info to be made public. But don't you feel they at least have a duty to report this information to the appropriate body in Congress?

(10-14-2025 03:22 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:51 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Are we eventually going to see the, heck any, evidence of the people they're killing?

What's left as evidence? Nope, you'll just have to trust Hegseth and Trump.

Well, don't you think they have evidence of either who's on board or the existence of drugs before we just blow up a boat in international waters?

Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?

Well, they claim they know exactly who it is and what they have on board, or they won't hit it, if there is any doubt. They claim they have passed on many more boats than they have hit.

As for the evidence, they don't have an obligation to make it public. I'm sure it's classified to protect sources and methods.

Dude, nobody is asking for classified info to be made public. But don't you feel they at least have a duty to report this information to the appropriate body in Congress?

Wait, you said: "Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?"

And even though you moved the goalposts, no, it's not a "war" that has to be formally declared. Do we report details when we attack cartels, or ISIS, or any other terrorist group? Nope.

Congress has declared war 5 times in our history. The exacutive branch has taken military action over 100 times without a declared war, and without reporting all details to Congress. OR to the public.

(10-14-2025 03:24 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:22 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:51 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:41 PM)TripleA Wrote:  What's left as evidence? Nope, you'll just have to trust Hegseth and Trump.

Well, don't you think they have evidence of either who's on board or the existence of drugs before we just blow up a boat in international waters?

Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?

Well, they claim they know exactly who it is and what they have on board, or they won't hit it, if there is any doubt. They claim they have passed on many more boats than they have hit.

As for the evidence, they don't have an obligation to make it public. I'm sure it's classified to protect sources and methods.

Dude, nobody is asking for classified info to be made public. But don't you feel they at least have a duty to report this information to the appropriate body in Congress?

Wait, you said: "Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?"

Yes, you can present evidence of drugs and criminals without revealing any classified information or the methods used to achieve it.

Hardly a bleeding heart liberal here....

(10-14-2025 03:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:24 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:22 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:51 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Well, don't you think they have evidence of either who's on board or the existence of drugs before we just blow up a boat in international waters?

Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?

Well, they claim they know exactly who it is and what they have on board, or they won't hit it, if there is any doubt. They claim they have passed on many more boats than they have hit.

As for the evidence, they don't have an obligation to make it public. I'm sure it's classified to protect sources and methods.

Dude, nobody is asking for classified info to be made public. But don't you feel they at least have a duty to report this information to the appropriate body in Congress?

Wait, you said: "Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?"

Yes, you can present evidence of drugs and criminals without revealing any classified information or the methods used to achieve it.

I'm amazed ewe still post ... what a fk'n masochist ewe are...

(10-14-2025 03:28 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:24 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:22 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:51 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Well, they claim they know exactly who it is and what they have on board, or they won't hit it, if there is any doubt. They claim they have passed on many more boats than they have hit.

As for the evidence, they don't have an obligation to make it public. I'm sure it's classified to protect sources and methods.

Dude, nobody is asking for classified info to be made public. But don't you feel they at least have a duty to report this information to the appropriate body in Congress?

Wait, you said: "Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?"

Yes, you can present evidence of drugs and criminals without revealing any classified information or the methods used to achieve it.

I'm amazed ewe still post ... what a fk'n masochist ewe are...

I'm amazed you manage to walk upright.

(10-14-2025 03:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:24 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:22 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:51 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 02:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Well, don't you think they have evidence of either who's on board or the existence of drugs before we just blow up a boat in international waters?

Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?

Well, they claim they know exactly who it is and what they have on board, or they won't hit it, if there is any doubt. They claim they have passed on many more boats than they have hit.

As for the evidence, they don't have an obligation to make it public. I'm sure it's classified to protect sources and methods.

Dude, nobody is asking for classified info to be made public. But don't you feel they at least have a duty to report this information to the appropriate body in Congress?

Wait, you said: "Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?"

Yes, you can present evidence of drugs and criminals without revealing any classified information or the methods used to achieve it.

But there is no obligation to do so. Good grief. You're starting to act like Tanq. I'm out. Blather on.

(10-14-2025 03:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:28 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:26 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:24 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-14-2025 03:22 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Dude, nobody is asking for classified info to be made public. But don't you feel they at least have a duty to report this information to the appropriate body in Congress?

Wait, you said: "Surely, that evidence can be easily presented to the public, right?"

Yes, you can present evidence of drugs and criminals without revealing any classified information or the methods used to achieve it.

I'm amazed ewe still post ... what a fk'n masochist ewe are...

I'm amazed you manage to walk upright.

They're drug runners. They kill people. F them all, blow them the F up.

Tom is an evil bastich.