(10-06-2025 03:03 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote: They just massively trolling now. It's not even amusing at this point.
Eh, I'm still laughing. Granted, it's at their lame attempts at trolling, which come off as stupidity, at this point.
What is funny and very sad is you all believe your orange daddy when he calls Portland a burning hellscape. The protests are literally in a 1 block area. You guys are the marks the con man depends on. Remember he loves the poorly educated, smart people do not like him and you and your kind lack critical thinking skills, my dude.
I also think it's funny he keeps calling me "my dude" as if it's suppose to be insulting to me. It's downright laughable.
(10-05-2025 10:44 PM)450bench Wrote: Only 4 instances of domestic terrorism? Lol…Right… How many do you think are acceptable?
Absolutely horrific instances of <evil organ music, and crashing thunder> DOMESTIC TERRORISM.
Lolz.
Hate to tell the MAGAt shitbirds constructed a gallows for Pence, now you are labeling a fake guillotine as <lighting crashes> DOMESTIC TERRORISM!!!!
Thats seriously dumb*** crazy at two different levels.
And no -- none of them rise to the retard level of calling out the National Guard, sparkles. Even <blood curdling scream in the dark> ALL FOUR OF THEM!!!!!
Are you seriously going to try and make the contention that the four above merit calling out the National Guard? Or sending in the 82nd Airborne Disvsion?
Wow, I have seen some absolutely idiotic and brain dead stances here, and yours above hits top 5 without any effort whatsoever. Good grief.
Yes
And you didn’t answer my very simple question. How many of these violent incidents are you ok with? Apparently 4 is no big deal to you.
I would also love to hear the answer to this question.
Charge the dudes shining flashlights as such. No skin off my back.
In MAGAt world, that is apparently cause to send in the 82nd Airborne. Something this judge pointedly noted.
yeah, charge the singular people committing violence against the officers. Waving a paper maiche Guillotine isnt that. Not is is something that would seriously be listed in a petition trying to justify military troops.
I mean, just listen to yourselves. You all are seemingly well in support of military troops in a city at the drop of a hat. Cool cool.
SOunds abnormally stupid to me.
When the situation in the streets hits a point equivalent to an invasion, or an insurrection -- i.e the Rodney King riots -- yeah send them in. That is the equivalent that the issues in the statute cite. This isnt that. Not by a flipping long shot.
But MAGAts seemingly have a big giant size boner about playing GI Joe, so I understand why they are so 'excited' in Federalizing and sending in the Guard, or simply sending in the 82nd.
(10-06-2025 03:03 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote: They just massively trolling now. It's not even amusing at this point.
Eh, I'm still laughing. Granted, it's at their lame attempts at trolling, which come off as stupidity, at this point.
What is funny and very sad is you all believe your orange daddy when he calls Portland a burning hellscape. The protests are literally in a 1 block area. You guys are the marks the con man depends on. Remember he loves the poorly educated, smart people do not like him and you and your kind lack critical thinking skills, my dude.
Yup the “useful idiots” that Trump uses to gain more power.
“Conservatives” who believe in limited government should be incensed at Trump violating State sanctity for political purposes. Instead they cheer on the degradation of their own rights.
Not to mention Trump openly talking about using cities for military training.
Scary stuff
Scary for filth
State sanctity. You are exactly what we would expect from a lousiana coyoun
Quote:The outlets you name haven’t even bothered to step outside at night up close with a camera, unlike the two women you’re smearing — women who actually put themselves in danger to document what’s happening. You showed zero care when they were assaulted. Instead, you’re parroting Antifa’s slander by dismissing them as “right-wing influencers.” You and your family are a disgrace.
(10-05-2025 10:44 PM)450bench Wrote: Only 4 instances of domestic terrorism? Lol…Right… How many do you think are acceptable?
Absolutely horrific instances of <evil organ music, and crashing thunder> DOMESTIC TERRORISM.
Lolz.
Hate to tell the MAGAt shitbirds constructed a gallows for Pence, now you are labeling a fake guillotine as <lighting crashes> DOMESTIC TERRORISM!!!!
Thats seriously dumb*** crazy at two different levels.
And no -- none of them rise to the retard level of calling out the National Guard, sparkles. Even <blood curdling scream in the dark> ALL FOUR OF THEM!!!!!
Are you seriously going to try and make the contention that the four above merit calling out the National Guard? Or sending in the 82nd Airborne Disvsion?
Wow, I have seen some absolutely idiotic and brain dead stances here, and yours above hits top 5 without any effort whatsoever. Good grief.
Yes
And you didn’t answer my very simple question. How many of these violent incidents are you ok with? Apparently 4 is no big deal to you.
I would also love to hear the answer to this question.
Charge the dudes shining flashlights as such. No skin off my back.
In MAGAt world, that is apparently cause to send in the 82nd Airborne. Something this judge pointedly noted.
yeah, charge the singular people committing violence against the officers. Waving a paper maiche Guillotine isnt that. Not is is something that would seriously be listed in a petition trying to justify military troops.
I mean, just listen to yourselves. You all are seemingly well in support of military troops in a city at the drop of a hat. Cool cool.
SOunds abnormally stupid to me.
When the situation in the streets hits a point equivalent to an invasion, or an insurrection -- i.e the Rodney King riots -- yeah send them in. That is the equivalent that the issues in the statute cite. This isnt that. Not by a flipping long shot.
But MAGAts seemingly have a big giant size boner about playing GI Joe, so I understand why they are so 'excited' in Federalizing and sending in the Guard, or simply sending in the 82nd.
So you just wait until the sh*t hits the fan. Sounds like a plan. You have no problem with what happened in the Chicago area the other day do you. ICE getting boxed in by 10 cars and being shot at. Yeah lets just wait until all hell breaks out and people get killed. Yeah that's a hell plan you have there. You should just sit this one out. it's not a good look for you but then again it never is.
(10-06-2025 03:03 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote: They just massively trolling now. It's not even amusing at this point.
Eh, I'm still laughing. Granted, it's at their lame attempts at trolling, which come off as stupidity, at this point.
What is funny and very sad is you all believe your orange daddy when he calls Portland a burning hellscape. The protests are literally in a 1 block area. You guys are the marks the con man depends on. Remember he loves the poorly educated, smart people do not like him and you and your kind lack critical thinking skills, my dude.
I also think it's funny he keeps calling me "my dude" as if it's suppose to be insulting to me. It's downright laughable.
fk that prick ... he only gets kitties from my arse...
(10-06-2025 07:03 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote: So you just wait until the sh*t hits the fan. Sounds like a plan. You have no problem with what happened in the Chicago area the other day do you. ICE getting boxed in by 10 cars and being shot at. Yeah lets just wait until all hell breaks out and people get killed. Yeah that's a hell plan you have there. You should just sit this one out. it's not a good look for you but then again it never is.
(10-06-2025 07:03 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote: So you just wait until the sh*t hits the fan. Sounds like a plan. You have no problem with what happened in the Chicago area the other day do you. ICE getting boxed in by 10 cars and being shot at. Yeah lets just wait until all hell breaks out and people get killed. Yeah that's a hell plan you have there. You should just sit this one out. it's not a good look for you but then again it never is.
(10-06-2025 07:03 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote: So you just wait until the sh*t hits the fan. Sounds like a plan. You have no problem with what happened in the Chicago area the other day do you. ICE getting boxed in by 10 cars and being shot at. Yeah lets just wait until all hell breaks out and people get killed. Yeah that's a hell plan you have there. You should just sit this one out. it's not a good look for you but then again it never is.
it's what 'chasers' do...
And tanq's the "chasiest chaser" of them all.
'they' call it "buttering bread"... "buttering breed" works, too ...
(This post was last modified: 10-06-2025 07:41 PM by stinkfist.)
(10-05-2025 11:04 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: Absolutely horrific instances of <evil organ music, and crashing thunder> DOMESTIC TERRORISM.
Lolz.
Hate to tell the MAGAt shitbirds constructed a gallows for Pence, now you are labeling a fake guillotine as <lighting crashes> DOMESTIC TERRORISM!!!!
Thats seriously dumb*** crazy at two different levels.
And no -- none of them rise to the retard level of calling out the National Guard, sparkles. Even <blood curdling scream in the dark> ALL FOUR OF THEM!!!!!
Are you seriously going to try and make the contention that the four above merit calling out the National Guard? Or sending in the 82nd Airborne Disvsion?
Wow, I have seen some absolutely idiotic and brain dead stances here, and yours above hits top 5 without any effort whatsoever. Good grief.
Yes
And you didn’t answer my very simple question. How many of these violent incidents are you ok with? Apparently 4 is no big deal to you.
I would also love to hear the answer to this question.
Charge the dudes shining flashlights as such. No skin off my back.
In MAGAt world, that is apparently cause to send in the 82nd Airborne. Something this judge pointedly noted.
yeah, charge the singular people committing violence against the officers. Waving a paper maiche Guillotine isnt that. Not is is something that would seriously be listed in a petition trying to justify military troops.
I mean, just listen to yourselves. You all are seemingly well in support of military troops in a city at the drop of a hat. Cool cool.
SOunds abnormally stupid to me.
When the situation in the streets hits a point equivalent to an invasion, or an insurrection -- i.e the Rodney King riots -- yeah send them in. That is the equivalent that the issues in the statute cite. This isnt that. Not by a flipping long shot.
But MAGAts seemingly have a big giant size boner about playing GI Joe, so I understand why they are so 'excited' in Federalizing and sending in the Guard, or simply sending in the 82nd.
So you just wait until the sh*t hits the fan. Sounds like a plan. You have no problem with what happened in the Chicago area the other day do you. ICE getting boxed in by 10 cars and being shot at. Yeah lets just wait until all hell breaks out and people get killed. Yeah that's a hell plan you have there. You should just sit this one out. it's not a good look for you but then again it never is.
Actually thats the law, dude.
Normal people dont sent in the 10th Mountian Division because of that level. There is a reason *why* 10 USC is written the way it is.
But of course, from the MAGA side -- 'who gives a flying fk about the law' seems to be the *only* thing that is a constant.
Yes, the law is written that the **** actually *has* to hit the fan before the President can Federalize, and before the President can ram military onto US soil to enforce law. Been part and parcel of this republic for a long time.
If the President wants to *up* Federal agents to enforce in an area, go for it. Well within his purview. When you start dealing with Presidential use of military *on US soil* and Presidential federalization of any states's guard, *that* by law *actually* requires the 'hit the fan' that you ***** about so shrilly.
Good grief.
Im astounded that this group of supposed state's rights advocates slobber up and down the floor over Presidential use of military power in US soil. Its like you are supporters of limited central government power in one time, then the biggest whores to not just support, but to celebrate and laud the use of US military *on US soil* at the drop of a fing hat. Its really odd.
(10-06-2025 07:48 PM)TripleA Wrote: Good to see Tanq finally rip off the mask and start calling everybody MAGAts. Conservative leanings, my ass.
You know what's worse than a lefty? A lefty who tries to hide that fact, and presents himself as something he's not, to cover up his hate.
that's fagoo boi from ewe la la's tag beneath his avatar ... if tanq-0fer-rang's doing it, he's now the surrogate paw-paw ...
he may define himself as libertarian, but his arguments do not 'mustard up'...
A libertarian is alarmed at the use of US military on US soil, dude. Basic definition, mind you. Like core definition.
The reticence to use US military on US soil *used* to be a cornerstone of conservative values as well, with that being a *serious* aversion to the exercise of large amounts of power by the Federal government, and support of local governments and states enjoying broader powers through the 10th amendment. Let alone the unitary decision of a President to utilize US military on US soil, and exercising that *only* as a '**** has hit the fan' last measure.
MAGA sure does seem eager to accept and swallow the full monty of the President utilizing US military at the drop of hat here. To the level of making some really blatantly incorrect comments about libertarianism to justify them changing their story 180 degrees.
Neat stuff.
I mean, dorks like red seem ready to throw the 82nd Airborne at a fing flat tire. And you are fundamentally making an abject falsehood about what a libertarian would think about that literally right above. You be you.
Ill still be libertarian.
Throwing the US military at this right now is abjectly horrendous. And if dumbasses here want to say 'just get ahead of it', I suggest they read up on why the fk 10 USC callups was written for really major league events -- literally declarations of war, invasion, and the like. Not for some pinhead shining a flashlight at an ICE car.
(This post was last modified: 10-06-2025 10:39 PM by tanqtonic.)
(10-06-2025 07:03 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote: So you just wait until the sh*t hits the fan. Sounds like a plan. You have no problem with what happened in the Chicago area the other day do you. ICE getting boxed in by 10 cars and being shot at. Yeah lets just wait until all hell breaks out and people get killed. Yeah that's a hell plan you have there. You should just sit this one out. it's not a good look for you but then again it never is.
it's what 'chasers' do...
Im glad you are bending over and swallowing the use of US military on US soil as somewhat normal and acceptable.
Me, I prefer the normal use of that law, which *requires* the decision to be a chaser. You? Apparently not. At the drop of a hat I guess?
(10-06-2025 07:48 PM)TripleA Wrote: Good to see Tanq finally rip off the mask and start calling everybody MAGAts. Conservative leanings, my ass.
You know what's worse than a lefty? A lefty who tries to hide that fact, and presents himself as something he's not, to cover up his hate.
that's fagoo boi from ewe la la's tag beneath his avatar ... if tanq-0fer-rang's doing it, he's now the surrogate paw-paw ...
he may define himself as libertarian, but his arguments do not 'mustard up'...
A libertarian is alarmed at the use of US military on US soil, dude. Basic definition, mind you. Like core definition.
The reticence to use US military on US soil *used* to be a cornerstone of conservative values as well, with that being a *serious* aversion to the exercise of large amounts of power by the Federal government, and support of local governments and states enjoying broader powers through the 10th amendment. Let alone the unitary decision of a President to utilize US military on US soil, and exercising that *only* as a '**** has hit the fan' last measure.
MAGA sure does seem eager to accept and swallow the full monty of the President utilizing US military at the drop of hat here. To the level of making some really blatantly incorrect comments about libertarianism to justify them changing their story 180 degrees.
Neat stuff.
I mean, dorks like red seem ready to throw the 82nd Airborne at a fing flat tire. And you are fundamentally making an abject falsehood about what a libertarian would think about that literally right above. You be you.
Ill still be libertarian.
Throwing the US military at this right now is abjectly horrendous. And if dumbasses here want to say 'just get ahead of it', I suggest they read up on why the fk 10 USC callups was written for really major league events -- literally declarations of war, invasion, and the like. Not for some pinhead shining a flashlight at an ICE car.
"I mean, dorks like red "
Name calling, you must be up set. I will deal with you tomorrow and maybe you will have settled downed from being wrong again.
(10-06-2025 07:48 PM)TripleA Wrote: Good to see Tanq finally rip off the mask and start calling everybody MAGAts. Conservative leanings, my ass.
You know what's worse than a lefty? A lefty who tries to hide that fact, and presents himself as something he's not, to cover up his hate.
that's fagoo boi from ewe la la's tag beneath his avatar ... if tanq-0fer-rang's doing it, he's now the surrogate paw-paw ...
he may define himself as libertarian, but his arguments do not 'mustard up'...
A libertarian is alarmed at the use of US military on US soil, dude. Basic definition, mind you. Like core definition.
The reticence to use US military on US soil *used* to be a cornerstone of conservative values as well, with that being a *serious* aversion to the exercise of large amounts of power by the Federal government, and support of local governments and states enjoying broader powers through the 10th amendment. Let alone the unitary decision of a President to utilize US military on US soil, and exercising that *only* as a '**** has hit the fan' last measure.
MAGA sure does seem eager to accept and swallow the full monty of the President utilizing US military at the drop of hat here. To the level of making some really blatantly incorrect comments about libertarianism to justify them changing their story 180 degrees.
Neat stuff.
I mean, dorks like red seem ready to throw the 82nd Airborne at a fing flat tire. And you are fundamentally making an abject falsehood about what a libertarian would think about that literally right above. You be you.
Ill still be libertarian.
Throwing the US military at this right now is abjectly horrendous. And if dumbasses here want to say 'just get ahead of it', I suggest they read up on why the fk 10 USC callups was written for really major league events -- literally declarations of war, invasion, and the like. Not for some pinhead shining a flashlight at an ICE car.
"I mean, dorks like red "
Name calling, you must be up set. I will deal with you tomorrow and maybe you will have settled downed from being wrong again.
Yep. It's idiotic to throw the military at Portland at the present, or even Chicago. And hate to tell you the law doesn't support 'getting ahead of it' for blindly chomping at the muzzle to Federalize the guard based on a dumb*** cardboard protest guillotine or even the horror of shining flashlights.
And not even for cars being boxed in.
Seriously, listen to yourself and try and not to bust out laughing.
![[Image: cat-monkey.gif]](https://media1.tenor.com/m/DFGqDDcZky4AAAAC/cat-monkey.gif)
![[Image: cat-funny-cat.gif]](https://media.tenor.com/I_m91P8YagIAAAAM/cat-funny-cat.gif)