(10-06-2025 09:22 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-05-2025 11:04 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-05-2025 10:44 PM)450bench Wrote:  Only 4 instances of domestic terrorism? Lol…Right… How many do you think are acceptable?

Absolutely horrific instances of <evil organ music, and crashing thunder> DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

Lolz.

Hate to tell the MAGAt shitbirds constructed a gallows for Pence, now you are labeling a fake guillotine as <lighting crashes> DOMESTIC TERRORISM!!!!

Thats seriously dumb*** crazy at two different levels.

And no -- none of them rise to the retard level of calling out the National Guard, sparkles. Even <blood curdling scream in the dark> ALL FOUR OF THEM!!!!!

Are you seriously going to try and make the contention that the four above merit calling out the National Guard? Or sending in the 82nd Airborne Disvsion?

Wow, I have seen some absolutely idiotic and brain dead stances here, and yours above hits top 5 without any effort whatsoever. Good grief.

Yes


And you didn’t answer my very simple question. How many of these violent incidents are you ok with? Apparently 4 is no big deal to you.

No sane person thinks violence is a good thing.
Most who post on here have zero room to try to claim moral high ground. When the 'muh gunz' crowd is silent when school kids have to be identified by their shoes after getting shot up in school. You all can **** all the way off.
And dont come back with gunning up the lunch lady or hiring vets to Rambo roam the schools. You all don't want the kids to have free lunch or the teachers to have class supplies.

Cars boxed in? How about two cars being rammed, at least one disabled, and agents fleeing for their safety from a crowd?

(10-06-2025 06:06 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 06:01 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 05:56 PM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 03:05 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 03:03 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  They just massively trolling now. It's not even amusing at this point.

Eh, I'm still laughing. Granted, it's at their lame attempts at trolling, which come off as stupidity, at this point.

What is funny and very sad is you all believe your orange daddy when he calls Portland a burning hellscape. The protests are literally in a 1 block area. You guys are the marks the con man depends on. Remember he loves the poorly educated, smart people do not like him and you and your kind lack critical thinking skills, my dude.

Yup the “useful idiots” that Trump uses to gain more power.

“Conservatives” who believe in limited government should be incensed at Trump violating State sanctity for political purposes. Instead they cheer on the degradation of their own rights.

Not to mention Trump openly talking about using cities for military training.

Scary stuff

gain more power?!! ... lmmfao ... all w/0 the autopen and the Geppetto's...

ewes are clueless when 10A is applied ... how's that abby-bortion thingy chewin' on ya like muh crabs...

do ewes suck ewer own teat as req'd ... goat yields milk, eh?!!!

Is this what a brain injury looks like in written form? I doubt you actually had a coherent thought but damn, it must be painful being the last brain cell up there.

(10-07-2025 08:15 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 09:22 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-05-2025 11:04 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-05-2025 10:44 PM)450bench Wrote:  Only 4 instances of domestic terrorism? Lol…Right… How many do you think are acceptable?

Absolutely horrific instances of <evil organ music, and crashing thunder> DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

Lolz.

Hate to tell the MAGAt shitbirds constructed a gallows for Pence, now you are labeling a fake guillotine as <lighting crashes> DOMESTIC TERRORISM!!!!

Thats seriously dumb*** crazy at two different levels.

And no -- none of them rise to the retard level of calling out the National Guard, sparkles. Even <blood curdling scream in the dark> ALL FOUR OF THEM!!!!!

Are you seriously going to try and make the contention that the four above merit calling out the National Guard? Or sending in the 82nd Airborne Disvsion?

Wow, I have seen some absolutely idiotic and brain dead stances here, and yours above hits top 5 without any effort whatsoever. Good grief.

Yes


And you didn’t answer my very simple question. How many of these violent incidents are you ok with? Apparently 4 is no big deal to you.

No sane person thinks violence is a good thing.
Most who post on here have zero room to try to claim moral high ground. When the 'muh gunz' crowd is silent when school kids have to be identified by their shoes after getting shot up in school. You all can **** all the way off.
And dont come back with gunning up the lunch lady or hiring vets to Rambo roam the schools. You all don't want the kids to have free lunch or the teachers to have class supplies.

No free lunches (that’s socialism) but let’s give Tesla $6B a year in subsidy and bail out farmers from trumps disastrously policy.

Oh and yeah let’s arm regular people when we have direct evidence that even trained “good guys with guns” just stand around with thumbs in their asses while these maniacs massacre children

Lol

You prog filth actually think you're winning some war here don't you? The difference between you and us is this is deadly serious to you and recreation to us. Carry on filth.

Their humor buttons were removed at birth.

(10-07-2025 06:49 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 12:13 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 10:12 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 07:55 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 07:48 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Good to see Tanq finally rip off the mask and start calling everybody MAGAts. Conservative leanings, my ass.

You know what's worse than a lefty? A lefty who tries to hide that fact, and presents himself as something he's not, to cover up his hate.

that's fagoo boi from ewe la la's tag beneath his avatar ... if tanq-0fer-rang's doing it, he's now the surrogate paw-paw ...

he may define himself as libertarian, but his arguments do not 'mustard up'...

A libertarian is alarmed at the use of US military on US soil, dude. Basic definition, mind you. Like core definition.

The reticence to use US military on US soil *used* to be a cornerstone of conservative values as well, with that being a *serious* aversion to the exercise of large amounts of power by the Federal government, and support of local governments and states enjoying broader powers through the 10th amendment. Let alone the unitary decision of a President to utilize US military on US soil, and exercising that *only* as a '**** has hit the fan' last measure.

MAGA sure does seem eager to accept and swallow the full monty of the President utilizing US military at the drop of hat here. To the level of making some really blatantly incorrect comments about libertarianism to justify them changing their story 180 degrees.

Neat stuff.

I mean, dorks like red seem ready to throw the 82nd Airborne at a fing flat tire. And you are fundamentally making an abject falsehood about what a libertarian would think about that literally right above. You be you.

Ill still be libertarian.

Throwing the US military at this right now is abjectly horrendous. And if dumbasses here want to say 'just get ahead of it', I suggest they read up on why the fk 10 USC callups was written for really major league events -- literally declarations of war, invasion, and the like. Not for some pinhead shining a flashlight at an ICE car.

"I mean, dorks like red "

Name calling, you must be up set. I will deal with you tomorrow and maybe you will have settled downed from being wrong again.

Yep. It's idiotic to throw the military at Portland at the present, or even Chicago. And hate to tell you the law doesn't support 'getting ahead of it' for blindly chomping at the muzzle to Federalize the guard based on a dumb*** cardboard protest guillotine or even the horror of shining flashlights.

And not even for cars being boxed in.

Seriously, listen to yourself and try and not to bust out laughing.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...1759817809

It's such a hellscape in Portland that the GOP(Group of Pedos) has to use images, from, (checks notes), South ******* America to bolster their case. As usual, it's nothing but a con job and the marks just eat it up and say "thank you daddy, may I have some more?"

(10-07-2025 08:26 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:15 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 09:22 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-05-2025 11:04 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-05-2025 10:44 PM)450bench Wrote:  Only 4 instances of domestic terrorism? Lol…Right… How many do you think are acceptable?

Absolutely horrific instances of <evil organ music, and crashing thunder> DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

Lolz.

Hate to tell the MAGAt shitbirds constructed a gallows for Pence, now you are labeling a fake guillotine as <lighting crashes> DOMESTIC TERRORISM!!!!

Thats seriously dumb*** crazy at two different levels.

And no -- none of them rise to the retard level of calling out the National Guard, sparkles. Even <blood curdling scream in the dark> ALL FOUR OF THEM!!!!!

Are you seriously going to try and make the contention that the four above merit calling out the National Guard? Or sending in the 82nd Airborne Disvsion?

Wow, I have seen some absolutely idiotic and brain dead stances here, and yours above hits top 5 without any effort whatsoever. Good grief.

Yes


And you didn’t answer my very simple question. How many of these violent incidents are you ok with? Apparently 4 is no big deal to you.

No sane person thinks violence is a good thing.
Most who post on here have zero room to try to claim moral high ground. When the 'muh gunz' crowd is silent when school kids have to be identified by their shoes after getting shot up in school. You all can **** all the way off.
And dont come back with gunning up the lunch lady or hiring vets to Rambo roam the schools. You all don't want the kids to have free lunch or the teachers to have class supplies.

No free lunches (that’s socialism) but let’s give Tesla $6B a year in subsidy and bail out farmers from trumps disastrously policy.

Oh and yeah let’s arm regular people when we have direct evidence that even trained “good guys with guns” just stand around with thumbs in their asses while these maniacs massacre children

Oh I buried them about this in a different thread and then the 'discussion' turned to weird ass cat videos and bartlby claiming he actually knows anything about guns. These ladies are not right.

(10-07-2025 08:27 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Lol

You prog filth actually think you're winning some war here don't you? The difference between you and us is this is deadly serious to you and recreation to us. Carry on filth.

lol you think talking **** to some trump cult on a college football message board is anything beyond entertainment


Llllllooooolllllll

(10-07-2025 08:15 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 09:22 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-05-2025 11:04 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-05-2025 10:44 PM)450bench Wrote:  Only 4 instances of domestic terrorism? Lol…Right… How many do you think are acceptable?

Absolutely horrific instances of <evil organ music, and crashing thunder> DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

Lolz.

Hate to tell the MAGAt shitbirds constructed a gallows for Pence, now you are labeling a fake guillotine as <lighting crashes> DOMESTIC TERRORISM!!!!

Thats seriously dumb*** crazy at two different levels.

And no -- none of them rise to the retard level of calling out the National Guard, sparkles. Even <blood curdling scream in the dark> ALL FOUR OF THEM!!!!!

Are you seriously going to try and make the contention that the four above merit calling out the National Guard? Or sending in the 82nd Airborne Disvsion?

Wow, I have seen some absolutely idiotic and brain dead stances here, and yours above hits top 5 without any effort whatsoever. Good grief.

Yes


And you didn’t answer my very simple question. How many of these violent incidents are you ok with? Apparently 4 is no big deal to you.

No sane person thinks violence is a good thing.
Most who post on here have zero room to try to claim moral high ground. When the 'muh gunz' crowd is silent when school kids have to be identified by their shoes after getting shot up in school. You all can **** all the way off.
And dont come back with gunning up the lunch lady or hiring vets to Rambo roam the schools. You all don't want the kids to have free lunch or the teachers to have class supplies.

Put a gun on a table and watch it. Put a camera on it for a day. You’ll notice, yes even you Librocrites will notice, that it doesn’t move. Doesn’t budge. Nothing.
Now let a person pick it up. Maybe one of you soy eating, girly clothes wearing, View watching beta-males or how about a tractor ridin, good ole boy from lower Alabama. Either one of you, pick it up, chamber a round and pull the trigger. You’ll notice it fires a bullet.

See the difference? Guns don’t fire themselves, people fire them.
Guns harm no one, people choosing to do harm to others do.

You skinny jean lefties need to comprehend that kind of thing.

Anyway, just how many domestic terrorist, freak show, lib induced, violent events targeting law enforcement is acceptable for you before those being attacked turn the tables and obliterate said freaks?

How many are ok with you?

(10-07-2025 08:45 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

You people sure have a weird fascination with transgender people. Less than 1% of the population twists yall up but not the 9% who think holding Nazi viewpoints is ok.

(10-07-2025 08:41 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 06:49 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 12:13 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 10:12 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 07:55 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  that's fagoo boi from ewe la la's tag beneath his avatar ... if tanq-0fer-rang's doing it, he's now the surrogate paw-paw ...

he may define himself as libertarian, but his arguments do not 'mustard up'...

A libertarian is alarmed at the use of US military on US soil, dude. Basic definition, mind you. Like core definition.

The reticence to use US military on US soil *used* to be a cornerstone of conservative values as well, with that being a *serious* aversion to the exercise of large amounts of power by the Federal government, and support of local governments and states enjoying broader powers through the 10th amendment. Let alone the unitary decision of a President to utilize US military on US soil, and exercising that *only* as a '**** has hit the fan' last measure.

MAGA sure does seem eager to accept and swallow the full monty of the President utilizing US military at the drop of hat here. To the level of making some really blatantly incorrect comments about libertarianism to justify them changing their story 180 degrees.

Neat stuff.

I mean, dorks like red seem ready to throw the 82nd Airborne at a fing flat tire. And you are fundamentally making an abject falsehood about what a libertarian would think about that literally right above. You be you.

Ill still be libertarian.

Throwing the US military at this right now is abjectly horrendous. And if dumbasses here want to say 'just get ahead of it', I suggest they read up on why the fk 10 USC callups was written for really major league events -- literally declarations of war, invasion, and the like. Not for some pinhead shining a flashlight at an ICE car.

"I mean, dorks like red "

Name calling, you must be up set. I will deal with you tomorrow and maybe you will have settled downed from being wrong again.

Yep. It's idiotic to throw the military at Portland at the present, or even Chicago. And hate to tell you the law doesn't support 'getting ahead of it' for blindly chomping at the muzzle to Federalize the guard based on a dumb*** cardboard protest guillotine or even the horror of shining flashlights.

And not even for cars being boxed in.

Seriously, listen to yourself and try and not to bust out laughing.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...1759817809

It's such a hellscape in Portland that the GOP(Group of Pedos) has to use images, from, (checks notes), South ******* America to bolster their case. As usual, it's nothing but a con job and the marks just eat it up and say "thank you daddy, may I have some more?"

What do you get when you combine a lower level of education with a high level of computer illiteracy?

(10-07-2025 08:46 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:15 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 09:22 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-05-2025 11:04 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-05-2025 10:44 PM)450bench Wrote:  Only 4 instances of domestic terrorism? Lol…Right… How many do you think are acceptable?

Absolutely horrific instances of <evil organ music, and crashing thunder> DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

Lolz.

Hate to tell the MAGAt shitbirds constructed a gallows for Pence, now you are labeling a fake guillotine as <lighting crashes> DOMESTIC TERRORISM!!!!

Thats seriously dumb*** crazy at two different levels.

And no -- none of them rise to the retard level of calling out the National Guard, sparkles. Even <blood curdling scream in the dark> ALL FOUR OF THEM!!!!!

Are you seriously going to try and make the contention that the four above merit calling out the National Guard? Or sending in the 82nd Airborne Disvsion?

Wow, I have seen some absolutely idiotic and brain dead stances here, and yours above hits top 5 without any effort whatsoever. Good grief.

Yes


And you didn’t answer my very simple question. How many of these violent incidents are you ok with? Apparently 4 is no big deal to you.

No sane person thinks violence is a good thing.
Most who post on here have zero room to try to claim moral high ground. When the 'muh gunz' crowd is silent when school kids have to be identified by their shoes after getting shot up in school. You all can **** all the way off.
And dont come back with gunning up the lunch lady or hiring vets to Rambo roam the schools. You all don't want the kids to have free lunch or the teachers to have class supplies.

Put a gun on a table and watch it. Put a camera on it for a day. You’ll notice, yes even you Librocrites will notice, that it doesn’t move. Doesn’t budge. Nothing.
Now let a person pick it up. Maybe one of you soy eating, girly clothes wearing, View watching beta-males or how about a tractor ridin, good ole boy from lower Alabama. Either one of you, pick it up, chamber a round and pull the trigger. You’ll notice it fires a bullet.

See the difference? Guns don’t fire themselves, people fire them.
Guns harm no one, people choosing to do harm to others do.

You skinny jean lefties need to comprehend that kind of thing.

Anyway, just how many domestic terrorist, freak show, lib induced, violent events targeting law enforcement is acceptable for you before those being attacked turn the tables and obliterate said freaks?

How many are ok with you?

Cool. Let's ban high-capacity weapons then or at least make sure they do not get into the hands of people that may use them for evil. TRY SOMETHING.
The guns are a multiplier and add distance to an assault.
How many kids is enough?
Again. I buried posters with these talking points. Your point of view is indefensible when the outcome is killing kids in schools.
Pro-life would be those kids getting to graduate. But a lot of you are worried about drag queens reading to kids and Harry Potter on the book shelf.

(10-07-2025 08:55 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:46 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:15 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 09:22 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-05-2025 11:04 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Absolutely horrific instances of <evil organ music, and crashing thunder> DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

Lolz.

Hate to tell the MAGAt shitbirds constructed a gallows for Pence, now you are labeling a fake guillotine as <lighting crashes> DOMESTIC TERRORISM!!!!

Thats seriously dumb*** crazy at two different levels.

And no -- none of them rise to the retard level of calling out the National Guard, sparkles. Even <blood curdling scream in the dark> ALL FOUR OF THEM!!!!!

Are you seriously going to try and make the contention that the four above merit calling out the National Guard? Or sending in the 82nd Airborne Disvsion?

Wow, I have seen some absolutely idiotic and brain dead stances here, and yours above hits top 5 without any effort whatsoever. Good grief.

Yes


And you didn’t answer my very simple question. How many of these violent incidents are you ok with? Apparently 4 is no big deal to you.

No sane person thinks violence is a good thing.
Most who post on here have zero room to try to claim moral high ground. When the 'muh gunz' crowd is silent when school kids have to be identified by their shoes after getting shot up in school. You all can **** all the way off.
And dont come back with gunning up the lunch lady or hiring vets to Rambo roam the schools. You all don't want the kids to have free lunch or the teachers to have class supplies.

Put a gun on a table and watch it. Put a camera on it for a day. You’ll notice, yes even you Librocrites will notice, that it doesn’t move. Doesn’t budge. Nothing.
Now let a person pick it up. Maybe one of you soy eating, girly clothes wearing, View watching beta-males or how about a tractor ridin, good ole boy from lower Alabama. Either one of you, pick it up, chamber a round and pull the trigger. You’ll notice it fires a bullet.

See the difference? Guns don’t fire themselves, people fire them.
Guns harm no one, people choosing to do harm to others do.

You skinny jean lefties need to comprehend that kind of thing.

Anyway, just how many domestic terrorist, freak show, lib induced, violent events targeting law enforcement is acceptable for you before those being attacked turn the tables and obliterate said freaks?

How many are ok with you?

Cool. Let's ban high-capacity weapons then or at least make sure they do not get into the hands of people that may use them for evil. TRY SOMETHING.
The guns are a multiplier and add distance to an assault.
How many kids is enough?
Again. I buried posters with these talking points. Your point of view is indefensible when the outcome is killing kids in schools.
Pro-life would be those kids getting to graduate. But a lot of you are worried about drag queens reading to kids and Harry Potter on the book shelf.

Answer the damn question. You’re the one who chimed in on my question. How many incidents are you ok with?

That’s the problem with you people, you hypothesize with no real answers.

Your gun talking point is a joke, just like your party.
Tell your gangbanging thug types to buy their weapons legally and us law abiding citizens will quit rightly defending ourselves against the scum you’re daily trying to coddle.

(10-07-2025 08:15 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Cars boxed in? How about two cars being rammed, at least one disabled, and agents fleeing for their safety from a crowd?

Quote:NEW: FBI Director
@FBIDirectorKash
pledges to bring to justice the two suspects who allegedly rammed a DHS agent’s vehicle in Chicago.

DHS calls the suspects “domestic terrorists,” accusing them of ambushing agents over the weekend.

One suspect, Marimar Martinez, was reportedly armed with a semi-automatic weapon and is known for doxxing federal agents.

(10-07-2025 09:03 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:15 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Cars boxed in? How about two cars being rammed, at least one disabled, and agents fleeing for their safety from a crowd?

Yep Unless it happened on J6, then you get a pardon!

(10-07-2025 08:15 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Cars boxed in? How about two cars being rammed, at least one disabled, and agents fleeing for their safety from a crowd?

And your response to that is apparently the 82nd Airborne or US military? Lolz.

(10-07-2025 09:03 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:15 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Cars boxed in? How about two cars being rammed, at least one disabled, and agents fleeing for their safety from a crowd?

Quote:NEW: FBI Director
@FBIDirectorKash
pledges to bring to justice the two suspects who allegedly rammed a DHS agent’s vehicle in Chicago.

DHS calls the suspects “domestic terrorists,” accusing them of ambushing agents over the weekend.

One suspect, Marimar Martinez, was reportedly armed with a semi-automatic weapon and is known for doxxing federal agents.

Absolutely charge them.

But using that to justify or rationalize US military intervention is simply south of stupid.