(10-04-2025 10:01 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(10-04-2025 08:39 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  Portland police department smears Post Millennial journalist who was assaulted by Antifa, suggests she invited violence on herself

Sounds like libel, false arrest and a violation of civil rights

Portland PD Basically Tells Conservative Journalists Attacked by Antifa, 'Your Skirt Was Too Short'

Are we still #BacktheBlue after this?

So Trump is prohibited from sending troops to Portland by a Karin (was one he appointed). SHE determined the protests were small and uneventful placing herself in an executive role.

Somebody explain whyy i should care if portland burns to the ground

If I’m not mistaken, the Constitution only allows for a Supreme Court. Everything else is up to Congress. So why doesn’t the GOP majority Congress start smacking these commie judges down?

Allows is probably the wrong word.

(10-05-2025 01:08 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  If I’m not mistaken, the Constitution only allows for a Supreme Court. Everything else is up to Congress. So why doesn’t the GOP majority Congress start smacking these commie judges down?

Pretty strict standard for impeachment. And the Dems would never give the 2/3 to remove them.

Good luck

Quote:PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Sunday that President Trump has deployed 300 California National Guard members to Portland. Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek also confirmed the deployment, stating 101 California troops already arrived in Oregon by plane Saturday night, with more on the way.

...

Newsom confirmed in a post on X that President Trump had deployed the California National Guard personnel, who are currently on their way to Oregon.

Additionally, Newsom pledged Sunday to fight the move in court.

“His deployment of the California National Guard to Oregon isn’t about crime. It’s about power,” Newsom said in a statement. “He is using our military as political pawns to build up his own ego. It’s appalling. It’s un-American. And it must stop.”
Oregon Governor Tina Kotek and Portland Mayor Keith Wilson have also decried the move.

Looks like it's going to be a busy Sunday evening/Monday morning in the federal courts in California and Oregon.

Link

Bwhahahaha.... im dead lol

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(10-05-2025 12:54 PM)bullet Wrote:  So Trump is prohibited from sending troops to Portland by a Karin (was one he appointed). SHE determined the protests were small and uneventful placing herself in an executive role.

Actually, her TRO pointed out, using Trump's own public untruths, that the basis used in the order was simply a lie.

Quote: But “a great level of deference” is not equivalent to ignoring the facts on the ground.

And --

Quote: The President’s determination was simply untethered to the facts.

Kind of easy to point out the abject lies in the Trump statements preceding the attempt to Federalize the Guard. Funny that.

She also noted the very obvious shortness in the recitation of facts by the US proferred in the filings. And how that level of proof and evidence didnt match in weight the actual evidence presented by such things as, well, actual communications within the State of Oregon on the issue, and the provable level of unrest present matched those communications where State officials decided that they did not feel the need to call up the troops.

Quote:Defendants’ declarants describe only four incidents of protesters clashing with federal
officers in the month of September preceding the federalization order—on September 1st, 9th,
12th, and without further specification, the second week of September.

Quote:The first involved protesters setting up a makeshift
guillotine to intimidate federal officials; the second involved four people shining overpowered
flashlights in the eyes of drivers; the third involved someone posting a photograph of an
unmarked ICE vehicle online; and the last involved additional drivers having flashlights shone in
their eyes.

Wow, four isolated incidents. Quite the fing national emergency that requires the military, or troops being called up.

I guess four single incidents is enough to alarm the Trump WH into a national emergency situation requiring either military troops of the mobilization of Guard. Pretty amazing breach that the Feds seemingly cannot handle. The horrors. Lolz.

Facts are your friend. Kneejerk characterizations may not be.

Bring it

(10-05-2025 08:43 PM)450bench Wrote:  Bring it

When there are four solitary incidents, bring out the troops. Lolz.

"Bring it" -- double lolz.

Only 4 instances of domestic terrorism? Lol…Right… How many do you think are acceptable?

(10-05-2025 10:44 PM)450bench Wrote:  Only 4 instances of domestic terrorism? Lol…Right… How many do you think are acceptable?

Absolutely horrific instances of <evil organ music, and crashing thunder> DOMESTIC TERRORISM.

Lolz.

Hate to tell the MAGAt shitbirds constructed a gallows for Pence, now you are labeling a fake guillotine as <lighting crashes> DOMESTIC TERRORISM!!!!

Thats seriously dumb*** crazy at two different levels.

And no -- none of them rise to the retard level of calling out the National Guard, sparkles. Even <blood curdling scream in the dark> ALL FOUR OF THEM!!!!!

Are you seriously going to try and make the contention that the four above merit calling out the National Guard? Or sending in the 82nd Airborne Disvsion?

Wow, I have seen some absolutely idiotic and brain dead stances here, and yours above hits top 5 without any effort whatsoever. Good grief.

The federal government can use the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 to pressure the PPD into doing its job. If the PPD refuses to do its job file RICO charges against its Chief and leadership structure.

Organized crime has captured the PPD. You don’t negotiate with terrorists and its allies.

(10-05-2025 12:53 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  Are we still #BacktheBlue after this?

We?
How many of you are there Andy

You got pronouns like me?

Ya’ll, All Ya’ll and You’uns

All joking aside….. If the police deserve my support I will back them. In the case of the Chicago or Portland police… individual officers maybe, depending on their actions,…..the entire department no.

Those police departments are now operating like political apparatus. Treat them accordingly.