(04-14-2021 09:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  There goes UofM again, called out on a lie and never manning up. Fraud.

And since when am I required to answer any question you pose?

Loser TOm wont answer the question because his overlords wont tell him how to answer a simple yes or no question without looking like an idiot.

Tom: "There was no election fraud and Biden* won by a lot"

ok, did PA break the law when they opened absentee ballots prior to election day and then cured the democratic ones?

Tom: " REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!! shut up troll!!!!!"

More bad news for the left; a majority of americans now believe it was likely that Biden* cheated.

(04-14-2021 09:03 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 09:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  There goes UofM again, called out on a lie and never manning up. Fraud.

And since when am I required to answer any question you pose?

Loser TOm wont answer the question because his overlords wont tell him how to answer a simple yes or no question without looking like an idiot.

Tom: "There was no election fraud and Biden* won by a lot"

ok, did PA break the law when they opened absentee ballots prior to election day and then cured the democratic ones?

Tom: " REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!! shut up troll!!!!!"

Loser UofM...lies about what happened...can't provide any proof to support his lies. Deflects to some other random topic and screams at the sky.

Dishonest troll!!!!

You're so juvenile.

(04-14-2021 09:07 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 09:03 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 09:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  There goes UofM again, called out on a lie and never manning up. Fraud.

And since when am I required to answer any question you pose?

Loser TOm wont answer the question because his overlords wont tell him how to answer a simple yes or no question without looking like an idiot.

Tom: "There was no election fraud and Biden* won by a lot"

ok, did PA break the law when they opened absentee ballots prior to election day and then cured the democratic ones?

Tom: " REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!! shut up troll!!!!!"

Loser UofM...lies about what happened...can't provide any proof to support his lies. Deflects to some other random topic and screams at the sky.

Dishonest troll!!!!

You're so juvenile.

Yep, he aint going to answer folks. SImple question, and all we get is REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Man up, its a simple yes or no. You seem to be the election expert who has deemed that no fraud took place.

Why argue with a buffoon?

(04-13-2021 09:51 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(04-13-2021 09:46 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-13-2021 08:07 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-13-2021 07:02 AM)TexanMark Wrote:  Why we need to show ID to vote. Absentee ballots should be sparingly granted and done in advance.

The states run their own elections...they are *NOT* able to determine how they want to handle it.
It's more than evident that most voters want the option to vote by mail...especially this past year.

Particularly the dead ones.

How many votes were fraudulently cast with the names of deceased people, Owl?

The question USUALLY is that^^^. THIS YEAR WITH AN UNPRECEDENTED AMOUNT OF MAIL-IN BALLOTS.... THIS vvv is the question.

(04-14-2021 10:06 AM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  

(04-13-2021 09:51 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(04-13-2021 09:46 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(04-13-2021 08:07 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-13-2021 07:02 AM)TexanMark Wrote:  Why we need to show ID to vote. Absentee ballots should be sparingly granted and done in advance.

The states run their own elections...they are *NOT* able to determine how they want to handle it.
It's more than evident that most voters want the option to vote by mail...especially this past year.

Particularly the dead ones.

How many votes were fraudulently cast with the names of deceased people, Owl?

The question USUALLY is that^^^. THIS YEAR WITH AN UNPRECEDENTED AMOUNT OF MAIL-IN BALLOTS.... THIS vvv is the question.

Something that the independent audit in GA could determine. WHich is why its funny that Raffensberger is fighting that audit tooth and nail. So much transparency.....

(04-14-2021 09:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 09:07 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 09:03 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 09:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  There goes UofM again, called out on a lie and never manning up. Fraud.

And since when am I required to answer any question you pose?

Loser TOm wont answer the question because his overlords wont tell him how to answer a simple yes or no question without looking like an idiot.

Tom: "There was no election fraud and Biden* won by a lot"

ok, did PA break the law when they opened absentee ballots prior to election day and then cured the democratic ones?

Tom: " REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!! shut up troll!!!!!"

Loser UofM...lies about what happened...can't provide any proof to support his lies. Deflects to some other random topic and screams at the sky.

Dishonest troll!!!!

You're so juvenile.

Yep, he aint going to answer folks. SImple question, and all we get is REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Man up, its a simple yes or no. You seem to be the election expert who has deemed that no fraud took place.

I guess I missed it, where did you man up and answer as to how adjudication actually works?

Oh...right...that's the thing you keep running away from because little ole me wiped the floor with you.

Once again, for the idiots who think this dishonest troll is some bastion of truth to this site rather than a sad clown. Here's what he claimed happened in Antrim County, Michigan.

(01-26-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Easy. The forensic audit turned up that 68% of the ballots scanned by that machine were rejected and went to adjudication. Adjudication is a manual process where the original ballots are sent to a single unmonitored workstation where an employee attempts to determine voter intent. That one unmonitored person then corrects the ballot, reprints the ballot corrected, and sends the original ballot to be destroyed.

None of this is true, it did not happen, and it's not how adjudication works. Not to mention the partisan "audit" firm he's basing this nonsense on claimed with no facts that 68% of ballots in the county (or in a precinct...who the **** knows as they didn't say much less show their work as to how they arrived at this figure) and in another report didn't know the difference between Michigan and Minnesota. It's quite telling how you continually ignore this colossal mistake...yet were more than happy to lie about an ex-porn star supposedly doing a report for the Lancet.

Why on earth do you guys keep lapping up his nonsense? Sad.

(04-14-2021 09:29 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Why argue with a buffoon?

Tell me, do you also believe this is what happened?

(01-26-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Easy. The forensic audit turned up that 68% of the ballots scanned by that machine were rejected and went to adjudication. Adjudication is a manual process where the original ballots are sent to a single unmonitored workstation where an employee attempts to determine voter intent. That one unmonitored person then corrects the ballot, reprints the ballot corrected, and sends the original ballot to be destroyed.

Hint: It's all lies. I called him out on and he's yet to provide any source for this nonsense, yet alone man up for the lies he just pulled out of his ass.

Answer the questions and put it all to bed....

(04-14-2021 09:01 AM)TexanMark Wrote:  

(04-13-2021 05:04 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-13-2021 04:33 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  

(04-13-2021 12:05 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-13-2021 11:46 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  In the business of physical security, the fact that something can take place usually means that it did.

When large numbers of ballots are dumped into the system in a short time, it is difficult to believe that all the P's and Q's were properly minded.

That makes no ******* sense here. They got large quantities of mail in ballots this year in Arizona. Around 80% of the total votes cast...and this was the largest turnout ever in a presidential election IIRC. And Arizona probably was the same as every other state.

And all these states counted and processed all these ballots. It didn't matter if they had 1 vote or 1 million votes. They still followed their procedure for all the votes...matching the signatures...curing those that needed curing...and throwing out those that did not get cured. That's one of the reasons why it took so long to count this year...and as I've explained before and in other threads...the ONLY reason trump was EVER "ahead" in MI and PA was because their GOP lead state legislatures DID NOT follow Florida and allow for mail in ballots to be processed for counting ahead of election day.

And mail in ballots were not dumped into some hopper and not checked.

Stop screaming at the sky old man...you just continue to look like a clown.

Explain how Dementia Joe received like 138K votes to virtually zero for Trump under the cover of darkness?

State, time, etc?

This one?

Quote:Hours after President Donald Trump called for the counting of votes cast before Election Day to cease and falsely declared that he’d won reelection, right-leaning pundits and politicians began circulating a pair of misleading screenshots that they claimed showed potential election fraud in Michigan.

The screenshots showed a change in the vote tallies as they appeared on the elections map powered by Decision Desk HQ, an election data and analysis service. The photos appeared to show that in one update overnight, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden received a sudden influx of 138,339 votes in Michigan while other candidates received none.

"An update gives Biden 100% of new votes — 128k+," said Matt Mackowiak, founder of a GOP political communications firm, in one of the first tweets that spotlighted the two screenshots.

Mackowiak later deleted his tweet, which Twitter had labeled as potentially misleading. "I have now learned the MI update referenced was a typo in one county," he wrote in a second tweet.



A screenshot of Matt Mackowiak's since-deleted tweet about Michigan.

But the correction hasn’t gotten nearly the same attention as the first tweet, which was spread widely among conservatives. Many claimed the photos showed proof of "fraud" or "theft" or illegality by Democrats in Michigan who had "magically found" ballots for Biden, the former vice president.

Trump shared a retweet of Mackowiak’s tweet, writing, "What is this all about?"


WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT? https://t.co/6487pYLZnL

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 4, 2020
Similarly misleading claims based on the same screenshots also circulated on Facebook, where they were flagged as part of the platform’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)

In reality, the influx of 138,339 votes for Biden referenced in the social media posts were the result of a data error, said Drew McCoy, a spokesperson for Decision Desk HQ. They were not indicative of voter fraud, mysteriously surfaced votes or other nefarious actions by Democrats.

"It was a simple error from a file created by the state that we ingested," McCoy said of the viral screenshots, noting that Decision Desk HQ does not make changes to state-provided files.

A simple data error...

You guys are too much...

You do know that the results that show up on TV aren't the actual official results from the state, right? They come through a third party data services that aggregates unofficial results.

HEY! What's going on, I placed that Commie Tom on my ignore list and now he's showing up. I don't want to know what the heck that Commie has to say anymore than listening to the Senile One on tv. They're both full of Schiff and they smell alike.

I guess I have to re-do my ignore list. *sigh*

(04-14-2021 10:27 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 09:29 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Why argue with a buffoon?

Tell me, do you also believe this is what happened?

(01-26-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Easy. The forensic audit turned up that 68% of the ballots scanned by that machine were rejected and went to adjudication. Adjudication is a manual process where the original ballots are sent to a single unmonitored workstation where an employee attempts to determine voter intent. That one unmonitored person then corrects the ballot, reprints the ballot corrected, and sends the original ballot to be destroyed.

Hint: It's all lies. I called him out on and he's yet to provide any source for this nonsense, yet alone man up for the lies he just pulled out of his ass.

One more time, reeeeeeeeeeBoy. The 68% number is what the forensic audit turned up, and the court agreed to release. (although some worked hard on it not getting released)

The next part is where I explained the dominion systems adjudication process. This was covered by affadavits which said in some of the locations that the adjudicators werent in the same room and were unmonitored by party officials.

One more time for you; the way dominion systems works is that you vote electronically, THEN your ballot is not counted. Instead it is printed out and scanned, which then counts the vote. If the scan doesnt work, it goes to adjuducation. In adjudication, someone determines voter intent, they then reselect the votes, and a new ballot is printed out and the old one is sent to be destroyed. This means the adjuducated vote will match in any recounts, because the original ballot no longer exists, but was replaced by the new ballot.

For absentee ballots, it works the same way, except that the electronic vote doesnt occur.

The investigations ongoing (just for this) includes absentee ballots in republican heavy areas that had misprinted alignment bars to ensure a large number went to adjudication. Also, the ink being used is being investigated to see if it was causing a large number of ballots to get rejected at the scanner and go to adjudication.

What we know from the COURT ORDERED FORENSIC AUDIT OF ARIZONA is that the dominion machine examined reported that it sent 68% of the ballots to adjudication.


Now, reeeeboy, answer the questions above.

(04-14-2021 01:43 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  HEY! What's going on, I placed that Commie Tom on my ignore list and now he's showing up. I don't want to know what the heck that Commie has to say anymore than listening to the Senile One on tv. They're both full of Schiff and they smell alike.

I guess I have to re-do my ignore list. *sigh*

You may miss him answering the questions....

(04-14-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 10:27 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 09:29 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Why argue with a buffoon?

Tell me, do you also believe this is what happened?

(01-26-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Easy. The forensic audit turned up that 68% of the ballots scanned by that machine were rejected and went to adjudication. Adjudication is a manual process where the original ballots are sent to a single unmonitored workstation where an employee attempts to determine voter intent. That one unmonitored person then corrects the ballot, reprints the ballot corrected, and sends the original ballot to be destroyed.

Hint: It's all lies. I called him out on and he's yet to provide any source for this nonsense, yet alone man up for the lies he just pulled out of his ass.

One more time, reeeeeeeeeeBoy. The 68% number is what the forensic audit turned up, and the court agreed to release. (although some worked hard on it not getting released)

The next part is where I explained the dominion systems adjudication process. This was covered by affadavits which said in some of the locations that the adjudicators werent in the same room and were unmonitored by party officials.

One more time for you; the way dominion systems works is that you vote electronically, THEN your ballot is not counted. Instead it is printed out and scanned, which then counts the vote. If the scan doesnt work, it goes to adjuducation. In adjudication, someone determines voter intent, they then reselect the votes, and a new ballot is printed out and the old one is sent to be destroyed. This means the adjuducated vote will match in any recounts, because the original ballot no longer exists, but was replaced by the new ballot.

For absentee ballots, it works the same way, except that the electronic vote doesnt occur.

The investigations ongoing (just for this) includes absentee ballots in republican heavy areas that had misprinted alignment bars to ensure a large number went to adjudication. Also, the ink being used is being investigated to see if it was causing a large number of ballots to get rejected at the scanner and go to adjudication.

What we know from the COURT ORDERED FORENSIC AUDIT OF ARIZONA is that the dominion machine examined reported that it sent 68% of the ballots to adjudication.


Now, reeeeboy, answer the questions above.

DAYum.... I had not heard any of that stuff about the misaligned printed bars. That's dirty...

(04-14-2021 04:03 PM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 10:27 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 09:29 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Why argue with a buffoon?

Tell me, do you also believe this is what happened?

(01-26-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Easy. The forensic audit turned up that 68% of the ballots scanned by that machine were rejected and went to adjudication. Adjudication is a manual process where the original ballots are sent to a single unmonitored workstation where an employee attempts to determine voter intent. That one unmonitored person then corrects the ballot, reprints the ballot corrected, and sends the original ballot to be destroyed.

Hint: It's all lies. I called him out on and he's yet to provide any source for this nonsense, yet alone man up for the lies he just pulled out of his ass.

One more time, reeeeeeeeeeBoy. The 68% number is what the forensic audit turned up, and the court agreed to release. (although some worked hard on it not getting released)

The next part is where I explained the dominion systems adjudication process. This was covered by affadavits which said in some of the locations that the adjudicators werent in the same room and were unmonitored by party officials.

One more time for you; the way dominion systems works is that you vote electronically, THEN your ballot is not counted. Instead it is printed out and scanned, which then counts the vote. If the scan doesnt work, it goes to adjuducation. In adjudication, someone determines voter intent, they then reselect the votes, and a new ballot is printed out and the old one is sent to be destroyed. This means the adjuducated vote will match in any recounts, because the original ballot no longer exists, but was replaced by the new ballot.

For absentee ballots, it works the same way, except that the electronic vote doesnt occur.

The investigations ongoing (just for this) includes absentee ballots in republican heavy areas that had misprinted alignment bars to ensure a large number went to adjudication. Also, the ink being used is being investigated to see if it was causing a large number of ballots to get rejected at the scanner and go to adjudication.

What we know from the COURT ORDERED FORENSIC AUDIT OF ARIZONA is that the dominion machine examined reported that it sent 68% of the ballots to adjudication.


Now, reeeeboy, answer the questions above.

DAYum.... I had not heard any of that stuff about the misaligned printed bars. That's dirty...

Here's a picture of an example of a correctly aligned and misaligned ballot. IN AZ, they found these misaligned ballots in republican heavy precincts. There was also an issue of where certain republican precincts were using sharpies to mark the votes instead of the proper black pen. Voters brought this to the attention of everyone early on, as the AZ website says to use a pen and not a sharpie. (In certain areas of AZ, votes are marked by the voter on the ballot instead of on an electronic machine that then prints the ballot. So the use of a sharpie could cause a lot of in person votes to be misread.)

(04-14-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 10:27 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-14-2021 09:29 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Why argue with a buffoon?

Tell me, do you also believe this is what happened?

(01-26-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Easy. The forensic audit turned up that 68% of the ballots scanned by that machine were rejected and went to adjudication. Adjudication is a manual process where the original ballots are sent to a single unmonitored workstation where an employee attempts to determine voter intent. That one unmonitored person then corrects the ballot, reprints the ballot corrected, and sends the original ballot to be destroyed.

Hint: It's all lies. I called him out on and he's yet to provide any source for this nonsense, yet alone man up for the lies he just pulled out of his ass.

One more time, reeeeeeeeeeBoy. The 68% number is what the forensic audit turned up, and the court agreed to release. (although some worked hard on it not getting released)

This is not what happened. The judge himself imposed a restriction on the release of the report as he wanted it reviewed before release. There was a court hearing in which he agreed to release the report with redactions of any personal information of those who actually conducted the audit and prepared the report. The only objections from the state were to those who were talking about the report before it was officially released in violation of the gag order and for the state to have a chance to review it before the lies and misinformation started. And the state withdrew their objections and agreed to the release.
https://www.freep.com/story/news/politic...537004002/

And again, the 68% "error" rate was not rejected ballots sent to adjudication as an expert who knows the difference between Minnesota and Michigan explains here:

Quote:Halderman's new analysis said Ramsland arrived at the 68% figure by examining the scanner log of a Nov. 6 re-scan of ballots in Central Lake Township, a township in Antrim County. The log included 15,676 lines with Ramsland classifying 10,667 as errors, equaling a 68% "error rate."

But the 68% finding is "meaningless," said Halderman, who is also co-chair of Michigan’s Election Security Advisory Commission. Scanning a single ballot produces multiple lines in the log, "often including many benign warnings or errors," he said.

"This means that the fraction of lines that are errors does not represent a fraction of ballots or votes, the entities for which an error rate would be relevant," Halderman said.

The professor included the image of log error notices and ballot "reversed" notices.

"The warning messages relate to benign instances where ballots did not feed into the scanner correctly and were ejected (“reversed”) for the voter to try again," Halderman wrote. "This is analogous to a vending machine returning a dollar bill that was inserted incorrectly."

Michigan expert debunks infamous report on Antrim County election as 'meaningless'

(04-14-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  The next part is where I explained the dominion systems adjudication process. This was covered by affadavits which said in some of the locations that the adjudicators werent in the same room and were unmonitored by party officials.

And to your claim about adjudication...more on that later...again this partisan "audit" firm is ignorant of what actually happened in Antrim County as explained here by an expert who knows the difference between Minnesota and Michigan:

Quote:He also examined Ramsland's claim that a "staggering number of votes required adjudication," a suggestion that ballot selections could have been changed once they were in adjudication.

"There are several problems with this theory," Halderman said. "First, adjudication occurs after ballots are scanned and poll tapes are printed. In Antrim County, the final reported results match the poll tapes in essentially all cases. Therefore, the final results could not have been altered using adjudication."

In addition, the adjudication functionality was not enabled at all in Antrim County during the November 2020 election, and Antrim did not purchase the application, Halderman said.

"Far from a 'staggering number' of ballots being adjudicated, the actual number was zero," Halderman said. "Therefore, Mr. Ramsland’s theories are completely inapplicable to the incident in Antrim County."

Michigan expert debunks infamous report on Antrim County election as 'meaningless'

But go ahead...show me one affidavit for Antrim County......

(04-14-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  One more time for you; the way dominion systems works is that you vote electronically, THEN your ballot is not counted. Instead it is printed out and scanned, which then counts the vote. If the scan doesnt work, it goes to adjuducation. In adjudication, someone determines voter intent, they then reselect the votes, and a new ballot is printed out and the old one is sent to be destroyed. This means the adjuducated vote will match in any recounts, because the original ballot no longer exists, but was replaced by the new ballot.

For absentee ballots, it works the same way, except that the electronic vote doesnt occur.

Okay, here's where this gets REALLY embarrassing for you. As the expert explained above, Antrim County...and most counties in Michigan...don't even use adjudication. So you really don't know how voting worked in Michigan, do you? Of course you don't...and you're talking out of your ass again.

I live in Michigan skippy...and here's a map of Michigan explaining what each county uses...and my county uses the exact same equipment as Antrim County as does most counties in Michigan.
https://michigan.maps.arcgis.com/apps/we...661b599c2f

And no, there is no printed ballot. Again, you're just making **** up. When you vote in Michigan in person in a Dominion County, you show your ID, fill out a card, and you're given a preprinted paper ballot that you fill out with a pen in bubbles, you know like the tests you took in school? Then YOU scan that ballot into the dominion tabulator machine. As the expert explained, the errors that this fake "audit" firm found are equivalent to a vending machine spitting out a dollar bill...LOL

Lastly, this "audit" firm was just reviewing computer logs well after the election. They were not there when any vote was scanned or counted. So how exactly can they say what votes might have been sent for adjudication or how that process would have even taken place? And again, the counties using Dominion in Michigan don't even use adjudication as the actual expert explained above.

But, feel free to provide the affidavits from Antrim County where this was supposedly witnessed.

So to summarize, no, there was not one unsupervised guy in Antrim County adjudicating ballots...determining on his own voter intent, filling out new ballots on his own, nor feeding ballots back through a tabulator, much less destroying the original ballot as you originally lied about.

And again, this is all complete lunacy anyway as the recount and receipts for Antrim County all support the final certified tally in which trump won the county by about the exact same margin as he did in 2016.

You should really stop embarrassing yourself. If a moron like my can so easily make you look like a fool...well....

Perhaps you need a vacation?

(04-15-2021 07:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Perhaps you need a vacation?

I'll read your drivel later. Now, go ahead and answer those questions.

(04-15-2021 07:28 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-15-2021 07:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Perhaps you need a vacation?

I'll read your drivel later. Now, go ahead and answer those questions.

Still waiting.

Kind of sad you spent hours responding to my response, which nobody wanted or asked for, and you are still dodging the simple yes or no questions.

(04-15-2021 09:07 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-15-2021 07:28 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(04-15-2021 07:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Perhaps you need a vacation?

I'll read your drivel later. Now, go ahead and answer those questions.

Still waiting.

Kind of sad you spent hours responding to my response, which nobody wanted or asked for, and you are still dodging the simple yes or no questions.

You're such a lying clown. Again, I don't need to answer any of your questions about Michigan...or Pennsylvania...in a thread about Arizona, if even at all. Especially while you continue to lie about adjudication and Antrim County.

And no, I did not take hours. Again, I'm not here 24x7 like your moronic ass with no life. I rarely if ever post or even visit here at night and on the weekends. I've only explained this to you about a dozen times now. Not to mention you can go to my page here and look at all my posts for proof. Or you can just keep lying like you did after I showed my actual receipts from my actual vacation.

Hurts getting owned by a "peon" like me, huh?