That thar is a military grade semi auto to libs...


Here comes the "why would anyone need an antique revolver" idiocy.

(06-22-2016 03:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Look, if you think that you need a AR 15, then you should have a DAMN good reason.

With all due respect, Tom, I owe you and Uncle Sam no explanation at all.

Tom, you do get that making it unlawful to modify magazines only affects law abiding folks right? You do understand long prison sentences has zero effect on Islamic jehadists and other persons set on killing people, right? Right?

Let's get back to banning douchy things.

I'll start. Hummers 1, 2, and 3. Starbucks. Cubs fans. Tuscaloosa.

(06-22-2016 06:30 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Obama's new counterterrorism method is to go into Mosques and yell:

"Clang clang clang goes the trolley....!"

If someone sings the next verse of the Judy Garland song, we have a new member of the watch list.

Well played, sir!!

Thank the Lord, someone got the deep platinum material!

I love how 'claims' now equals 'official'

(06-22-2016 07:51 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Tom, you do get that making it unlawful to modify magazines only affects law abiding folks right? You do understand long prison sentences has zero effect on Islamic jehadists and other persons set on killing people, right? Right?

I think that some of these cases are simply cases of an unstable person who just snaps. Making it more difficult for them to have fast firing/large capacity firearms limits the damage when they do so.

Besides, what do you need a weapon that can fire 50 rounds in a minute for?

(06-23-2016 09:10 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-22-2016 07:51 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Tom, you do get that making it unlawful to modify magazines only affects law abiding folks right? You do understand long prison sentences has zero effect on Islamic jehadists and other persons set on killing people, right? Right?

I think that some of these cases are simply cases of an unstable person who just snaps. Making it more difficult for them to have fast firing/large capacity firearms limits the damage when they do so.

Besides, what do you need a weapon that can fire 50 rounds in a minute for?

The stupidity is oozing out of you


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

(06-23-2016 09:46 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(06-23-2016 09:10 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-22-2016 07:51 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Tom, you do get that making it unlawful to modify magazines only affects law abiding folks right? You do understand long prison sentences has zero effect on Islamic jehadists and other persons set on killing people, right? Right?

I think that some of these cases are simply cases of an unstable person who just snaps. Making it more difficult for them to have fast firing/large capacity firearms limits the damage when they do so.

Besides, what do you need a weapon that can fire 50 rounds in a minute for?

The stupidity is oozing out of you


Sent from #ClutchCity using Tapatalk

The reason your side will eventually lose this argument (and the restrictions will probably be more severe than they'd be now) is because you cannot answer that question.

You think its stupid for anyone to question the decision of any non-Muslim to acquire as many firearms without limit as to type or reason for having one.

We think its insanity to allow this. And we're willing to try and figure out ways to protect some gun access, but not all guns.

(06-23-2016 09:10 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-22-2016 07:51 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Tom, you do get that making it unlawful to modify magazines only affects law abiding folks right? You do understand long prison sentences has zero effect on Islamic jehadists and other persons set on killing people, right? Right?

I think that some of these cases are simply cases of an unstable person who just snaps. Making it more difficult for them to have fast firing/large capacity firearms limits the damage when they do so.

Besides, what do you need a weapon that can fire 50 rounds in a minute for?

To defend myself and my family

(06-23-2016 11:04 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-23-2016 09:10 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-22-2016 07:51 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Tom, you do get that making it unlawful to modify magazines only affects law abiding folks right? You do understand long prison sentences has zero effect on Islamic jehadists and other persons set on killing people, right? Right?

I think that some of these cases are simply cases of an unstable person who just snaps. Making it more difficult for them to have fast firing/large capacity firearms limits the damage when they do so.

Besides, what do you need a weapon that can fire 50 rounds in a minute for?

To defend myself and my family

From what? Space ailens? A zombie apocalypse? Red Dawn?

Maybe a drug gang? I dunno. I suppose if you were threatened by one, you could get a license for a weapon like that. But it should be registered and be limited to a certain area (e.g., your property).

(06-23-2016 11:34 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-23-2016 11:04 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-23-2016 09:10 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-22-2016 07:51 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Tom, you do get that making it unlawful to modify magazines only affects law abiding folks right? You do understand long prison sentences has zero effect on Islamic jehadists and other persons set on killing people, right? Right?

I think that some of these cases are simply cases of an unstable person who just snaps. Making it more difficult for them to have fast firing/large capacity firearms limits the damage when they do so.

Besides, what do you need a weapon that can fire 50 rounds in a minute for?

To defend myself and my family

From what? Space ailens? A zombie apocalypse? Red Dawn?

Maybe a drug gang? I dunno. I suppose if you were threatened by one, you could get a license for a weapon like that. But it should be registered and be limited to a certain area (e.g., your property).

Two people with 25 round clips?
Three people with 20 round clips?
...

(06-23-2016 11:39 AM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote:  

(06-23-2016 11:34 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-23-2016 11:04 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-23-2016 09:10 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-22-2016 07:51 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Tom, you do get that making it unlawful to modify magazines only affects law abiding folks right? You do understand long prison sentences has zero effect on Islamic jehadists and other persons set on killing people, right? Right?

I think that some of these cases are simply cases of an unstable person who just snaps. Making it more difficult for them to have fast firing/large capacity firearms limits the damage when they do so.

Besides, what do you need a weapon that can fire 50 rounds in a minute for?

To defend myself and my family

From what? Space ailens? A zombie apocalypse? Red Dawn?

Maybe a drug gang? I dunno. I suppose if you were threatened by one, you could get a license for a weapon like that. But it should be registered and be limited to a certain area (e.g., your property).

Two people with 25 round clips?
Three people with 20 round clips?
...

Seriously, do you get in a lot of shootouts with marauding gangs? At your home? Seriously, if you'd like a gun like that, then go get a license for it, and keep it where you say you need to have it (no taking it to the Kroger isn't appropriate). And then BE RESPONSIBLE for it. If your kid kills someone else or himself with it because you were negligent then go to jail. If someone steals it and commits a crime with it because you were negligent, go to jail. If you can't produce the weapon, go to jail.

The Purge is a work of fiction.

(06-23-2016 11:34 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-23-2016 11:04 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-23-2016 09:10 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-22-2016 07:51 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Tom, you do get that making it unlawful to modify magazines only affects law abiding folks right? You do understand long prison sentences has zero effect on Islamic jehadists and other persons set on killing people, right? Right?

I think that some of these cases are simply cases of an unstable person who just snaps. Making it more difficult for them to have fast firing/large capacity firearms limits the damage when they do so.

Besides, what do you need a weapon that can fire 50 rounds in a minute for?

To defend myself and my family

From what? Space ailens? A zombie apocalypse? Red Dawn?

Maybe a drug gang? I dunno. I suppose if you were threatened by one, you could get a license for a weapon like that. But it should be registered and be limited to a certain area (e.g., your property).

The whole counter argument to banning "assault" weapons hinges on incrementalism. If the progs are successful in getting one ban, then they lower the bar and go after the next weapon down the list. Then ten years for now, they'll be crying about the damage a derringer can do.

It is the exact same argument abortion advocates have used in opposing sensible abortion restrictions, such as the partial birth abortion ban and requiring parental notifications.

Every hill has a slippery slope.

(06-23-2016 11:34 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-23-2016 11:04 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-23-2016 09:10 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(06-22-2016 07:51 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Tom, you do get that making it unlawful to modify magazines only affects law abiding folks right? You do understand long prison sentences has zero effect on Islamic jehadists and other persons set on killing people, right? Right?

I think that some of these cases are simply cases of an unstable person who just snaps. Making it more difficult for them to have fast firing/large capacity firearms limits the damage when they do so.

Besides, what do you need a weapon that can fire 50 rounds in a minute for?

To defend myself and my family

From what? Space ailens? A zombie apocalypse? Red Dawn?

Maybe a drug gang? I dunno. I suppose if you were threatened by one, you could get a license for a weapon like that. But it should be registered and be limited to a certain area (e.g., your property).

Well the current gun I have that fires more than your arbitrary 50 rounds a minute protects us from squirrels and other varmints, but I thought we had put that asinine figure to bed last night. Evidently you just like to expose how effin' ignorant and stubborn you are to continue to argue the 50 rounds per minute strawman even after it has been utterly debunked as something you have pulled straight out your ass. Like I said last night....no skin off my nose. It's actually entertaining helping you look like a bigger fool than you already do.

Tom, you keep saying "rapid fire" as though there are guns that when you pull the trigger you have to wait three minutes for anything to come out.

(06-22-2016 01:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-22-2016 01:46 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Anyone who needs an ar15 to go hunting should consider another hobby

And what do you base this upon? You have much experience with either hunting or AR15's or is this your usual pull something out your ass in a pathetic attempt to be a troll?

I just don't think hunting with a semiautomatic weapon is much sport.

(06-23-2016 04:13 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-22-2016 01:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-22-2016 01:46 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Anyone who needs an ar15 to go hunting should consider another hobby

And what do you base this upon? You have much experience with either hunting or AR15's or is this your usual pull something out your ass in a pathetic attempt to be a troll?

I just don't think hunting with a semiautomatic weapon is much sport.

So it's yet another pathetic attempt to be a troll. So noted.


For the record I dove and duck hunt with my Winchester pump because I can cycle it and reacquire the target faster than I can with my Browning Light 12 semiautomatic. Perhaps I should hunt with the Browning and make it more sporting.

(06-23-2016 04:15 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-23-2016 04:13 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(06-22-2016 01:51 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(06-22-2016 01:46 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Anyone who needs an ar15 to go hunting should consider another hobby

And what do you base this upon? You have much experience with either hunting or AR15's or is this your usual pull something out your ass in a pathetic attempt to be a troll?

I just don't think hunting with a semiautomatic weapon is much sport.

So it's yet another pathetic attempt to be a troll. So noted.


For the record I dove and duck hunt with my Winchester pump because I can cycle it and reacquire the target faster than I can with my Browning Light 12 semiautomatic. Perhaps I should hunt with the Browning and make it more sporting.

If you get off on shooting ducks with a shotgun be my guest. No need for personal attacks. Especially since it's supposed to be a violation of the rules.