(06-24-2022 10:47 PM)Bearcat419 Wrote: If an admin wants to ban me, ban me. I don't give a ****.
**** every single one of you who bitched and moaned about employers mandating a vaccine in an attempt to stop a worldwide pandemic and are now fine with the government allowing states to force women to carry a pregnancy to term. From the bottom of my heart, **** each and every one of your old, crusty, fear mongering, racist ********.
And on top of that, if you support the states that don't even allow exemptions for instances of rape.... There's a special place in hell for your evangelical bull****.
It's obvious you don't get it.
1. The constitution does not mention abortion. Therefore, according to the Constitution itself, abortion is left for each state to decide how to handle it.
Hey Bearcat... you want again to answer question 1 in particular?
Again, I've got a bunch of liberal friends online who have been up in arms ever since this decision.. I've been staying out of it altoghter, but ironically most of them living in Illinoisy and Minnehaha, where absolutely NOTHING is going to change, other than those pro-abortion states are probably going to get busier than before by allowing abortions...
But they swear the SC is setting up women to be raped and prostituted... (and heaven forbid if you mention PP was set up as a eugenics policy together .. )
(06-25-2022 08:42 AM)b2b Wrote: I'd rather support liberal sterilization.
Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
Half the problem solved in one stroke, I like it.
Prog filth neutered and spayed while turning in their firearms.
Its the only reasonable answer for them
Yes sir, they aren't equipped for real struggles so they should give up before they get hurt. Remove their ability to be "birthing persons" and they have no reason to worry about RvW. Besides, what self respecting man wants to have his urethra expanded to 100 times it's normal size to pass a baby??
Why not link a Phd in history instead of English composition
“Linda Sue Grimes
Devotee of Paramahansa Yogananda's teachings, I compose poems, songs, essays, & veggie recipes.”
Try digging a little deeper
I guess to you Carol Swain is not qualified.
First off both parties have blood on their hands…
The same Carol Swain who spoke of values in that video but is controversial for being anti gay and Muslim? Let’s see what she might have left out:
Fact: Democrats introduced and led the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Fact: it was the bloc of conservative Southern Democrats in the Senate who filibustered and voted against the act. The same democrats that thought it was okay to beat, sic dogs onto and shoot water hoses at the people protesting/advocating for those same rights
Fact: The act passed with a Democrat majority in both houses.
(06-25-2022 12:36 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote: Why not link a Phd in history instead of English composition
“Linda Sue Grimes
Devotee of Paramahansa Yogananda's teachings, I compose poems, songs, essays, & veggie recipes.”
Try digging a little deeper
Dude, you come on here with a BS answer to everything that nobody buys.
Republicans ended slavery and are doing their best to end the slaughter of unborn children.
Democrats are the party of human slavery and infanticide. Just own it.
When you just look at the name or letter, then yes you are absolutely correct. But history is not this or that. It is not black or white, red or blue. It is in the grays or purples.
Willful ignorance. Have a day!
That bumbling moron biden's mentor was once the head of the kkk
The only moron here is you
His avatar is a horse's ass on two legs and it's running around wildly. What else is there to know?
Why not link a Phd in history instead of English composition
“Linda Sue Grimes
Devotee of Paramahansa Yogananda's teachings, I compose poems, songs, essays, & veggie recipes.”
Try digging a little deeper
I guess to you Carol Swain is not qualified.
First off both parties have blood on their hands…
The same Carol Swain who spoke of values in that video but is controversial for being anti gay and Muslim? Let’s see what she might have left out:
Fact: Democrats introduced and led the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Fact: it was the bloc of conservative Southern Democrats in the Senate who filibustered and voted against the act. The same democrats that thought it was okay to beat, sic dogs onto and shoot water hoses at the people protesting/advocating for those same rights
Fact: The act passed with a Democrat majority in both houses.
The South may not be slow, but you sure are. She just laid it out to you as simple as it can get and yet you are so stiffnecked you cannot receive.
Why not link a Phd in history instead of English composition
“Linda Sue Grimes
Devotee of Paramahansa Yogananda's teachings, I compose poems, songs, essays, & veggie recipes.”
Try digging a little deeper
I guess to you Carol Swain is not qualified.
First off both parties have blood on their hands…
The same Carol Swain who spoke of values in that video but is controversial for being anti gay and Muslim? Let’s see what she might have left out:
Fact: Democrats introduced and led the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Fact: it was the bloc of conservative Southern Democrats in the Senate who filibustered and voted against the act. The same democrats that thought it was okay to beat, sic dogs onto and shoot water hoses at the people protesting/advocating for those same rights
Fact: The act passed with a Democrat majority in both houses.
One final FACT, reemphasizing one of Swain's final points: the South is now overwhelmingly conservative today.
The last vestiges of pure hard core liberalism is on the Left coast, Hawaii, Illinois (Chicago), Wisconsin, Michigan, New York (NYC; rest of that state is fairly conservative), and the NE USA.
Mr, you really need to read up on the history of the Bill, the leaders on all sides & what they thought, what states they were from, some of their history, & trace it to current day.
I do applaud you recognizing BOTH PARTIES have blood on their hands. So you do have some wisdom. That can only grow.
(06-25-2022 11:03 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote: Neither side has the high ground on pork in proposed legislation but please remind us of the last piece of Republican supported social legislation?
What was the last piece of good social legislation?
The problem is the Right wants nothing. The left is open to progression. So when you get something like the ACA it is a given that can be changed and improved.
(06-26-2022 10:52 AM)Bronco14 Wrote: Mr, you really need to read up on the history of the Bill, the leaders on all sides & what they thought, what states they were from, some of their history, & trace it to current day.
I do applaud you recognizing BOTH PARTIES have blood on their hands. So you do have some wisdom. That can only grow.
Tell me where were all the Democrats that voted against the bill from?
So all the liberal woman (menstruating persons) should stop having sex with men until the US Senate passes an abortion law. The menstruating persons won't have worry about getting pregnant and needing an abortion while the men will make it a priority to pass a law... if having sex with a nagging feminist is really appealing. Basically feminists should put their ****** where their mouth is.
In the end will DEMONCRATS are excited about an issue that will help them in November all this really does is energize an otherwise disinterested base. This issue might save a few house seats, but in the end probably one cause many people to change their votes.
(This post was last modified: 06-26-2022 10:59 AM by THE NC Herd Fan.)
Why not link a Phd in history instead of English composition
“Linda Sue Grimes
Devotee of Paramahansa Yogananda's teachings, I compose poems, songs, essays, & veggie recipes.”
Try digging a little deeper
I guess to you Carol Swain is not qualified.
First off both parties have blood on their hands…
The same Carol Swain who spoke of values in that video but is controversial for being anti gay and Muslim? Let’s see what she might have left out:
Fact: Democrats introduced and led the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Fact: it was the bloc of conservative Southern Democrats in the Senate who filibustered and voted against the act. The same democrats that thought it was okay to beat, sic dogs onto and shoot water hoses at the people protesting/advocating for those same rights
Fact: The act passed with a Democrat majority in both houses.
One final FACT, reemphasizing one of Swain's final points: the South is now overwhelmingly conservative today.
The last vestiges of pure hard core liberalism is on the Left coast, Hawaii, Illinois (Chicago), Wisconsin, Michigan, New York (NYC; rest of that state is fairly conservative), and the NE USA.
What part of “Conservative Southern Democrat” is so hard to understand? They were trying to conserve their way of life in the south. But keep deluding your self with the idea that only the party name matters.
Why not link a Phd in history instead of English composition
“Linda Sue Grimes
Devotee of Paramahansa Yogananda's teachings, I compose poems, songs, essays, & veggie recipes.”
Try digging a little deeper
I guess to you Carol Swain is not qualified.
First off both parties have blood on their hands…
The same Carol Swain who spoke of values in that video but is controversial for being anti gay and Muslim? Let’s see what she might have left out:
Fact: Democrats introduced and led the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Fact: it was the bloc of conservative Southern Democrats in the Senate who filibustered and voted against the act. The same democrats that thought it was okay to beat, sic dogs onto and shoot water hoses at the people protesting/advocating for those same rights
Fact: The act passed with a Democrat majority in both houses.
The South may not be slow, but you sure are. She just laid it out to you as simple as it can get and yet you are so stiffnecked you cannot receive.
Ok Sparky. I disagreed with her and your point and explained why. Care to refute my argurmenrpt or are you only “fast” enough to insult?
(06-26-2022 10:52 AM)Bronco14 Wrote: Mr, you really need to read up on the history of the Bill, the leaders on all sides & what they thought, what states they were from, some of their history, & trace it to current day.
I do applaud you recognizing BOTH PARTIES have blood on their hands. So you do have some wisdom. That can only grow.
Tell me where were all the Democrats that voted against the bill from?
The South may change their voting habits, the Republican Party does not. What about northern Republicans? What about Republicans in general? Im a northern Republican & have an understanding how the Party has operated here in the north historically. I find it revisionist history to paint the Republican Party was in opposition to the Civil Rights Act. History does not support that.
(This post was last modified: 06-26-2022 11:07 AM by Bronco'14.)
(06-25-2022 12:36 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote: Why not link a Phd in history instead of English composition
“Linda Sue Grimes
Devotee of Paramahansa Yogananda's teachings, I compose poems, songs, essays, & veggie recipes.”
Try digging a little deeper
I guess to you Carol Swain is not qualified.
First off both parties have blood on their hands…
The same Carol Swain who spoke of values in that video but is controversial for being anti gay and Muslim? Let’s see what she might have left out:
Fact: Democrats introduced and led the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Fact: it was the bloc of conservative Southern Democrats in the Senate who filibustered and voted against the act. The same democrats that thought it was okay to beat, sic dogs onto and shoot water hoses at the people protesting/advocating for those same rights
Fact: The act passed with a Democrat majority in both houses.
The South may not be slow, but you sure are. She just laid it out to you as simple as it can get and yet you are so stiffnecked you cannot receive.
Ok Sparky. I disagreed with her and your point and explained why. Care to refute my argurmenrpt or are you only “fast” enough to insult?
'Only one of the no votes changed parties. The rest continued running & winning elections as Democrats.' You can look that up, dude. Your Party continued sponsoring them. Those Dixiecrats continued to be Democrats. FACT! Instead of kicking them to the side, the Democrat Party continued to embrace them.
(This post was last modified: 06-26-2022 11:18 AM by Bronco'14.)
![[Image: FWEO08OWYAAGuUC.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FWEO08OWYAAGuUC.jpg)
Basically feminists should put their ****** where their mouth is. 
