Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
Author Message
Frank the Tank Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,507
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 3268
I Root For: Illinois/DePaul
Location: Chicago
Post: #21
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 12:17 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 09:40 AM)Erictelevision Wrote:  The Oscars are Sunday, and 2 E8 games will be played that day.

The Oscars ain't what it used to be, ratings-wise.

Nothing is anywhere close to where it used to be ratings-wise except for sports (particularly NFL football). That's the biggest reason why sports rights keep climbing higher and higher and higher.

The highest-rated shows on TV today would *all* be cancelled if they got those same ratings 10 years ago. The Oscar ratings actually look excellent (at least not counting last year) when compared to how many fewer people now watch linear network TV at any given time outside of sports.

There might be more total TV viewers available as a whole, but that audience is now MUCH more dispersed than ever before. The *relative* power of the Oscars is actually arguably higher in the TV universe. There's no such thing as a "regular" TV show like Seinfeld or Friends that can draw massive audiences anymore, which elevates the *relative* value of live events (e.g. sports, awards shows, news, etc.) and/or shows that have sports-like properties (e.g. reality show competitions) even if their absolute viewership has gone down.
03-24-2022 12:44 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pervis_Griffith Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,368
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 407
I Root For: Louisville
Location:
Post: #22
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 12:31 PM)wleakr Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 11:16 AM)Pervis_Griffith Wrote:  Seinfeld said it best ...

I always thought is was so smooth how it did this. The comedy is embedded in such a way where you're not 100% certain if the entire thing is a bit or if it's truly how he feels on the subject. Initially, the entire audience is laughing and then it starts to fade in and out as some are probably thinking "Hey, he's talking about me!".

Flawless execution!


It's genius. He's a go**amn genius! Give him a huge gold trophy!!! lol

I'm in the insurance industry ... and he's so right. There are so many stupid awards handed out it's nauseating.
03-24-2022 12:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dbackjon Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,252
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 986
I Root For: NAU/Illini
Location:
Post: #23
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 12:22 PM)goodknightfl Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 11:15 AM)Minutemen429 Wrote:  Is there a lot of overlap between the audiences? I know I would fall in the group of very interested in the NCAA tournament, no interest in the Oscars.

I kind of agree. Most little old ladies from Pasadena don't watch NCAA and most real folks don't watch Oscar's.

So someone that enjoys the Oscars isn't a real person?
03-24-2022 12:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Scoochpooch1 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,753
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 255
I Root For: P4
Location:
Post: #24
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 11:20 AM)djsuperfly Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 11:06 AM)Scoochpooch1 Wrote:  There are more people with TV availability in 2022 than 1998. So the trend is terrible. More people, less watching.

Are there, though? And I would think that even if there were more raw numbers of "people with TV availability" now, there are likely less people with cable/OTA availability now.

There are around 50m more people in US over the 20 year period. What would lead you to believe that they don't have access to cable or OTA? Places that have trouble with Antenna access are rural areas which aren't growing at all.
03-24-2022 01:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
djsuperfly Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,615
Joined: Sep 2021
Reputation: 291
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #25
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 01:02 PM)Scoochpooch1 Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 11:20 AM)djsuperfly Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 11:06 AM)Scoochpooch1 Wrote:  There are more people with TV availability in 2022 than 1998. So the trend is terrible. More people, less watching.

Are there, though? And I would think that even if there were more raw numbers of "people with TV availability" now, there are likely less people with cable/OTA availability now.

There are around 50m more people in US over the 20 year period. What would lead you to believe that they don't have access to cable or OTA? Places that have trouble with Antenna access are rural areas which aren't growing at all.

Ok, fine, yes, there are more people who "could" subscribe to cable or put up an antenna. The point is there are now less people who feel the need to do so.
03-24-2022 01:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Scoochpooch1 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,753
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 255
I Root For: P4
Location:
Post: #26
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 12:44 PM)Frank the Tank Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 12:17 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 09:40 AM)Erictelevision Wrote:  The Oscars are Sunday, and 2 E8 games will be played that day.

The Oscars ain't what it used to be, ratings-wise.

Nothing is anywhere close to where it used to be ratings-wise except for sports (particularly NFL football). That's the biggest reason why sports rights keep climbing higher and higher and higher.

The highest-rated shows on TV today would *all* be cancelled if they got those same ratings 10 years ago. The Oscar ratings actually look excellent (at least not counting last year) when compared to how many fewer people now watch linear network TV at any given time outside of sports.

There might be more total TV viewers available as a whole, but that audience is now MUCH more dispersed than ever before. The *relative* power of the Oscars is actually arguably higher in the TV universe. There's no such thing as a "regular" TV show like Seinfeld or Friends that can draw massive audiences anymore, which elevates the *relative* value of live events (e.g. sports, awards shows, news, etc.) and/or shows that have sports-like properties (e.g. reality show competitions) even if their absolute viewership has gone down.

i.e. the interest level for the Oscars has cratered
03-24-2022 01:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Frank the Tank Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,507
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 3268
I Root For: Illinois/DePaul
Location: Chicago
Post: #27
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 12:25 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 12:22 PM)goodknightfl Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 11:15 AM)Minutemen429 Wrote:  Is there a lot of overlap between the audiences? I know I would fall in the group of very interested in the NCAA tournament, no interest in the Oscars.

I kind of agree. Most little old ladies from Pasadena don't watch NCAA and most real folks don't watch Oscar's.

IMO, the reason the Oscars ratings have plunged so much - and they were plunging before the virus hit - is that the producers have moved away from the "little old ladies" and have tried to revamp it for a young, woke audience.

But as sometimes happens with these kinds of moves, you end up really alienating your traditional audience without really capturing the new target audience, and you are kind of sunk.

Not that I'm an expert on TV, LOL. But that's my feeling.

I don't think this is the reason at all.

At the end of the day, people watch the Oscars the most when the movies that they actually care about are competing for the top awards.

Hence, the high water mark of the Oscars in the Titanic year of 1998: that's when the then-highest grossing film of all-time converged with a Best Picture Oscar. The years when blockbusters like Forrest Gump, the Lord of the Rings trilogy, Gladiator and Avatar were competing for Best Picture awards also drew massive audiences.

At the same time, there used to be a critical mass of well-watched (if not necessarily blockbuster) mid-budget movies that featured stars and often dominated Oscar categories: think Pulp Fiction, Shawshank Redemption, Jerry Maguire, Good Will Hunting, etc. (Essentially, the old Miramax playbook irrespective of the despicable actions of its leadership off-the-screen.) These weren't film franchises, but they also weren't made for niche audiences. So, people tuned into the Oscars because the stars they loved were up for awards in movies that they actually watched and loved.

For various reasons, the entire industry has changed dramatically since around 2010. Most notably, that category of well-watched mid-budget movies with stars that would be Oscar competitors has totally and *completely* disappeared. It's gone.

Why? Well, we talk about the influence of ESPN/Disney on college sports a lot around here, but it's nowhere near the influence that Disney has had on the entire movie industrial complex. Simply put, in the mid-2000s, Disney make the calculation that if it wanted to *dependably* make money in Hollywood (which is often a boom-and-bust industry with big hits and even bigger misses), then it would need to focus on (a) franchises with wide and deep fan bases that can churn out dependable content for years/decades and (b) movies that can draw audiences worldwide... and specifically in China.

Hence, Disney bought Pixar (where a lot of people may not remember that then-Pixar chair Steve Jobs was ready to cut all ties with Disney until the relationship was salvaged when Bob Iger replaced Michael Eisner), Marvel, Lucasfilm (AKA Star Wars) and Fox essentially one after the other. Disney effectively just turned to a solely blockbuster model... and it completely worked. Disney was making dependable massive profits in a notoriously undependable industry. As with pretty much everything that works, it was copied throughout the entire industry.

It's not an accident that the vast majority of films are now either (1) blockbuster franchises or (2) very low-budget filler movies (which largely consist of horror movies). Those are essentially the only types of films that are profitable anymore.

Those mid-budget Oscar category killers have effectively become extinct in the process. Every once in awhile, you'll see one break through (think Knives Out a few years ago), but they've largely gone the way of the dodo bird.

In the meantime, it's almost as if though the Oscar electorate is actively punishing films for being blockbusters and rarely ever nominate them outside of the technical categories (and even those that get nominated for Best Picture, like Black Panther in 2019, aren't ever serious contenders). Instead, the electorate is nominating truly small niche films that very few people have seen. (Once again, I'm curious if this might start to change as those films have been migrating to streaming particularly in the past year.)

Simply put, the Oscars used to involve a lot of films that a lot of people actually watched and cared about. That often hasn't been the case in recent years, so it shouldn't shock anyone that there has been a decline in viewership. It's not about youth vs. old or political stances (as much as a lot of people seem to want that to be the case).
(This post was last modified: 03-24-2022 01:14 PM by Frank the Tank.)
03-24-2022 01:11 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
b2b Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,083
Joined: May 2021
Reputation: 1418
I Root For: Fam+ECU/CSU/App
Location: Land of Confusion
Post: #28
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
Thank God we have Frank here to explain *everything* to us rubes.
03-24-2022 01:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Frank the Tank Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,507
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 3268
I Root For: Illinois/DePaul
Location: Chicago
Post: #29
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 01:14 PM)b2b Wrote:  Thank God we have Frank here to explain *everything* to us rubes.

Heh - it just happens to be a category of (generally) useless information that I am super-interested in and have read a lot about over the years.

If you asked me about things that would actually be quite useful, such as biomedical engineering or basic electrical work for my house, I'm completely clueless.
03-24-2022 01:25 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fighting Muskie Offline
Senior Chief Realignmentologist
*

Posts: 15,050
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 1214
I Root For: Bishop Sycamore
Location: Secret Lair
Post: #30
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
Frank put it a lot more eloquently than I could but I stopped caring about the Oscars when Hollywood stopped making watchable movies.
03-24-2022 01:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
IWokeUpLikeThis Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,076
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation: 2463
I Root For: NIU, Chicago St
Location:
Post: #31
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 01:14 PM)b2b Wrote:  Thank God we have Frank here to explain *everything* to us rubes.

I wonder if any point we'll get a Frank the Tank YouTube channel? He has his blog, but blogs are out of style and non-profitable.
03-24-2022 01:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Frank the Tank Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,507
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation: 3268
I Root For: Illinois/DePaul
Location: Chicago
Post: #32
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 01:39 PM)IWokeUpLikeThis Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 01:14 PM)b2b Wrote:  Thank God we have Frank here to explain *everything* to us rubes.

I wonder if any point we'll get a Frank the Tank YouTube channel? He has his blog, but blogs are out of style and non-profitable.

Heh - as opposed to YouTube, I've honestly thought about doing a podcast for quite awhile. That's really the medium that translates the best for the depth of analysis that I'd want to perform. The main hurdle is simply time with twin middle schoolers at home. It's not an accident that my most prolific writing periods happened to be when I was up at all weird hours when my kids were infants. That's totally changed when every single day is filled with school, sports practices, games/meets, etc.

You're totally correct that blogs are unprofitable (or at least don't generate much compared to the time that you put into them) unless you have (a) massive scale and (b) a constant stream of content. I'm just not someone that would write 10 short 4 sentence blog posts per day that's basically just a link to somewhere else. That's simply not my style. Unfortunately, the Internet generally doesn't financially reward long-form writing in the same way as quick hits and algorithm-boosted topics. And when I say unfortunate, it's not about me personally at all (as it's really hard for me to write these days, anyway), but rather way more important items such as real journalism that isn't simply reacting to whatever stupid thing a narcissistic politician Tweeted, in-depth scientific studies, etc.
03-24-2022 02:30 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 55,973
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 3192
I Root For: Notre Dame/USF/G'Town
Location: New Orleans
Post: #33
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 01:11 PM)Frank the Tank Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 12:25 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 12:22 PM)goodknightfl Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 11:15 AM)Minutemen429 Wrote:  Is there a lot of overlap between the audiences? I know I would fall in the group of very interested in the NCAA tournament, no interest in the Oscars.

I kind of agree. Most little old ladies from Pasadena don't watch NCAA and most real folks don't watch Oscar's.

IMO, the reason the Oscars ratings have plunged so much - and they were plunging before the virus hit - is that the producers have moved away from the "little old ladies" and have tried to revamp it for a young, woke audience.

But as sometimes happens with these kinds of moves, you end up really alienating your traditional audience without really capturing the new target audience, and you are kind of sunk.

Not that I'm an expert on TV, LOL. But that's my feeling.

I don't think this is the reason at all.

At the end of the day, people watch the Oscars the most when the movies that they actually care about are competing for the top awards.

Hence, the high water mark of the Oscars in the Titanic year of 1998: that's when the then-highest grossing film of all-time converged with a Best Picture Oscar. The years when blockbusters like Forrest Gump, the Lord of the Rings trilogy, Gladiator and Avatar were competing for Best Picture awards also drew massive audiences.

At the same time, there used to be a critical mass of well-watched (if not necessarily blockbuster) mid-budget movies that featured stars and often dominated Oscar categories: think Pulp Fiction, Shawshank Redemption, Jerry Maguire, Good Will Hunting, etc. (Essentially, the old Miramax playbook irrespective of the despicable actions of its leadership off-the-screen.) These weren't film franchises, but they also weren't made for niche audiences. So, people tuned into the Oscars because the stars they loved were up for awards in movies that they actually watched and loved.

For various reasons, the entire industry has changed dramatically since around 2010. Most notably, that category of well-watched mid-budget movies with stars that would be Oscar competitors has totally and *completely* disappeared. It's gone.

Why? Well, we talk about the influence of ESPN/Disney on college sports a lot around here, but it's nowhere near the influence that Disney has had on the entire movie industrial complex. Simply put, in the mid-2000s, Disney make the calculation that if it wanted to *dependably* make money in Hollywood (which is often a boom-and-bust industry with big hits and even bigger misses), then it would need to focus on (a) franchises with wide and deep fan bases that can churn out dependable content for years/decades and (b) movies that can draw audiences worldwide... and specifically in China.

Hence, Disney bought Pixar (where a lot of people may not remember that then-Pixar chair Steve Jobs was ready to cut all ties with Disney until the relationship was salvaged when Bob Iger replaced Michael Eisner), Marvel, Lucasfilm (AKA Star Wars) and Fox essentially one after the other. Disney effectively just turned to a solely blockbuster model... and it completely worked. Disney was making dependable massive profits in a notoriously undependable industry. As with pretty much everything that works, it was copied throughout the entire industry.

It's not an accident that the vast majority of films are now either (1) blockbuster franchises or (2) very low-budget filler movies (which largely consist of horror movies). Those are essentially the only types of films that are profitable anymore.

Those mid-budget Oscar category killers have effectively become extinct in the process. Every once in awhile, you'll see one break through (think Knives Out a few years ago), but they've largely gone the way of the dodo bird.

In the meantime, it's almost as if though the Oscar electorate is actively punishing films for being blockbusters and rarely ever nominate them outside of the technical categories (and even those that get nominated for Best Picture, like Black Panther in 2019, aren't ever serious contenders). Instead, the electorate is nominating truly small niche films that very few people have seen. (Once again, I'm curious if this might start to change as those films have been migrating to streaming particularly in the past year.)

Simply put, the Oscars used to involve a lot of films that a lot of people actually watched and cared about. That often hasn't been the case in recent years, so it shouldn't shock anyone that there has been a decline in viewership. It's not about youth vs. old or political stances (as much as a lot of people seem to want that to be the case).

Well, I'm not so sure about the mid-budget or "mid-major" disappearing thing. E.g, at the 2017 Oscars alone, we had La La Land, The Arrival, Hidden Figures, and Hacksaw Ridge, all nominated for BP and all what I would call successful mid-majors, popular movies made on modest budgets. FWIW, I discount the past two years because of the virus, that IMO has warped the whole industry.

And IIRC, the Oscars have always had kind of a love/hate with huge blockbusters. For every Black Panther or Lord Of the Rings or Avatar that gets nominated, there seemingly is a Spider-Man (this year, and 2002) or Avengers that doesn't. There is maybe a streak of envy against giving best picture to film that already made all the money. I think it's kind of always been that way. Though the 1970s seemed to be an exception (IIRC, some of the very biggest films, like Rocky, The Godfather, the Exorcist, Jaws and Star Wars all were nominated for Best Picture).
(This post was last modified: 03-24-2022 03:20 PM by quo vadis.)
03-24-2022 02:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stever20 Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,317
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 1010
I Root For: Hoyas
Location:
Post: #34
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
Last year there were 5 things that were in the top 100 ratings for the entire year that weren't sports, and 1 was tied to sports.

Episode of The Equalizer that CBS aired immediately after the Super Bowl
President Biden’s inauguration
President Biden’s April address to Congress
the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade
Oprah Winfrey’s interview with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
03-24-2022 03:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Erictelevision Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,493
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 60
I Root For: Uconn hoops
Location:
Post: #35
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 03:00 PM)stever20 Wrote:  Last year there were 5 things that were in the top 100 ratings for the entire year that weren't sports, and 1 was tied to sports.

Episode of The Equalizer that CBS aired immediately after the Super Bowl
President Biden’s inauguration
President Biden’s April address to Congress
the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade
Oprah Winfrey’s interview with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

Interesting. I always thought the Oscars were the 2nd most watched thing on TV every year (behind the SB)
03-24-2022 03:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stever20 Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,317
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 1010
I Root For: Hoyas
Location:
Post: #36
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 03:11 PM)Erictelevision Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 03:00 PM)stever20 Wrote:  Last year there were 5 things that were in the top 100 ratings for the entire year that weren't sports, and 1 was tied to sports.

Episode of The Equalizer that CBS aired immediately after the Super Bowl
President Biden’s inauguration
President Biden’s April address to Congress
the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade
Oprah Winfrey’s interview with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

Interesting. I always thought the Oscars were the 2nd most watched thing on TV every year (behind the SB)

Think it used to but the ratings for this really have totally cratered-
https://www.statista.com/chart/13142/the...-time-low/

The chart in there is really dramatic.
03-24-2022 03:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ken d Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,242
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 2017
I Root For: college sports
Location: Raleigh
Post: #37
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
I've been trying to remember when the last time I watched the Oscars was. While I was at it, my mind wandered to a different question: When was the last time I actually went to a movie. I suppose it was around the time movies were more about the story and less about special effects. I'm pretty sure it was sometime in the twentieth century.
03-24-2022 03:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NJMark Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 272
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 47
I Root For: Rutgers
Location:
Post: #38
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 11:15 AM)Minutemen429 Wrote:  Is there a lot of overlap between the audiences? I know I would fall in the group of very interested in the NCAA tournament, no interest in the Oscars.

The answer to questions like that is almost always "yes."

It's not either/or. People can like both basketball and movies.

People like lots of different things that are unrelated. They don't fit into perfect little boxes all the time.
03-24-2022 04:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AntiG Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,454
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 54
I Root For: Rutgers
Location: NYC
Post: #39
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 01:08 PM)Scoochpooch1 Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 12:44 PM)Frank the Tank Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 12:17 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 09:40 AM)Erictelevision Wrote:  The Oscars are Sunday, and 2 E8 games will be played that day.

The Oscars ain't what it used to be, ratings-wise.

Nothing is anywhere close to where it used to be ratings-wise except for sports (particularly NFL football). That's the biggest reason why sports rights keep climbing higher and higher and higher.

The highest-rated shows on TV today would *all* be cancelled if they got those same ratings 10 years ago. The Oscar ratings actually look excellent (at least not counting last year) when compared to how many fewer people now watch linear network TV at any given time outside of sports.

There might be more total TV viewers available as a whole, but that audience is now MUCH more dispersed than ever before. The *relative* power of the Oscars is actually arguably higher in the TV universe. There's no such thing as a "regular" TV show like Seinfeld or Friends that can draw massive audiences anymore, which elevates the *relative* value of live events (e.g. sports, awards shows, news, etc.) and/or shows that have sports-like properties (e.g. reality show competitions) even if their absolute viewership has gone down.

i.e. the interest level for the Oscars has cratered

well its basically watching a bunch of egotistical self-obsessed celebrities perform a circle jerk lol
03-25-2022 11:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Minutemen429 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 884
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 37
I Root For: UMass
Location:
Post: #40
RE: Is the NCAAT REALLY going up against the Oscars?!
(03-24-2022 01:11 PM)Frank the Tank Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 12:25 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 12:22 PM)goodknightfl Wrote:  
(03-24-2022 11:15 AM)Minutemen429 Wrote:  Is there a lot of overlap between the audiences? I know I would fall in the group of very interested in the NCAA tournament, no interest in the Oscars.

I kind of agree. Most little old ladies from Pasadena don't watch NCAA and most real folks don't watch Oscar's.

IMO, the reason the Oscars ratings have plunged so much - and they were plunging before the virus hit - is that the producers have moved away from the "little old ladies" and have tried to revamp it for a young, woke audience.

But as sometimes happens with these kinds of moves, you end up really alienating your traditional audience without really capturing the new target audience, and you are kind of sunk.

Not that I'm an expert on TV, LOL. But that's my feeling.

I don't think this is the reason at all.

At the end of the day, people watch the Oscars the most when the movies that they actually care about are competing for the top awards.

Hence, the high water mark of the Oscars in the Titanic year of 1998: that's when the then-highest grossing film of all-time converged with a Best Picture Oscar. The years when blockbusters like Forrest Gump, the Lord of the Rings trilogy, Gladiator and Avatar were competing for Best Picture awards also drew massive audiences.

At the same time, there used to be a critical mass of well-watched (if not necessarily blockbuster) mid-budget movies that featured stars and often dominated Oscar categories: think Pulp Fiction, Shawshank Redemption, Jerry Maguire, Good Will Hunting, etc. (Essentially, the old Miramax playbook irrespective of the despicable actions of its leadership off-the-screen.) These weren't film franchises, but they also weren't made for niche audiences. So, people tuned into the Oscars because the stars they loved were up for awards in movies that they actually watched and loved.

For various reasons, the entire industry has changed dramatically since around 2010. Most notably, that category of well-watched mid-budget movies with stars that would be Oscar competitors has totally and *completely* disappeared. It's gone.

Why? Well, we talk about the influence of ESPN/Disney on college sports a lot around here, but it's nowhere near the influence that Disney has had on the entire movie industrial complex. Simply put, in the mid-2000s, Disney make the calculation that if it wanted to *dependably* make money in Hollywood (which is often a boom-and-bust industry with big hits and even bigger misses), then it would need to focus on (a) franchises with wide and deep fan bases that can churn out dependable content for years/decades and (b) movies that can draw audiences worldwide... and specifically in China.

Hence, Disney bought Pixar (where a lot of people may not remember that then-Pixar chair Steve Jobs was ready to cut all ties with Disney until the relationship was salvaged when Bob Iger replaced Michael Eisner), Marvel, Lucasfilm (AKA Star Wars) and Fox essentially one after the other. Disney effectively just turned to a solely blockbuster model... and it completely worked. Disney was making dependable massive profits in a notoriously undependable industry. As with pretty much everything that works, it was copied throughout the entire industry.

It's not an accident that the vast majority of films are now either (1) blockbuster franchises or (2) very low-budget filler movies (which largely consist of horror movies). Those are essentially the only types of films that are profitable anymore.

Those mid-budget Oscar category killers have effectively become extinct in the process. Every once in awhile, you'll see one break through (think Knives Out a few years ago), but they've largely gone the way of the dodo bird.

In the meantime, it's almost as if though the Oscar electorate is actively punishing films for being blockbusters and rarely ever nominate them outside of the technical categories (and even those that get nominated for Best Picture, like Black Panther in 2019, aren't ever serious contenders). Instead, the electorate is nominating truly small niche films that very few people have seen. (Once again, I'm curious if this might start to change as those films have been migrating to streaming particularly in the past year.)

Simply put, the Oscars used to involve a lot of films that a lot of people actually watched and cared about. That often hasn't been the case in recent years, so it shouldn't shock anyone that there has been a decline in viewership. It's not about youth vs. old or political stances (as much as a lot of people seem to want that to be the case).

Just cause you brought it up. When Forrest Gump and Sam I Am both were up for Oscars. The late great Norm MacDonald had one of the greatest off color jokes about the category they would be in. I don't want to put fake pen to fake paper on the message board.
03-25-2022 11:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread:


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.