(12-19-2017 11:28 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(you're singing this song in your head now, aren't you?)

Here's another strange concept to the misfit toys in here. It's called links to back up your claims.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk...12a87dbbd9

Trump says his plan could hike taxes on the wealthy, contradicting experts and his own treasury secretary

Trump now says he wants to tax the rich

http://money.cnn.com/2017/07/26/news/eco...index.html

(12-19-2017 11:31 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-03...ustry-jobs

This is what I am talking about and that article should scare the hell out of 80% of Americans.

which is why infrastructure is going to be the next wave of job creation for those workers....

I just had a good friend lose his son two weeks ago on a rig.....

here's a caveat from your linky.....

Quote:The inevitable advance of technology and automation has upended industries such as car manufacturing and food processing. Now robotics is making its way into the oil fields by helping drilling activities and putting together heavy pipes.

For companies, more automation would mean higher efficiency, safer operations, and ultimately, lower drilling and production costs. For oil rig workers, it would mean that part of the jobs lost during the oil price downturn would never return. Also, part of the new job openings would require a different type of skill set: for example, information technology and advanced computer skills.

in no way do I see anything in this article as a negative....

Maybe if you used a few more exclamation points it would be more convincing.

Nothing screams credibility like 15-20 consecutive exclamation points.

(12-19-2017 11:31 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-03...ustry-jobs

This is what I am talking about and that article should scare the hell out of 80% of Americans.

Linking to zerohedge and talking about false flags?

You ok mach?

(12-19-2017 11:38 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  in no way do I see anything in this article as a negative....

On our innovation teams at work we refer to those having jobs that our not yet automated as working in "meat-space."

negative positive..................... I'm calling it a reality........................

Were 20 trillion in debt and this boondoggle just passed on the con that it is going to mean more jobs for your average Trump voter.

I'll take a Con Men and how they lie for 500 Alex: What is "they have no freaking clue on what they voted for"

(12-19-2017 11:36 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 11:28 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(you're singing this song in your head now, aren't you?)

(12-19-2017 07:27 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 07:14 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  And our deficit is going to go up 1.5 trillion due to this boondoggle. People can’t be this stupid? Who could possibly support this? It’s going to be the most disliked piece of legislation in 30 years.

Shush. If this was Obama you'd be singing the praises.

So what you are saying is that because it's Trump's, you'll take it?

It's called being well rounded and informed.

Put a picture of me next to it in the dictionary.

(12-19-2017 11:36 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 11:28 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(you're singing this song in your head now, aren't you?)

Lee Greenwood? The one who famously didn't go to Vietnam?

(12-19-2017 09:55 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 09:16 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 09:15 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  job creators........ trickle down.........

you guys have the vernacular down......... if only your policies were as half as successful as your vernacular.

No it's reality. I didn't get a job from a middle class person or a poor person.

You don't understand how an economy works, income inequality means absolutely nothing. Worry about YOU

This is the stupidest thing i've ever read in my life. Seriously, it's not even close.

You're a dumb as dirt then. Sorry

Anyone who does not want to partake in their savings is free to give the extra money back to the government

(12-19-2017 11:50 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Anyone who does not want to partake in their savings is free to give the extra money back to the government

Did you miss the part where it says in 10 years most of us will be paying more?

How do Republican supporters just gloss over that fact?

(12-19-2017 11:51 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 11:50 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Anyone who does not want to partake in their savings is free to give the extra money back to the government

Did you miss the part where it says in 10 years most of us will be paying more?

How do Republican supporters just gloss over that fact?

Because they will get extended

(12-19-2017 11:45 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 11:36 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 11:28 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(you're singing this song in your head now, aren't you?)

Lee Greenwood? The one who famously didn't go to Vietnam?

are you claiming he is a draft dodger?

(12-19-2017 11:00 AM)gdunn Wrote:  Mach understand the cuts. While we're not going to be buying new Mercedes or BMWs from the cuts, what it'll do is encourage companies to stay and encourage new ones to come here or old ones to come back. Guess what that does? It boosthe economy. It brings back jobs. Gets people back to work. Do you hate when people work?

Hes a liberal Dem. Of course he does. The more government freeloading moochers, the better.

(12-19-2017 12:02 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha