LibertyOrangeman
Bench Warmer
Posts: 127
Joined: Jun 2016
Reputation: 12
I Root For: Liberty, SU
Location: Lynchburg, VA
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
So what are the good channels on Roku for watching college football? I recently got rid of Directv and am still playing with the Roku. I do plan on trying out the Directv Now as I get 2 free months with my Roku. I'm also using Verizon DSL, which maybe a bit or too slow, but so far it's been working fine.
|
|
08-13-2017 01:59 PM |
|
billybobby777
The REAL BillyBobby
Posts: 11,898
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 502
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
(08-13-2017 12:44 PM)msm96wolf Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:03 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 10:17 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote: You still need a cable, it's just CAT-5 instead of BNC.
I have internet. I don't need cable.
Quick question, just how exactly are you getting internet? They symantics of cutting cable really is misleading. You still need to have either hard wire or wi-fi hotspot at your house. The question is what is your internet costing? Cable companies made money off the leasing of devices. The main savings from not getting TV has been on the pricing bundle and hardware. Sadly, I still need spectrum where I live as my best internet option. Would love if they truly had better options than DSL to compete. :(
I grabbed my last internet (centurylink) bill. It's $27.32 total a month. I have high speed. They say there's faster speeds, but I don't think Im missing anything. No problems watching games, GOT, Netflix and I'm not a big gamer. I have PlayStation3 and XBOX and play vs the computer in shooter games. I don't play any RPG games vs random people. So to add up:
Centurylink High Speed Intetnet: $27.32 per month
Netflix: $7.96 per month
And yes, I do have a jail broke Amazon Fire stick that I haven't used since last November 2015 for a big PPV event. I don't pay for ESPN or anything else, but i also am not watching it and stealing it either.
(This post was last modified: 08-13-2017 02:30 PM by billybobby777.)
|
|
08-13-2017 02:07 PM |
|
billybobby777
The REAL BillyBobby
Posts: 11,898
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 502
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
(08-13-2017 12:44 PM)msm96wolf Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:03 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 10:17 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote: You still need a cable, it's just CAT-5 instead of BNC.
I have internet. I don't need cable.
Quick question, just how exactly are you getting internet? They symantics of cutting cable really is misleading. You still need to have either hard wire or wi-fi hotspot at your house. The question is what is your internet costing? Cable companies made money off the leasing of devices. The main savings from not getting TV has been on the pricing bundle and hardware. Sadly, I still need spectrum where I live as my best internet option. Would love if they truly had better options than DSL to compete. :(
Centurylink is good for folks in south Texas/Louisiana. They have great deals down here. You don't need cable. I realize some areas you do need cable probably still though.....
|
|
08-13-2017 02:31 PM |
|
goodknightfl
Hall of Famer
Posts: 21,204
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 523
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
(08-13-2017 09:51 AM)quo vadis Wrote: (08-13-2017 09:37 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: I went to Walmart yesterday to get a small smart tv for my bedroom to watch a few of my favorite blue rays like GOT. I paid $138 for a 32 inch smart tv with built in services (Roku) I didn't need to buy another fire stick for it. It's wonderful; the quality is better and it scanned & picked up 55 free channels before I even started with the Roku channels and my $8 Netflix account. I cannot understand why anyone would have Direct tv or Comcast anymore? Obsolete services for obsolete technology. I hope the AAC starts up a digital platform and doesn't re up with cable (espn).---That's becoming obsolete at a rapid rate. For those who still pay more for less....why? Just curious. I'm not a technical guy at all BTW. If I figured this out, I'm certain others have.
I saw what looked like the same for $135 at Walmart, but it was only 720P. Is yours 1080P?
on a smaller TV there isn't much difference. As the screen gets bigger it becomes a bigger deal.
|
|
08-13-2017 02:48 PM |
|
Wolfman
All American
Posts: 4,470
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 184
I Root For: The Cartel
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
I recently purchased a 32" TV as a second monitor for my computer. I chose a TV over a traditional monitor because it has more than 1 HDMI input. I have both my computer and cable connected at the same time. I like that I can just switch inputs and go.
As a monitor it has better color than traditional monitors. Black is the real test and it does blacks very well. The text isn't as crisp as I would like but it is acceptable.
Does any one actually broadcast in progressive? It was my understanding that all OTA/Cable companies use interlaced. TVs designed for sports or gaming would convert the interlaced signal to progressive to improve motion quality.
|
|
08-13-2017 02:52 PM |
|
toddjnsn
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12,553
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation: 154
I Root For: WMU, MAC
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
Quote:I saw what looked like the same for $135 at Walmart, but it was only 720P. Is yours 1080P?
Using it as a TV -- at only 32", there's really no visual difference between 720P & 1080P. That's why they still have them around, I guess. Like, if you have a small 13" TV, there's no visual difference between DVD-quality standard def & 720P.
That said though, I would hope piping in online to stream a 1080p video would run fine and auto-convert/display in 720p on-screen. If so, never with a hitch, I wouldn't mind that at all for a quick-n-easy relatively small TV.
|
|
08-13-2017 03:16 PM |
|
MplsBison
Banned
Posts: 16,648
Joined: Dec 2014
I Root For: NDSU/Minnesota
Location:
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
(08-13-2017 11:03 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: I have internet.
Which comes from a cable, as he said.
|
|
08-13-2017 03:35 PM |
|
msm96wolf
All American
Posts: 4,558
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 180
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
(08-13-2017 02:07 PM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 12:44 PM)msm96wolf Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:03 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 10:17 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote: You still need a cable, it's just CAT-5 instead of BNC.
I have internet. I don't need cable.
Quick question, just how exactly are you getting internet? They symantics of cutting cable really is misleading. You still need to have either hard wire or wi-fi hotspot at your house. The question is what is your internet costing? Cable companies made money off the leasing of devices. The main savings from not getting TV has been on the pricing bundle and hardware. Sadly, I still need spectrum where I live as my best internet option. Would love if they truly had better options than DSL to compete. :(
I grabbed my last internet (centurylink) bill. It's $27.32 total a month. I have high speed. They say there's faster speeds, but I don't think Im missing anything. No problems watching games, GOT, Netflix and I'm not a big gamer. I have PlayStation3 and XBOX and play vs the computer in shooter games. I don't play any RPG games vs random people. So to add up:
Centurylink High Speed Intetnet: $27.32 per month
Netflix: $7.96 per month
And yes, I do have a jail broke Amazon Fire stick that I haven't used since last November 2015 for a big PPV event. I don't pay for ESPN or anything else, but i also am not watching it and stealing it either.
Thanks for the info, that was my concern. If I may ask what is your internet speed? If I can bump down, I would be all for it.
|
|
08-13-2017 04:14 PM |
|
MplsBison
Banned
Posts: 16,648
Joined: Dec 2014
I Root For: NDSU/Minnesota
Location:
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
That likely means you're getting a steep, steep discount on a regular DSL product, which from any of the remaining baby Bell companies (CenturyLink, AT&T, Verizon) should probably be in the $50-60/mo range for standalone (not bundled) service.
And DSL is the slowest of the modern broadband technologies. Usually 10-15Mbit ... which can be just fine for some people.
(This post was last modified: 08-13-2017 04:22 PM by MplsBison.)
|
|
08-13-2017 04:21 PM |
|
MJG
1st String
Posts: 2,278
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 30
I Root For: U I , UMich, SC
Location: Myrtle Beach
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
I had a cable bill a bill for the internet and Netflix.
Now I have PS Vue bill taking cables place and I save a good bit. Pluto and some OTA channels I have are new to me and free. I don't care if that makes me a cord cutter I get more pay less like sixty a month less.
Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
|
|
08-13-2017 05:09 PM |
|
DoubleRSU
All American
Posts: 3,780
Joined: Aug 2015
I Root For: Seattle U
Location:
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
(08-13-2017 01:38 PM)solohawks Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:55 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:48 AM)DoubleRSU Wrote: Basically how would you watch if there was no bar and everyone you knew "cut the cord"?
How much do you spend at the bar when you watch those games?
I go to the bar regularly (once every 2 weeks or so) so I don't go there just to watch colllege football. I go to that particular place because that's where me and my friends hang out. I don't spend much because I don't drink that often anymore. I usually buy a meal. Club sandwich or wings and a Coke. But how much I spend when I go to watch college football is irrelevant as I go there anyway.
Exactly. Many people can live without paying their local cable co a car payment each month. Why do these people get bashed. Sure it's not for everyone but it can be great for a good many
Not bashing, just hypothetically asking how he would watch games if he didn't go to the bar, which he didn't answer. Was curious as how much he spent at the bar because likely those that go and spend money at the bar for games, end up spending more there than 6 months of cable.
Since cord cutting is about saving money, you can spend the same amount, watching at home without having the risk of being at a bar.
I would never tell anyone how to spend their money, to each their own, just curious as to how big sports fans get by without a cable/satellite subscription themselves.
(This post was last modified: 08-13-2017 05:28 PM by DoubleRSU.)
|
|
08-13-2017 05:28 PM |
|
TexanMark
Legend
Posts: 25,739
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 1336
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: St. Augustine, FL
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
(08-13-2017 11:21 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:07 AM)TexanMark Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:03 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 10:17 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote: You still need a cable, it's just CAT-5 instead of BNC.
I have internet. I don't need cable.
Whaaat? You mean I don't need my cable box and VCR recorder? So happy I went with VHS over Betamax...Sony suckers.:lmfao:
Did I say something to offend you? I don't get why you are mocking me.
Nah....I was making fun....you did great BillyBobby finding that buy
|
|
08-13-2017 05:49 PM |
|
billybobby777
The REAL BillyBobby
Posts: 11,898
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 502
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
(08-13-2017 05:28 PM)DoubleRSU Wrote: (08-13-2017 01:38 PM)solohawks Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:55 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:48 AM)DoubleRSU Wrote: Basically how would you watch if there was no bar and everyone you knew "cut the cord"?
How much do you spend at the bar when you watch those games?
I go to the bar regularly (once every 2 weeks or so) so I don't go there just to watch colllege football. I go to that particular place because that's where me and my friends hang out. I don't spend much because I don't drink that often anymore. I usually buy a meal. Club sandwich or wings and a Coke. But how much I spend when I go to watch college football is irrelevant as I go there anyway.
Exactly. Many people can live without paying their local cable co a car payment each month. Why do these people get bashed. Sure it's not for everyone but it can be great for a good many
Not bashing, just hypothetically asking how he would watch games if he didn't go to the bar, which he didn't answer. Was curious as how much he spent at the bar because likely those that go and spend money at the bar for games, end up spending more there than 6 months of cable.
Since cord cutting is about saving money, you can spend the same amount, watching at home without having the risk of being at a bar.
I would never tell anyone how to spend their money, to each their own, just curious as to how big sports fans get by without a cable/satellite subscription themselves.
I did answer. You said what if the bar closed down?...and I said I would go to another. I get what you are doing. You don't like it they I don't have cable. If you didn't care you'd ignore this thread. But no, you are on here questioning me about how I'm going to watch Army games and (1) ECU game...then after I answer you, you don't like it so you further question me until it's a ridiculous question about bars closing. You are so cool.
(This post was last modified: 08-13-2017 06:49 PM by billybobby777.)
|
|
08-13-2017 06:47 PM |
|
billybobby777
The REAL BillyBobby
Posts: 11,898
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 502
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
(08-13-2017 05:49 PM)TexanMark Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:21 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:07 AM)TexanMark Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:03 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 10:17 AM)Hokie Mark Wrote: You still need a cable, it's just CAT-5 instead of BNC.
I have internet. I don't need cable.
Whaaat? You mean I don't need my cable box and VCR recorder? So happy I went with VHS over Betamax...Sony suckers.
Did I say something to offend you? I don't get why you are mocking me.
Nah....I was making fun....you did great BillyBobby finding that buy
Thanks...Your first response to me went over my head. I get the joke now after rereading
|
|
08-13-2017 07:37 PM |
|
solohawks
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20,818
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 810
I Root For: UNCW
Location: Wilmington, NC
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
(08-13-2017 05:28 PM)DoubleRSU Wrote: (08-13-2017 01:38 PM)solohawks Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:55 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:48 AM)DoubleRSU Wrote: Basically how would you watch if there was no bar and everyone you knew "cut the cord"?
How much do you spend at the bar when you watch those games?
I go to the bar regularly (once every 2 weeks or so) so I don't go there just to watch colllege football. I go to that particular place because that's where me and my friends hang out. I don't spend much because I don't drink that often anymore. I usually buy a meal. Club sandwich or wings and a Coke. But how much I spend when I go to watch college football is irrelevant as I go there anyway.
Exactly. Many people can live without paying their local cable co a car payment each month. Why do these people get bashed. Sure it's not for everyone but it can be great for a good many
Not bashing, just hypothetically asking how he would watch games if he didn't go to the bar, which he didn't answer. Was curious as how much he spent at the bar because likely those that go and spend money at the bar for games, end up spending more there than 6 months of cable.
Since cord cutting is about saving money, you can spend the same amount, watching at home without having the risk of being at a bar.
I would never tell anyone how to spend their money, to each their own, just curious as to how big sports fans get by without a cable/satellite subscription themselves.
But he said he went to the bar regularly for socialization regardless of who was playing.
|
|
08-13-2017 07:53 PM |
|
DoubleRSU
All American
Posts: 3,780
Joined: Aug 2015
I Root For: Seattle U
Location:
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
I asked where he would watch the games if there were no bar. Just hypothetical. Nevermind, no big deal.
|
|
08-13-2017 08:40 PM |
|
TexanMark
Legend
Posts: 25,739
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 1336
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: St. Augustine, FL
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
(08-13-2017 07:37 PM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 05:49 PM)TexanMark Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:21 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:07 AM)TexanMark Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:03 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: I have internet. I don't need cable.
Whaaat? You mean I don't need my cable box and VCR recorder? So happy I went with VHS over Betamax...Sony suckers.
Did I say something to offend you? I don't get why you are mocking me.
Nah....I was making fun....you did great BillyBobby finding that buy
Thanks...Your first response to me went over my head. I get the joke now after rereading
No worries...sometimes jokes don't always translate. More power to you to cut costs.
The neat thing about receiving TV signals OTA...the picture quality is better than cable and you don't need to pay for HD....it is in HD OTA and for free after your antenna set up costs. Well the main channels are (HD)...some of the sub channels are not but those channels often show old TV shows so it doesn't really matter.
|
|
08-14-2017 02:40 AM |
|
TerryD
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15,019
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 938
I Root For: Notre Dame
Location: Grayson Highlands
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
I cannot understand the "cable lovers" and their attitudes towards those who have dumped cable and satellite.
Personal choice, and all of that.
I started with DirecTV in 1997. I also had Sirius satellite radio and a Treo in the early 2000's. Cutting edge, ya know?
I dumped DirecTV for streaming television and dumped satellite radio for Pandora. I went from Treos to iPhones and now have a Samsung Galaxy S8+.
Hell, we have Echo Shows and Alexa in both of our houses.
Who says a sixty year old is old fashioned and set in his ways? Things change, technology wise.
(This post was last modified: 08-14-2017 06:51 AM by TerryD.)
|
|
08-14-2017 06:49 AM |
|
Hokie Mark
Hall of Famer
Posts: 23,863
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 1414
I Root For: VT, ACC teams
Location: Greensboro, NC
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
(08-14-2017 06:49 AM)TerryD Wrote: I cannot understand the "cable lovers" and their attitudes towards those who have dumped cable and satellite.
Not a lover of cable (or any other utility). Not a cable hater either. I "cut" my cable until they cut the price in half... then I went back. I just want a good deal and to be able to watch college football on TV.
|
|
08-14-2017 07:43 AM |
|
panama
Legend
Posts: 31,353
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 633
I Root For: Georgia STATE
Location: East Atlanta Village
|
RE: 32 inch smart tv's with Roku for $138: Cable TV is obsolete.
(08-13-2017 11:17 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: (08-13-2017 11:11 AM)DoubleRSU Wrote: (08-13-2017 09:37 AM)billybobby777 Wrote: I went to Walmart yesterday to get a small smart tv for my bedroom to watch a few of my favorite blue rays like GOT. I paid $138 for a 32 inch smart tv with built in services (Roku) I didn't need to buy another fire stick for it. It's wonderful; the quality is better and it scanned & picked up 55 free channels before I even started with the Roku channels and my $8 Netflix account. I cannot understand why anyone would have Direct tv or Comcast anymore? Obsolete services for obsolete technology. I hope the AAC starts up a digital platform and doesn't re up with cable (espn).---That's becoming obsolete at a rapid rate. For those who still pay more for less....why? Just curious. I'm not a technical guy at all BTW. If I figured this out, I'm certain others have.
That's great. How do you plan on watching the 9 Army games that are CBSSN & Beinsports this season? How do you plan to watch the ECU vs WVU game on FS2?
At a local bar I go to.
Or get Sling or DirectNow for 4 months ...
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
|
|
08-14-2017 07:53 AM |
|