(10-04-2013 06:37 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Oh yeah, wonder if that Chad guy and his father from Flintstone, GA were the ones they counted for in the "Single Digits?"

Um, no. They never signed up. Apparently, like many of the other rightwinger types on here, you can't read. Not surprising though, you got your edumacation in Texass.

Hey Rubber

According to your article:
"Barrasso is correct that there is no federal requirement for navigators to undergo criminal background checks...no statutory requirement for Navigators to complete background checks, although some organizations already conduct background checks and some states have laws that require it of Navigators.”

(10-04-2013 05:52 PM)RobertN Wrote:  I haven't seen too many intelligent people from GA

So identity thieves can just avoid the intelligent states that decided to require them, like Georgia, and move on to the ones that don't, like maybe Illinois, land of Obama!

(10-04-2013 07:11 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Hey Rubber

According to your article:
"Barrasso is correct that there is no federal requirement for navigators to undergo criminal background checks...no statutory requirement for Navigators to complete background checks, although some organizations already conduct background checks and some states have laws that require it of Navigators.”

(10-04-2013 05:52 PM)RobertN Wrote:  I haven't seen too many intelligent people from GA

So identity thieves can just avoid the intelligent states that decided to require them, like Georgia, and move on to the ones that don't, like maybe Illinois, land of Obama!

Hey StupidOwl, I read that. I am really surprised they didn't have anything in there but there are some safeguards and some states implemented background checks. Given that for the most part it is local and state organizations, it actually makes sense for the states to decide on the regulations.

I read today that Louisiana had 7 people sign up in the first two day. 7.

(10-04-2013 08:58 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  I read today that Louisiana had 7 people sign up in the first two day. 7.

WOw. That many?



enjoy! (pause for inevitable comment from usedRubberN)

(10-04-2013 10:29 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(10-03-2013 04:06 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-03-2013 04:00 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  So let me get this straight. Obamacare has been around for 2 days and we have already decided it's a failure?

Imagine if we did the same for the space race, cold war, medicare, social security.

Especially since you have until December 15th to enroll to be covered by January and you have several options in many states. Why would anyone actually enroll the first day anyway? A little research is certainly expected.

Uhm... Tom, you do remember when the plan was passed right? 2010. That's 3.75 years to do research. People have either done research and not bought into the system, or provided research they didnt' believe?

Honestly, if people didnt' do research and just took the WH (and MSM's) message to heart, they'd be jumping all over it wouldn't they?

The law may have been passed nearly 4 years ago, but pricing was not released before October 1, except for a few states running their own exchange. So we haven't had that long to truly understand its impact, and the big variable is who actually signs up.

(10-05-2013 06:58 AM)chargeradio Wrote:  

(10-04-2013 10:29 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(10-03-2013 04:06 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-03-2013 04:00 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  So let me get this straight. Obamacare has been around for 2 days and we have already decided it's a failure?

Imagine if we did the same for the space race, cold war, medicare, social security.

Especially since you have until December 15th to enroll to be covered by January and you have several options in many states. Why would anyone actually enroll the first day anyway? A little research is certainly expected.

Uhm... Tom, you do remember when the plan was passed right? 2010. That's 3.75 years to do research. People have either done research and not bought into the system, or provided research they didnt' believe?

Honestly, if people didnt' do research and just took the WH (and MSM's) message to heart, they'd be jumping all over it wouldn't they?

The law may have been passed nearly 4 years ago, but pricing was not released before October 1, except for a few states running their own exchange. So we haven't had that long to truly understand its impact, and the big variable is who actually signs up.

Do you have any clue to why the law was passed 4years ago and just now "up and running"(if you want to call it that)

(10-05-2013 10:42 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-05-2013 06:58 AM)chargeradio Wrote:  

(10-04-2013 10:29 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(10-03-2013 04:06 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-03-2013 04:00 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  So let me get this straight. Obamacare has been around for 2 days and we have already decided it's a failure?

Imagine if we did the same for the space race, cold war, medicare, social security.

Especially since you have until December 15th to enroll to be covered by January and you have several options in many states. Why would anyone actually enroll the first day anyway? A little research is certainly expected.

Uhm... Tom, you do remember when the plan was passed right? 2010. That's 3.75 years to do research. People have either done research and not bought into the system, or provided research they didnt' believe?

Honestly, if people didnt' do research and just took the WH (and MSM's) message to heart, they'd be jumping all over it wouldn't they?

The law may have been passed nearly 4 years ago, but pricing was not released before October 1, except for a few states running their own exchange. So we haven't had that long to truly understand its impact, and the big variable is who actually signs up.

Do you have any clue to why the law was passed 4years ago and just now "up and running"(if you want to call it that)

It was up and running about 3.5 years ago. There were portions that just started later to get prepared for the main part to go into effect. Unfortunately, the Republicans have cut money from the budget to get the exchanges up and running(including money for an info campaign on how it would work) causing the problems that we see today.

We don't even have a ACA exchange set up. Our governor returned the grant money and said to the Federal Govt "You want it? come set it up yourself."

We did implement a state exchange for business group plans, but that has nothing to do with Obamacare.

(10-03-2013 09:46 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(10-03-2013 04:06 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-03-2013 04:00 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  So let me get this straight. Obamacare has been around for 2 days and we have already decided it's a failure?

Imagine if we did the same for the space race, cold war, medicare, social security.

Especially since you have until December 15th to enroll to be covered by January and you have several options in many states. Why would anyone actually enroll the first day anyway? A little research is certainly expected.

But thats not what Obama is saying, they said overwhelming popularity is contesting the servers. Millions of hits. You know, the typical obama used car lies.

But that's not what I was responding to either. I was referring to those saying it's a failure already after two days. Try to keep up.

Clearly the sites are crashing as conservatives are purposely trying to overwhelm them. Hey, it's fun just making stuff up. I think I'll try it more often!

(10-05-2013 11:33 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Clearly the sites are crashing as conservatives are purposely trying to overwhelm them. Hey, it's fun just making stuff up. I think I'll try it more often!

Oh, man oh man was I gonna jump your sh!t until I saw the bolded part. You had me going. Good one.