(10-05-2026 05:56 PM)BirdHawkEagle Wrote: I trust what UofMStateU said more than AI.
His posts reject reality.
Like he continues to harp on reasons there were three recounts, when the Trump campaign publicly announced they requested the third recount.
“ A Trump legal team statement said: “Today, the Trump campaign filed a petition for recount in Georgia. We are focused on ensuring that every aspect of Georgia State Law and the U.S. Constitution are followed so that every legal vote is counted”
(10-05-2026 08:25 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: Sorta love that my little township polling place and my one vote was one of the 1700 or so Dominion switched that started all of this.
Any system you can hack with a ballpoint pen or a paper clip is craptastic.
Watch out. The resident leftists will shout at you and call you delusional and a liar.
(10-05-2026 11:20 AM)bullet Wrote: There was a case in Dekalb County in a Democratic primary where votes were switched between candidates. They programmed it wrong after a candidate dropped out. The 3rd place finisher actually came in first and first place came in 3rd.
These machines don't count accurately. They count per what their program tells them.
Machines count accurately.
yea, remember how machines took someone who lost badly in third place and made sure they were the winner?
But, it doesnt really matter if they can count accurately. Eric Coomer is set up so that he can get into the raw votes before tabulation and change things around.
Yea, remember when I explained that to your ignorant ass like 5 times now...and again in this thread...with links to the audit report explaining the issue and you still act like you don't know what happened? There's a reason why I rightly call you the local dishonest troll.
But props for renewing the Eric Coomer whooper.
Quote:The right-wing media outlet Newsmax, which amplified former President Donald Trump's false allegations of election rigging and widespread voter fraud, said on Friday there is no evidence that Dominion Voting Systems and one of its top employees, Eric Coomer, manipulated election results in 2020.
"Newsmax subsequently found no evidence that such allegations were true. Many of the states whose results were contested by the Trump campaign after the November 2020 election have conducted extensive recounts and audits, and each of these states certified the results as legal and final," the company said in a statement published online that will also be broadcast.
The Eric Coomer emails, where he described having a vpn and server setup, and where he acknowledged getting into raw votes prior to tabulation, is all part of a court record of discovery that dominion turned over to Byrnes initial attorney.
Stop swallowing the taint and follow the actual court case.
Eric Coomer also caught himself in a lie when he said none of their hardware was made in china, only to later admit in another deposition that the devices connected to the printers were made in china and programmed in serbia.
Now I suppose you are going to say that the russia collusion hoax was real......
You guys arent keeping up with this because you dont want to know what really happened. Because you know its not going to be good for your side.
One more time: Dominion turned over discovery to Byrnes first attorney, which contained evidence of a crime that is punishable by the death penalty. We know that through court filings by Byrnes current attorney, who is so done with the biased judge that he is threatening the judge that he's going to get caught up in this and get charged with obstruction if he keeps trying to hide dominion's crimes by sealing the court records.
lolz.
One more time, you're either completely ignorant of how any of this works or again, reinforcing your moniker of the local dishonest troll.
BTW - This trial you keep droning on about isn't exactly going your way...so naturally...you and the conspiracy minions blame the judge.
Finally, trump STILL lost 2020...bigly...to a houseplant.
(10-05-2026 08:25 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote: Sorta love that my little township polling place and my one vote was one of the 1700 or so Dominion switched that started all of this.
Any system you can hack with a ballpoint pen or a paper clip is craptastic.
Watch out. The resident leftists will shout at you and call you delusional and a liar.
Well, he is. And he knows it. The machine didn't switch a ******* thing. Rather, his republican clerk and republican lead county staff ****** up the implementation of software on the counting machines, etc.
We/I have explained this about a dozen times now.
So, again...
Quote:Misreported election results in a rural northern Michigan county drew national attention on Election night 2020 and led to the release of a false report claiming that the county’s Dominion Voting Systems equipment had deliberately introduced errors.
On Election Night 2020, Antrim County, Michigan published inaccurate unofficial results, misstating totals by as many as several thousand votes in a county with fewer than 22,000 registered voters. Over the next three weeks, the county restated its results four times to correct the errors.
Halderman’s report found that the misstated results were caused by a series of human errors, largely due to last-minute changes to the ballot. Antrim County’s presidential election results have since been confirmed by examining its paper ballots in a county-wide hand count and further affirmed by a statewide risk-limiting audit.
“Some of these human errors would have been harmless individually, but their combined effects undermined safeguards that should have ensured accuracy,” Halderman wrote in the report. “Their number speaks to the extreme pressures that election workers faced last year, in the midst of a global pandemic and a bitterly contested presidential contest.”
Quote:My investigation shows that the Antrim County incident was initiated by unusual circumstances that are unlikely to have widely affected other jurisdictions. After making last-minute revisions to certain ballot designs, workers made two key human errors that directly led to inaccurate results:
– County staff failed to ensure that all ballot scanners used the revised election definition. This caused the EMS to misinterpret results from the scanners, leading to major election-night reporting errors (that are now fully corrected).
– Township staff failed to ensure that all ballots used the revised ballot designs.Ballots that did not match the scanner configurations were misread, leading to smaller errors in specific down-ballot contests (that remain uncorrected).
Antrim could have discovered these problems before incorrect results were published or deemed official, but several opportunities to do so were missed:
– Townships failed to notice poll tape errors during pre-election testing.
– Poll workers erased memory cards, making the reporting errors harder to spot.
– County staff did not adequately investigate EMS errors on election night.
– County staff failed to “sanity-check” the initial results before posting them.
Here's a summary of the recent motion filed by Byrnes defense team. Its long, but its chock full of stuff. Here's a brief lead up to how we got here in this defamation lawsuit.
1. Byrne previously had an attorney. (Forget her name) When dominion finally turned over discovery to her, she saw evidence that a crime had been committed. We know that crime is treason because in the video below, Byrnes new attorney will talk about the crime that was discovered that has a death penalty, which is almost certainly treason. (or some other crime just as serious)
2. Dominion had the judge remove Byrnes first attorney for handing over the evidence of a crime. Whether or not they should have been able to do that is up for debate. Byrnes new attorney was Trumps roomate in cadet school I believe.
3. Trumps new attorney has filed for discovery, and has yet to receive it. The judge has refused to compel it to be turned over. This has been going on for years now and its ridiiculous. Keep this in mind though, because what we are about to see in these filings is dominion complaining that Byrnes lawyer made public discovery that the judge had sealed, and Byrnes attorney is saying that we couldnt have done that, because we havent received any discovery yet.
4. Dominion has continuously emailed the judge to seal documents ex-parte, and the judge has complied. Byrnes attorney in the motion filed just prior to this one ripped the judge a new one for doing this, in saying how it is completely improper. Its improper for the documents to be sealed in the first place (because they are publicly sourced) and the method of using emails to do it is improper. So given this, and the fact the judge will not allow discovery to be turned over to Byrnes new attorney, shows this judge is a completely biased homer.
5. Byrnes' attorney filed a motion a couple of weeks ago, which hit the public docket and was visible to everyone. In that motion he listed things (like evidence dominion committed a crime) in his motion. Because that discovery that contained evidence of a crime was sealed, dominion and the judge got big mad, and dominion filed for default judgement over it. The problem with this though is that Byrnes attorney laid out a long response to this last week where he stated he didnt release any discovery that had been sealed because he has yet to receive discovery at all. Because the dumb*** judge wont compel dominion to turn it over.
6. So the judge responds by saying Byrnes attorney "laundered" the discovery. So the judge put nads on a tee, and Byrnes attorney grabbed the big bertha and basically tried to drive the green on a 600 yard par 5. The video below is covering that recent response by Byrnes attorney, and it is full of fire and brimstone for the judge, basically telling the judge that if he doesnt unseal the discovery, he can be found guilty of obstruction and other crimes.
Much of this video is where Byrnes attorney is talking about case law as to why they are correct and the judge is flirting with prison. But there are also some of the revelations made where we findout that the dominion tablets were made in china and programmed by serbians. And where Eric Coomer had a VPN and server set up to access the reaw votes prior to tabulation.
(This post was last modified: 10-06-2026 09:04 AM by UofMstateU.)
In other news, attorneys for their clients will always publicly claim things in favor of their client, often disregarding or distorting actual facts of the case...and/or blame the judge. Especially when they have basically no hope of winning.
Here's another summary of how badly this has gone for Byrne.
The court rejected Byrne's motion to dismiss in April 2022, meaning Dominion's defamation claims were legally sufficient to proceed.
In August 2024, the magistrate judge found that Byrne and then-counsel Stefanie Lambert had violated discovery/protective-order requirements involving confidential litigation materials. The judge disqualified Lambert from representing Byrne in this case. The opinion specifically found repeated dissemination or promotion of protected documents and noted that Byrne did not meaningfully dispute the authenticity of the cited posts and interviews.
Byrne's attempts to immediately overturn that disqualification failed: the D.C. Circuit dismissed his interlocutory appeal on March 24, 2025, denied rehearing on June 9, 2025, and the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari on November 10, 2025. Those rulings left the disqualification in place; they did not decide the underlying defamation claim.
The immediate threat to Byrne is now procedural rather than a conventional merits trial. On August 13, 2026, Liberty Vote moved for a default judgment, asserting that Byrne's continued defiance of court orders makes the case impossible to manage and asking for default on liability followed by a damages-only jury trial.
In the most recent reported activity, Judge Carl Nichols rejected Byrne's effort to dissolve the protective order, characterizing his position as frivolous and an abuse of the court system, according to contemporaneous legal reporting. Byrne's counsel then argued that maintaining the order could interfere with alleged crime reporting; that is Byrne's legal assertion, not a judicial finding that Liberty Vote, the judge, or anyone else committed a crime. Liberty Vote asked the court to put its default-judgment motion back on the calendar promptly.
(10-06-2026 09:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: In other news, attorneys for their clients will always publicly claim things in favor of their client, often disregarding or distorting actual facts of the case...and/or blame the judge. Especially when they have basically no hope of winning.
Here's another summary of how badly this has gone for Byrne.
The court rejected Byrne's motion to dismiss in April 2022, meaning Dominion's defamation claims were legally sufficient to proceed.
In August 2024, the magistrate judge found that Byrne and then-counsel Stefanie Lambert had violated discovery/protective-order requirements involving confidential litigation materials. The judge disqualified Lambert from representing Byrne in this case. The opinion specifically found repeated dissemination or promotion of protected documents and noted that Byrne did not meaningfully dispute the authenticity of the cited posts and interviews.
Byrne's attempts to immediately overturn that disqualification failed: the D.C. Circuit dismissed his interlocutory appeal on March 24, 2025, denied rehearing on June 9, 2025, and the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari on November 10, 2025. Those rulings left the disqualification in place; they did not decide the underlying defamation claim.
The immediate threat to Byrne is now procedural rather than a conventional merits trial. On August 13, 2026, Liberty Vote moved for a default judgment, asserting that Byrne's continued defiance of court orders makes the case impossible to manage and asking for default on liability followed by a damages-only jury trial.
In the most recent reported activity, Judge Carl Nichols rejected Byrne's effort to dissolve the protective order, characterizing his position as frivolous and an abuse of the court system, according to contemporaneous legal reporting. Byrne's counsel then argued that maintaining the order could interfere with alleged crime reporting; that is Byrne's legal assertion, not a judicial finding that Liberty Vote, the judge, or anyone else committed a crime. Liberty Vote asked the court to put its default-judgment motion back on the calendar promptly.
womp womp dum dum
stupid take. it means you havent kept up.
oh, and Byrne is wanting to go to trial. Its dominion thats trying to stall everything or try to win by default.
and of course this judge said there was enough evidence to go forward. Everything he has done is improper. However, the main thing dominion filed these charges over were the photos of dominion equipment boxes with made in china on them. Turns out, thats true. You cant win a defamation suit for someone telling the truth. And dominion, in the discovery they keep having the judge hide under seal, admits this.
(This post was last modified: 10-06-2026 09:20 AM by UofMstateU.)
(10-06-2026 09:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: In other news, attorneys for their clients will always publicly claim things in favor of their client, often disregarding or distorting actual facts of the case...and/or blame the judge. Especially when they have basically no hope of winning.
Here's another summary of how badly this has gone for Byrne.
The court rejected Byrne's motion to dismiss in April 2022, meaning Dominion's defamation claims were legally sufficient to proceed.
In August 2024, the magistrate judge found that Byrne and then-counsel Stefanie Lambert had violated discovery/protective-order requirements involving confidential litigation materials. The judge disqualified Lambert from representing Byrne in this case. The opinion specifically found repeated dissemination or promotion of protected documents and noted that Byrne did not meaningfully dispute the authenticity of the cited posts and interviews.
Byrne's attempts to immediately overturn that disqualification failed: the D.C. Circuit dismissed his interlocutory appeal on March 24, 2025, denied rehearing on June 9, 2025, and the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari on November 10, 2025. Those rulings left the disqualification in place; they did not decide the underlying defamation claim.
The immediate threat to Byrne is now procedural rather than a conventional merits trial. On August 13, 2026, Liberty Vote moved for a default judgment, asserting that Byrne's continued defiance of court orders makes the case impossible to manage and asking for default on liability followed by a damages-only jury trial.
In the most recent reported activity, Judge Carl Nichols rejected Byrne's effort to dissolve the protective order, characterizing his position as frivolous and an abuse of the court system, according to contemporaneous legal reporting. Byrne's counsel then argued that maintaining the order could interfere with alleged crime reporting; that is Byrne's legal assertion, not a judicial finding that Liberty Vote, the judge, or anyone else committed a crime. Liberty Vote asked the court to put its default-judgment motion back on the calendar promptly.
womp womp dum dum
stupid take. it means you havent kept up.
oh, and Byrne is wanting to go to trial. Its dominion thats trying to stall everything or try to win by default.
and of course this judge said there was enough evidence to go forward. Everything he has done is improper. However, the main thing dominion filed these charges over were the photos of dominion equipment boxes with made in china on them. Turns out, thats true. You cant win a defamation suit for someone telling the truth. And dominion, in the discovery they keep having the judge hide under seal, admits this.
Keep hoping. Maybe one day trump will actually win the 2020 election!
(10-06-2026 09:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: In other news, attorneys for their clients will always publicly claim things in favor of their client, often disregarding or distorting actual facts of the case...and/or blame the judge. Especially when they have basically no hope of winning.
Here's another summary of how badly this has gone for Byrne.
The court rejected Byrne's motion to dismiss in April 2022, meaning Dominion's defamation claims were legally sufficient to proceed.
In August 2024, the magistrate judge found that Byrne and then-counsel Stefanie Lambert had violated discovery/protective-order requirements involving confidential litigation materials. The judge disqualified Lambert from representing Byrne in this case. The opinion specifically found repeated dissemination or promotion of protected documents and noted that Byrne did not meaningfully dispute the authenticity of the cited posts and interviews.
Byrne's attempts to immediately overturn that disqualification failed: the D.C. Circuit dismissed his interlocutory appeal on March 24, 2025, denied rehearing on June 9, 2025, and the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari on November 10, 2025. Those rulings left the disqualification in place; they did not decide the underlying defamation claim.
The immediate threat to Byrne is now procedural rather than a conventional merits trial. On August 13, 2026, Liberty Vote moved for a default judgment, asserting that Byrne's continued defiance of court orders makes the case impossible to manage and asking for default on liability followed by a damages-only jury trial.
In the most recent reported activity, Judge Carl Nichols rejected Byrne's effort to dissolve the protective order, characterizing his position as frivolous and an abuse of the court system, according to contemporaneous legal reporting. Byrne's counsel then argued that maintaining the order could interfere with alleged crime reporting; that is Byrne's legal assertion, not a judicial finding that Liberty Vote, the judge, or anyone else committed a crime. Liberty Vote asked the court to put its default-judgment motion back on the calendar promptly.
womp womp dum dum
stupid take. it means you havent kept up.
oh, and Byrne is wanting to go to trial. Its dominion thats trying to stall everything or try to win by default.
and of course this judge said there was enough evidence to go forward. Everything he has done is improper. However, the main thing dominion filed these charges over were the photos of dominion equipment boxes with made in china on them. Turns out, thats true. You cant win a defamation suit for someone telling the truth. And dominion, in the discovery they keep having the judge hide under seal, admits this.
Keep hoping. Maybe one day trump will actually win the 2020 election!
I remember when you thought the same thing when Trump said Obama had his wires tapped.
(10-06-2026 09:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: In other news, attorneys for their clients will always publicly claim things in favor of their client, often disregarding or distorting actual facts of the case...and/or blame the judge. Especially when they have basically no hope of winning.
Here's another summary of how badly this has gone for Byrne.
The court rejected Byrne's motion to dismiss in April 2022, meaning Dominion's defamation claims were legally sufficient to proceed.
In August 2024, the magistrate judge found that Byrne and then-counsel Stefanie Lambert had violated discovery/protective-order requirements involving confidential litigation materials. The judge disqualified Lambert from representing Byrne in this case. The opinion specifically found repeated dissemination or promotion of protected documents and noted that Byrne did not meaningfully dispute the authenticity of the cited posts and interviews.
Byrne's attempts to immediately overturn that disqualification failed: the D.C. Circuit dismissed his interlocutory appeal on March 24, 2025, denied rehearing on June 9, 2025, and the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari on November 10, 2025. Those rulings left the disqualification in place; they did not decide the underlying defamation claim.
The immediate threat to Byrne is now procedural rather than a conventional merits trial. On August 13, 2026, Liberty Vote moved for a default judgment, asserting that Byrne's continued defiance of court orders makes the case impossible to manage and asking for default on liability followed by a damages-only jury trial.
In the most recent reported activity, Judge Carl Nichols rejected Byrne's effort to dissolve the protective order, characterizing his position as frivolous and an abuse of the court system, according to contemporaneous legal reporting. Byrne's counsel then argued that maintaining the order could interfere with alleged crime reporting; that is Byrne's legal assertion, not a judicial finding that Liberty Vote, the judge, or anyone else committed a crime. Liberty Vote asked the court to put its default-judgment motion back on the calendar promptly.
womp womp dum dum
stupid take. it means you havent kept up.
oh, and Byrne is wanting to go to trial. Its dominion thats trying to stall everything or try to win by default.
and of course this judge said there was enough evidence to go forward. Everything he has done is improper. However, the main thing dominion filed these charges over were the photos of dominion equipment boxes with made in china on them. Turns out, thats true. You cant win a defamation suit for someone telling the truth. And dominion, in the discovery they keep having the judge hide under seal, admits this.
Keep hoping. Maybe one day trump will actually win the 2020 election!
I remember when you thought the same thing when Trump said Obama had his wires tapped.
Remember that?
Sure, Jan. I remember lots of things that never happened...like Obama never ordering surveillance of trump.
(10-06-2026 09:00 AM)UofMstateU Wrote: Here's a summary of the recent motion filed by Byrnes defense team. Its long, but its chock full of stuff. Here's a brief lead up to how we got here in this defamation lawsuit.
1. Byrne previously had an attorney. (Forget her name) When dominion finally turned over discovery to her, she saw evidence that a crime had been committed. We know that crime is treason because in the video below, Byrnes new attorney will talk about the crime that was discovered that has a death penalty, which is almost certainly treason. (or some other crime just as serious)
2. Dominion had the judge remove Byrnes first attorney for handing over the evidence of a crime. Whether or not they should have been able to do that is up for debate. Byrnes new attorney was Trumps roomate in cadet school I believe.
3. Trumps new attorney has filed for discovery, and has yet to receive it. The judge has refused to compel it to be turned over. This has been going on for years now and its ridiiculous. Keep this in mind though, because what we are about to see in these filings is dominion complaining that Byrnes lawyer made public discovery that the judge had sealed, and Byrnes attorney is saying that we couldnt have done that, because we havent received any discovery yet.
4. Dominion has continuously emailed the judge to seal documents ex-parte, and the judge has complied. Byrnes attorney in the motion filed just prior to this one ripped the judge a new one for doing this, in saying how it is completely improper. Its improper for the documents to be sealed in the first place (because they are publicly sourced) and the method of using emails to do it is improper. So given this, and the fact the judge will not allow discovery to be turned over to Byrnes new attorney, shows this judge is a completely biased homer.
5. Byrnes' attorney filed a motion a couple of weeks ago, which hit the public docket and was visible to everyone. In that motion he listed things (like evidence dominion committed a crime) in his motion. Because that discovery that contained evidence of a crime was sealed, dominion and the judge got big mad, and dominion filed for default judgement over it. The problem with this though is that Byrnes attorney laid out a long response to this last week where he stated he didnt release any discovery that had been sealed because he has yet to receive discovery at all. Because the dumb*** judge wont compel dominion to turn it over.
6. So the judge responds by saying Byrnes attorney "laundered" the discovery. So the judge put nads on a tee, and Byrnes attorney grabbed the big bertha and basically tried to drive the green on a 600 yard par 5. The video below is covering that recent response by Byrnes attorney, and it is full of fire and brimstone for the judge, basically telling the judge that if he doesnt unseal the discovery, he can be found guilty of obstruction and other crimes.
Much of this video is where Byrnes attorney is talking about case law as to why they are correct and the judge is flirting with prison. But there are also some of the revelations made where we findout that the dominion tablets were made in china and programmed by serbians. And where Eric Coomer had a VPN and server set up to access the reaw votes prior to tabulation.
Here is a factual breakdown of the claims made in that summary:
1. Claim: Byrne's attorney (Stefanie Lambert) uncovered "evidence of treason" in discovery documents.
Fact: Unsubstantiated and rejected by the court. U.S. Magistrate Judge Moxila A. Upadhyaya explicitly noted in her disqualification order that Lambert "failed to substantiate any of her conclusory allegations that Dominion's Litigation Documents contain evidence of national security crimes." No court, grand jury, or law enforcement agency has found evidence of treason or capital crimes in Dominion's discovery material.
2. Claim: The judge removed Lambert for "exposing a crime."
Fact: False. The judge disqualified Lambert for "egregious misconduct" after she intentionally violated a court-issued Protective Order and Status Quo Order by leaking millions of confidential internal discovery documents to an unauthorized third party (a Michigan sheriff). Disqualification was a direct procedural sanction for breaching court orders and professional rules of conduct.
3. Claim: Byrne's defense team "hasn't received any discovery yet" so they couldn't have leaked anything.
Fact: False. Byrne's legal defense was provided with Dominion's litigation discovery (totaling millions of pages) under a strict protective order. The unauthorized leak originated directly from the repository assigned to Byrne's defense team.
4. Claim: Dominion and the judge engaged in improper ex-parte emails, showing judicial bias.
Fact: Misleading. Emergency motions regarding breaches of protective orders routinely involve expedited filings under seal to prevent further unauthorized leaks of proprietary data. Enforcing standard protective orders that both parties originally agreed to is routine judicial procedure, not evidence of judicial bias.
5. Claim: Byrne's lawyer can threaten the judge with "obstruction of justice" and prison for keeping documents sealed.
Fact: Misleading legal posturing. Civil litigants and defense attorneys cannot prosecute or threaten a federal magistrate judge with criminal charges for enforcing civil protective orders. Federal judges have broad discretion to manage discovery and seal confidential corporate records. "Discovery laundering"—putting confidential discovery into public court filings to bypass a protective order—is a recognized form of misconduct that courts actively penalize.
6. Claim: Discovery proves Chinese hardware, Serbian programmers, and Eric Coomer accessing raw votes via VPN.
Supply Chains: Utilizing global hardware components (such as parts manufactured in Asia) and employing software developers in Serbia is standard practice across the global technology industry, not evidence of foreign election manipulation.
Eric Coomer & VPNs: Multiple court rulings, independent forensic audits, and federal cybersecurity agencies (CISA) have repeatedly confirmed there is no evidence that Eric Coomer or anyone else used VPNs or remote servers to access, alter, or manipulate raw vote tallies prior to tabulation.
Verdict : Cuckoo for cocoa puffs. More batshite conspiracy.
/
[NEWS] Georgia Election Board wants Dominion machines GONE
![[Image: rod.jpg]](https://www.cheatsheet.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/rod.jpg)