(04-27-2026 03:33 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(04-27-2026 03:29 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(04-27-2026 02:57 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  Is anybody on the right questioning why people with guns and allegedly bad intent keep getting close to the most powerful man in the world when it is politically expedient for him?

Things that make you to hmmmmmmmmm

If I were a nations leader, Im not sure I can define a time when it would be politically expedient for me to be assassinated. Yet thats the logic pretzel one must complete to follow the Left's full throated defense of hate speech and political murder. The Left may as well just admit that they are now a violence advocating terrorist hate group that no longer believes in democracy or a constitutional government. They believe in an unhinged totalitarian DNC aristocracy that only owes allegiance to its own pursuit of unbridled power.

Wouldn’t they have to be in actual danger for an assassination attempt to not be politically expedient?

Most would consider a manifesto declaring an intent to kill Trump along with an actual armed attempt to do just that as Trump being "in danger". The only reason Trump wasnt shot or killed is the Secret Service was able to stop the mainstream Democrat Party member before he made it to the Ball room and practiced some of the Lefts new "progressive democracy".

(04-27-2026 05:14 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(04-27-2026 03:33 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(04-27-2026 03:29 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(04-27-2026 02:57 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  Is anybody on the right questioning why people with guns and allegedly bad intent keep getting close to the most powerful man in the world when it is politically expedient for him?

Things that make you to hmmmmmmmmm

If I were a nations leader, Im not sure I can define a time when it would be politically expedient for me to be assassinated. Yet thats the logic pretzel one must complete to follow the Left's full throated defense of hate speech and political murder. The Left may as well just admit that they are now a violence advocating terrorist hate group that no longer believes in democracy or a constitutional government. They believe in an unhinged totalitarian DNC aristocracy that only owes allegiance to its own pursuit of unbridled power.

Wouldn’t they have to be in actual danger for an assassination attempt to not be politically expedient?

Most would consider a manifesto declaring an intent to kill Trump along with an actual armed attempt to do just that as Trump being "in danger". The only reason Trump wasnt shot or killed is the Secret Service was able to stop the mainstream Democrat Party member before he made it to the Ball room and practiced some of the Lefts new "progressive democracy".

They understand. They are just disappointed.

The filth are so disappointed

Democrats have murdered over 65,000,000 babies. They will kill you for fun.

(04-27-2026 06:26 PM)Trojanbybirth Wrote:  Democrats have murdered over 65,000,000 babies. They will kill you for fun.

there's a movie that came out in '20 called "The Hunt" ... it's beyond shite, but XACLY! what you'd expect from the libtard hollyweird nation ... the irony is the redneck chick wins out ... of course, the final battle was chick vs. chick ... so much tard in today's version of this world...

(04-27-2026 05:14 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(04-27-2026 03:33 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(04-27-2026 03:29 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(04-27-2026 02:57 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  Is anybody on the right questioning why people with guns and allegedly bad intent keep getting close to the most powerful man in the world when it is politically expedient for him?

Things that make you to hmmmmmmmmm

If I were a nations leader, Im not sure I can define a time when it would be politically expedient for me to be assassinated. Yet thats the logic pretzel one must complete to follow the Left's full throated defense of hate speech and political murder. The Left may as well just admit that they are now a violence advocating terrorist hate group that no longer believes in democracy or a constitutional government. They believe in an unhinged totalitarian DNC aristocracy that only owes allegiance to its own pursuit of unbridled power.

Wouldn’t they have to be in actual danger for an assassination attempt to not be politically expedient?

Most would consider a manifesto declaring an intent to kill Trump along with an actual armed attempt to do just that as Trump being "in danger". The only reason Trump wasnt shot or killed is the Secret Service was able to stop the mainstream Democrat Party member before he made it to the Ball room and practiced some of the Lefts new "progressive democracy".

Uh huh.

(04-26-2026 09:11 AM)goodknightfl Wrote:  

(04-25-2026 09:05 PM)banker Wrote:  Won’t have stuff like this when it’s held in the big beautiful ballroom.

Trump said the same thing.

Well, of course. Never let a "crisis" go to waste. Now the shills in congress are whining to have the government pay for the monstrosity...when it was supposedly all paid for by trump's donors for...cough cough...no quid pro quo...cough...cough.

That being said, this is a private event where the president gets an invite. It's not a government function whatsoever. So why would it ever be held on White House grounds? Were they planning on renting out the new ballroom for weddings and Bar Mitzvahs?

focus on your party's assassination culture

(04-28-2026 08:22 AM)hoopfan Wrote:  focus on your party's assassination culture

More democrats have been assassinated than republicans recently.

(04-28-2026 07:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-26-2026 09:11 AM)goodknightfl Wrote:  

(04-25-2026 09:05 PM)banker Wrote:  Won’t have stuff like this when it’s held in the big beautiful ballroom.

Trump said the same thing.

Well, of course. Never let a "crisis" go to waste. Now the shills in congress are whining to have the government pay for the monstrosity...when it was supposedly all paid for by trump's donors for...cough cough...no quid pro quo...cough...cough.

That being said, this is a private event where the president gets an invite. It's not a government function whatsoever. So why would it ever be held on White House grounds? Were they planning on renting out the new ballroom for weddings and Bar Mitzvahs?

So, with that talking point logic you got from this morning which is everywhere, the UFC fights on the WH lawn must be a "government function".

(04-28-2026 08:34 AM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 08:22 AM)hoopfan Wrote:  focus on your party's assassination culture

More democrats have been assassinated than republicans recently.

Name them ballgargle

(04-28-2026 08:42 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 07:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-26-2026 09:11 AM)goodknightfl Wrote:  

(04-25-2026 09:05 PM)banker Wrote:  Won’t have stuff like this when it’s held in the big beautiful ballroom.

Trump said the same thing.

Well, of course. Never let a "crisis" go to waste. Now the shills in congress are whining to have the government pay for the monstrosity...when it was supposedly all paid for by trump's donors for...cough cough...no quid pro quo...cough...cough.

That being said, this is a private event where the president gets an invite. It's not a government function whatsoever. So why would it ever be held on White House grounds? Were they planning on renting out the new ballroom for weddings and Bar Mitzvahs?

So, with that talking point logic you got from this morning which is everywhere, the UFC fights on the WH lawn must be a "government function".

I didn't think I had to mention this too, but the WHCD is NOT put on by the president. The president can put on any event he likes at the WH. He's not in charge of the WHCD. Again, please try a little more critical thinking.

(04-28-2026 08:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 08:42 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 07:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-26-2026 09:11 AM)goodknightfl Wrote:  

(04-25-2026 09:05 PM)banker Wrote:  Won’t have stuff like this when it’s held in the big beautiful ballroom.

Trump said the same thing.

Well, of course. Never let a "crisis" go to waste. Now the shills in congress are whining to have the government pay for the monstrosity...when it was supposedly all paid for by trump's donors for...cough cough...no quid pro quo...cough...cough.

That being said, this is a private event where the president gets an invite. It's not a government function whatsoever. So why would it ever be held on White House grounds? Were they planning on renting out the new ballroom for weddings and Bar Mitzvahs?

So, with that talking point logic you got from this morning which is everywhere, the UFC fights on the WH lawn must be a "government function".

I didn't think I had to mention this too, but the WHCD is NOT put on by the president. The president can put on any event he likes at the WH. He's not in charge of the WHCD. Again, please try a little more critical thinking.

That is not an example of critical thinking.


Did you take your meds today?

(04-28-2026 08:52 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 08:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 08:42 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 07:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-26-2026 09:11 AM)goodknightfl Wrote:  

Trump said the same thing.

Well, of course. Never let a "crisis" go to waste. Now the shills in congress are whining to have the government pay for the monstrosity...when it was supposedly all paid for by trump's donors for...cough cough...no quid pro quo...cough...cough.

That being said, this is a private event where the president gets an invite. It's not a government function whatsoever. So why would it ever be held on White House grounds? Were they planning on renting out the new ballroom for weddings and Bar Mitzvahs?

So, with that talking point logic you got from this morning which is everywhere, the UFC fights on the WH lawn must be a "government function".

I didn't think I had to mention this too, but the WHCD is NOT put on by the president. The president can put on any event he likes at the WH. He's not in charge of the WHCD. Again, please try a little more critical thinking.

That is not an example of critical thinking.


Did you take your meds today?

It would be a lot cheaper for the Fed Government to have it at the WH than at the Hilton down the road. Not even close. It is a venue. The WHCA would pay for the catering etc. This isn't rocket surgery. That talking point is trash. Find another one.

(04-26-2026 08:58 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Where are the camps the filth said would be built?

Unfortunately way behind schedule.

(04-28-2026 09:16 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 08:52 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 08:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 08:42 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 07:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Well, of course. Never let a "crisis" go to waste. Now the shills in congress are whining to have the government pay for the monstrosity...when it was supposedly all paid for by trump's donors for...cough cough...no quid pro quo...cough...cough.

That being said, this is a private event where the president gets an invite. It's not a government function whatsoever. So why would it ever be held on White House grounds? Were they planning on renting out the new ballroom for weddings and Bar Mitzvahs?

So, with that talking point logic you got from this morning which is everywhere, the UFC fights on the WH lawn must be a "government function".

I didn't think I had to mention this too, but the WHCD is NOT put on by the president. The president can put on any event he likes at the WH. He's not in charge of the WHCD. Again, please try a little more critical thinking.

That is not an example of critical thinking.


Did you take your meds today?

It would be a lot cheaper for the Fed Government to have it at the WH than at the Hilton down the road. Not even close. It is a venue. The WHCA would pay for the catering etc. This isn't rocket surgery. That talking point is trash. Find another one.

This is an example of critical thinking commietom.

No charge

(04-28-2026 09:22 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(04-26-2026 08:58 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Where are the camps the filth said would be built?

Unfortunately way behind schedule.

I would like to know the number of people that have died because the Obamacare subsidies were allowed to expire, which the Democrats shut down government for a month and a half last year.

(04-28-2026 09:16 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 08:52 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 08:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 08:42 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 07:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Well, of course. Never let a "crisis" go to waste. Now the shills in congress are whining to have the government pay for the monstrosity...when it was supposedly all paid for by trump's donors for...cough cough...no quid pro quo...cough...cough.

That being said, this is a private event where the president gets an invite. It's not a government function whatsoever. So why would it ever be held on White House grounds? Were they planning on renting out the new ballroom for weddings and Bar Mitzvahs?

So, with that talking point logic you got from this morning which is everywhere, the UFC fights on the WH lawn must be a "government function".

I didn't think I had to mention this too, but the WHCD is NOT put on by the president. The president can put on any event he likes at the WH. He's not in charge of the WHCD. Again, please try a little more critical thinking.

That is not an example of critical thinking.


Did you take your meds today?

It would be a lot cheaper for the Fed Government to have it at the WH than at the Hilton down the road. Not even close. It is a venue. The WHCA would pay for the catering etc. This isn't rocket surgery. That talking point is trash. Find another one.

So your argument is basically that any private function the president attends going forward should all be held in DC in a new ballroom on White House grounds? And you think that would be of no additional cost to the taxpayers?

(04-28-2026 09:49 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 09:16 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 08:52 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 08:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-28-2026 08:42 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  So, with that talking point logic you got from this morning which is everywhere, the UFC fights on the WH lawn must be a "government function".

I didn't think I had to mention this too, but the WHCD is NOT put on by the president. The president can put on any event he likes at the WH. He's not in charge of the WHCD. Again, please try a little more critical thinking.

That is not an example of critical thinking.


Did you take your meds today?

It would be a lot cheaper for the Fed Government to have it at the WH than at the Hilton down the road. Not even close. It is a venue. The WHCA would pay for the catering etc. This isn't rocket surgery. That talking point is trash. Find another one.

So your argument is basically that any private function the president attends going forward should all be held in DC in a new ballroom on White House grounds? And you think that would be of no additional cost to the taxpayers?

Remember these people were regurgitating the talking points that the ball room was “at no cost to taxpayers” while funded largely by government contractor leeches (and unknown donors) and that other countries paid tariffs. If it deviates from their talking points you’re not going to get anywhere