(12-11-2025 01:38 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 11:09 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 09:53 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Sanction enforcement is not "against the law". We have done it before. Google Suez Rajan. I know, no one has heard of it.....because it happened during the Biden Administration. Our country is so phucked by the "news".

https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Suez_Rajan

"The Marshall Islands-flagged Suez Rajan, carrying Iranian-grade crude oil,[1] was seized in April 2023 by the US Department of Justice.[2] The Suez Rajan was carrying about 800,000 barrels of oil, a cargo worth about $56 million.[3] The US justification for the seizure was violation of US sanctions on Iran's oil exports, and the US said the Suez Rajan scheme "attempted to disguise the origin of the oil using ship-to-ship transfers". Suez Rajan Ltd., the owner of the ship, pleaded guilty and was fined $2.5 million. The US claimed ownership of the confiscated oil.[4] As the original payment to Iran for the Iranian oil was done using US dollar transaction wire transfers, without a license issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the US Department of the Treasury, the US could claim jurisdiction under US law.[5]"

Funny, never said sanction enforcement actions werent enforceable. Calling into question the use of the military in extraterritorial aspects. Might want to retool your pithy off the subject answer to one more on point.

First off---its flying under a false flag. A nation can intercept, detain, investigate, and seize a ship flying a false flag treating it as a stateless vessel outside of normal protections----especially if its involved in sanctions violations or other illegal activities. Furthermore, what difference does it make what branch of US government intercepts it? Its outside of US waters on the high seas---and it was unknown if the crew would resist. Maybe it just came down to the the US Navy represented the closest force that that could make a show of force sufficient enough to minimize the likelihood of crew resistance....or maybe the ship foolishly entered into an area of denial zone around the current Navy operations off the coast of Venezuela. Im not sure why it matters what branch of the US seizes the ship when its outside of US waters.

Anything to argue. Problem is Leftists can't scream to end a discussion in which they are flailing like they can in person.

(12-11-2025 11:04 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 10:18 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 08:02 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I’m glad to know the US military is now serving and executing civil warrants. Maybe I can sign up my local Rangers detachment to execute service on my next subpoenas or execute a court authorized seizure. Sounds fun.

Since you've ignored the other threads....

Have you ever been or are you currently a member of the National Lawyers Guild?

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Nope, just ignore your dumb*** empty questions. But please keep bleating it. I think you are up to about 13 or 14 times on this one.

I heard ritalin works smashingly for issues like yours.

Avoiding not ignoring dummy

Pretty sure youre lying but that would be on par for a clown like you.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(12-11-2025 12:40 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I repeated what Sheehy said. Period. End of sentence.

You actually started: "Hey Tanq, Sen. Sheehy of Montana just gave you a shout-out."

I guess you cannot (do not, or will not) look at what you typed. Cool cool.

Quote:All that other blah blah is just you making up stuff. And dodging any points anybody else makes. As usual.

Im not the person that seemingly cannot distinguish between 'questioning' an issue and 'opposing' something. Funny that.

All I said was that I guess questioning the basis makes me a 'disgusting' person. Since you prefaced it with "Hey Tanq, Sen. Sheehy of Montana just gave you a shout-out."

Might want to try some remedial English practice sessions. Or simply make more garbage up that 'all you did was repeat Sheehy's comments.' Brazenly brain dead to say that, hoss. Even for you.

(12-11-2025 01:48 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 11:04 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 10:18 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 08:02 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I’m glad to know the US military is now serving and executing civil warrants. Maybe I can sign up my local Rangers detachment to execute service on my next subpoenas or execute a court authorized seizure. Sounds fun.

Since you've ignored the other threads....

Have you ever been or are you currently a member of the National Lawyers Guild?

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Nope, just ignore your dumb*** empty questions. But please keep bleating it. I think you are up to about 13 or 14 times on this one.

I heard ritalin works smashingly for issues like yours.

Avoiding not ignoring dummy

Pretty sure youre lying but that would be on par for a clown like you.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

And example #1 why I decided to ignore your dumb*** question, and continue to ignore it. You have a bright shiny object, and simply dont care about an answer. Nor what the answer might be when you have that bright shiny bug in Maxi vision sight. Lolz. Cool cool.

Im hoping to get you to an even 50 of continued whiny asks. Lolz.

(12-10-2025 11:03 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 08:37 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 07:59 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 07:30 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 07:26 PM)maximus Wrote:  Ummm Venezuela dope

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Look again, maybe use daddy elons Ai if you can’t figure it out

The majority is refined in country retard

They refine more than they export

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Wrong again (really no need to specify with any of your dumb*** assertions) Venezuela has let its refining capacity go to **** since it’s not spent real money up keeping including this fire just last month. They are an importer of fuel and refined oil products

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/...025-11-20/

Nah.... yes their refining capacity is less than 30% or so but they still refine more in country.

Nice try though

Venezuela refines more oil than it imports, based on the latest available data for 2024 and early 2025. This holds despite the country's chronic refining challenges (e.g., underutilization, breakdowns, and reliance on imported diluents to process its heavy crude). Below, I'll break it down with key figures, trends, and context.Key Figures (Averages for 2024–Early 2025)Domestic Refining Throughput: ~200,000–400,000 barrels per day (bpd). 2023: 137,000 bpd (down ~80% from 2014 peaks due to outages).
2024 estimates: ~300,000–400,000 bpd, with partial restarts aided by Iranian technicians and parts, though still at ~20–30% of 1.3–1.46 million bpd nameplate capacity.
Early 2025: Similar levels, hovering around 300,000 bpd amid power issues and limited diluents.

Oil Imports: ~100,000–150,000 bpd (mostly light crude, naphtha diluents, and fuels).2024: ~92,000 bpd (up from 60,000 bpd in 2023; primarily swaps with partners like Chevron for diluents to blend heavy Orinoco crude).
November 2025: ~167,000 bpd (doubled from October due to increased naphtha from Russia and the U.S. to offset upgrader fires).
Annual 2025 trend: ~120,000 bpd average, focused on inputs for refining/export rather than finished products.

Comparison: Refining throughput exceeds imports by ~100,000–200,000 bpd on average. For context, Venezuela's crude production is ~900,000–950,000 bpd, with ~55–60% going to domestic refineries (yielding gasoline, diesel, etc., for local use and limited exports) and the rest exported as crude.Why This Imbalance?Refining Purpose: Most refined output (300,000+ bpd) addresses domestic shortages (e.g., gasoline/diesel), with imports mainly serving as "feedstock" to enable that process. Without imported diluents (100,000+ bpd of the total imports), heavy crude couldn't flow through pipelines or be upgraded efficiently.
Challenges: Refineries like Paraguaná (world's largest complex) run at low capacity due to sanctions, corruption, and maintenance issues, forcing imports. However, throughput still outpaces imports.
Exports Context: Crude exports (~700,000–900,000 bpd) dwarf both, but that's unrefined output—not relevant to refining vs. importing.


Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

lol you're wrong again. thanks for giving me the peace of mind that Grok is not going to suddenly make stupid people critical thinkers.

(12-11-2025 01:38 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 11:09 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 09:53 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Sanction enforcement is not "against the law". We have done it before. Google Suez Rajan. I know, no one has heard of it.....because it happened during the Biden Administration. Our country is so phucked by the "news".

https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Suez_Rajan

"The Marshall Islands-flagged Suez Rajan, carrying Iranian-grade crude oil,[1] was seized in April 2023 by the US Department of Justice.[2] The Suez Rajan was carrying about 800,000 barrels of oil, a cargo worth about $56 million.[3] The US justification for the seizure was violation of US sanctions on Iran's oil exports, and the US said the Suez Rajan scheme "attempted to disguise the origin of the oil using ship-to-ship transfers". Suez Rajan Ltd., the owner of the ship, pleaded guilty and was fined $2.5 million. The US claimed ownership of the confiscated oil.[4] As the original payment to Iran for the Iranian oil was done using US dollar transaction wire transfers, without a license issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the US Department of the Treasury, the US could claim jurisdiction under US law.[5]"

Funny, never said sanction enforcement actions werent enforceable. Calling into question the use of the military in extraterritorial aspects. Might want to retool your pithy off the subject answer to one more on point.

First off---its flying under a false flag. A nation can intercept, detain, investigate, and seize a ship flying a false flag treating it as a stateless vessel outside of normal protections----especially if its involved in sanctions violations or other illegal activities.

Funny, thats not the legal rationale set out by our government. Care to attempt an answer that follows the stated rationale?

Bondi’s claim that the Skipper was seized in accordance with domestically imposed sanctions has no standing in international law. Zero.

And a boarding under the Unclos provisions you allude to above for stateless vessels only contain provisions for allowing boarding to inspect. The provisions do not allow for arrest, seizure, or prosecution beyond an initial inspection.

Quote:Furthermore, what difference does it make what branch of US government intercepts it? Its outside of US waters on the high seas---and it was unknown if the crew would resist. Maybe it just came down to the the US Navy represented the closest force that that could make a show of force sufficient enough to minimize the likelihood of crew resistance....or maybe the ship foolishly entered into an area of denial zone around the current Navy operations off the coast of Venezuela. Im not sure why it matters what branch of the US seizes the ship when its outside of US waters.

Under various treaties relating to specific law enforcement powers, the Coast Guard is under a much stronger position legally when seizing vessels in international waters. And, there seems to be a decent amount of confusion about whether the ship was in international waters or not.

(12-11-2025 03:41 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 01:48 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 11:04 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 10:18 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 08:02 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I’m glad to know the US military is now serving and executing civil warrants. Maybe I can sign up my local Rangers detachment to execute service on my next subpoenas or execute a court authorized seizure. Sounds fun.

Since you've ignored the other threads....

Have you ever been or are you currently a member of the National Lawyers Guild?

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Nope, just ignore your dumb*** empty questions. But please keep bleating it. I think you are up to about 13 or 14 times on this one.

I heard ritalin works smashingly for issues like yours.

Avoiding not ignoring dummy

Pretty sure youre lying but that would be on par for a clown like you.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

And example #1 why I decided to ignore your dumb*** question, and continue to ignore it. You have a bright shiny object, and simply dont care about an answer. Nor what the answer might be when you have that bright shiny bug in Maxi vision sight. Lolz. Cool cool.

Im hoping to get you to an even 50 of continued whiny asks. Lolz.

Yep definitely a member.

Not surprised

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(12-11-2025 03:43 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 11:03 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 08:37 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 07:59 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 07:30 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  Look again, maybe use daddy elons Ai if you can’t figure it out

The majority is refined in country retard

They refine more than they export

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Wrong again (really no need to specify with any of your dumb*** assertions) Venezuela has let its refining capacity go to **** since it’s not spent real money up keeping including this fire just last month. They are an importer of fuel and refined oil products

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/...025-11-20/

Nah.... yes their refining capacity is less than 30% or so but they still refine more in country.

Nice try though

Venezuela refines more oil than it imports, based on the latest available data for 2024 and early 2025. This holds despite the country's chronic refining challenges (e.g., underutilization, breakdowns, and reliance on imported diluents to process its heavy crude). Below, I'll break it down with key figures, trends, and context.Key Figures (Averages for 2024–Early 2025)Domestic Refining Throughput: ~200,000–400,000 barrels per day (bpd). 2023: 137,000 bpd (down ~80% from 2014 peaks due to outages).
2024 estimates: ~300,000–400,000 bpd, with partial restarts aided by Iranian technicians and parts, though still at ~20–30% of 1.3–1.46 million bpd nameplate capacity.
Early 2025: Similar levels, hovering around 300,000 bpd amid power issues and limited diluents.

Oil Imports: ~100,000–150,000 bpd (mostly light crude, naphtha diluents, and fuels).2024: ~92,000 bpd (up from 60,000 bpd in 2023; primarily swaps with partners like Chevron for diluents to blend heavy Orinoco crude).
November 2025: ~167,000 bpd (doubled from October due to increased naphtha from Russia and the U.S. to offset upgrader fires).
Annual 2025 trend: ~120,000 bpd average, focused on inputs for refining/export rather than finished products.

Comparison: Refining throughput exceeds imports by ~100,000–200,000 bpd on average. For context, Venezuela's crude production is ~900,000–950,000 bpd, with ~55–60% going to domestic refineries (yielding gasoline, diesel, etc., for local use and limited exports) and the rest exported as crude.Why This Imbalance?Refining Purpose: Most refined output (300,000+ bpd) addresses domestic shortages (e.g., gasoline/diesel), with imports mainly serving as "feedstock" to enable that process. Without imported diluents (100,000+ bpd of the total imports), heavy crude couldn't flow through pipelines or be upgraded efficiently.
Challenges: Refineries like Paraguaná (world's largest complex) run at low capacity due to sanctions, corruption, and maintenance issues, forcing imports. However, throughput still outpaces imports.
Exports Context: Crude exports (~700,000–900,000 bpd) dwarf both, but that's unrefined output—not relevant to refining vs. importing.


Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

lol you're wrong again. thanks for giving me the peace of mind that Grok is not going to suddenly make stupid people critical thinkers.

Prove the numbers wrong...

I dont think you understand how AI works, most retards dont.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(12-11-2025 04:54 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 03:43 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 11:03 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 08:37 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 07:59 PM)maximus Wrote:  The majority is refined in country retard

They refine more than they export

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Wrong again (really no need to specify with any of your dumb*** assertions) Venezuela has let its refining capacity go to **** since it’s not spent real money up keeping including this fire just last month. They are an importer of fuel and refined oil products

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/...025-11-20/

Nah.... yes their refining capacity is less than 30% or so but they still refine more in country.

Nice try though

Venezuela refines more oil than it imports, based on the latest available data for 2024 and early 2025. This holds despite the country's chronic refining challenges (e.g., underutilization, breakdowns, and reliance on imported diluents to process its heavy crude). Below, I'll break it down with key figures, trends, and context.Key Figures (Averages for 2024–Early 2025)Domestic Refining Throughput: ~200,000–400,000 barrels per day (bpd). 2023: 137,000 bpd (down ~80% from 2014 peaks due to outages).
2024 estimates: ~300,000–400,000 bpd, with partial restarts aided by Iranian technicians and parts, though still at ~20–30% of 1.3–1.46 million bpd nameplate capacity.
Early 2025: Similar levels, hovering around 300,000 bpd amid power issues and limited diluents.

Oil Imports: ~100,000–150,000 bpd (mostly light crude, naphtha diluents, and fuels).2024: ~92,000 bpd (up from 60,000 bpd in 2023; primarily swaps with partners like Chevron for diluents to blend heavy Orinoco crude).
November 2025: ~167,000 bpd (doubled from October due to increased naphtha from Russia and the U.S. to offset upgrader fires).
Annual 2025 trend: ~120,000 bpd average, focused on inputs for refining/export rather than finished products.

Comparison: Refining throughput exceeds imports by ~100,000–200,000 bpd on average. For context, Venezuela's crude production is ~900,000–950,000 bpd, with ~55–60% going to domestic refineries (yielding gasoline, diesel, etc., for local use and limited exports) and the rest exported as crude.Why This Imbalance?Refining Purpose: Most refined output (300,000+ bpd) addresses domestic shortages (e.g., gasoline/diesel), with imports mainly serving as "feedstock" to enable that process. Without imported diluents (100,000+ bpd of the total imports), heavy crude couldn't flow through pipelines or be upgraded efficiently.
Challenges: Refineries like Paraguaná (world's largest complex) run at low capacity due to sanctions, corruption, and maintenance issues, forcing imports. However, throughput still outpaces imports.
Exports Context: Crude exports (~700,000–900,000 bpd) dwarf both, but that's unrefined output—not relevant to refining vs. importing.


Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

lol you're wrong again. thanks for giving me the peace of mind that Grok is not going to suddenly make stupid people critical thinkers.

Prove the numbers wrong...

I dont think you understand how AI works, most retards dont.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/...025-12-10/

Sent 765k bpd to China most unprocessed and at a discount to Brent crude (unprocessed price) another 150k bpd to US all unrefined to be refined in the gulf.

Thats a little over 80% exported vast majority of which isn’t refined.

Just stick to what you know- cult worship and Elon ****riding. I’ll always take your word if it’s dealing with either one of those

(12-11-2025 05:01 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:54 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 03:43 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 11:03 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 08:37 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  Wrong again (really no need to specify with any of your dumb*** assertions) Venezuela has let its refining capacity go to **** since it’s not spent real money up keeping including this fire just last month. They are an importer of fuel and refined oil products

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/...025-11-20/

Nah.... yes their refining capacity is less than 30% or so but they still refine more in country.

Nice try though

Venezuela refines more oil than it imports, based on the latest available data for 2024 and early 2025. This holds despite the country's chronic refining challenges (e.g., underutilization, breakdowns, and reliance on imported diluents to process its heavy crude). Below, I'll break it down with key figures, trends, and context.Key Figures (Averages for 2024–Early 2025)Domestic Refining Throughput: ~200,000–400,000 barrels per day (bpd). 2023: 137,000 bpd (down ~80% from 2014 peaks due to outages).
2024 estimates: ~300,000–400,000 bpd, with partial restarts aided by Iranian technicians and parts, though still at ~20–30% of 1.3–1.46 million bpd nameplate capacity.
Early 2025: Similar levels, hovering around 300,000 bpd amid power issues and limited diluents.

Oil Imports: ~100,000–150,000 bpd (mostly light crude, naphtha diluents, and fuels).2024: ~92,000 bpd (up from 60,000 bpd in 2023; primarily swaps with partners like Chevron for diluents to blend heavy Orinoco crude).
November 2025: ~167,000 bpd (doubled from October due to increased naphtha from Russia and the U.S. to offset upgrader fires).
Annual 2025 trend: ~120,000 bpd average, focused on inputs for refining/export rather than finished products.

Comparison: Refining throughput exceeds imports by ~100,000–200,000 bpd on average. For context, Venezuela's crude production is ~900,000–950,000 bpd, with ~55–60% going to domestic refineries (yielding gasoline, diesel, etc., for local use and limited exports) and the rest exported as crude.Why This Imbalance?Refining Purpose: Most refined output (300,000+ bpd) addresses domestic shortages (e.g., gasoline/diesel), with imports mainly serving as "feedstock" to enable that process. Without imported diluents (100,000+ bpd of the total imports), heavy crude couldn't flow through pipelines or be upgraded efficiently.
Challenges: Refineries like Paraguaná (world's largest complex) run at low capacity due to sanctions, corruption, and maintenance issues, forcing imports. However, throughput still outpaces imports.
Exports Context: Crude exports (~700,000–900,000 bpd) dwarf both, but that's unrefined output—not relevant to refining vs. importing.


Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

lol you're wrong again. thanks for giving me the peace of mind that Grok is not going to suddenly make stupid people critical thinkers.

Prove the numbers wrong...

I dont think you understand how AI works, most retards dont.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/...025-12-10/

Sent 765k bpd to China most unprocessed and at a discount to Brent crude (unprocessed price) another 150k bpd to US all unrefined to be refined in the gulf.

Thats a little over 80% exported vast majority of which isn’t refined.

Just stick to what you know- cult worship and Elon ****riding. I’ll always take your word if it’s dealing with either one of those

You dont even know what youre arguing retard.

Reading comprehension is your friend.

Try again...

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(12-11-2025 05:12 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 05:01 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 04:54 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 03:43 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 11:03 PM)maximus Wrote:  Nah.... yes their refining capacity is less than 30% or so but they still refine more in country.

Nice try though

Venezuela refines more oil than it imports, based on the latest available data for 2024 and early 2025. This holds despite the country's chronic refining challenges (e.g., underutilization, breakdowns, and reliance on imported diluents to process its heavy crude). Below, I'll break it down with key figures, trends, and context.Key Figures (Averages for 2024–Early 2025)Domestic Refining Throughput: ~200,000–400,000 barrels per day (bpd). 2023: 137,000 bpd (down ~80% from 2014 peaks due to outages).
2024 estimates: ~300,000–400,000 bpd, with partial restarts aided by Iranian technicians and parts, though still at ~20–30% of 1.3–1.46 million bpd nameplate capacity.
Early 2025: Similar levels, hovering around 300,000 bpd amid power issues and limited diluents.

Oil Imports: ~100,000–150,000 bpd (mostly light crude, naphtha diluents, and fuels).2024: ~92,000 bpd (up from 60,000 bpd in 2023; primarily swaps with partners like Chevron for diluents to blend heavy Orinoco crude).
November 2025: ~167,000 bpd (doubled from October due to increased naphtha from Russia and the U.S. to offset upgrader fires).
Annual 2025 trend: ~120,000 bpd average, focused on inputs for refining/export rather than finished products.

Comparison: Refining throughput exceeds imports by ~100,000–200,000 bpd on average. For context, Venezuela's crude production is ~900,000–950,000 bpd, with ~55–60% going to domestic refineries (yielding gasoline, diesel, etc., for local use and limited exports) and the rest exported as crude.Why This Imbalance?Refining Purpose: Most refined output (300,000+ bpd) addresses domestic shortages (e.g., gasoline/diesel), with imports mainly serving as "feedstock" to enable that process. Without imported diluents (100,000+ bpd of the total imports), heavy crude couldn't flow through pipelines or be upgraded efficiently.
Challenges: Refineries like Paraguaná (world's largest complex) run at low capacity due to sanctions, corruption, and maintenance issues, forcing imports. However, throughput still outpaces imports.
Exports Context: Crude exports (~700,000–900,000 bpd) dwarf both, but that's unrefined output—not relevant to refining vs. importing.


Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

lol you're wrong again. thanks for giving me the peace of mind that Grok is not going to suddenly make stupid people critical thinkers.

Prove the numbers wrong...

I dont think you understand how AI works, most retards dont.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/...025-12-10/

Sent 765k bpd to China most unprocessed and at a discount to Brent crude (unprocessed price) another 150k bpd to US all unrefined to be refined in the gulf.

Thats a little over 80% exported vast majority of which isn’t refined.

Just stick to what you know- cult worship and Elon ****riding. I’ll always take your word if it’s dealing with either one of those

You dont even know what youre arguing retard.

Reading comprehension is your friend.

Try again...

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Poor ballgargle.

Good lord, Tanq, you are an effing moron. You always dodge the actual point with some stupid deflection.

(12-11-2025 06:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Good lord, Tanq, you are an effing moron. You always dodge the actual point with some stupid deflection.

That's what lawyers do but I know you already knew that.

(12-11-2025 06:41 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 06:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Good lord, Tanq, you are an effing moron. You always dodge the actual point with some stupid deflection.

That's what lawyers do but I know you already knew that.

Yes, but there's usually a reason for it. Here, it just makes him look like the moron he is. He's so damn dishonest.

But yeah, whenever you corner them, they pull out a flashy coin and say, "Look here!" lol

Rath makes a good comparison. You may not like his opinion, but he usually gives a legit reason for it.

(12-10-2025 07:26 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 06:33 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 06:18 PM)maximus Wrote:  The OP must be retarded, we dont need or want their dirty ass oil.

I mean maybe a few barrels to use for public tar and feathering, no need to waste the good stuff.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I know this is pretty much wasted effort given your very limited capacity, but you should probably look up who is currently refining the bulk of Venezuelan sour

Ummm Venezuela dope

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

You have the grasp of donny in a cabinet meeting. I’ll give you credit at least you’re not the dumbest maga here, you realized you took up a failing position and are now pivoting to reframe the argument as something else.

Keep us up to date on elons latest bm or what your cult is up to though you’re good for that.

(12-11-2025 06:51 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 07:26 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 06:33 PM)ballantyneapp Wrote:  

(12-10-2025 06:18 PM)maximus Wrote:  The OP must be retarded, we dont need or want their dirty ass oil.

I mean maybe a few barrels to use for public tar and feathering, no need to waste the good stuff.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I know this is pretty much wasted effort given your very limited capacity, but you should probably look up who is currently refining the bulk of Venezuelan sour

Ummm Venezuela dope

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

You have the grasp of donny in a cabinet meeting. I’ll give you credit at least you’re not the dumbest maga here, you realized you took up a failing position and are now pivoting to reframe the argument as something else.

Keep us up to date on elons latest bm or what your cult is up to though you’re good for that.

My man or woman or thing... or whichever sock account you are....my last dump has more intelligence than you.

Keep trying

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(12-11-2025 10:02 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

I have a serious question about the sky screamer girl. Do you think she screamed at the sky again when Trump was sworn back in back in January? I bet ya she probably did.

(12-11-2025 10:17 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(12-11-2025 10:02 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

I have a serious question about the sky screamer girl. Do you think she screamed at the sky again when Trump was sworn back in back in January? I bet ya she probably did.

her name is ball gurgles…

(12-11-2025 10:02 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

Bwhahahaha

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk