(06-26-2025 06:32 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

Uh oh! Did he pay the licensing fees?

That will get him impeached!!!

(06-26-2025 07:48 AM)TripleA Wrote:  After Tapper spends 10 minutes trying to discredit the damage reports, Israeli intel reports there has been "underground collapse inside the facility" at Fordow.

I don't understand how you send a bomb down an airshaft and don't cause damage.

(06-25-2025 07:25 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:13 PM)TripleA Wrote:  IAEA just confirmed on the ground today: Total devastation. All three sites. Many years to rebuild.

My apologies to those here who are rooting for the Iranians.

Nah. Let 'em eat crow. Hell, they should be apologizing to us since they made fun of us for believing Trump, Hegseth, Caine, and Gabbard over CNN and PMSLSD (that is, MSNBC). (Lookin' at you, Tom.)

Nobody "believed" anything, chucklehead. We merely posted that an initial report was leaked FROM THE trump PENTAGON saying the damage was less than hoped, or not "obliterated" ...at the same time also reporting that experts like General Hertling say the initial reports are always wrong...and that also trump said the report did say that and was from the Pentagon.

Also, nobody is blaming the pilots either...or cheering for Iran. Such a coward move by trump and drunk Pete, and several posters here.

(06-26-2025 07:23 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  Hegseth in a press conference today has excoriated the Dem aligned media. It is richly deserved. Their blind hate (among other stories) causes them to miss articles about the outstanding execution of the mission by our armed forces. As I type, General Caine is giving a detailed explanation of our armed forces bravery and skill.

Shame on the Dem's and their lapdog media if they pass on the opportunity to write stories praising our military.

The attacks on the free press for merely reporting accurate information leaked to them BY THE trump PENTAGON is pathetic.

As is their using the pilots as shields for any criticism.

(06-26-2025 08:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:25 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:13 PM)TripleA Wrote:  IAEA just confirmed on the ground today: Total devastation. All three sites. Many years to rebuild.

My apologies to those here who are rooting for the Iranians.

Nah. Let 'em eat crow. Hell, they should be apologizing to us since they made fun of us for believing Trump, Hegseth, Caine, and Gabbard over CNN and PMSLSD (that is, MSNBC). (Lookin' at you, Tom.)

Nobody "believed" anything, chucklehead. We merely posted that an initial report was leaked FROM THE trump PENTAGON saying the damage was less than hoped, or not "obliterated" ...at the same time also reporting that experts like General Hertling say the initial reports are always wrong...and that also trump said the report did say that and was from the Pentagon.

Also, nobody is blaming the pilots either...or cheering for Iran. Such a coward move by trump and drunk Pete, and several posters here.

So you've read the actual report or is it more "according to sources familiar with the matter"? Surely you must know whoever is responsible for this report is trustworthy.

(06-26-2025 08:44 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(06-26-2025 08:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:25 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:13 PM)TripleA Wrote:  IAEA just confirmed on the ground today: Total devastation. All three sites. Many years to rebuild.

My apologies to those here who are rooting for the Iranians.

Nah. Let 'em eat crow. Hell, they should be apologizing to us since they made fun of us for believing Trump, Hegseth, Caine, and Gabbard over CNN and PMSLSD (that is, MSNBC). (Lookin' at you, Tom.)

Nobody "believed" anything, chucklehead. We merely posted that an initial report was leaked FROM THE trump PENTAGON saying the damage was less than hoped, or not "obliterated" ...at the same time also reporting that experts like General Hertling say the initial reports are always wrong...and that also trump said the report did say that and was from the Pentagon.

Also, nobody is blaming the pilots either...or cheering for Iran. Such a coward move by trump and drunk Pete, and several posters here.

So you've read the actual report or it more "according to sources familiar with the matter"? Surely you must know whoever is responsible for this report is trustworthy.

trump and drunk Pete confirmed what was in that leaked initial assessment IIRC.

(06-26-2025 08:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:25 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:13 PM)TripleA Wrote:  IAEA just confirmed on the ground today: Total devastation. All three sites. Many years to rebuild.

My apologies to those here who are rooting for the Iranians.

Nah. Let 'em eat crow. Hell, they should be apologizing to us since they made fun of us for believing Trump, Hegseth, Caine, and Gabbard over CNN and PMSLSD (that is, MSNBC). (Lookin' at you, Tom.)

Nobody "believed" anything, chucklehead. We merely posted that an initial report was leaked FROM THE trump PENTAGON saying the damage was less than hoped, or not "obliterated" ...at the same time also reporting that experts like General Hertling say the initial reports are always wrong...and that also trump said the report did say that and was from the Pentagon.

Also, nobody is blaming the pilots either...or cheering for Iran. Such a coward move by trump and drunk Pete, and several posters here.

Nobody gives a ****, Tom. Your words mean nothing here. Seriously, I'm not in the mood today.

(06-26-2025 08:45 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-26-2025 08:44 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(06-26-2025 08:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:25 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:13 PM)TripleA Wrote:  IAEA just confirmed on the ground today: Total devastation. All three sites. Many years to rebuild.

My apologies to those here who are rooting for the Iranians.

Nah. Let 'em eat crow. Hell, they should be apologizing to us since they made fun of us for believing Trump, Hegseth, Caine, and Gabbard over CNN and PMSLSD (that is, MSNBC). (Lookin' at you, Tom.)

Nobody "believed" anything, chucklehead. We merely posted that an initial report was leaked FROM THE trump PENTAGON saying the damage was less than hoped, or not "obliterated" ...at the same time also reporting that experts like General Hertling say the initial reports are always wrong...and that also trump said the report did say that and was from the Pentagon.

Also, nobody is blaming the pilots either...or cheering for Iran. Such a coward move by trump and drunk Pete, and several posters here.

So you've read the actual report or it more "according to sources familiar with the matter"? Surely you must know whoever is responsible for this report is trustworthy.

trump and drunk Pete confirmed what was in that leaked initial assessment IIRC.

Tom, you're a partisan dipshit who will believe anything that makes Trump and the right look bad. Just admit you were wrong (again), and take the L.

(06-26-2025 08:45 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-26-2025 08:44 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(06-26-2025 08:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:25 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:13 PM)TripleA Wrote:  IAEA just confirmed on the ground today: Total devastation. All three sites. Many years to rebuild.

My apologies to those here who are rooting for the Iranians.

Nah. Let 'em eat crow. Hell, they should be apologizing to us since they made fun of us for believing Trump, Hegseth, Caine, and Gabbard over CNN and PMSLSD (that is, MSNBC). (Lookin' at you, Tom.)

Nobody "believed" anything, chucklehead. We merely posted that an initial report was leaked FROM THE trump PENTAGON saying the damage was less than hoped, or not "obliterated" ...at the same time also reporting that experts like General Hertling say the initial reports are always wrong...and that also trump said the report did say that and was from the Pentagon.

Also, nobody is blaming the pilots either...or cheering for Iran. Such a coward move by trump and drunk Pete, and several posters here.

So you've read the actual report or it more "according to sources familiar with the matter"? Surely you must know whoever is responsible for this report is trustworthy.

trump and drunk Pete confirmed what was in that leaked initial assessment IIRC.

WRONG. That's also not what I asked.

leaked to CNN of course.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics/...lear-sites

"two of the people familiar with the assessment"

"Another source said..."

"It is still early for the US to have a comprehensive picture of the impact of the strikes, and none of the sources described how the DIA assessment compares to the view of other agencies in the intelligence community."

"Two separate sources familiar told CNN ..."

"This story has been updated with additional details."

(06-26-2025 08:45 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-26-2025 08:44 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(06-26-2025 08:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:25 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:13 PM)TripleA Wrote:  IAEA just confirmed on the ground today: Total devastation. All three sites. Many years to rebuild.

My apologies to those here who are rooting for the Iranians.

Nah. Let 'em eat crow. Hell, they should be apologizing to us since they made fun of us for believing Trump, Hegseth, Caine, and Gabbard over CNN and PMSLSD (that is, MSNBC). (Lookin' at you, Tom.)

Nobody "believed" anything, chucklehead. We merely posted that an initial report was leaked FROM THE trump PENTAGON saying the damage was less than hoped, or not "obliterated" ...at the same time also reporting that experts like General Hertling say the initial reports are always wrong...and that also trump said the report did say that and was from the Pentagon.

Also, nobody is blaming the pilots either...or cheering for Iran. Such a coward move by trump and drunk Pete, and several posters here.

So you've read the actual report or it more "according to sources familiar with the matter"? Surely you must know whoever is responsible for this report is trustworthy.

trump and drunk Pete confirmed what was in that leaked initial assessment IIRC.

If only you had waited a few hours before swallowing CNN's fake news taint you could have avoided all of this embarrassment and future regret.

I don't believe any of these reports.... good or bad.

- You cannot trust anything Iran says first of all.
- Why on earth would Iran allow anyone (other than their own people) into that area to "assess damage"

Who can credibly see and report what happened under ground there? We bombed the hell out of an area suspected of being their Nuke Development area - great. There are no actual receipts other than pictures of the holes they made.

It is likely that damage was done, but how much - who knows for sure. It is likely that Iran had materials there, how much who knows....

Given the complexity and size of that place, would anyone be surprised if they had other adjacent (via underground access) to more areas outside of that bomb zone? I would not be surprised.

Trust LIDAR.

The structure under the mountain collapsed flat like the dummies who took the sub to the Titanic.

(06-26-2025 09:26 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Trust LIDAR.

The structure under the mountain collapsed flat like the dummies who took the sub to the Titanic.

I know I'm a sick bastige, but I still find that funny.

(06-26-2025 09:20 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  I don't believe any of these reports.... good or bad.

- You cannot trust anything Iran says first of all.
- Why on earth would Iran allow anyone (other than their own people) into that area to "assess damage"

Who can credibly see and report what happened under ground there? We bombed the hell out of an area suspected of being their Nuke Development area - great. There are no actual receipts other than pictures of the holes they made.

It is likely that damage was done, but how much - who knows for sure. It is likely that Iran had materials there, how much who knows....

Given the complexity and size of that place, would anyone be surprised if they had other adjacent (via underground access) to more areas outside of that bomb zone? I would not be surprised.

I understand the skepticism, but because Iran is an existential threat to Israel one can place high confidence in their assessment alone. When placed with other intel, it is virtually assured the mission hit its mark - much to the disappointment of some Dem’s and their media acolytes.

(06-26-2025 08:51 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(06-26-2025 08:45 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-26-2025 08:44 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(06-26-2025 08:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-25-2025 07:25 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Nah. Let 'em eat crow. Hell, they should be apologizing to us since they made fun of us for believing Trump, Hegseth, Caine, and Gabbard over CNN and PMSLSD (that is, MSNBC). (Lookin' at you, Tom.)

Nobody "believed" anything, chucklehead. We merely posted that an initial report was leaked FROM THE trump PENTAGON saying the damage was less than hoped, or not "obliterated" ...at the same time also reporting that experts like General Hertling say the initial reports are always wrong...and that also trump said the report did say that and was from the Pentagon.

Also, nobody is blaming the pilots either...or cheering for Iran. Such a coward move by trump and drunk Pete, and several posters here.

So you've read the actual report or it more "according to sources familiar with the matter"? Surely you must know whoever is responsible for this report is trustworthy.

trump and drunk Pete confirmed what was in that leaked initial assessment IIRC.

Tom, you're a partisan dipshit who will believe anything that makes Trump and the right look bad. Just admit you were wrong (again), and take the L.

Wrong is an epic understatement.

(06-26-2025 09:20 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  I don't believe any of these reports.... good or bad.

- You cannot trust anything Iran says first of all.
- Why on earth would Iran allow anyone (other than their own people) into that area to "assess damage"

Who can credibly see and report what happened under ground there? We bombed the hell out of an area suspected of being their Nuke Development area - great. There are no actual receipts other than pictures of the holes they made.

It is likely that damage was done, but how much - who knows for sure. It is likely that Iran had materials there, how much who knows....

Given the complexity and size of that place, would anyone be surprised if they had other adjacent (via underground access) to more areas outside of that bomb zone? I would not be surprised.

There is a new place they've been watching next to Natanz that is supposedly buried deeper in a mountain than Fordow, so you are correct that there are likely other areas adjacent to the sites we bombed. I suspect that Israel will know within short order if there are other places that need to be hit, and they'll likely take care of it in short order if they need to hit another place while Iran is still reeling.

We sent 150 tons of ordinance down vent shafts and people actually believe it didn't destroy everything. Does anyone have any idea what 150 tons of explosives can do. That mountain will be unstable for eternity. Won't be able to do anything there.

(06-26-2025 09:43 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  We sent 150 tons of ordinance down vent shafts and people actually believe it didn't destroy everything. Does anyone have any idea what 150 tons of explosives can do. That mountain will be unstable for eternity. Won't be able to do anything there.

"Yeah, but the initial report said--"

IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE INITIAL REPORT SAID!

Leftists, you can take that initial report, shine it up real good, turn that sumbitch sidewayes, AND STICK IT STRAIGHT UP YOUR CANDY ASSES!

(I watched wrestling too much growing up. lol)

This guy...have another drink, alky!