Ah, the irony. Sometimes these morons actually DO swerve into something with a grain of truth to it, but they refuse to make that weee last step to actually make it relevant.
Quote:“An influential percentage of poor, uneducated, underserved, insurance-less white southerners continue to cast votes for candidates whose agendas clearly conflict with their own self interest.” What Thompson doesn’t do—what I’ve never seen anyone do—is offer a valid explanation for why white Southerners ally themselves with the party that treats them contemptuously.
This posits what could be a mildly interesting discussion, only with tweak or two. First, what would define an"influential percentage"? Would, say, 93% qualify? Now, what voting block voted one way or another in those numbers? What community has suffered FAR worse than any other under the very regime they clamored for, to the tune of 93%? Only one and it's not poor, uneducated, underserved white folk.
Unemployment remains stuck at the horribly high 7.6%. Not good, I don't think anyone would deny that. However, in the black community, that voted to the tune of 93% for this band of merry pranksters? Unemployment is nearly 15%. Who's underserved? Why do they vote against their own self or best interests?
Worried about crime in urban areas? How about black youth unemployment nearing 50%! Yes, that's one out of every two that's even
lookingfor work. Forget those that have quit or never bothered to begin with. So who's going to remain "poor"? Why would they vote in such large percentages against their own self interests?
I could go on and on, but this makes the point. And it's not simply because zerO is half black himself. They generally vote for the dim's and their mind numbing, spirit crushing "social(ist)" policies no matter what the pigment of the candidates skin. Time and again they vote against their best interests, and who's to remain uneducated? You seen the inner city schools lately?
The author, or original author, was right on the cusp of actually finding something good, but couldn't bring himself to ask the next logical question. So as it turns out, the article is useless garbage. But that shouldn't surprise anyone.