(10-07-2025 09:00 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:55 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:46 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:15 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 09:22 AM)450bench Wrote:  Yes


And you didn’t answer my very simple question. How many of these violent incidents are you ok with? Apparently 4 is no big deal to you.

No sane person thinks violence is a good thing.
Most who post on here have zero room to try to claim moral high ground. When the 'muh gunz' crowd is silent when school kids have to be identified by their shoes after getting shot up in school. You all can **** all the way off.
And dont come back with gunning up the lunch lady or hiring vets to Rambo roam the schools. You all don't want the kids to have free lunch or the teachers to have class supplies.

Put a gun on a table and watch it. Put a camera on it for a day. You’ll notice, yes even you Librocrites will notice, that it doesn’t move. Doesn’t budge. Nothing.
Now let a person pick it up. Maybe one of you soy eating, girly clothes wearing, View watching beta-males or how about a tractor ridin, good ole boy from lower Alabama. Either one of you, pick it up, chamber a round and pull the trigger. You’ll notice it fires a bullet.

See the difference? Guns don’t fire themselves, people fire them.
Guns harm no one, people choosing to do harm to others do.

You skinny jean lefties need to comprehend that kind of thing.

Anyway, just how many domestic terrorist, freak show, lib induced, violent events targeting law enforcement is acceptable for you before those being attacked turn the tables and obliterate said freaks?

How many are ok with you?

Cool. Let's ban high-capacity weapons then or at least make sure they do not get into the hands of people that may use them for evil. TRY SOMETHING.
The guns are a multiplier and add distance to an assault.
How many kids is enough?
Again. I buried posters with these talking points. Your point of view is indefensible when the outcome is killing kids in schools.
Pro-life would be those kids getting to graduate. But a lot of you are worried about drag queens reading to kids and Harry Potter on the book shelf.

Answer the damn question. You’re the one who chimed in on my question. How many incidents are you ok with?

That’s the problem with you people, you hypothesize with no real answers.

Your gun talking point is a joke, just like your party.
Tell your gangbanging thug types to buy their weapons legally and us law abiding citizens will quit rightly defending ourselves against the scum you’re daily trying to coddle.

I answered that. None. No violence is acceptable. Now do the kids. How many murdered kids is enough? I think I know your answer. There is clearly not a number that will make some of you change your mind.
There have been discussions about running pictures from school shootings on the news so that people can see the carnage inflicted on those kids. I would hope it would cause the awakening that the Emmet Till photos did but I think a large percentage of the country is too far gone for it to have an effect.

(10-07-2025 09:03 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:15 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Cars boxed in? How about two cars being rammed, at least one disabled, and agents fleeing for their safety from a crowd?

Quote:NEW: FBI Director
@FBIDirectorKash
pledges to bring to justice the two suspects who allegedly rammed a DHS agent’s vehicle in Chicago.

DHS calls the suspects “domestic terrorists,” accusing them of ambushing agents over the weekend.

One suspect, Marimar Martinez, was reportedly armed with a semi-automatic weapon and is known for doxxing federal agents.

ICE agents need to start center massing these filth.

It will only take a few

(10-07-2025 09:09 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 09:00 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:55 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:46 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:15 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  No sane person thinks violence is a good thing.
Most who post on here have zero room to try to claim moral high ground. When the 'muh gunz' crowd is silent when school kids have to be identified by their shoes after getting shot up in school. You all can **** all the way off.
And dont come back with gunning up the lunch lady or hiring vets to Rambo roam the schools. You all don't want the kids to have free lunch or the teachers to have class supplies.

Put a gun on a table and watch it. Put a camera on it for a day. You’ll notice, yes even you Librocrites will notice, that it doesn’t move. Doesn’t budge. Nothing.
Now let a person pick it up. Maybe one of you soy eating, girly clothes wearing, View watching beta-males or how about a tractor ridin, good ole boy from lower Alabama. Either one of you, pick it up, chamber a round and pull the trigger. You’ll notice it fires a bullet.

See the difference? Guns don’t fire themselves, people fire them.
Guns harm no one, people choosing to do harm to others do.

You skinny jean lefties need to comprehend that kind of thing.

Anyway, just how many domestic terrorist, freak show, lib induced, violent events targeting law enforcement is acceptable for you before those being attacked turn the tables and obliterate said freaks?

How many are ok with you?

Cool. Let's ban high-capacity weapons then or at least make sure they do not get into the hands of people that may use them for evil. TRY SOMETHING.
The guns are a multiplier and add distance to an assault.
How many kids is enough?
Again. I buried posters with these talking points. Your point of view is indefensible when the outcome is killing kids in schools.
Pro-life would be those kids getting to graduate. But a lot of you are worried about drag queens reading to kids and Harry Potter on the book shelf.

Answer the damn question. You’re the one who chimed in on my question. How many incidents are you ok with?

That’s the problem with you people, you hypothesize with no real answers.

Your gun talking point is a joke, just like your party.
Tell your gangbanging thug types to buy their weapons legally and us law abiding citizens will quit rightly defending ourselves against the scum you’re daily trying to coddle.

I answered that. None. No violence is acceptable. Now do the kids. How many murdered kids is enough? I think I know your answer. There is clearly not a number that will make some of you change your mind.
There have been discussions about running pictures from school shootings on the news so that people can see the carnage inflicted on those kids. I would hope it would cause the awakening that the Emmet Till photos did but I think a large percentage of the country is too far gone for it to have an effect.

FFS

Im going to commit extreme violence when defending myself.

So yeah, its not only acceptable its appropriate

Loser

Sounds like ragin' is asking for common sense tranny laws.

(10-07-2025 09:12 AM)gdunn Wrote:  Sounds like ragin' is asking for common sense tranny laws.

They always run that circle until they figure out where it leads

Thats the funnest part

Well he did say he was a tranny.

I mean did I do enough critical thinking to come to that conclusion?

(10-07-2025 08:55 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  Cool. Let's ban high-capacity weapons

ragintranny,

I own many high capacity weapons, none of them have ever shot anyone.

(10-07-2025 09:15 AM)gdunn Wrote:  I mean did I do enough critical thinking to come to that conclusion?

yes

(10-07-2025 09:09 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 09:00 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:55 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:46 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:15 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  No sane person thinks violence is a good thing.
Most who post on here have zero room to try to claim moral high ground. When the 'muh gunz' crowd is silent when school kids have to be identified by their shoes after getting shot up in school. You all can **** all the way off.
And dont come back with gunning up the lunch lady or hiring vets to Rambo roam the schools. You all don't want the kids to have free lunch or the teachers to have class supplies.

Put a gun on a table and watch it. Put a camera on it for a day. You’ll notice, yes even you Librocrites will notice, that it doesn’t move. Doesn’t budge. Nothing.
Now let a person pick it up. Maybe one of you soy eating, girly clothes wearing, View watching beta-males or how about a tractor ridin, good ole boy from lower Alabama. Either one of you, pick it up, chamber a round and pull the trigger. You’ll notice it fires a bullet.

See the difference? Guns don’t fire themselves, people fire them.
Guns harm no one, people choosing to do harm to others do.

You skinny jean lefties need to comprehend that kind of thing.

Anyway, just how many domestic terrorist, freak show, lib induced, violent events targeting law enforcement is acceptable for you before those being attacked turn the tables and obliterate said freaks?

How many are ok with you?

Cool. Let's ban high-capacity weapons then or at least make sure they do not get into the hands of people that may use them for evil. TRY SOMETHING.
The guns are a multiplier and add distance to an assault.
How many kids is enough?
Again. I buried posters with these talking points. Your point of view is indefensible when the outcome is killing kids in schools.
Pro-life would be those kids getting to graduate. But a lot of you are worried about drag queens reading to kids and Harry Potter on the book shelf.

Answer the damn question. You’re the one who chimed in on my question. How many incidents are you ok with?

That’s the problem with you people, you hypothesize with no real answers.

Your gun talking point is a joke, just like your party.
Tell your gangbanging thug types to buy their weapons legally and us law abiding citizens will quit rightly defending ourselves against the scum you’re daily trying to coddle.

I answered that. None. No violence is acceptable. Now do the kids. How many murdered kids is enough? I think I know your answer. There is clearly not a number that will make some of you change your mind.
There have been discussions about running pictures from school shootings on the news so that people can see the carnage inflicted on those kids. I would hope it would cause the awakening that the Emmet Till photos did but I think a large percentage of the country is too far gone for it to have an effect.

Kids being killed? In schools? Like the ones murdered by you tranny fruitcakes? Like those?
Yeah, I’m against kids or anyone else being killed in cold blood, for absolutely no reason at all, by anyone. Even you leftist nutjobs.

And what does that have to do with this topic? Nothing. Until you conflated it into a lib narrative talking point that makes zero sense to begin with.

Since you brought it up, You know who else I’m against being shot and killed for no reason at all, by a gangbanging, worthless POS thug?

My niece. Murdered 3 years ago while she pulled in a parking spot at her apartment.
Had someone been armed and present with her before she was murdered, she may be alive today.

(10-07-2025 09:34 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 09:09 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 09:00 AM)450bench Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:55 AM)ragin4u Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 08:46 AM)450bench Wrote:  Put a gun on a table and watch it. Put a camera on it for a day. You’ll notice, yes even you Librocrites will notice, that it doesn’t move. Doesn’t budge. Nothing.
Now let a person pick it up. Maybe one of you soy eating, girly clothes wearing, View watching beta-males or how about a tractor ridin, good ole boy from lower Alabama. Either one of you, pick it up, chamber a round and pull the trigger. You’ll notice it fires a bullet.

See the difference? Guns don’t fire themselves, people fire them.
Guns harm no one, people choosing to do harm to others do.

You skinny jean lefties need to comprehend that kind of thing.

Anyway, just how many domestic terrorist, freak show, lib induced, violent events targeting law enforcement is acceptable for you before those being attacked turn the tables and obliterate said freaks?

How many are ok with you?

Cool. Let's ban high-capacity weapons then or at least make sure they do not get into the hands of people that may use them for evil. TRY SOMETHING.
The guns are a multiplier and add distance to an assault.
How many kids is enough?
Again. I buried posters with these talking points. Your point of view is indefensible when the outcome is killing kids in schools.
Pro-life would be those kids getting to graduate. But a lot of you are worried about drag queens reading to kids and Harry Potter on the book shelf.

Answer the damn question. You’re the one who chimed in on my question. How many incidents are you ok with?

That’s the problem with you people, you hypothesize with no real answers.

Your gun talking point is a joke, just like your party.
Tell your gangbanging thug types to buy their weapons legally and us law abiding citizens will quit rightly defending ourselves against the scum you’re daily trying to coddle.

I answered that. None. No violence is acceptable. Now do the kids. How many murdered kids is enough? I think I know your answer. There is clearly not a number that will make some of you change your mind.
There have been discussions about running pictures from school shootings on the news so that people can see the carnage inflicted on those kids. I would hope it would cause the awakening that the Emmet Till photos did but I think a large percentage of the country is too far gone for it to have an effect.

Kids being killed? In schools? Like the ones murdered by you tranny fruitcakes? Like those?
Yeah, I’m against kids or anyone else being killed in cold blood, for absolutely no reason at all, by anyone. Even you leftist nutjobs.

And what does that have to do with this topic? Nothing. Until you conflated it into a lib narrative talking point that makes zero sense to begin with.

Since you brought it up, You know who else I’m against being shot and killed for no reason at all, by a gangbanging, worthless POS thug?

My niece. Murdered 3 years ago while she pulled in a parking spot at her apartment.
Had someone been armed and present with her before she was murdered, she may be alive today.

I'm sorry for your loss, 450. Such a senseless loss at the hands of a worthless POS thuggish gang banger. I hope you're able to find peace some day.

(10-07-2025 09:42 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  

History doesn't repeat itself. It rhymes.

Antifa, huh? If you are anti-anti-fascist, what does that make you? Go on, you can say it. This is apparently your safe space.
And I thought yall LOVED the Confederate traitors to our country. Flying the traitorous flag and protecting statues of traitors.

lol ragin's an idiot. Confirmed.

I think we’ve discovered an individual who may be on that “special” level of the lib spectrum.

(10-07-2025 09:07 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Absolutely charge them.

But using that to justify or rationalize US military intervention is simply south of stupid.

Speaking of south of stupid, kindly find the post where I ever said that. I'll wait.

(10-07-2025 10:20 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 09:07 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Absolutely charge them.

But using that to justify or rationalize US military intervention is simply south of stupid.

Speaking of south of stupid, kindly find the post where I ever said that. I'll wait.

Then I am glad you are on board that it is south of stupid to use that justify or rationalize US military intervention with that. Which is *what* my response was to 450 who seemingly thinks that. And you decided to chime in on.

Glad you jsut chimed in to chime in. And I am glad you also think it is south of stupid to use that justify or rationalize US military intervention with that. Kudos to you.

Maybe you want to educate your bud 450 on that issue.

(10-07-2025 06:49 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-07-2025 12:13 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 10:12 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 07:55 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-06-2025 07:48 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Good to see Tanq finally rip off the mask and start calling everybody MAGAts. Conservative leanings, my ass.

You know what's worse than a lefty? A lefty who tries to hide that fact, and presents himself as something he's not, to cover up his hate.

that's fagoo boi from ewe la la's tag beneath his avatar ... if tanq-0fer-rang's doing it, he's now the surrogate paw-paw ...

he may define himself as libertarian, but his arguments do not 'mustard up'...

A libertarian is alarmed at the use of US military on US soil, dude. Basic definition, mind you. Like core definition.

The reticence to use US military on US soil *used* to be a cornerstone of conservative values as well, with that being a *serious* aversion to the exercise of large amounts of power by the Federal government, and support of local governments and states enjoying broader powers through the 10th amendment. Let alone the unitary decision of a President to utilize US military on US soil, and exercising that *only* as a '**** has hit the fan' last measure.

MAGA sure does seem eager to accept and swallow the full monty of the President utilizing US military at the drop of hat here. To the level of making some really blatantly incorrect comments about libertarianism to justify them changing their story 180 degrees.

Neat stuff.

I mean, dorks like red seem ready to throw the 82nd Airborne at a fing flat tire. And you are fundamentally making an abject falsehood about what a libertarian would think about that literally right above. You be you.

Ill still be libertarian.

Throwing the US military at this right now is abjectly horrendous. And if dumbasses here want to say 'just get ahead of it', I suggest they read up on why the fk 10 USC callups was written for really major league events -- literally declarations of war, invasion, and the like. Not for some pinhead shining a flashlight at an ICE car.

"I mean, dorks like red "

Name calling, you must be up set. I will deal with you tomorrow and maybe you will have settled downed from being wrong again.

Yep. It's idiotic to throw the military at Portland at the present, or even Chicago. And hate to tell you the law doesn't support 'getting ahead of it' for blindly chomping at the muzzle to Federalize the guard based on a dumb*** cardboard protest guillotine or even the horror of shining flashlights.

And not even for cars being boxed in.

Seriously, listen to yourself and try and not to bust out laughing.

Just say it, you want blood in the streets. If it's ICE blood a smile would probably come across your face. Why don't you just tell this Board you do not support ICE.

ICE has no support from LEO from Portland or the Chicago area. You left out the part where ICE was shot at in Chicago when they were boxed in. I'm sure that wasn't a mistake.

Portland has been a big a problem for a while now. But you see no problem with them burning it down. You can also stop with the 82nd Airborne crap. That's not going to happen. So just say it, say it. You want blood in the streets and you don't care who's blood it is. Some how you would try and blame all of this on President Trump that seems to be your Goal in life.