(09-04-2025 08:01 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(09-04-2025 07:00 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(09-04-2025 06:03 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(09-04-2025 05:37 AM)miko33 Wrote:  The War on Drugs spent obscene amounts of money going after supply. The actual root cause of the problem is demand. Always has been, always will be.

Its never been about 100% elimination of drugs and drug use. That is just impossible, just as its impossible to eliminate poverty 100%.

But you CAN curb usage and deaths considerably with the right policy such as going after the suppliers in a much more heavy handed way.

No one starts out looking to become a drug user. You have to be introduced to drugs first, and if you can curb and limit the amount of drugs and the access (not eliminate but curb) then you can cut out a fair amount of regular drug users and bring drug deaths down.

Its never been about 100% elimination of guns and gun ownership. That is just impossible, just as its impossible to eliminate poverty 100%.

But you CAN curb shootings and deaths considerably with the right policy such as going after the gun manufacturers in a much more heavy handed way.

No one starts out looking to become a violent criminal. You have to be introduced to guns first, and if you can curb and limit the amount of guns and the access (not eliminate but curb) then you can cut out a fair amount of gun crimes and bring shooting deaths down.

That is one of the most absurd comparisons I have ever seen. Drug addition to legal gun ownership?

Legally owning guns is not a gateway to being a criminal.

The ignorance of that post is staggering, and you are not an ignorant person.

Its a pathetically sad reach you should have never made.

The purpose of the comment you responded to is how the argument can be adapted to something else and it will still make sense. I am not a gun control advocate. I strongly support the 2nd Amendment. That said, the thoughts you posed is a 180 to how gun rights supporters would argue in favor of preserving the 2A. You can take the underlined portions and replace those with alcohol as the subject. Let's try it.

Its never been about 100% elimination of alcohol and drinking. That is just impossible, just as its impossible to eliminate poverty 100%.

But you CAN curb alcohol consumption and deaths considerably with the right policy such as going after the suppliers of alcohol in a much more heavy handed way.

No one starts out looking to become a(n) alcoholic. You have to be introduced to alcohol first, and if you can curb and limit the amount of alcohol and the access (not eliminate but curb) then you can cut out a fair amount of alcoholism and bring alcohol related deaths down.

(09-03-2025 03:46 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 01:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 01:33 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-03-2025 01:30 PM)TripleA Wrote:  That last diatribe is too effing stupid to even respond to. I think you've been in the Commie Tom hooch a bit too much.

Im not the steelhead trying to say the difference between a kinetic strike and a hellfire is the grand ass major league differential in the matter that you subscribe to, sparkles. I think youve been in the moron juice hooch a bit too much there, 3a.

But please continue. Kind of cute.

Like I said, you didn't have an effing clue what a kinetic strike was before you opened your big mouth, or you would not have compared it to a Hellfire. A Hellfire typically contains explosives, although one variety doesn't. A kinetic strike uses gravity and weight. No explosives.

I spent 4 years on active duty in the Navy, then another 15 years working as a consultant to SecNav. You really want to go down this path with me, genius?

Please do continue your exposition of how important the most inane of details is.

Said previously -- I dont give a rat's ass if it were a hellfire, a photon torpedo, a phasor shot, a cruise missile, a 105 shell, or a kinetic weapon, or fing grapefruit shot at relativistic speeds. You seem to think that makes a major difference -- so please keep flapping your short little hands up and down on this. Lolz.

Put them all into my sentence. Doesnt change the point. But please flap your inanity on the detail some more for all of us to enjoy, champ. Notwithstanding your CV or who the fk you consulted with. Not that simple of a concept to wrap one's arms around -- except you seemingly have that problem.

Well, I have to give you rep pts for the Star Trek reference!

(09-04-2025 10:30 AM)450bench Wrote:  Again, it’s amazing how some criticize thwarting drug runners and the action taken by the administration to do just that.

This is yet another example of how our culture has decayed.

But muh brown people

We live in a country half full of retards

(09-03-2025 11:31 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

This was the best response. Cannot wait for him to humiliate Newscum or whoever the idiot Dems install to run against him in 28

Btw, I think this has gotten lost in the uproar about bombing vs. interdiction, but the 11 people on board were identified as MS-13 members before the kinetic strike was ordered.

MS-13 has been designated for some time as a terrorist org, making the attack legit anywhere.

(09-04-2025 11:16 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Btw, I think this has gotten lost in the uproar about bombing vs. interdiction, but the 11 people on board were identified as MS-13 members before the kinetic strike was ordered.

MS-13 has been designated for some time as a terrorist org, making the attack legit anywhere.

but, but, but due process!

(09-04-2025 11:19 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(09-04-2025 11:16 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Btw, I think this has gotten lost in the uproar about bombing vs. interdiction, but the 11 people on board were identified as MS-13 members before the kinetic strike was ordered.

MS-13 has been designated for some time as a terrorist org, making the attack legit anywhere.

but, but, but due process!

LOL. Terrorists forfeited any due process when they became terrorists. Same with that freaking wife beating, human smuggler Abrego Garcia.

How long before they strap a couple of kidnapped moms and kids to the bow of their drug running boat?

(09-04-2025 11:29 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  How long before they strap a couple of kidnapped moms and kids to the bow of their drug running boat?

They do now.....or at least did prior to Trump 2. It was just at the Southern botder.

(09-04-2025 11:29 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  How long before they strap a couple of kidnapped moms and kids to the bow of their drug running boat?

Flag of Ukraine would protect them better

I consider what happened to them "due process".

(09-04-2025 11:33 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-04-2025 11:29 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  How long before they strap a couple of kidnapped moms and kids to the bow of their drug running boat?

Flag of Ukraine would protect them better

Oh damn, burn.

(09-04-2025 11:33 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-04-2025 11:29 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  How long before they strap a couple of kidnapped moms and kids to the bow of their drug running boat?

Flag of Ukraine would protect them better

I did not give Tanqi Ofer Bois permission to use my Ukraine handle for you. So don’t tempt me…..

(09-04-2025 11:51 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I consider what happened to them "due process".

I do, too.

1. Identified as a member of a terrorist org.
2. Identified as running drugs potentially bound for the US.
3. AMF.

(09-04-2025 11:51 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I consider what happened to them "due process".

The due process was on the end of whatever missile landed in their lap.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(09-04-2025 03:11 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-04-2025 11:51 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I consider what happened to them "due process".

The due process was on the end of whatever missile landed in their lap.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Yep. They got a high they weren’t expecting.

Drunk tanqs gurl

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

F’ing psychos

(09-04-2025 04:04 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  F’ing psychos

honestly, if I'm heading up the RNC, I'm hiring all kinds of propaganda whackjobbers to 'git out their message'...

the more I see it, the more I love the 'damned' ... these crazy whackadoodles only help those with any sense whatsoever by the purest definition of 'what not to do'...

(09-04-2025 03:39 PM)maximus Wrote:  Drunk tanqs gurl

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Im always impressed with the sad ass dipshits that cannot do anything more than try to lay down insults as the whole and entire depth of their ability to respond. Lolz.