(06-23-2025 01:25 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:24 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:22 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:20 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:05 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  “War” was sarcastic.

There isn’t going to be a full out regime change war.

Guessing you wouldn't bet more than a dime on that.

No need to. I’ll bump this thread in a few months when it’s clear that there won’t be a war.

Did the same after Trump won the election.

Well, I'm guessing there won't be either...but I sure as **** ain't going to red line in the sand it!

I would be very surprised if we do. And I wouldn’t support it FWIW.

Just not going to freak out in the meantime, that goes for people on all sides politically.

Agreed...not freaking out either. I don't think Iran is anywhere near any direct attacks to our mainland. That's about the only thing I'd consider freaking out over.

(06-23-2025 01:27 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 12:47 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 07:00 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 06:54 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  You were saying?


no image avatar

Yes, I saw that, too. Does it make you all giggly?

You had such a bad day yesterday, I was thinking you might take a day off to recover.

P.S. Be sure to get back to us when Trump actually does something about that regime change.

It took you 1 day to go from he's never said it to then he says it and doing all sorts of back bends to make it alright. So lets just get this on the record right now, if Trump decides and takes action to do regime change will you support it?

Try to pay attention. The original statement from Trump was that he was not interested in regime change. Then he came out with the latter statement saying it might not be a bad idea, but he didn't say HE was going to do it. He just said it would be good for the Iranian people. Sorry you're too dense to get that.

My opinion, good if Iranians do it, not good for US, and Trump is not going to do it, no matter how tingly your leg gets.

Does “Zero” mean something different to the cult than regular humans?

No, that's the number of times you've made a cogent statement since the B-2 bombing run.

(06-23-2025 01:28 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:25 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:24 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:22 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:20 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Guessing you wouldn't bet more than a dime on that.

No need to. I’ll bump this thread in a few months when it’s clear that there won’t be a war.

Did the same after Trump won the election.

Well, I'm guessing there won't be either...but I sure as **** ain't going to red line in the sand it!

I would be very surprised if we do. And I wouldn’t support it FWIW.

Just not going to freak out in the meantime, that goes for people on all sides politically.

Agreed...not freaking out either. I don't think Iran is anywhere near any direct attacks to our mainland. That's about the only thing I'd consider freaking out over.

In my view, the potential future of Iran having nukes that could reach our shores was enough for us to have a vested interest in the region.

IF (we still don’t know the full extent objectively) we did enough damage to set back their enrichment capabilities by 5-10 years, that’s a massive victory for us.

If Biden had done this with the same results, I would have approved as well. Just thinking about it through a non political lens.

From what I've heard from experts, Iran was years away from having any deliverable nuclear device. Enriching uranium is one thing, getting it small enough to insert into a weapon and then making that weapon deliverable to the US, is quite another. So, they'd likely attack Israel long before they tried to attack our shores. Being as the deliverable distance is much much shorter.

(06-23-2025 01:37 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  From what I've heard from experts, Iran was years away from having any deliverable nuclear device. Enriching uranium is one thing, getting it small enough to insert into a weapon and then making that weapon deliverable to the US, is quite another. So, they'd likely attack Israel long before they tried to attack our shores. Being as the deliverable distance is much much shorter.

Yes, probably within 5. Which means the next President would have to negotiate a peace deal with a nuclearized Iran. Ouch.

If we assume the reports were accurate, 60% enrichment is about 2/3rds of the way to being weapons capable (90%).

(06-23-2025 01:27 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 12:47 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 07:00 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 06:54 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  You were saying?


no image avatar

Yes, I saw that, too. Does it make you all giggly?

You had such a bad day yesterday, I was thinking you might take a day off to recover.

P.S. Be sure to get back to us when Trump actually does something about that regime change.

It took you 1 day to go from he's never said it to then he says it and doing all sorts of back bends to make it alright. So lets just get this on the record right now, if Trump decides and takes action to do regime change will you support it?

Try to pay attention. The original statement from Trump was that he was not interested in regime change. Then he came out with the latter statement saying it might not be a bad idea, but he didn't say HE was going to do it. He just said it would be good for the Iranian people. Sorry you're too dense to get that.

My opinion, good if Iranians do it, not good for US, and Trump is not going to do it, no matter how tingly your leg gets.

Does “Zero” mean something different to the cult than regular humans?

What it actually describes is the exact amount of water pressure in psi that was present in the california fire hydrants operated by lesbian dei hires that were connected to empty reservoirs.

(06-23-2025 01:31 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:27 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 12:47 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 07:00 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Yes, I saw that, too. Does it make you all giggly?

You had such a bad day yesterday, I was thinking you might take a day off to recover.

P.S. Be sure to get back to us when Trump actually does something about that regime change.

It took you 1 day to go from he's never said it to then he says it and doing all sorts of back bends to make it alright. So lets just get this on the record right now, if Trump decides and takes action to do regime change will you support it?

Try to pay attention. The original statement from Trump was that he was not interested in regime change. Then he came out with the latter statement saying it might not be a bad idea, but he didn't say HE was going to do it. He just said it would be good for the Iranian people. Sorry you're too dense to get that.

My opinion, good if Iranians do it, not good for US, and Trump is not going to do it, no matter how tingly your leg gets.

Does “Zero” mean something different to the cult than regular humans?

No, that's the number of times you've made a cogent statement since the B-2 bombing run.

Keep trying to twist that logic and “translate” the orange one to try and make your statement correct when the words “Regime Change” came directly out of trumps mouth the same day you said he had no interest. “zero” was your word, wanted to make sure there wasn’t a different MAGA cult definition I didn’t know.

You were wrong. It’s obvious to anyone with half a brain you were wrong, you just don’t have the maturity to admit it and instead have to turn to talking about me instead of the content.

(06-23-2025 01:39 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:27 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 12:47 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 07:00 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Yes, I saw that, too. Does it make you all giggly?

You had such a bad day yesterday, I was thinking you might take a day off to recover.

P.S. Be sure to get back to us when Trump actually does something about that regime change.

It took you 1 day to go from he's never said it to then he says it and doing all sorts of back bends to make it alright. So lets just get this on the record right now, if Trump decides and takes action to do regime change will you support it?

Try to pay attention. The original statement from Trump was that he was not interested in regime change. Then he came out with the latter statement saying it might not be a bad idea, but he didn't say HE was going to do it. He just said it would be good for the Iranian people. Sorry you're too dense to get that.

My opinion, good if Iranians do it, not good for US, and Trump is not going to do it, no matter how tingly your leg gets.

Does “Zero” mean something different to the cult than regular humans?

What it actually describes is the exact amount of water pressure in psi that was present in the california fire hydrants operated by lesbian dei hires that were connected to empty reservoirs.

Take your meds.

(06-23-2025 12:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 12:21 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 11:04 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 10:38 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 09:58 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Trump spouts so much BS no one has a good idea of what he is talking about, not even Trump.

As an example see you guys constantly trying to play “spray tan translator” and tell us what he actually meant.

No, you simply believe what you are told. Time to start thinking for yourself.

C'mon dude, this is ridiculous. You read his posts...he more than explains things, indicating that he's clearly speaking and thinking for himself.

Now, kindly apply that apparent standard to your right wing buddies here.

Nah, I see his exact words sprouted on other sites, damn near word for word sometimes. It's a simple cut & paste.

As far as others, I have no control on what others post.

Weak.

Nah, it's not difficult. I see his exact words plastered all over Reddit. Give it a look. You'll see.

(06-23-2025 01:39 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:27 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 12:47 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 07:00 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Yes, I saw that, too. Does it make you all giggly?

You had such a bad day yesterday, I was thinking you might take a day off to recover.

P.S. Be sure to get back to us when Trump actually does something about that regime change.

It took you 1 day to go from he's never said it to then he says it and doing all sorts of back bends to make it alright. So lets just get this on the record right now, if Trump decides and takes action to do regime change will you support it?

Try to pay attention. The original statement from Trump was that he was not interested in regime change. Then he came out with the latter statement saying it might not be a bad idea, but he didn't say HE was going to do it. He just said it would be good for the Iranian people. Sorry you're too dense to get that.

My opinion, good if Iranians do it, not good for US, and Trump is not going to do it, no matter how tingly your leg gets.

Does “Zero” mean something different to the cult than regular humans?

What it actually describes is the exact amount of water pressure in psi that was present in the california fire hydrants operated by lesbian dei hires that were connected to empty reservoirs.

FFS, you may be dumber than trump.

(06-23-2025 01:39 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:27 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Does “Zero” mean something different to the cult than regular humans?

What it actually describes is the exact amount of water pressure in psi that was present in the california fire hydrants operated by lesbian dei hires that were connected to empty reservoirs.

It also refers to the number of "shovel-ready" jobs the Obama administration actually had lined up before putting our deficit spending into the stratosphere.

(06-23-2025 01:40 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:31 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:27 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 12:47 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  It took you 1 day to go from he's never said it to then he says it and doing all sorts of back bends to make it alright. So lets just get this on the record right now, if Trump decides and takes action to do regime change will you support it?

Try to pay attention. The original statement from Trump was that he was not interested in regime change. Then he came out with the latter statement saying it might not be a bad idea, but he didn't say HE was going to do it. He just said it would be good for the Iranian people. Sorry you're too dense to get that.

My opinion, good if Iranians do it, not good for US, and Trump is not going to do it, no matter how tingly your leg gets.

Does “Zero” mean something different to the cult than regular humans?

No, that's the number of times you've made a cogent statement since the B-2 bombing run.

Keep trying to twist that logic and “translate” the orange one to try and make your statement correct when the words “Regime Change” came directly out of trumps mouth the same day you said he had no interest. “zero” was your word, wanted to make sure there wasn’t a different MAGA cult definition I didn’t know.

You were wrong. It’s obvious to anyone with half a brain you were wrong, you just don’t have the maturity to admit it and instead have to turn to talking about me instead of the content.

Nope. Trump made both statements, and anybody but an effing moron understands what he meant.

(06-23-2025 01:42 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 12:47 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 12:21 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 11:04 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 10:38 AM)VA49er Wrote:  No, you simply believe what you are told. Time to start thinking for yourself.

C'mon dude, this is ridiculous. You read his posts...he more than explains things, indicating that he's clearly speaking and thinking for himself.

Now, kindly apply that apparent standard to your right wing buddies here.

Nah, I see his exact words sprouted on other sites, damn near word for word sometimes. It's a simple cut & paste.

As far as others, I have no control on what others post.

Weak.

Nah, it's not difficult. I see his exact words plastered all over Reddit. Give it a look. You'll see.

I don't use reddit...never have. Says a lot about who's using talking points.

(06-23-2025 01:24 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:20 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:17 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Go back and read my last paragraph. But honestly, IDGAF what you think about any of my opinions.

Now go back and ask your mommy for your birth certificate, weirdo.

Lucky for you you'll be dead by the time the consequences of bigger stupider Iraq actually come due. Unfortunately for me I'll get to live through them, and probably live long enough that retards like you cheerlead for Iraq 3.0.

So you think allowing Iran to develop nukes is a peachy idea? Any regime change is coming from Iranians, not us. Next dope in line, come on down.

I'll bet any amount of money you want to lose that 3-5 years from now we'll find out that the claims of how close their nuke program was have as much basis in fact as yellow cake and WMD's in Iraq.

(06-23-2025 01:43 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:39 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:27 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Does “Zero” mean something different to the cult than regular humans?

What it actually describes is the exact amount of water pressure in psi that was present in the california fire hydrants operated by lesbian dei hires that were connected to empty reservoirs.

It also refers to the number of "shovel-ready" jobs the Obama administration actually had lined up before putting our deficit spending into the stratosphere.

Wow, a reference from what, 2008? 2010?

(06-23-2025 01:45 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:40 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:31 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:27 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Try to pay attention. The original statement from Trump was that he was not interested in regime change. Then he came out with the latter statement saying it might not be a bad idea, but he didn't say HE was going to do it. He just said it would be good for the Iranian people. Sorry you're too dense to get that.

My opinion, good if Iranians do it, not good for US, and Trump is not going to do it, no matter how tingly your leg gets.

Does “Zero” mean something different to the cult than regular humans?

No, that's the number of times you've made a cogent statement since the B-2 bombing run.

Keep trying to twist that logic and “translate” the orange one to try and make your statement correct when the words “Regime Change” came directly out of trumps mouth the same day you said he had no interest. “zero” was your word, wanted to make sure there wasn’t a different MAGA cult definition I didn’t know.

You were wrong. It’s obvious to anyone with half a brain you were wrong, you just don’t have the maturity to admit it and instead have to turn to talking about me instead of the content.

Nope. Trump made both statements, and anybody but an effing moron understands what he meant.

Well, in fairness, you're both older than dirt...so it does explain how you so easily understand old man gibberish.

(06-23-2025 01:53 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:24 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:20 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:17 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Go back and read my last paragraph. But honestly, IDGAF what you think about any of my opinions.

Now go back and ask your mommy for your birth certificate, weirdo.

Lucky for you you'll be dead by the time the consequences of bigger stupider Iraq actually come due. Unfortunately for me I'll get to live through them, and probably live long enough that retards like you cheerlead for Iraq 3.0.

So you think allowing Iran to develop nukes is a peachy idea? Any regime change is coming from Iranians, not us. Next dope in line, come on down.

I'll bet any amount of money you want to lose that 3-5 years from now we'll find out that the claims of how close their nuke program was have as much basis in fact as yellow cake and WMD's in Iraq.

Bibi said they were close like 30 years ago.

Who cares? What's done is done. They have been building and operating those facilities out in the open for almost 20 years now, you think they're doing it for residential energy?

(06-23-2025 01:53 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:43 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:39 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-23-2025 01:27 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Does “Zero” mean something different to the cult than regular humans?

What it actually describes is the exact amount of water pressure in psi that was present in the california fire hydrants operated by lesbian dei hires that were connected to empty reservoirs.

It also refers to the number of "shovel-ready" jobs the Obama administration actually had lined up before putting our deficit spending into the stratosphere.

Wow, a reference from what, 2008? 2010?

Let's bring it forward a bit. The number of times that the skank Hillary visited Wisconsin.

(06-23-2025 01:56 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Who cares? What's done is done. They have been building and operating those facilities out in the open for almost 20 years now, you think they're doing it for residential energy?

Well, we mostly knew until your boy tore up the Obama era deal while promising to come up with a better one. Lemme guess, that one will be out in...checks notes...two weeks?