If true, completely destroys any narrative that it was okay or "Biden approved" to be using Signal for this...OOPS!

(03-25-2025 11:20 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(03-25-2025 11:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-25-2025 09:53 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  We told you guys to wait until more info came out.

We're probably about to find out that someone in the Biden* administration set up the reporter into signal automatically.

Right...just like you did before crowing that Blinken was going to resign.

Take a seat.

You first, cupcake.

If not one thing was done wrong here, I'll gladly say that. But the local dishonest troll I was responding to, not you, hasn't once to my knowledge ever admitted he was wrong about anything ever on this forum.

(03-25-2025 11:23 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(03-24-2025 06:51 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(03-24-2025 06:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Btw, these were not war plans. It was a discussion among the group about what to recommend to Trump.

So that's it? Is that really all that was said?

“At 11:44 a.m., the account labeled “Pete Hegseth” posted in Signal a “TEAM UPDATE.” I will not quote from this update, or from certain other subsequent texts. The information contained in them, if they had been read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly in the broader Middle East, Central Command’s area of responsibility. What I will say, in order to illustrate the shocking recklessness of this Signal conversation, is that the Hegseth post contained operational details of forthcoming strikes on Yemen, including information about targets, weapons the U.S. would be deploying, and attack sequencing.”

That’s the kind of intel that gets people killed if it gets into the wrong hands, and it’s being sent via commercial messaging with no retention by people who know better. They are actively trying to subvert FOIA and legal discovery laws, and in the process through their incompetence leaked classified information.

Yes, he was supposed to be, and yes, he is.

Not my fault you're so blinded by your TDS that you can't see the obvious, in that this was most likely leaked, and that this might actually be leaking a private and potentially classified convo between the VP and the DefSec. So yes, you sit down first, cupcake.

(03-25-2025 11:23 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(03-24-2025 06:51 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(03-24-2025 06:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Btw, these were not war plans. It was a discussion among the group about what to recommend to Trump.

So that's it? Is that really all that was said?

Should we buckle up?

They got the good?

Parhetic filth

(03-25-2025 11:33 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-25-2025 11:23 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(03-24-2025 06:51 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(03-24-2025 06:49 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Btw, these were not war plans. It was a discussion among the group about what to recommend to Trump.

So that's it? Is that really all that was said?

Should we buckle up?

They got the good?

Parhetic filth

Pearl clutchers gonna clutch them pearls, you know?

lulz

well, we did warn you all

(03-25-2025 11:33 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  Yes, he was supposed to be, and yes, he is.

Not my fault you're so blinded by your TDS that you can't see the obvious, in that this was most likely leaked, and that this might actually be leaking a private and potentially classified convo between the VP and the DefSec. So yes, you sit down first, cupcake.

WTF are you babbling about? I don't disagree at all that this may have been done intentionally by someone with access. But how does that help your argument? I believe the reports are that only like 18 people were in the chat with nearly all being high ranking trump officials...cabinet members. You think one of them did it? That's a pretty big issue for the trump administration if true. And if it wasn't one of the 18 on the chat, why is some other staffer having access to it? That's probably even a bigger issue! And the reporter got this in real time...he didn't get it after the fact.

lol NPR, first and foremost. Second, Jeffrey Goldberg's already been proven to be a partisan hack of a journalist, posting hoax after hoax and even the lie that Saddam Hussein aided and abetted Osama Bin Laden leading up to 9/11. Why should this be any different than what we already know?

(03-25-2025 11:38 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  lulz

well, we did warn you all

meh, I don't think we're completely out of the woods yet. There's still the issue of how the journalist got looped in. Any way you slice it the admin looks pretty stupid right now.

Setup. Period. Someone needs to go to jail to end this kind of chit.

Staffer added JG to message group. Got by because that happens to be the initials of the trade secretary. Who should have been in the know.

No way they throw this staffer under the bus for an international leak.

SOMEONE MUST GO TO JAIL TO END THIS TYPE OF CHIT!

(03-25-2025 11:42 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  lol NPR, first and foremost. Second, Jeffrey Goldberg's already been proven to be a partisan hack of a journalist, posting hoax after hoax and even the lie that Saddam Hussein aided and abetted Osama Bin Laden leading up to 9/11. Why should this be any different than what we already know?

The administration admitted to it?

(03-25-2025 11:17 AM)mlb Wrote:  

(03-25-2025 09:33 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-25-2025 08:31 AM)mlb Wrote:  My employer, whom is not in national defense, would reprimand and potentially fire someone for putting protected information into an unapproved system, even if the data was not exposed. I don't get why people are defending this stupidity. They should all be reprimanded at minimum. I don't care who you are, you broke the law. Be better.

My man, the docs and staff in all of your facilities SMS HIPAA data all day long

You might think they don't but they 100% do it. They should be using the HIPAA mobile app but they SMS.... guaranteed

We have reprimanded and actually fired one within the last 2 years over sending HIPAA protected data over SMS. There is a reason to use Epic Secure Chat.

Absolutely, but they still do it all the time.

Cheers

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(03-25-2025 11:55 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Setup. Period. Someone needs to go to jail to end this kind of chit.

Staffer added JG to message group. Got by because that happens to be the initials of the trade secretary. Who should have been in the know.

No way they throw this staffer under the bus for an international leak.

SOMEONE MUST GO TO JAIL TO END THIS TYPE OF CHIT!

If it was intentional, then by all means, they should. But that doesn't fix the issue of them using Signal to begin with.

I just hope going forward they've learned their lesson and go back to truly secure and approved solutions that our government controls, not some 3rd party.

(03-25-2025 11:57 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-25-2025 11:17 AM)mlb Wrote:  

(03-25-2025 09:33 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-25-2025 08:31 AM)mlb Wrote:  My employer, whom is not in national defense, would reprimand and potentially fire someone for putting protected information into an unapproved system, even if the data was not exposed. I don't get why people are defending this stupidity. They should all be reprimanded at minimum. I don't care who you are, you broke the law. Be better.

My man, the docs and staff in all of your facilities SMS HIPAA data all day long

You might think they don't but they 100% do it. They should be using the HIPAA mobile app but they SMS.... guaranteed

We have reprimanded and actually fired one within the last 2 years over sending HIPAA protected data over SMS. There is a reason to use Epic Secure Chat.

Absolutely, but they still do it all the time.

Cheers

Not disagreeing, but there are consequences when we find out they have. Just as there should be here.

There goes the midterms in 2026 for the Republicans.

(03-25-2025 12:05 PM)andybible1995 Wrote:  There goes the midterms in 2026 for the Republicans.

If the economy is booming then nobody will even remember this in 2026. Simple as that. That doesn't mean it is unimportant, however.

(03-25-2025 11:58 AM)mlb Wrote:  

(03-25-2025 11:55 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Setup. Period. Someone needs to go to jail to end this kind of chit.

Staffer added JG to message group. Got by because that happens to be the initials of the trade secretary. Who should have been in the know.

No way they throw this staffer under the bus for an international leak.

SOMEONE MUST GO TO JAIL TO END THIS TYPE OF CHIT!

If it was intentional, then by all means, they should. But that doesn't fix the issue of them using Signal to begin with.

I just hope going forward they've learned their lesson and go back to truly secure and approved solutions that our government controls, not some 3rd party.

Do you remember in Trump’s first term when a recorded conversation with another head of state was released in it’s entirety?

It’s not the signal app. It is used by government for years. It’s the intentional leaking to harm the administration that needs to be dealt with immediately and harshly. People need to go to jail for this type of behavior.