(03-25-2024 06:19 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 06:16 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 05:36 PM)gdunn Wrote:  I mean they have a great idea but the people they pick to execute them ain’t the best.

You don’t like the Fanni and the Tishie?

Racisss!!!

at the very least, it's the 'french mistake'...





this thread is everything I thought it would become....

I like taking days off from the board....

And yet again, you get it.

I thought Tooshie might make it too obvious, takes a true connasewer to get that one.
Bravo stink, bravo

(03-25-2024 08:05 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 07:56 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 07:47 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Come on AM. You said you would admit you were wrong about them wanting to run against Trump. Now that they have gone so far as to take a dump on the constitution and law and order and have pulled out the stops to remove him, you should admit you were wrong. They don’t want him in the race. There is no denying that fact. And it’s always been the fact.

The only lemming here is you. You fell into the MSM trap of Trump is a moron. You sound just like them. You believe all their smears. You can’t think straight.

Help me follow your logic WSME - - what is prompting you to think that anything in this thread, or frankly anywhere in current news, is inconsistent with my statement (which I hold to still be true) that the Democrats wanted to run against Donald Trump? Demonizing their opponent is the ONLY path open to the Democrats, and the easiest person to demonize is Donald Trump.

Why? Because he really is a moron.

That you think there is some inconsistency in what I’ve posted suggests that someone caring really does need to build a fence for you. It’s for your own safety.

Why?

Why is the wrong question. That would call for a psychological profile that I’m not capable of giving, but I suspect it boils down to an oversized ego that does not allow for much in the way of self-awareness or learning from mistakes.

The better question is how is Trump a moron? That’s been covered many times, but like lemmings you guys seem to enjoy repeatedly running off of that same cliff.

The how comes in many forms, but the core concerns from an electability standpoint are:

—> Extremely poor judge of character;

—> Dangerously thin skin;

—> Constantly taking whatever bait is dangled before him;

—> Susceptibility to flattery;

—> Inexplicable need to run his mouth when any sensible person would stay quiet and let others speak for him.

Now, I need to be fair. Donald Trump has been leagues better at controlling himself over these past several months. If he maintains that discipline, he will win in December. It is then - - when Donald Trump actually wins - - that WMSE will get the apology from me that he so weirdly craves.

But not until then.

(03-25-2024 07:37 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 06:05 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 02:03 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 01:35 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 12:57 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The Trump campaign thanks you Kruciff (and tanq. and Mensa and RWT and Mr. X and several others who are slipping my mind at the moment).

The Donald would not be where his is today - - poised to retake the White House - - if it weren't for your non-stop spittle-flecked, anti-American, karma-begging posts.

Now really? So I guess you have crossed the Rubicon and have decided it was not a plan to run against Trump all along?

I hope you and a few others continue to be wrong. Although I sadly think even if he wins Trump will never make it to the White House. But it may be the tipping point that is needed if that’s the case.

I'm not sure what posts of mine you (or shere) believe to be inconsistent with what I've just posted on this thread.

Yet you both offer up a real-time reminder for the rest of us that as hopeful as things may presently look for re-installing Donald Trump back into the White House, he and his eye-bulging, Reeee-speaking, maniacal supporters are still perfectly capable of stupiding their way to a loss.

Will they still be stupid when he wins or will they magically become smarter?

When lemmings are prevented from running off a cliff because someone vastly more capable than they erected a fence, were the lemmings still stupid or did they magically get smarter?

That's not quite the same thing though. Or did you just call Trump vastly more capable than the rest of us?

I also think you have democrats confused with republicans. I think it's been shown repeatedly that conservatives typically are not blind followers.

(03-25-2024 07:56 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 07:47 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Come on AM. You said you would admit you were wrong about them wanting to run against Trump. Now that they have gone so far as to take a dump on the constitution and law and order and have pulled out the stops to remove him, you should admit you were wrong. They don’t want him in the race. There is no denying that fact. And it’s always been the fact.

The only lemming here is you. You fell into the MSM trap of Trump is a moron. You sound just like them. You believe all their smears. You can’t think straight.

Help me follow your logic WSME - - what is prompting you to think that anything in this thread, or frankly anywhere in current news, is inconsistent with my statement (which I hold to still be true) that the Democrats wanted to run against Donald Trump? Demonizing their opponent is the ONLY path open to the Democrats, and the easiest person to demonize is Donald Trump.

Why? Because he really is a moron.

That you think there is some inconsistency in what I’ve posted suggests that someone caring really does need to build a fence for you. It’s for your own safety.

Dude, c'mon. Morons are not typically worth billions and they don't increase their wealth through idiocy. You speak of consistency, how consistent would voting for Trump be with your value judgment that he is undeserving of your own or any others vote. Yet you have repeatedly stated you will vote for him.

I hope you realize I am saying all this to you with all due respect.

(03-25-2024 10:10 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 09:30 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 09:04 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 08:05 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 07:56 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Help me follow your logic WSME - - what is prompting you to think that anything in this thread, or frankly anywhere in current news, is inconsistent with my statement (which I hold to still be true) that the Democrats wanted to run against Donald Trump? Demonizing their opponent is the ONLY path open to the Democrats, and the easiest person to demonize is Donald Trump.

Why? Because he really is a moron.

That you think there is some inconsistency in what I’ve posted suggests that someone caring really does need to build a fence for you. It’s for your own safety.

Why?

Apparently because Keith Olberman says so.

You can hate Trump all you want but joining the “HE IS A MORON!” screee only makes you look foolish. And somewhere deep down under the TDS, AM knows it. There has to be an untold story there somewhere. Don’t know what Trump did to him but it must have been akin to stealing his wife.

(03-25-2024 11:45 PM)banker Wrote:  I need to clarify a falsehood in this thread.

It was stated that Trump’s position in DJT increased $500 million today. That is incorrect. He has 80 million shares and the stock was up just over $13 per share today, so that’s $1,040,000,000, not $500,000,000.

What a moron, huh?

If being a moron gets you that I want to take half my brain out.

This thread was great... Leftist creates it thinking it's the end of his candidate's opponent.

Then tried to throw out other talking points as a gotcha.. Got trounced... Trump's bond was reduced bigly... And lefty has abandoned ship.

(03-26-2024 05:49 AM)gdunn Wrote:  This thread was great... Leftist creates it thinking it's the end of his candidate's opponent.

Then tried to throw out other talking points as a gotcha.. Got trounced... Trump's bond was reduced bigly... And lefty has abandoned ship.

You perfectly described the whole thing since 2016...



Continue to throw sh*t against the wall until something sticks. AKA the Bird Shot Approach.

(03-25-2024 08:38 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  As of right now, Donald Trump owes $457,721,000.00.

He has 6 hours and 35 minutes as of this post left to pay before his property starts getting seized.

Does he actually pay up or does Mar-a-lago become government property?

Gobble that crow, Kruciff. Trump wins again.

Truth Social makes a huge splash going public. From the Time article: “It's a barometer for how he's doing in the election,” says Kristi Marvin, the finance guru who founded SPACInsider. “There are definitely people who like Trump and want to support him. They're probably buying the stock. And there's probably other people thinking: If he wins the presidency, who knows?”

From the CNN article: his net worth just doubled.

TOO SWEET.





https://time.com/6960491/donald-trump-st...-billions/

https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/25/investing...index.html

Lol, what a great way to start my morning. Kruciff has been curb stomped, biatch slapped, and rolled like a queer in the 70's and he's gone into hiding.

Just to be clear....is today the day?

(03-26-2024 08:42 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Just to be clear....is today the day?

I do believe the random number the appeals court pulled out of their ass is 10 days. So no.

Puffy lower lip alert.

(03-26-2024 08:47 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Puffy lower lip alert.

lol

(03-26-2024 08:36 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Lol, what a great way to start my morning. Kruciff has been curb stomped, biatch slapped, and rolled like a queer in the 70's and he's gone into hiding.

lol * 2

(03-26-2024 08:45 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-26-2024 08:42 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Just to be clear....is today the day?

I do believe the random number the appeals court pulled out of their ass is 10 days. So no.

The time limit is not something "pull out of their ass". One that is educated would assume that the 10 days (whether business or calendar) should be time to secure a bond since the overpriced bond was a ridiculous price set by a judge and AG that has never tried this type of case, probably never a case like this tried before.. I dunno, the "legal" expert here claims it was and when pressed stated to call the NY AG.

(03-26-2024 08:45 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-26-2024 08:42 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Just to be clear....is today the day?

I do believe the random number the appeals court pulled out of their ass is 10 days. So no.

Where do you think the original dollar amount and timeframe came from?

(03-26-2024 08:59 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(03-26-2024 08:45 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-26-2024 08:42 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Just to be clear....is today the day?

I do believe the random number the appeals court pulled out of their ass is 10 days. So no.

Where do you think the original dollar amount and timeframe came from?

Same place the list of victims and the jury pool in this case came from.

(03-26-2024 08:45 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-26-2024 08:42 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Just to be clear....is today the day?

I do believe the random number the appeals court pulled out of their ass is 10 days. So no.

Reeeeeeeeeeeeee

(03-26-2024 08:47 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Puffy lower lip alert.

#snicker