(03-25-2024 09:13 AM)Kruciff Wrote: Wow, I bet the judge never heard this argument! Unfortunately, the judge doesn't care about feelings, only facts
You realize this decision will be overturned on appeal and that you are pulling for the weaponization of the judicial system only because it's going after someone you don't like. What happens when this happens to someone you don't dislike? Most people with an ounce of common sense recognize this for what it is, polls reflect it.
Buddy, Republicans weaponizing the judicial system is nothing new or unprecedented. That pandora's box isn't going to be re-opened by a fraud being held accountable for his actions, and this fraud being held accountable isn't going to stop Republicans from trying their old bag of used up tricks whenever they can, anyway.
Please, feel free to expand...
Mind telling the classroom how exactly Roe v Wade came to be overturned? About the time of Merrick Garland's nomination could be a good starting point. I didn't hear many people here accuse Mitch McConnell of weaponizing the DoJ.
Of course that's just one, egregious example. Sicking the FBI on a political opponent in 2016 is another that comes to mind.
Tell me you don't understand weaponizing without saying I don't understand weaponizing. And please do it without resorting to the old shuck and jive diversion.
(03-25-2024 08:38 AM)Kruciff Wrote: As of right now, Donald Trump owes $457,721,000.00.
He has 6 hours and 35 minutes as of this post left to pay before his property starts getting seized.
Does he actually pay up or does Mar-a-lago become government property?
Looks like the Republican weaponization of the DoJ is doling out the protectionism! Or is at least trying to. We'll see what happens, but it is pretty telling the collective sigh of relief coming from the MAGAts so quickly.
Trump sidesteps justice again... for the moment!
Sent from my SM-F946U using Tapatalk
An appeals court lowers the number and that is somehow a result of republican weaponization of the Biden DOJ currently ran by Merrick Garland. And you wonder why people think you are a fool.
Your words not mine. No wonder the world is a strange scary place.
Congratulations on the postponement! I'm sure this is the start of turning the L train around, moral victories right?
Sent from my SM-F946U using Tapatalk
Bahahahaha look at the baffoon trying to tap dance his way out of the schitshow he created for himself. Dance moonbat, dance!
(03-25-2024 12:57 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote: The Trump campaign thanks you Kruciff (and tanq. and Mensa and RWT and Mr. X and several others who are slipping my mind at the moment).
The Donald would not be where his is today - - poised to retake the White House - - if it weren't for your non-stop spittle-flecked, anti-American, karma-begging posts.
Absolutely
And it’s not because those guys you mentioned are dumb. They’re not but their arrogance makes them not apply logic and reason to their comments on the subject.
(03-25-2024 12:57 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote: The Trump campaign thanks you Kruciff (and tanq. and Mensa and RWT and Mr. X and several others who are slipping my mind at the moment).
The Donald would not be where his is today - - poised to retake the White House - - if it weren't for your non-stop spittle-flecked, anti-American, karma-begging posts.
Now really? So I guess you have crossed the Rubicon and have decided it was not a plan to run against Trump all along?
I hope you and a few others continue to be wrong. Although I sadly think even if he wins Trump will never make it to the White House. But it may be the tipping point that is needed if that’s the case.
I'm not sure what posts of mine you (or shere) believe to be inconsistent with what I've just posted on this thread.
Yet you both offer up a real-time reminder for the rest of us that as hopeful as things may presently look for re-installing Donald Trump back into the White House, he and his eye-bulging, Reeee-speaking, maniacal supporters are still perfectly capable of stupiding their way to a loss.
Will they still be stupid when he wins or will they magically become smarter?
(03-25-2024 09:20 AM)bearcat65 Wrote: You realize this decision will be overturned on appeal and that you are pulling for the weaponization of the judicial system only because it's going after someone you don't like. What happens when this happens to someone you don't dislike? Most people with an ounce of common sense recognize this for what it is, polls reflect it.
Buddy, Republicans weaponizing the judicial system is nothing new or unprecedented. That pandora's box isn't going to be re-opened by a fraud being held accountable for his actions, and this fraud being held accountable isn't going to stop Republicans from trying their old bag of used up tricks whenever they can, anyway.
Please, feel free to expand...
Mind telling the classroom how exactly Roe v Wade came to be overturned? About the time of Merrick Garland's nomination could be a good starting point. I didn't hear many people here accuse Mitch McConnell of weaponizing the DoJ.
Of course that's just one, egregious example. Sicking the FBI on a political opponent in 2016 is another that comes to mind.
Tell me you don't understand weaponizing without saying I don't understand weaponizing. And please do it without resorting to the old shuck and jive diversion.
Exactly. Roe vs Wade did not represent "lawfare" in any way. Nobody attempted to ruin a political opponent nor attack any individual. Furthermore---the overturning of Roe vs Wade simply reversed a bad precedent caused entirely by judicial activism---the forerunner of the current new wave of "lawfare".
That said---I happen to think Roe vs Wade wass somewhere in the ballpark of what would be a reasonable legislative compromise between the pro-life and pro-choice positions. The problem is it was never the courts job to create that compromise. The courts were simply there to determine if the law was unconstitutional---and it is. It is up to state legislatures or Congress to craft a reasonable compromise via the normal legislative process---it is not the courts job to create legislation. The Supreme Court is merely a referee to decide disputes and is the ultimate arbitrator of what falls within or outside the bounds of the US Constitution. The court does not have any legislative power----it is instead a CHECK and a BALANCE to the legislative and executive branches.
(This post was last modified: 03-25-2024 06:12 PM by Attackcoog.)
(03-25-2024 12:57 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote: The Trump campaign thanks you Kruciff (and tanq. and Mensa and RWT and Mr. X and several others who are slipping my mind at the moment).
The Donald would not be where his is today - - poised to retake the White House - - if it weren't for your non-stop spittle-flecked, anti-American, karma-begging posts.
Now really? So I guess you have crossed the Rubicon and have decided it was not a plan to run against Trump all along?
I hope you and a few others continue to be wrong. Although I sadly think even if he wins Trump will never make it to the White House. But it may be the tipping point that is needed if that’s the case.
I'm not sure what posts of mine you (or shere) believe to be inconsistent with what I've just posted on this thread.
Yet you both offer up a real-time reminder for the rest of us that as hopeful as things may presently look for re-installing Donald Trump back into the White House, he and his eye-bulging, Reeee-speaking, maniacal supporters are still perfectly capable of stupiding their way to a loss.
Will they still be stupid when he wins or will they magically become smarter?
When lemmings are prevented from running off a cliff because someone vastly more capable than they erected a fence, were the lemmings still stupid or did they magically get smarter?
(03-25-2024 12:57 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote: The Trump campaign thanks you Kruciff (and tanq. and Mensa and RWT and Mr. X and several others who are slipping my mind at the moment).
The Donald would not be where his is today - - poised to retake the White House - - if it weren't for your non-stop spittle-flecked, anti-American, karma-begging posts.
Now really? So I guess you have crossed the Rubicon and have decided it was not a plan to run against Trump all along?
I hope you and a few others continue to be wrong. Although I sadly think even if he wins Trump will never make it to the White House. But it may be the tipping point that is needed if that’s the case.
I'm not sure what posts of mine you (or shere) believe to be inconsistent with what I've just posted on this thread.
Yet you both offer up a real-time reminder for the rest of us that as hopeful as things may presently look for re-installing Donald Trump back into the White House, he and his eye-bulging, Reeee-speaking, maniacal supporters are still perfectly capable of stupiding their way to a loss.
Will they still be stupid when he wins or will they magically become smarter?
When lemmings are prevented from running off a cliff because someone vastly more capable than they erected a fence, were the lemmings still stupid or did they magically get smarter?
Come on AM. You said you would admit you were wrong about them wanting to run against Trump. Now that they have gone so far as to take a dump on the constitution and law and order and have pulled out the stops to remove him, you should admit you were wrong. They don’t want him in the race. There is no denying that fact. And it’s always been the fact.
The only lemming here is you. You fell into the MSM trap of Trump is a moron. You sound just like them. You believe all their smears. You can’t think straight.
(03-25-2024 07:47 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote: Come on AM. You said you would admit you were wrong about them wanting to run against Trump. Now that they have gone so far as to take a dump on the constitution and law and order and have pulled out the stops to remove him, you should admit you were wrong. They don’t want him in the race. There is no denying that fact. And it’s always been the fact.
The only lemming here is you. You fell into the MSM trap of Trump is a moron. You sound just like them. You believe all their smears. You can’t think straight.
Help me follow your logic WSME - - what is prompting you to think that anything in this thread, or frankly anywhere in current news, is inconsistent with my statement (which I hold to still be true) that the Democrats wanted to run against Donald Trump? Demonizing their opponent is the ONLY path open to the Democrats, and the easiest person to demonize is Donald Trump.
Why? Because he really is a moron.
That you think there is some inconsistency in what I’ve posted suggests that someone caring really does need to build a fence for you. It’s for your own safety.
(This post was last modified: 03-25-2024 07:58 PM by AdoptedMonarch.)
(03-25-2024 07:47 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote: Come on AM. You said you would admit you were wrong about them wanting to run against Trump. Now that they have gone so far as to take a dump on the constitution and law and order and have pulled out the stops to remove him, you should admit you were wrong. They don’t want him in the race. There is no denying that fact. And it’s always been the fact.
The only lemming here is you. You fell into the MSM trap of Trump is a moron. You sound just like them. You believe all their smears. You can’t think straight.
Help me follow your logic WSME - - what is prompting you to think that anything in this thread, or frankly anywhere in current news, is inconsistent with my statement (which I hold to still be true) that the Democrats wanted to run against Donald Trump? Demonizing their opponent is the ONLY path open to the Democrats, and the easiest person to demonize is Donald Trump.
Why? Because he really is a moron.
That you think there is some inconsistency in what I’ve posted suggests that someone caring really does need to build a fence for you. It’s for your own safety.
(03-25-2024 07:47 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote: Come on AM. You said you would admit you were wrong about them wanting to run against Trump. Now that they have gone so far as to take a dump on the constitution and law and order and have pulled out the stops to remove him, you should admit you were wrong. They don’t want him in the race. There is no denying that fact. And it’s always been the fact.
The only lemming here is you. You fell into the MSM trap of Trump is a moron. You sound just like them. You believe all their smears. You can’t think straight.
Help me follow your logic WSME - - what is prompting you to think that anything in this thread, or frankly anywhere in current news, is inconsistent with my statement (which I hold to still be true) that the Democrats wanted to run against Donald Trump? Demonizing their opponent is the ONLY path open to the Democrats, and the easiest person to demonize is Donald Trump.
Why? Because he really is a moron.
That you think there is some inconsistency in what I’ve posted suggests that someone caring really does need to build a fence for you. It’s for your own safety.
Why?
no doubt ... I"m contemplating adding a 'penalty box' multiplier within the tally if he goes full cuck from here to Nov ...
@>270EVsBlueBakedInn(413X) and/or moo-moo-chelle (aka big mike) if all else fails by Aug. 22, 2024 ... (AM)
(This post was last modified: 03-25-2024 08:36 PM by stinkfist.)
(03-25-2024 07:47 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote: Come on AM. You said you would admit you were wrong about them wanting to run against Trump. Now that they have gone so far as to take a dump on the constitution and law and order and have pulled out the stops to remove him, you should admit you were wrong. They don’t want him in the race. There is no denying that fact. And it’s always been the fact.
The only lemming here is you. You fell into the MSM trap of Trump is a moron. You sound just like them. You believe all their smears. You can’t think straight.
Help me follow your logic WSME - - what is prompting you to think that anything in this thread, or frankly anywhere in current news, is inconsistent with my statement (which I hold to still be true) that the Democrats wanted to run against Donald Trump? Demonizing their opponent is the ONLY path open to the Democrats, and the easiest person to demonize is Donald Trump.
Why? Because he really is a moron.
That you think there is some inconsistency in what I’ve posted suggests that someone caring really does need to build a fence for you. It’s for your own safety.
Why?
Apparently because Keith Olberman says so.
You can hate Trump all you want but joining the “HE IS A MORON!” screee only makes you look foolish. And somewhere deep down under the TDS, AM knows it. There has to be an untold story there somewhere. Don’t know what Trump did to him but it must have been akin to stealing his wife.
(03-25-2024 07:47 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote: Come on AM. You said you would admit you were wrong about them wanting to run against Trump. Now that they have gone so far as to take a dump on the constitution and law and order and have pulled out the stops to remove him, you should admit you were wrong. They don’t want him in the race. There is no denying that fact. And it’s always been the fact.
The only lemming here is you. You fell into the MSM trap of Trump is a moron. You sound just like them. You believe all their smears. You can’t think straight.
Help me follow your logic WSME - - what is prompting you to think that anything in this thread, or frankly anywhere in current news, is inconsistent with my statement (which I hold to still be true) that the Democrats wanted to run against Donald Trump? Demonizing their opponent is the ONLY path open to the Democrats, and the easiest person to demonize is Donald Trump.
Why? Because he really is a moron.
That you think there is some inconsistency in what I’ve posted suggests that someone caring really does need to build a fence for you. It’s for your own safety.
Why?
Apparently because Keith Olberman says so.
You can hate Trump all you want but joining the “HE IS A MORON!” screee only makes you look foolish. And somewhere deep down under the TDS, AM knows it. There has to be an untold story there somewhere. Don’t know what Trump did to him but it must have been akin to stealing his wife.
(03-25-2024 07:47 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote: Come on AM. You said you would admit you were wrong about them wanting to run against Trump. Now that they have gone so far as to take a dump on the constitution and law and order and have pulled out the stops to remove him, you should admit you were wrong. They don’t want him in the race. There is no denying that fact. And it’s always been the fact.
The only lemming here is you. You fell into the MSM trap of Trump is a moron. You sound just like them. You believe all their smears. You can’t think straight.
Help me follow your logic WSME - - what is prompting you to think that anything in this thread, or frankly anywhere in current news, is inconsistent with my statement (which I hold to still be true) that the Democrats wanted to run against Donald Trump? Demonizing their opponent is the ONLY path open to the Democrats, and the easiest person to demonize is Donald Trump.
Why? Because he really is a moron.
That you think there is some inconsistency in what I’ve posted suggests that someone caring really does need to build a fence for you. It’s for your own safety.
Why?
Apparently because Keith Olberman says so.
You can hate Trump all you want but joining the “HE IS A MORON!” screee only makes you look foolish. And somewhere deep down under the TDS, AM knows it. There has to be an untold story there somewhere. Don’t know what Trump did to him but it must have been akin to stealing his wife.
It was stated that Trump’s position in DJT increased $500 million today. That is incorrect. He has 80 million shares and the stock was up just over $13 per share today, so that’s $1,040,000,000, not $500,000,000.
![[Image: maury-well.gif]](https://media1.tenor.com/m/ZxT4FM0dYUkAAAAC/maury-well.gif)
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/MctANWFymbUJCmYtb0/giphy.gif)
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExM3VnMHg0N3JmM2p5NTNsaGtwdXp2cjI0NWU2MXZ1ZTMxdXd5dTZnaiZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/ZeRMA1DlxafrY42mFy/giphy.gif)
![[Image: c1bd4870-fbc2-450e-8387-33db0ce681d1_text.gif]](https://y.yarn.co/c1bd4870-fbc2-450e-8387-33db0ce681d1_text.gif)
![[Image: giphy.gif?cid=6c09b952gt27b258n5nz2yiajd...p;amp;ct=g]](https://media4.giphy.com/media/3oEjHCWdU7F4hkcudy/giphy.gif?cid=6c09b952gt27b258n5nz2yiajdks7pj58dlh4yyns9zj4691&ep=v1_internal_gif_by_id&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g)