Hell, they didn't even go after Hillary.

(03-25-2024 01:35 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 12:57 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The Trump campaign thanks you Kruciff (and tanq. and Mensa and RWT and Mr. X and several others who are slipping my mind at the moment).

The Donald would not be where his is today - - poised to retake the White House - - if it weren't for your non-stop spittle-flecked, anti-American, karma-begging posts.

Now really? So I guess you have crossed the Rubicon and have decided it was not a plan to run against Trump all along?

I hope you and a few others continue to be wrong. Although I sadly think even if he wins Trump will never make it to the White House. But it may be the tipping point that is needed if that’s the case.

I'm not sure what posts of mine you (or shere) believe to be inconsistent with what I've just posted on this thread.

Yet you both offer up a real-time reminder for the rest of us that as hopeful as things may presently look for re-installing Donald Trump back into the White House, he and his eye-bulging, Reeee-speaking, maniacal supporters are still perfectly capable of stupiding their way to a loss.

(03-25-2024 01:59 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Hell, they didn't even go after Hillary.

They did for a week... Then Comey dropped it, but that week F'ed Hillary so bad.. She got drug into court, wait no...

It's funny, Kruciff doesn't acknowledge what she did was wrong, just that she got caught...

It's like my buddy Mach that no longer posts here, he was big mad that the DNC got hacked but not the GOP and if the GOP did, they didn't say anything and none of their dirty laundry got aired..

(03-25-2024 02:03 PM)gdunn Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 01:59 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Hell, they didn't even go after Hillary.

They did for a week... Then Comey dropped it, but that week F'ed Hillary so bad.. She got drug into court, wait no...

It's funny, Kruciff doesn't acknowledge what she did was wrong, just that she got caught...

It's like my buddy Mach that no longer posts here, he was big mad that the DNC got hacked but not the GOP and if the GOP did, they didn't say anything and none of their dirty laundry got aired..

Kruchevff really is the new Mach.

(03-25-2024 01:57 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 10:21 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 10:11 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 10:06 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 09:56 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Please, feel free to expand...

Mind telling the classroom how exactly Roe v Wade came to be overturned? About the time of Merrick Garland's nomination could be a good starting point. I didn't hear many people here accuse Mitch McConnell of weaponizing the DoJ.

Of course that's just one, egregious example. Sicking the FBI on a political opponent in 2016 is another that comes to mind.

1. Roe v Wade didn't get overturned.. It was moved to the States to make the decision on abortion not the federal government.-- Hardly weaponizing the DOJ

Would that have happened if Merrick Garland was on the Supreme Court instead of Neil Gorsuch?

2. Merrick Garland was nominated in a lame duck year for Obama.. DOJ didn't have a hand in that, blame the Senate.

Who withheld the vote for an entire year because of this lame duck? How did this timeline differ for Amy Comey Barrett?

3. FBI on a political opponent in 2016, you mean the Steele Dossier? Cause Hillary went through about 4 days of scrutiny when Comey said we're not pursuing it.

And it was a part of the reason she lost in 2016. Not to mention Trump lost the Steele Dossier lawsuit...

Republicans set the precedent. Prior to Trump it was the cringeworthy "When they go low, we go high". Democrats aren't so naive anymore, and know if Republicans have any opportunity at their disposal, ethical, legal, or not, they will take it. So now that the options are being whittled away, you pretend to worry about weaponizing the DoJ? Please.

I don't usually respond to your post because its useless debating someone like you. Especially someone that thinks Trump's DOJ was the one that investigated Hillary....

honestly after that you should have just stopped after making that point.

Name one a politic opponent Trumps DOJ "went after"?

So you're just going to exempt one of the most egregious and beneficial examples of Trump utilizing lawfare to his benefit?

Ok.

Why did Bill Barr resign? What did Trump tell him to do, that Barr refused, that led to his resignation?

Sent from my SM-F946U using Tapatalk

(03-25-2024 01:23 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 10:53 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  You guys almost seem surprised to learn Kruciff is a moron?

Arguing with Khrushchev will absolutely lower your IQ. He proudly post this nut job “judge” deals in facts. Reminding him this nut first ruled Trump had overstated his worth by claiming ML was only worth $18,000,000 won’t help him see how stupid he is. He is incapable of understanding just what a moron he is. It’s part of being a moron.

The gate house that fronts the ocean is worth more than 18 million...

the property next door or two lots over is similar to that ocean front gate house and its on the market for 45 million. They could tear down LM and place 100 lots in that area and get 2 million a lot if not more.

There's a 4 acre lot (no house) in Ft Lauderdale (with in an hour of ML) that's on the international water way 2 miles from the ocean that is listed at 11 million. We own a home that is in view of this lot with 1.5 acres and 3200sq ft that was remolded in 2017 when we bought it for $800k. If we wanted to list it it would start at 5 million

That judge is a flat out idiot that doesn't have a clue what anything with in a couple miles of the ocean is going for

(03-25-2024 02:15 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 01:57 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 10:21 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 10:11 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 10:06 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  Mind telling the classroom how exactly Roe v Wade came to be overturned? About the time of Merrick Garland's nomination could be a good starting point. I didn't hear many people here accuse Mitch McConnell of weaponizing the DoJ.

Of course that's just one, egregious example. Sicking the FBI on a political opponent in 2016 is another that comes to mind.

1. Roe v Wade didn't get overturned.. It was moved to the States to make the decision on abortion not the federal government.-- Hardly weaponizing the DOJ

Would that have happened if Merrick Garland was on the Supreme Court instead of Neil Gorsuch?

2. Merrick Garland was nominated in a lame duck year for Obama.. DOJ didn't have a hand in that, blame the Senate.

Who withheld the vote for an entire year because of this lame duck? How did this timeline differ for Amy Comey Barrett?

3. FBI on a political opponent in 2016, you mean the Steele Dossier? Cause Hillary went through about 4 days of scrutiny when Comey said we're not pursuing it.

And it was a part of the reason she lost in 2016. Not to mention Trump lost the Steele Dossier lawsuit...

Republicans set the precedent. Prior to Trump it was the cringeworthy "When they go low, we go high". Democrats aren't so naive anymore, and know if Republicans have any opportunity at their disposal, ethical, legal, or not, they will take it. So now that the options are being whittled away, you pretend to worry about weaponizing the DoJ? Please.

I don't usually respond to your post because its useless debating someone like you. Especially someone that thinks Trump's DOJ was the one that investigated Hillary....

honestly after that you should have just stopped after making that point.

Name one a politic opponent Trumps DOJ "went after"?

So you're just going to exempt one of the most egregious and beneficial examples of Trump utilizing lawfare to his benefit?

Ok.

Why did Bill Barr resign? What did Trump tell him to do, that Barr refused, that led to his resignation?

Sent from my SM-F946U using Tapatalk

Like I said I usually just avoid you and its nothing personal. The most seconds I'm willing to waste from now on will be something like the below....

Not sure why anyone is really "celebrating" here either way.

The ruling still stands while on appeal. trump and his kids can't run the business(es) and the independent monitor still has to be involved in the decisions. They can't get loans for the businesses, etc.

All it does is reduce what he has to pay, or put on bond, while the appeals process plays out. A process that will take months if not more than a year.

lol

Trump made another $500 million in personal wealth today when truth social stock jumped 35% at the news of the reduction in bond.

Genius.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/tru...fraud-bond

(03-25-2024 02:22 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Not sure why anyone is really "celebrating" here either way.

The ruling still stands while on appeal. trump and his kids can't run the business(es) and the independent monitor still has to be involved in the decisions. They can't get loans for the businesses, etc.

All it does is reduce what he has to pay, or put on bond, while the appeals process plays out. A process that will take months if not more than a year.

A lot was deducted right out of thr gate

This is just the beginning.

Reeeeeeeeeeee

Chess vs. checkers.

(03-25-2024 08:38 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  As of right now, Donald Trump owes $457,721,000.00.

He has 6 hours and 35 minutes as of this post left to pay before his property starts getting seized.

Does he actually pay up or does Mar-a-lago become government property?

How it started ^^^^

How it ended:

(03-25-2024 02:03 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 01:35 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 12:57 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  The Trump campaign thanks you Kruciff (and tanq. and Mensa and RWT and Mr. X and several others who are slipping my mind at the moment).

The Donald would not be where his is today - - poised to retake the White House - - if it weren't for your non-stop spittle-flecked, anti-American, karma-begging posts.

Now really? So I guess you have crossed the Rubicon and have decided it was not a plan to run against Trump all along?

I hope you and a few others continue to be wrong. Although I sadly think even if he wins Trump will never make it to the White House. But it may be the tipping point that is needed if that’s the case.

he and his eye-bulging, Reeee-speaking, maniacal supporters

Funny you sound just like Joe Biden.

(03-25-2024 02:15 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 01:57 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 10:21 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 10:11 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 10:06 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  Mind telling the classroom how exactly Roe v Wade came to be overturned? About the time of Merrick Garland's nomination could be a good starting point. I didn't hear many people here accuse Mitch McConnell of weaponizing the DoJ.

Of course that's just one, egregious example. Sicking the FBI on a political opponent in 2016 is another that comes to mind.

1. Roe v Wade didn't get overturned.. It was moved to the States to make the decision on abortion not the federal government.-- Hardly weaponizing the DOJ

Would that have happened if Merrick Garland was on the Supreme Court instead of Neil Gorsuch?

2. Merrick Garland was nominated in a lame duck year for Obama.. DOJ didn't have a hand in that, blame the Senate.

Who withheld the vote for an entire year because of this lame duck? How did this timeline differ for Amy Comey Barrett?

3. FBI on a political opponent in 2016, you mean the Steele Dossier? Cause Hillary went through about 4 days of scrutiny when Comey said we're not pursuing it.

And it was a part of the reason she lost in 2016. Not to mention Trump lost the Steele Dossier lawsuit...

Republicans set the precedent. Prior to Trump it was the cringeworthy "When they go low, we go high". Democrats aren't so naive anymore, and know if Republicans have any opportunity at their disposal, ethical, legal, or not, they will take it. So now that the options are being whittled away, you pretend to worry about weaponizing the DoJ? Please.

I don't usually respond to your post because its useless debating someone like you. Especially someone that thinks Trump's DOJ was the one that investigated Hillary....

honestly after that you should have just stopped after making that point.

Name one a politic opponent Trumps DOJ "went after"?

So you're just going to exempt one of the most egregious and beneficial examples of Trump utilizing lawfare to his benefit?

Ok.

Why did Bill Barr resign? What did Trump tell him to do, that Barr refused, that led to his resignation?

Sent from my SM-F946U using Tapatalk

You truly are a moron.

(03-25-2024 02:31 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 02:22 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Not sure why anyone is really "celebrating" here either way.

The ruling still stands while on appeal. trump and his kids can't run the business(es) and the independent monitor still has to be involved in the decisions. They can't get loans for the businesses, etc.

All it does is reduce what he has to pay, or put on bond, while the appeals process plays out. A process that will take months if not more than a year.

A lot was deducted right out of thr gate

This is just the beginning.

Reeeeeeeeeeee

Maybe, maybe not. But by all means, do drink some champagne.

(03-25-2024 02:28 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  lol

Trump made another $500 million in personal wealth today when truth social stock jumped 35% at the news of the reduction in bond.

Genius.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/tru...fraud-bond

Isn't there like a 6-month waiting period before he can do anything with this???

(03-25-2024 02:22 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Not sure why anyone is really "celebrating" here either way.

The ruling still stands while on appeal. trump and his kids can't run the business(es) and the independent monitor still has to be involved in the decisions. They can't get loans for the businesses, etc.

All it does is reduce what he has to pay, or put on bond, while the appeals process plays out. A process that will take months if not more than a year.

You shouldn’t have come back to this thread. You prove you and Khrushchev are both morons. Figure it out and come back later and make excuses.

(03-25-2024 02:53 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-25-2024 02:28 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  lol

Trump made another $500 million in personal wealth today when truth social stock jumped 35% at the news of the reduction in bond.

Genius.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/tru...fraud-bond

Isn't there like a 6-month waiting period before he can do anything with this???

In 6 months it should increase another 25%, right? Your 401k under Biden's economy has doubled this year....

isn't that what you said? so a 25% increase which is 25% less than yours went up in 6 months