(04-02-2023 09:38 PM)maximus Wrote:  Its all just so they can still play Rocky Horror Picture show once a month.....

Bwhahahaha, what crock o ****

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(04-02-2023 09:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 08:00 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 07:40 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 05:58 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 05:50 PM)maximus Wrote:  It's Ok Tanq just admit you like you some "drag queens"

It will get through this hurdle

Argument by mischaracterization is a bad loo there, Maximus. Just saying.

Quote:The person worried about Rocky Horror Picture show is just a dummy. That already has a rating and is covered in the law. Unless they are of course letting kids in to watch....im sure they would never do such a thing.

Where exactly is it covered 'in the law' and for purposes of Tennessee law?

Apparently the Federal judge in the case doesnt agree with your argument about that. Funny that........

That movie/show has a rating to allow audiences of certain ages to see the show.... what don't you understand that kids aren't involved.

Thats not a law nor part of a law. Care to try again?

Yes it is,

Tennessee Code 39-17-907, enacted in 1989, states, "...viewing a motion picture designated "R" for restricted audiences, persons under eighteen (18) years of age not admitted unless accompanied by parent or adult guardian..."

Violating the law is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by a $2,500 fine and/or 11 months and 29 days in jail.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Couple of things --

1) Seems the federal judge disagrees with you on the applicability of the now enjoined law to showing RH Pic Show and that the point is made moot by the R-rating statute. Imagine that.

and

2)

Quote:During the hearing, Defendants agreed with the Court’s observation that current obscenity laws already account for much of the conduct that the Statute seeks to punish. When the Court asked exactly what conduct this Statute reaches that is outside the scope of Tennessee’s obscenity laws, Defendant initially answered that the Statute adds very little

Did you catch that little thing about 'current obscenity laws' there Max?

The funny thing is that the issue with the now-enjoined law is that it seemed overbroad, and should be scaled back to avoid it being overbroad.

No one disagrees with your issues on that there should be activity that should be prohibited.

But your response to the issue that the law is overbroad is to label anyone and everyone who thinks that it should solely be crafted more carefully somehow supports the more extreme items you go spastic and apeshit about.

Good grief. Talk about unhinged.

"Drag Queen Story Hour?" Or no?

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(04-18-2023 08:54 PM)maximus Wrote:  "Drag Queen Story Hour?" Or no?

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Did the children’s parents knowingly take them to this story time? You know provide consent for THEIR children? Was not the support behind all the recent education “reform” about parents being able to make the choice. You just mad someone else used their freedom in a way you don’t like. You snowflakes are going to snowflake.

I just threw up in my mouth a little…..

Why are kids still wearing masks? It has been over 3 years, and there is endless data showing they aren't at risk and cloth masks are worthless. At this point it is just abuse.

(04-02-2023 09:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 08:00 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 07:40 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 05:58 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 05:50 PM)maximus Wrote:  It's Ok Tanq just admit you like you some "drag queens"

It will get through this hurdle

Argument by mischaracterization is a bad loo there, Maximus. Just saying.

Quote:The person worried about Rocky Horror Picture show is just a dummy. That already has a rating and is covered in the law. Unless they are of course letting kids in to watch....im sure they would never do such a thing.

Where exactly is it covered 'in the law' and for purposes of Tennessee law?

Apparently the Federal judge in the case doesnt agree with your argument about that. Funny that........

That movie/show has a rating to allow audiences of certain ages to see the show.... what don't you understand that kids aren't involved.

Thats not a law nor part of a law. Care to try again?

Yes it is,

Tennessee Code 39-17-907, enacted in 1989, states, "...viewing a motion picture designated "R" for restricted audiences, persons under eighteen (18) years of age not admitted unless accompanied by parent or adult guardian..."

Violating the law is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by a $2,500 fine and/or 11 months and 29 days in jail.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

I hope he's a better lawyer than he lets on. Dude talks in circles.

(04-02-2023 09:38 PM)maximus Wrote:  Its all just so they can still play Rocky Horror Picture show once a month.....

Bwhahahaha, what crock o ****

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Just watching that brings out my baser nature. Seeing it makes me want to throttle that effin freak weirdo.

All of you who think this is ok and that these people aren't coming for your children at every opportunity are every bit as bad as the queer weirdos themselves.

(04-18-2023 09:06 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 08:54 PM)maximus Wrote:  "Drag Queen Story Hour?" Or no?

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Did the children’s parents knowingly take them to this story time? You know provide consent for THEIR children? Was not the support behind all the recent education “reform” about parents being able to make the choice. You just mad someone else used their freedom in a way you don’t like. You snowflakes are going to snowflake.

TN is trying to ban it completely. See title thread. It went over your head.

(04-18-2023 09:06 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 08:54 PM)maximus Wrote:  "Drag Queen Story Hour?" Or no?

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Did the children’s parents knowingly take them to this story time? You know provide consent for THEIR children? Was not the support behind all the recent education “reform” about parents being able to make the choice. You just mad someone else used their freedom in a way you don’t like. You snowflakes are going to snowflake.

ok groomer

(04-02-2023 10:09 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 09:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 08:00 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 07:40 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 05:58 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Argument by mischaracterization is a bad loo there, Maximus. Just saying.


Where exactly is it covered 'in the law' and for purposes of Tennessee law?

Apparently the Federal judge in the case doesnt agree with your argument about that. Funny that........

That movie/show has a rating to allow audiences of certain ages to see the show.... what don't you understand that kids aren't involved.

Thats not a law nor part of a law. Care to try again?

Yes it is,

Tennessee Code 39-17-907, enacted in 1989, states, "...viewing a motion picture designated "R" for restricted audiences, persons under eighteen (18) years of age not admitted unless accompanied by parent or adult guardian..."

Violating the law is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by a $2,500 fine and/or 11 months and 29 days in jail.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Couple of things --

1) Seems the federal judge disagrees with you on the applicability of the now enjoined law to showing RH Pic Show and that the point is made moot by the R-rating statute. Imagine that.

and

2)

Quote:During the hearing, Defendants agreed with the Court’s observation that current obscenity laws already account for much of the conduct that the Statute seeks to punish. When the Court asked exactly what conduct this Statute reaches that is outside the scope of Tennessee’s obscenity laws, Defendant initially answered that the Statute adds very little

Did you catch that little thing about 'current obscenity laws' there Max?

The funny thing is that the issue with the now-enjoined law is that it seemed overbroad, and should be scaled back to avoid it being overbroad.

No one disagrees with your issues on that there should be activity that should be prohibited.

But your response to the issue that the law is overbroad is to label anyone and everyone who thinks that it should solely be crafted more carefully somehow supports the more extreme items you go spastic and apeshit about.

Good grief. Talk about unhinged.

So, to summarize, Tanq was unaware that there is already a law in place in TN, he even said there was no such law. Now, when shown the law he attempts to obfuscate the fact that he was wrong.

Tanq should probably stick to bankruptcies and the occasional divorce.

(04-18-2023 09:06 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 08:54 PM)maximus Wrote:  "Drag Queen Story Hour?" Or no?

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Did the children’s parents knowingly take them to this story time? You know provide consent for THEIR children? Was not the support behind all the recent education “reform” about parents being able to make the choice. You just mad someone else used their freedom in a way you don’t like. You snowflakes are going to snowflake.

If the childrens parents knowingly took their kids to that story hour they should have their kids taken away.

To try and mix this in with education reform is laughable. There are no lengths you prog filth won't sink to in order to advance your vile agendas.

By the way, do you prefer Gucci gowns or something by someone else?

Dang, I missed a boatload of invaluable comedic materials in this thread.

(04-18-2023 09:06 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 08:54 PM)maximus Wrote:  "Drag Queen Story Hour?" Or no?

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Did the children’s parents knowingly take them to this story time? You know provide consent for THEIR children? Was not the support behind all the recent education “reform” about parents being able to make the choice. You just mad someone else used their freedom in a way you don’t like. You snowflakes are going to snowflake.

I don't think you understand the meaning of snowflake.

yet another thread where groomers have their panties in a wad.

(04-19-2023 08:56 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  yet another thread where groomers have their panties in a wad.

We know by now who the sympathizers are and we can pretty much predict their responses. Seriously, if someone comes out and defends this in ANY way then you know where their sympathies are.

(04-19-2023 10:24 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(04-19-2023 08:56 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  yet another thread where groomers have their panties in a wad.

We know by now who the sympathizers are and we can pretty much predict their responses. Seriously, if someone comes out and defends this in ANY way then you know where their sympathies are.

I think it's kinda funny how they're trying to take our labels and make them their own to use against us.

lol... snowflake...

The only person I recall pulling that off was Trump taking ownership of the phrase "fake news" and turning it back on them.

(04-19-2023 07:25 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 10:09 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 09:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 08:00 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 07:40 PM)maximus Wrote:  That movie/show has a rating to allow audiences of certain ages to see the show.... what don't you understand that kids aren't involved.

Thats not a law nor part of a law. Care to try again?

Yes it is,

Tennessee Code 39-17-907, enacted in 1989, states, "...viewing a motion picture designated "R" for restricted audiences, persons under eighteen (18) years of age not admitted unless accompanied by parent or adult guardian..."

Violating the law is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by a $2,500 fine and/or 11 months and 29 days in jail.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Couple of things --

1) Seems the federal judge disagrees with you on the applicability of the now enjoined law to showing RH Pic Show and that the point is made moot by the R-rating statute. Imagine that.

and

2)

Quote:During the hearing, Defendants agreed with the Court’s observation that current obscenity laws already account for much of the conduct that the Statute seeks to punish. When the Court asked exactly what conduct this Statute reaches that is outside the scope of Tennessee’s obscenity laws, Defendant initially answered that the Statute adds very little

Did you catch that little thing about 'current obscenity laws' there Max?

The funny thing is that the issue with the now-enjoined law is that it seemed overbroad, and should be scaled back to avoid it being overbroad.

No one disagrees with your issues on that there should be activity that should be prohibited.

But your response to the issue that the law is overbroad is to label anyone and everyone who thinks that it should solely be crafted more carefully somehow supports the more extreme items you go spastic and apeshit about.

Good grief. Talk about unhinged.

So, to summarize, Tanq was unaware that there is already a law in place in TN, he even said there was no such law. Now, when shown the law he attempts to obfuscate the fact that he was wrong.

Tanq should probably stick to bankruptcies and the occasional divorce.

More to the point the judge affirmed my point that the TN law seems to be overbroad.

(04-18-2023 09:06 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 08:54 PM)maximus Wrote:  "Drag Queen Story Hour?" Or no?

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Did the children’s parents knowingly take them to this story time? You know provide consent for THEIR children? Was not the support behind all the recent education “reform” about parents being able to make the choice. You just mad someone else used their freedom in a way you don’t like. You snowflakes are going to snowflake.

You're equating school curriculum and ensuring the PUBLIC education system teaches kids correctly and knowing what they are being taught.....to allowing parents to subject their kids to this depraved ****?

You obviously have a screw loose. I mean ****, let's allow parents to teach their kids to rob banks, be prostitutes, smoke, drink, etc etc...

You know what.... **** you dude. You're a ****** up individual.

Actually, I think I found you on Twitter.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(04-19-2023 08:07 PM)maximus Wrote:  

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Bring it, sweetheart.



If you think you are going to walk into a bathroom with little girls in front of me you got another thing coming. I'm gonna stomp a mud hole in your a55 and walk it dry.

No one is scared of a feminine little bytch wearing a dress.

I'm a peaceful man but when you start following little girls into the bathroom you've crossed a line. F around and find out.