They just don’t understand just how far over the line they’re crossing. Want a war? Keep on.

(04-19-2023 08:07 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 09:06 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 08:54 PM)maximus Wrote:  "Drag Queen Story Hour?" Or no?

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Did the children’s parents knowingly take them to this story time? You know provide consent for THEIR children? Was not the support behind all the recent education “reform” about parents being able to make the choice. You just mad someone else used their freedom in a way you don’t like. You snowflakes are going to snowflake.

You're equating school curriculum and ensuring the PUBLIC education system teaches kids correctly and knowing what they are being taught.....to allowing parents to subject their kids to this depraved ****?

You obviously have a screw loose. I mean ****, let's allow parents to teach their kids to rob banks, be prostitutes, smoke, drink, etc etc...

You know what.... **** you dude. You're a ****** up individual.

Actually, I think I found you on Twitter.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

You are the stains trying to take away parental rights. You and the rest trying to tag this as better of the community are lying through your teeth. Your actions, you know the things that speak louder than words, show you don't care about freedom.

(04-20-2023 09:40 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-19-2023 08:07 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 09:06 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 08:54 PM)maximus Wrote:  "Drag Queen Story Hour?" Or no?

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Did the children’s parents knowingly take them to this story time? You know provide consent for THEIR children? Was not the support behind all the recent education “reform” about parents being able to make the choice. You just mad someone else used their freedom in a way you don’t like. You snowflakes are going to snowflake.

You're equating school curriculum and ensuring the PUBLIC education system teaches kids correctly and knowing what they are being taught.....to allowing parents to subject their kids to this depraved ****?

You obviously have a screw loose. I mean ****, let's allow parents to teach their kids to rob banks, be prostitutes, smoke, drink, etc etc...

You know what.... **** you dude. You're a ****** up individual.

Actually, I think I found you on Twitter.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

You are the stains trying to take away parental rights. You and the rest trying to tag this as better of the community are lying through your teeth. Your actions, you know the things that speak louder than words, show you don't care about freedom.

Ok weirdo.... and yes, it's very clear, you are absolute freakshow....by all means please elaborate on your rambling post.

WTF are talking about

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(04-20-2023 09:58 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-20-2023 09:40 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-19-2023 08:07 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 09:06 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 08:54 PM)maximus Wrote:  "Drag Queen Story Hour?" Or no?

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Did the children’s parents knowingly take them to this story time? You know provide consent for THEIR children? Was not the support behind all the recent education “reform” about parents being able to make the choice. You just mad someone else used their freedom in a way you don’t like. You snowflakes are going to snowflake.

You're equating school curriculum and ensuring the PUBLIC education system teaches kids correctly and knowing what they are being taught.....to allowing parents to subject their kids to this depraved ****?

You obviously have a screw loose. I mean ****, let's allow parents to teach their kids to rob banks, be prostitutes, smoke, drink, etc etc...

You know what.... **** you dude. You're a ****** up individual.

Actually, I think I found you on Twitter.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

You are the stains trying to take away parental rights. You and the rest trying to tag this as better of the community are lying through your teeth. Your actions, you know the things that speak louder than words, show you don't care about freedom.

Ok weirdo.... and yes, it's very clear, you are absolute freakshow....by all means please elaborate on your rambling post.

WTF are talking about

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Do the trans people scare batboy in his underoos? Is big bad Maxipad scared of people different then he is? Are you going to use your transference to justify watching more trans videos to find the one that “owns” me while you not so secretly get off on it?

You can post every trans video ever made and it won’t matter. I see them as people having a human experience. Like Dave Chapelle’s Daphne. You on the other hand are free to “change the channel” at any time. Why haven’t you?

(04-21-2023 02:04 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-20-2023 09:58 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-20-2023 09:40 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-19-2023 08:07 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 09:06 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Did the children’s parents knowingly take them to this story time? You know provide consent for THEIR children? Was not the support behind all the recent education “reform” about parents being able to make the choice. You just mad someone else used their freedom in a way you don’t like. You snowflakes are going to snowflake.

You're equating school curriculum and ensuring the PUBLIC education system teaches kids correctly and knowing what they are being taught.....to allowing parents to subject their kids to this depraved ****?

You obviously have a screw loose. I mean ****, let's allow parents to teach their kids to rob banks, be prostitutes, smoke, drink, etc etc...

You know what.... **** you dude. You're a ****** up individual.

Actually, I think I found you on Twitter.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

You are the stains trying to take away parental rights. You and the rest trying to tag this as better of the community are lying through your teeth. Your actions, you know the things that speak louder than words, show you don't care about freedom.

Ok weirdo.... and yes, it's very clear, you are absolute freakshow....by all means please elaborate on your rambling post.

WTF are talking about

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Do the trans people scare batboy in his underoos? Is big bad Maxipad scared of people different then he is? Are you going to use your transference to justify watching more trans videos to find the one that “owns” me while you not so secretly get off on it?

You can post every trans video ever made and it won’t matter. I see them as people having a human experience. Like Dave Chapelle’s Daphne. You on the other hand are free to “change the channel” at any time. Why haven’t you?

Whacko

You can't even stay on topic without going weirdo.

I'll elaborate later on the absolute mess you are.

BTW, based on the post you made in the other thread you dont even know what's actually going on with children and the mentally ill trans movement.

I'd say educate yourself before you make yourself look like a complete moron, hell...at least give yourself a chance at not being a moron.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Oh look I found a pic of Mr_X

Federal court found drag show law unconstitutional:

“The Court concludes that the AEA is both unconstitutionally vague and substantially
overbroad. The AEA’s “harmful to minors” standard applies to minors of all ages, so it fails to
provide fair notice of what is prohibited, and it encourages discriminatory enforcement. The
AEA is substantially overbroad because it applies to public property or “anywhere” a minor
could be present.”

(06-03-2023 10:21 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Federal court found drag show law unconstitutional:

“The Court concludes that the AEA is both unconstitutionally vague and substantially
overbroad. The AEA’s “harmful to minors” standard applies to minors of all ages, so it fails to
provide fair notice of what is prohibited, and it encourages discriminatory enforcement. The
AEA is substantially overbroad because it applies to public property or “anywhere” a minor
could be present.”

Oh look, a groomer thinks he got a victory.

Jesus, just be a parent and not take your kids there.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

(06-03-2023 10:21 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Federal court found drag show law unconstitutional:

“The Court concludes that the AEA is both unconstitutionally vague and substantially
overbroad. The AEA’s “harmful to minors” standard applies to minors of all ages, so it fails to
provide fair notice of what is prohibited, and it encourages discriminatory enforcement. The
AEA is substantially overbroad because it applies to public property or “anywhere” a minor
could be present.”

And... it'll be amended and move forward.

The fact you're joyous over this means something.

Sad

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(06-03-2023 12:11 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Jesus, just be a parent and not take your kids there.

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

Ummm yes

But the clowns on this board and elsewhere cannot accept this because they are sick *****.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(06-03-2023 12:50 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 10:21 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Federal court found drag show law unconstitutional:

“The Court concludes that the AEA is both unconstitutionally vague and substantially
overbroad. The AEA’s “harmful to minors” standard applies to minors of all ages, so it fails to
provide fair notice of what is prohibited, and it encourages discriminatory enforcement. The
AEA is substantially overbroad because it applies to public property or “anywhere” a minor
could be present.”

And... it'll be amended and move forward.

The fact you're joyous over this means something.

Sad

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Yeah, it means I respect the first amendment and understand the the constitution applies to everyone and not just people I agree with.

(06-03-2023 03:42 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 12:50 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 10:21 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Federal court found drag show law unconstitutional:

“The Court concludes that the AEA is both unconstitutionally vague and substantially
overbroad. The AEA’s “harmful to minors” standard applies to minors of all ages, so it fails to
provide fair notice of what is prohibited, and it encourages discriminatory enforcement. The
AEA is substantially overbroad because it applies to public property or “anywhere” a minor
could be present.”

And... it'll be amended and move forward.

The fact you're joyous over this means something.

Sad

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Yeah, it means I respect the first amendment and understand the the constitution applies to everyone and not just people I agree with.

therefore, ewe're just hunky with the fk'n dory when SCOTUS (rightfully) gave abortion legislation back to the states...

ewer dipshite arse won't even recognize the difference...

#toofk'neasy

Ah frick a federal judge legislating. Shocker

Groomers happy

(06-03-2023 03:42 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 12:50 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 10:21 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Federal court found drag show law unconstitutional:

“The Court concludes that the AEA is both unconstitutionally vague and substantially
overbroad. The AEA’s “harmful to minors” standard applies to minors of all ages, so it fails to
provide fair notice of what is prohibited, and it encourages discriminatory enforcement. The
AEA is substantially overbroad because it applies to public property or “anywhere” a minor
could be present.”

And... it'll be amended and move forward.

The fact you're joyous over this means something.

Sad

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Yeah, it means I respect the first amendment and understand the the constitution applies to everyone and not just people I agree with.

Slinging dick in front of kids... doesn't equal First Amendment rights...



Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(06-03-2023 05:24 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 03:42 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 12:50 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 10:21 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Federal court found drag show law unconstitutional:

“The Court concludes that the AEA is both unconstitutionally vague and substantially
overbroad. The AEA’s “harmful to minors” standard applies to minors of all ages, so it fails to
provide fair notice of what is prohibited, and it encourages discriminatory enforcement. The
AEA is substantially overbroad because it applies to public property or “anywhere” a minor
could be present.”

And... it'll be amended and move forward.

The fact you're joyous over this means something.

Sad

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Yeah, it means I respect the first amendment and understand the the constitution applies to everyone and not just people I agree with.

Slinging dick in front of kids... doesn't equal First Amendment rights...



Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

That’s illegal without this law. This law is overly broad and as written would be used to target people you don’t like who happen to be in a dress.

Write a law that says it’s illegal to show kids your genitals and everyone will sign it (except Lauren Bobert’s ex husband since that’s kind of his thing).

(06-03-2023 06:16 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 05:24 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 03:42 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 12:50 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 10:21 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Federal court found drag show law unconstitutional:

“The Court concludes that the AEA is both unconstitutionally vague and substantially
overbroad. The AEA’s “harmful to minors” standard applies to minors of all ages, so it fails to
provide fair notice of what is prohibited, and it encourages discriminatory enforcement. The
AEA is substantially overbroad because it applies to public property or “anywhere” a minor
could be present.”

And... it'll be amended and move forward.

The fact you're joyous over this means something.

Sad

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Yeah, it means I respect the first amendment and understand the the constitution applies to everyone and not just people I agree with.

Slinging dick in front of kids... doesn't equal First Amendment rights...



Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

That’s illegal without this law. This law is overly broad and as written would be used to target people you don’t like who happen to be in a dress.

Write a law that says it’s illegal to show kids your genitals and everyone will sign it (except Lauren Bobert’s ex husband since that’s kind of his thing).

So sexually graphic drag shows and pride events can not include minors according to current law?

Great.

I want to see enforcement.


I also want to see TN appeal.

(06-03-2023 06:16 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 05:24 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 03:42 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 12:50 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(06-03-2023 10:21 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Federal court found drag show law unconstitutional:

“The Court concludes that the AEA is both unconstitutionally vague and substantially
overbroad. The AEA’s “harmful to minors” standard applies to minors of all ages, so it fails to
provide fair notice of what is prohibited, and it encourages discriminatory enforcement. The
AEA is substantially overbroad because it applies to public property or “anywhere” a minor
could be present.”

And... it'll be amended and move forward.

The fact you're joyous over this means something.

Sad

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Yeah, it means I respect the first amendment and understand the the constitution applies to everyone and not just people I agree with.

Slinging dick in front of kids... doesn't equal First Amendment rights...



Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

That’s illegal without this law. This law is overly broad and as written would be used to target people you don’t like who happen to be in a dress.

Write a law that says it’s illegal to show kids your genitals and everyone will sign it (except Lauren Bobert’s ex husband since that’s kind of his thing).

Bullllllllllll Shiiiiiiiiiit

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(04-20-2023 09:40 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-19-2023 08:07 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 09:06 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-18-2023 08:54 PM)maximus Wrote:  "Drag Queen Story Hour?" Or no?

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Did the children’s parents knowingly take them to this story time? You know provide consent for THEIR children? Was not the support behind all the recent education “reform” about parents being able to make the choice. You just mad someone else used their freedom in a way you don’t like. You snowflakes are going to snowflake.

You're equating school curriculum and ensuring the PUBLIC education system teaches kids correctly and knowing what they are being taught.....to allowing parents to subject their kids to this depraved ****?

You obviously have a screw loose. I mean ****, let's allow parents to teach their kids to rob banks, be prostitutes, smoke, drink, etc etc...

You know what.... **** you dude. You're a ****** up individual.

Actually, I think I found you on Twitter.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

You are the stains trying to take away parental rights. You and the rest trying to tag this as better of the community are lying through your teeth. Your actions, you know the things that speak louder than words, show you don't care about freedom.

I try very hard not to hate but in your case I find myself inching closer and closer to it. Are you really such a POS that you support these perversions or do you just like to argue to hear your own voice?

(04-02-2023 10:09 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 09:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 08:00 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 07:40 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(04-02-2023 05:58 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Argument by mischaracterization is a bad loo there, Maximus. Just saying.


Where exactly is it covered 'in the law' and for purposes of Tennessee law?

Apparently the Federal judge in the case doesnt agree with your argument about that. Funny that........

That movie/show has a rating to allow audiences of certain ages to see the show.... what don't you understand that kids aren't involved.

Thats not a law nor part of a law. Care to try again?

Yes it is,

Tennessee Code 39-17-907, enacted in 1989, states, "...viewing a motion picture designated "R" for restricted audiences, persons under eighteen (18) years of age not admitted unless accompanied by parent or adult guardian..."

Violating the law is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by a $2,500 fine and/or 11 months and 29 days in jail.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

Couple of things --

1) Seems the federal judge disagrees with you on the applicability of the now enjoined law to showing RH Pic Show and that the point is made moot by the R-rating statute. Imagine that.

and

2)

Quote:During the hearing, Defendants agreed with the Court’s observation that current obscenity laws already account for much of the conduct that the Statute seeks to punish. When the Court asked exactly what conduct this Statute reaches that is outside the scope of Tennessee’s obscenity laws, Defendant initially answered that the Statute adds very little

Did you catch that little thing about 'current obscenity laws' there Max?

The funny thing is that the issue with the now-enjoined law is that it seemed overbroad, and should be scaled back to avoid it being overbroad.

No one disagrees with your issues on that there should be activity that should be prohibited.

But your response to the issue that the law is overbroad is to label anyone and everyone who thinks that it should solely be crafted more carefully somehow supports the more extreme items you go spastic and apeshit about.

Good grief. Talk about unhinged.

So do the current obscenity laws make it illegal for children to be in attendance at drag shows? If they do then why aren't they being used?

You must support these perversions as well, it is the ONLY reason for someone to argue in favor of them.

You are all sick frickin weirdos that don't mind children being exposed to sexual deviants and deviancy.

Come around my grandchildren with that crap while I'm present and you won't like the results.