(04-03-2023 01:01 PM)mlb Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 12:45 PM)b2b Wrote:  Yes, I do. It's why I say we need laws to be passed that ban this nonsense altogether.

Ok, so you don't believe in this part:

Quote:No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

And, since you asked, here is the defition from the Oxford dictionary, of which I agree:

Quote:the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behavior, or political views.

Don't get me wrong, I would never want to go through it or my kids, but if they decide at 18 that they want to do that then it should be their right. I don't agree with doing it before 18, as they are too young to make something of sound judgment at that time. There is a reason we don't establish a child as an adult until 18.

We all talk about freedom, but for a very large percentage of the population it is freedom as long as you agree with their personal viewpoint. That goes for abortion, gay marriage, inoculations, etc., as well, clearly.

Uhhhh, thought kids are kids until 26 now, right?

The vast majority of mental illness, most of it schizophrenia manifests itself somewhere between 17-18 and 24-26.

Soooooo, who’s we talking about here with these people?

They need counseling help and perhaps some form of “gentle” medication, not a scalpel and purple hair dye.

How was this near nonexistent a scant 20 yrs ago? What’s changed?

It’s probably too soon but we’ll start hearing about “transition regret” in great numbers in the future. A young person’s brain isn’t fully developed until 25 or so. The rational thinking areas of the brain are some of the last to be developed.

If we’re “allowing” young people to transition by removing breasts or pecker with testicles before the age of 25, we’re doing our young people a terrible disservice by not working harder to keep them from mutilating their bodies.

An 18 year old may have the right to transition. Someone needs to be asking the question if they should.

(P enis is censored)

(04-03-2023 02:34 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 12:36 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 12:33 PM)mlb Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 12:24 PM)b2b Wrote:  No we need to outlaw medical "transitioning" altogether.

So you want to take away a person's liberty? How very unpatriotic, let alone opposite of what Republicans constantly say they support.

I'm all for making a law making it illegal to happen until a person is 18, but after that if someone wants to switch gender then I don't care. Have at it.

Yes, if that's the idiotic way you want to frame it. I'm not allowed to drive without a seat belt on either.

In all seriousness saying this is "unpatriotic" has to be one of the dumbest ******* things I've ever read on this board. These people have major mental issues and permanently disfiguring the body given to them isn't going to help them.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

So you also want to outlaw breast augmentation, tattoos, and piercings?

Or you are willing to make an exception to your moral outrage around body modifications as long as it’s for Susie to have bigger tits for everyone to look at?

If we are going to go hardcore on the “only use what god gave us” stance then boob jobs, low testosterone injections, and viagra are all gone and they are all pretty popular with the MAGA crowd.

Full retard post alert.... my God

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(04-03-2023 02:34 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 12:36 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 12:33 PM)mlb Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 12:24 PM)b2b Wrote:  No we need to outlaw medical "transitioning" altogether.

So you want to take away a person's liberty? How very unpatriotic, let alone opposite of what Republicans constantly say they support.

I'm all for making a law making it illegal to happen until a person is 18, but after that if someone wants to switch gender then I don't care. Have at it.

Yes, if that's the idiotic way you want to frame it. I'm not allowed to drive without a seat belt on either.

In all seriousness saying this is "unpatriotic" has to be one of the dumbest ******* things I've ever read on this board. These people have major mental issues and permanently disfiguring the body given to them isn't going to help them.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

So you also want to outlaw breast augmentation, tattoos, and piercings?

Or you are willing to make an exception to your moral outrage around body modifications as long as it’s for Susie to have bigger tits for everyone to look at?

If we are going to go hardcore on the “only use what god gave us” stance then boob jobs, low testosterone injections, and viagra are all gone and they are all pretty popular with the MAGA crowd.

This line of deflection borders on disgusting.

(04-03-2023 06:11 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

That bald skank enjoyed that psychotic tranny murdering those people. But that murdering tranny was white and Baldy had to inject race into the discussion.

(04-03-2023 02:34 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 12:36 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 12:33 PM)mlb Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 12:24 PM)b2b Wrote:  No we need to outlaw medical "transitioning" altogether.

So you want to take away a person's liberty? How very unpatriotic, let alone opposite of what Republicans constantly say they support.

I'm all for making a law making it illegal to happen until a person is 18, but after that if someone wants to switch gender then I don't care. Have at it.

Yes, if that's the idiotic way you want to frame it. I'm not allowed to drive without a seat belt on either.

In all seriousness saying this is "unpatriotic" has to be one of the dumbest ******* things I've ever read on this board. These people have major mental issues and permanently disfiguring the body given to them isn't going to help them.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

So you also want to outlaw breast augmentation, tattoos, and piercings?

Or you are willing to make an exception to your moral outrage around body modifications as long as it’s for Susie to have bigger tits for everyone to look at?

If we are going to go hardcore on the “only use what god gave us” stance then boob jobs, low testosterone injections, and viagra are all gone and they are all pretty popular with the MAGA crowd.

When it comes to children, yes groomer.

It's called registration. How many people have to have their cars registered ALONG with insurance. I can live with this with guns being accountable.

(04-03-2023 10:19 PM)sierrajip Wrote:  It's called registration. How many people have to have their cars registered ALONG with insurance. I can live with this with guns being accountable.

No

(04-03-2023 10:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 10:19 PM)sierrajip Wrote:  It's called registration. How many people have to have their cars registered ALONG with insurance. I can live with this with guns being accountable.

No

Can't be accountable? Why. You don't believe anything should be accountable and I am not a fan of insurance companies.

(04-03-2023 10:48 PM)sierrajip Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 10:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 10:19 PM)sierrajip Wrote:  It's called registration. How many people have to have their cars registered ALONG with insurance. I can live with this with guns being accountable.

No

Can't be accountable? Why. You don't believe anything should be accountable and I am not a fan of insurance companies.

No. Frick no. Dont ask me loaded questions. You think bulshite laws an insurance willl make people accountable frick no. Trackable if you are honrst.

Read the mf constituition. No. Frick no. Not one damn inch am I giving on this shite. You can. Call the sheriff, give him your serial numbers. Leave me the frick slone. That lunatic rabid tramny that murdered kids wouldnt have been stopped by your false accountability.

Im accountable for everything i do. I dont need the gdammed govt butting into my life anymore thas the authoritarian aholes already do.

So no. Frick no. You do you though. I aint registering shite .



What other constitutional rights do you want me register for and get insurance. Speech registration. Church registration.

Frick no. No.

(04-03-2023 10:19 PM)sierrajip Wrote:  It's called registration. How many people have to have their cars registered ALONG with insurance. I can live with this with guns being accountable.

how many cars have an amendment in the constitution?

(04-03-2023 11:44 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 10:48 PM)sierrajip Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 10:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 10:19 PM)sierrajip Wrote:  It's called registration. How many people have to have their cars registered ALONG with insurance. I can live with this with guns being accountable.

No

Can't be accountable? Why. You don't believe anything should be accountable and I am not a fan of insurance companies.

No. Frick no. Dont ask me loaded questions. You think bulshite laws an insurance willl make people accountable frick no. Trackable if you are honrst.

Read the mf constituition. No. Frick no. Not one damn inch am I giving on this shite. You can. Call the sheriff, give him your serial numbers. Leave me the frick slone. That lunatic rabid tramny that murdered kids wouldnt have been stopped by your false accountability.

Im accountable for everything i do. I dont need the gdammed govt butting into my life anymore thas the authoritarian aholes already do.

So no. Frick no. You do you though. I aint registering shite .



What other constitutional rights do you want me register for and get insurance. Speech registration. Church registration.

Frick no. No.

that jefferson quote explains why the Bill of Rights exists in the 1st place. The constitution was not going to be ratified until addition clauses were added that placed more restrictions on the federal government.

Quote:PREAMBLE TO THE BILL OF RIGHTS
Congress of the United States
begun and held at the City of New-York, on
Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

The 12 amendments which followed were included to specifically identify exactly how the citizens can keep the government in check and prevent it from becoming tyrannical.

Yes, there were 12 amendments initially. Only 10 were ratified.

(04-03-2023 10:48 PM)sierrajip Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 10:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 10:19 PM)sierrajip Wrote:  It's called registration. How many people have to have their cars registered ALONG with insurance. I can live with this with guns being accountable.

No

Can't be accountable? Why. You don't believe anything should be accountable and I am not a fan of insurance companies.

Have you ever purchased a gun?

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(04-03-2023 09:54 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 02:34 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 12:36 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 12:33 PM)mlb Wrote:  

(04-03-2023 12:24 PM)b2b Wrote:  No we need to outlaw medical "transitioning" altogether.

So you want to take away a person's liberty? How very unpatriotic, let alone opposite of what Republicans constantly say they support.

I'm all for making a law making it illegal to happen until a person is 18, but after that if someone wants to switch gender then I don't care. Have at it.

Yes, if that's the idiotic way you want to frame it. I'm not allowed to drive without a seat belt on either.

In all seriousness saying this is "unpatriotic" has to be one of the dumbest ******* things I've ever read on this board. These people have major mental issues and permanently disfiguring the body given to them isn't going to help them.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

So you also want to outlaw breast augmentation, tattoos, and piercings?

Or you are willing to make an exception to your moral outrage around body modifications as long as it’s for Susie to have bigger tits for everyone to look at?

If we are going to go hardcore on the “only use what god gave us” stance then boob jobs, low testosterone injections, and viagra are all gone and they are all pretty popular with the MAGA crowd.

When it comes to children, yes groomer.

He didn’t say children, he said all together. Left to right, top to bottom. Try reading the post.

Groomer

(04-04-2023 01:57 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Groomer

Fascist who thinks the constitution only applies to straight white people ^

(04-04-2023 02:07 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-04-2023 01:57 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Groomer

Fascist who thinks the constitution only applies to straight white people ^

Groomer who thinks children are sex objects.

(04-04-2023 02:07 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-04-2023 01:57 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Groomer

Fascist who thinks the constitution only applies to straight white people ^

So you think it's proper to allow someone with a mental illness to have their genitals chopped off?

(04-04-2023 03:02 PM)b2b Wrote:  

(04-04-2023 02:07 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(04-04-2023 01:57 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Groomer

Fascist who thinks the constitution only applies to straight white people ^

So you think it's proper to allow someone with a mental illness to have their genitals chopped off?

If they are an adult I think it’s unconstitutional to stop them.