(03-03-2023 05:44 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 05:38 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 04:35 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 03:11 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  I didn't say he had the same attitude as those who committed the holocaust (SS, concentration camp workers, nazi leaders). I said that his attitude of "I don't care about the rights of anyone I don't like" is the type of attitude that paved the way for the holocaust.

The vast majority of the german population weren't Nazis. They didn't know about the final solution. But they went along with the increasing persecution of jews primarily because of the same logic Bartlett has "I don't care about their rights because they are different".

You're a liar twisting my words. That is NOT what I said.

I was really respecting your “that’s what I said and I meant it” attitude compared to Eric’s futile attempts to weasel around his bigoted dog whistles.

What you literally said is “ No I won't defend someone's right to do something I don't like”

Sounds like you said it.

No one here is buying any of this bs, Elvis. Even you know that.

We all see right through you for the compulsive lying troll you really are.

You told us a lot about your character in this thread. None of it was good.

We also learned that guys in dresses really seem to turn you on, since the only way you can see them is sexual. Maybe you learned something about yourself in this thread.

(03-03-2023 06:05 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 05:44 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 05:38 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 04:35 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 03:11 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  I didn't say he had the same attitude as those who committed the holocaust (SS, concentration camp workers, nazi leaders). I said that his attitude of "I don't care about the rights of anyone I don't like" is the type of attitude that paved the way for the holocaust.

The vast majority of the german population weren't Nazis. They didn't know about the final solution. But they went along with the increasing persecution of jews primarily because of the same logic Bartlett has "I don't care about their rights because they are different".

You're a liar twisting my words. That is NOT what I said.

I was really respecting your “that’s what I said and I meant it” attitude compared to Eric’s futile attempts to weasel around his bigoted dog whistles.

What you literally said is “ No I won't defend someone's right to do something I don't like”

Sounds like you said it.

No one here is buying any of this bs, Elvis. Even you know that.

We all see right through you for the compulsive lying troll you really are.

You told us a lot about your character in this thread. None of it was good.

We also learned that guys in dresses really seem to turn you on, since the only way you can see them is sexual. Maybe you learned something about yourself in this thread.

Bless your heart

(03-03-2023 05:59 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Save your humanitarian bullsh!t for your leftist friends. My dad was a warrior and he taught me to win at all costs.

Id say quite the the bang up job he did on you.....

Namaste and hugs Barteet. To quote, at least in part, eric: Bless your little black hate filled heart.

You just can't stand there's someone here that's a bigger ahole than you.

(03-03-2023 03:22 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  3. I don't know if the FO was a minority or not, but what makes you think him being a minority has anything at all to do with the crash which according to the NTSB was caused by spacial disorientation after inadvertent activation of the autopilots go around mode. Are you saying that it happened because he was a minority? Are you saying that white people are better pilots?

The FO was a Black man, and I don't think his being Black did anything to cause the crash. The crash happened because he was a terrible pilot who made some critical mistakes flying the airplane. What his being Black may well have caused was for him to be hired ahead of a more qualified other pilot.

(03-03-2023 03:22 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  3. I don't know if the FO was a minority or not, but what makes you think him being a minority has anything at all to do with the crash which according to the NTSB was caused by spacial disorientation after inadvertent activation of the autopilots go around mode. Are you saying that it happened because he was a minority? Are you saying that white people are better pilots?

The FO was a Black man, and I don't think his being Black did anything to cause the crash. The crash happened because he was a terrible pilot who made some critical mistakes flying the airplane. What his being Black may well have caused was for him to be hired ahead of a more qualified other pilot.

The funniest part in all this is here you have two presumably educated mature men acting as if they hold some moral superiority over some others of us here when in actuality they are in the smallest of minorities here. Almost every one is laughing at them, no one takes them seriously and no one really cares anything about their opinions. And yet they've taken up 35 pages trying in vain to make points few here agree with. Their points have been refuted and rejected on every page and they are simply too dense to realize how stupid they appear to others so they keep bleating and blathering on.

(03-03-2023 08:57 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  The funniest part in all this is here you have two presumably educated mature men acting as if they hold some moral superiority over some others of us here when in actuality they are in the smallest of minorities here. Almost every one is laughing at them, no one takes them seriously and no one really cares anything about their opinions. And yet they've taken up 35 pages trying in vain to make points few here agree with. Their points have been refuted and rejected on every page and they are simply too dense to realize how stupid they appear to others so they keep bleating and blathering on.

Cue Elvis with more sheep bleating

(03-03-2023 08:57 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  The funniest part in all this is here you have two presumably educated mature men acting as if they hold some moral superiority over some others of us here when in actuality they are in the smallest of minorities here. Almost every one is laughing at them, no one takes them seriously and no one really cares anything about their opinions. And yet they've taken up 35 pages trying in vain to make points few here agree with. Their points have been refuted and rejected on every page and they are simply too dense to realize how stupid they appear to others so they keep bleating and blathering on.

This is an example of the psychology of a leftist. In order to worship at that altar an individual must be extremely narcissistic and fully incapable of ever admitting they are ever wrong (even in a nuanced way). Because of this, any differing opinion is not viewed as an assault on the idea being discussed but an assault on the individual. By disagreeing with a leftist they personally feel attacked because their entire identity is built around their ideology and the idea that they are never wrong. They are truly anti-intellectuals and thus not worth the effort of having any sort of serious discussion with.

(03-03-2023 08:50 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  You just can't stand there's someone here that's a bigger ahole than you.

No. Just somewhat amazed that the stick you have up your ass about people in general hasnt created an aneurysm for you.

(03-03-2023 09:32 PM)RuckleSt Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 08:57 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  The funniest part in all this is here you have two presumably educated mature men acting as if they hold some moral superiority over some others of us here when in actuality they are in the smallest of minorities here. Almost every one is laughing at them, no one takes them seriously and no one really cares anything about their opinions. And yet they've taken up 35 pages trying in vain to make points few here agree with. Their points have been refuted and rejected on every page and they are simply too dense to realize how stupid they appear to others so they keep bleating and blathering on.

This is an example of the psychology of a leftist. In order to worship at that altar an individual must be extremely narcissistic and fully incapable of ever admitting they are ever wrong (even in a nuanced way). Because of this, any differing opinion is not viewed as an assault on the idea being discussed but an assault on the individual. By disagreeing with a leftist they personally feel attacked because their entire identity is built around their ideology and the idea that they are never wrong. They are truly anti-intellectuals and thus not worth the effort of having any sort of serious discussion with.

I truly understand…. Especially when the response to ‘golly, the law could be tailored to be a little less overbroad’, and the response is spittle-flecked ‘groomer’.

When that is bleated constantly, it is pretty good evidence of a decent amount of ignorance. Thanks for further in the above. Bravo (I guess…..)

Kind of like a chat board version of the monkey/man opening scene in Kubrick’s 2001….

The funny thing is that you are apparently too stupid to even apparently denote the point being made before the chimp tribe response kicks in for you. And the funny thing is that you huff and puff about a point being 'refuted', when, to put it simply, I doubt you can even name what the point is. Just that it involves guys and dresses, and lordy be how anyone shouldnt do *anything* but think that that combination should simply be locked away.

The asinine kneejerk paroxysms of gnashing teeth and spittle are pretty much what one expects from a bad comedy. Please keep it up. Mention anything with 'guy' and 'dress' and watch all the pinheads pour out gnashing their red army ant jaws, ready to defend the hive. Lolz.

Yes, saying that the law is overbroad, and maybe think about making it quite not so vague *is*, by pretty much any means imaginable, morally superior to both: 'fk em and let them appeal', *and* 'well you are a groomer'. That much is blindingly obvious to even the most thick-headed. But apparently.....

Does anyone actually read all his drivel?

(03-04-2023 04:19 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Does anyone actually read all his drivel?

No

Tennessee protects children from freaks. The regular prog filth groomer weirdos do what they do best

Reeeeeeee

(03-03-2023 03:25 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I don't care whom you sleep with or what you do with your body--at least, as long as you are a mentally competent adult.

But I do care when you start impacting the lives of others, particularly others who are somehow disadvantaged in achieving the best for themselves. I don't care if you mutilate your own genitals; I do care if you mutilate someone else's, or influence someone else to mutilate his/her own. I don't care if you want to dress in drag, or to do drag shows for adults. I do care whether you perform such shows for children. So in my opinion the Tennessee statute does some good things, but is overly broad.

I really wish conservatives were willing just to take what they can get, one step at a time, instead of always going for the jugular.

Well said.

(03-03-2023 10:07 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 08:50 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  You just can't stand there's someone here that's a bigger ahole than you.

No. Just somewhat amazed that the stick you have up your ass about people in general hasnt created an aneurysm for you.

Funny, I only see about 3-4 people out of the many posters here he has a stick up his ass about. As to the general population you speak of I feel confident in speaking for him by stating that the only people he has a problem with are those that the majority of our society also deem problematic. The people you are worried about him having issues with are a small segment of our society who receive far more attention than they deserve.

(03-03-2023 10:13 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 09:32 PM)RuckleSt Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 08:57 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  The funniest part in all this is here you have two presumably educated mature men acting as if they hold some moral superiority over some others of us here when in actuality they are in the smallest of minorities here. Almost every one is laughing at them, no one takes them seriously and no one really cares anything about their opinions. And yet they've taken up 35 pages trying in vain to make points few here agree with. Their points have been refuted and rejected on every page and they are simply too dense to realize how stupid they appear to others so they keep bleating and blathering on.

This is an example of the psychology of a leftist. In order to worship at that altar an individual must be extremely narcissistic and fully incapable of ever admitting they are ever wrong (even in a nuanced way). Because of this, any differing opinion is not viewed as an assault on the idea being discussed but an assault on the individual. By disagreeing with a leftist they personally feel attacked because their entire identity is built around their ideology and the idea that they are never wrong. They are truly anti-intellectuals and thus not worth the effort of having any sort of serious discussion with.

I truly understand…. Especially when the response to ‘golly, the law could be tailored to be a little less overbroad’, and the response is spittle-flecked ‘groomer’.

When that is bleated constantly, it is pretty good evidence of a decent amount of ignorance. Thanks for further in the above. Bravo (I guess…..)

Kind of like a chat board version of the monkey/man opening scene in Kubrick’s 2001….

The funny thing is that you are apparently too stupid to even apparently denote the point being made before the chimp tribe response kicks in for you. And the funny thing is that you huff and puff about a point being 'refuted', when, to put it simply, I doubt you can even name what the point is. Just that it involves guys and dresses, and lordy be how anyone shouldnt do *anything* but think that that combination should simply be locked away.

The asinine kneejerk paroxysms of gnashing teeth and spittle are pretty much what one expects from a bad comedy. Please keep it up. Mention anything with 'guy' and 'dress' and watch all the pinheads pour out gnashing their red army ant jaws, ready to defend the hive. Lolz.

Yes, saying that the law is overbroad, and maybe think about making it quite not so vague *is*, by pretty much any means imaginable, morally superior to both: 'fk em and let them appeal', *and* 'well you are a groomer'. That much is blindingly obvious to even the most thick-headed. But apparently.....

For a lawyer you have an awful command of the English language. I don't even know what the fuq you're trying to say in that rant.

Oh, and the point is that the people of TN now have a law which protects children from exposure to indecency and perversion hiding under the guise of "art". It doesn't matter what you or anyone else not from TN think about the law itself, whether it's too broad or not broad enough, whether its language is too vague or too specific, regardless of any aspect of the law you have no say so about it, yet here you remain, bleating on and on incoherently. STFU and sit down.

(03-04-2023 08:40 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-04-2023 04:19 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Does anyone actually read all his drivel?

No

Tennessee protects children from freaks. The regular prog filth groomer weirdos do what they do best

Reeeeeeee

See, I just typed out two paragraphs to basically say what you just said.

(03-04-2023 10:10 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(03-04-2023 08:40 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-04-2023 04:19 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Does anyone actually read all his drivel?

No

Tennessee protects children from freaks. The regular prog filth groomer weirdos do what they do best

Reeeeeeee

See, I just typed out two paragraphs to basically say what you just said.

tanq would have needed 50 paragraphs

(03-04-2023 10:08 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 10:13 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 09:32 PM)RuckleSt Wrote:  

(03-03-2023 08:57 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  The funniest part in all this is here you have two presumably educated mature men acting as if they hold some moral superiority over some others of us here when in actuality they are in the smallest of minorities here. Almost every one is laughing at them, no one takes them seriously and no one really cares anything about their opinions. And yet they've taken up 35 pages trying in vain to make points few here agree with. Their points have been refuted and rejected on every page and they are simply too dense to realize how stupid they appear to others so they keep bleating and blathering on.

This is an example of the psychology of a leftist. In order to worship at that altar an individual must be extremely narcissistic and fully incapable of ever admitting they are ever wrong (even in a nuanced way). Because of this, any differing opinion is not viewed as an assault on the idea being discussed but an assault on the individual. By disagreeing with a leftist they personally feel attacked because their entire identity is built around their ideology and the idea that they are never wrong. They are truly anti-intellectuals and thus not worth the effort of having any sort of serious discussion with.

I truly understand…. Especially when the response to ‘golly, the law could be tailored to be a little less overbroad’, and the response is spittle-flecked ‘groomer’.

When that is bleated constantly, it is pretty good evidence of a decent amount of ignorance. Thanks for further in the above. Bravo (I guess…..)

Kind of like a chat board version of the monkey/man opening scene in Kubrick’s 2001….

The funny thing is that you are apparently too stupid to even apparently denote the point being made before the chimp tribe response kicks in for you. And the funny thing is that you huff and puff about a point being 'refuted', when, to put it simply, I doubt you can even name what the point is. Just that it involves guys and dresses, and lordy be how anyone shouldnt do *anything* but think that that combination should simply be locked away.

The asinine kneejerk paroxysms of gnashing teeth and spittle are pretty much what one expects from a bad comedy. Please keep it up. Mention anything with 'guy' and 'dress' and watch all the pinheads pour out gnashing their red army ant jaws, ready to defend the hive. Lolz.

Yes, saying that the law is overbroad, and maybe think about making it quite not so vague *is*, by pretty much any means imaginable, morally superior to both: 'fk em and let them appeal', *and* 'well you are a groomer'. That much is blindingly obvious to even the most thick-headed. But apparently.....

I don't even know what the fuq you're trying to say in that rant.

Im sure you dont.

Quote:Oh, and the point is that the people of TN now have a law which protects children from exposure to indecency and perversion hiding under the guise of "art". It doesn't matter what you or anyone else not from TN think about the law itself, whether it's too broad or not broad enough, whether its language is too vague or too specific, regardless of any aspect of the law you have no say so about it, yet here you remain, bleating on and on incoherently. STFU and sit down.

Relatedly, I am absolutely sure that you dont give a flip about whether the law is broad or vague. Kind of rolls with you I would guess from the rest of your tone most of the time.

No we don't give a flip. Next?