(09-23-2022 02:17 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote: (09-22-2022 11:31 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: (09-22-2022 10:21 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote: (09-22-2022 09:23 PM)tanqtonic Wrote: (09-22-2022 07:26 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote: Most of us remember seeing this dog and pony show before with the aforementioned (Russia, Russia, Russia) and the (we've got the bastard now) legally but falsely obtained FISA warrant. If I remember correctly the LEFT rode that donkey for 3 years with seemingly endless mounds of evidence to support their salacious claims. It was all good up until it suddenly wasn't worth the paper it was typed on and it all fell apart like the proverbially house of cards.
Yeah, you're right the DOJ and FBI would neaaaaaaaaaver create false evidence to support their cause - which is to damage Trump ahead of the '24 election. The list is long of high-ranking people and organizations that supposedly had enough to put Trump away - Lawyer Michael Avenatti, Congressman Eric Swalwell, etc. The common denominator each time has been just another bunch of lies put out to tarnish Trump's name with the public, and to keep him tied up with the process.
You believe whatever you want, but a good lawyer would have the common sense to say, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me" when looking at (evidence) provided by questionable parties that have a recent track record of fabricating false information, and an obvious hatred for the individual being accused. Lastly, tell your 'friend' LeftwingTom that you mentioned you created your statement for that I said hello.
Here's a nice timeline of how professional and above board the people are that you seem anxious to hitch your wagon to.
https://i0.wp.com/fatherlyadviceandrants....jpg?ssl=1
I guess you are circling back to the 'it was planted' or 'it was manufactured' explanation.
Got it.
Looks like that ball of poo was taken to task by the special master today when he directed ol Donny to submit to him any issues they have on the inventory list
The tried and true 'Russia' followed by 'they planted it"
One would think there would be better than those stale, yet tried ad infinitum excuses.
Better yet, in the words of Judge Dearie, maybe some proof aside from the wild gyrations......
Seems like you're OK with a "ball of poo" so long as the "poo" came from a friendly source. Not surprised.
I am okay with the facts of the issue.
What I find utterly inane is some wild ass gyration of 'they planted it' with *zero* grounding in any fact whatsoever.
If there are in fact such items to support your mind numbingly idiotic and unsubstantiated comment about 'stuff was planted' or 'stuff was manufactured; -- take Judge Dearies advice and put it out there.
Simply said -- if your 'ball of poo' had some flipping grounding or basis in facts I wouldnt be noting it as a 'ball of poo'.
Or just keep throwing poo against the wall and see what sticks.
Not my problem. But somehow you are "surprised" when your groundless topic is noted for what it is. Bummer.
Maybe next go around blame the Roswell space aliens, or some secret Angolan email con ring -- have about as much grounding as your 'they planted it schtick'.... and it wouldnt be the so normally and mundane form of stupid exhibited.
Before you get your panties too wadded up, I was only implying - and correctly so - that these same people (FBI & DOJ) have attempted to pull the wool over the public's eyes before, and it took about 3 years to disprove the 'evidence' on that one. Since you're projecting yourself as someone that is all about the 'facts', we should be able to find some common ground that those are facts that have been proven and should be taken into consideration since it is basically the same people chasing the same person in this case. Guess anyone questioning that one during the first year or two would have been subjected to your cutesy 'Roswell space aliens' type of rhetoric too. Lolz - yeah, Bummer.
Without underlying facts -- yeah you would be correct. If you bothered to look I noted the underlying lack of facts there.
Quote:As far as you're concerned this is an open and shut case because they have a photo of papers on the floor along with some other unquestionable facts, and it's just a matter of time till we get to the sentencing phase. Does that sound about right?
Im still waiting for facts on the other side. I havent said 'hes guilty, lock him up'. Perhaps you should state where I have considering your comment above. Please do, be precise.
What I do have from the Donny side is what one typically gets from Donny. Excuse 1, then excuse 2, then 3, then 4..... I could go on but you get the picture.
Special master is now making him back up all the inveterate **** he has tossed out. Maybe Donny will give us some stuff under oath there -- that is stuff that can be taken as fact as to 'declassification' or 'they planted it'.
Or, more likely, he will simply do what he did on Fox and run all the same unsubstantiated **** that he has such an awesome track record of doing. And which then gets slurped up by his dear followers and regurgitated out from them like you just did.
Quote:I'm sure the Dems would be pleased if this one took a couple of years to disprove as well. Do you really think this was just about getting some OMG national security items back, and this was simply the only way to get it done?
The DOJ gave the Donald plenty of chances to do that. He blew off subpoenas, gave them a false sworn declaration, and that is how we got there.
But again you show your awesome streak of 'conspiracy' hive mind when you conflate the DOJ actions and the 'Dems would be pleased' along with the claptrap about them running how it goes.
You seem really steeped in conspiracy stuff at the drop of a hat washout the basics of actually bothering with the little stuff like underlying facts.
Quote:On a side note -
Did you happen to see what the Sun Belt 3 ended up paying to CUSA to leave early? It just came out recently and I thought you would be interested to see if it was close to your predicted outcome.
Yep sure did. Pretty slick move of the shitbird breachers to run to their own court to weasel out of their agreement to binding arbitration. Nothing like getting the local JP style judge to grant them their out where what they signed and agreed to they really didnt sign and agree to -- and simply bog it down.
Not that the above has much to do with the current Donny thing except for you to provide a whiny comment,. Bravo.... (I guess)
Not that the underlying facts have much to do with your whine above. Seems to be a pattern.