uh oh, now we have the SUpreme Court vs Scorpius being decided today as well:

(06-24-2022 10:07 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  Go ask all the Roe supporters what it forbids and allows, 70 percent of them would have no idea.

The court is now neutral on abortion, as it should be. I’m pro choice.

You mean pro extermination or should I dare say pro murder.

(06-24-2022 12:17 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Pretty certain there's gotta be some semen from somewhere to get a woman pregnant. So are we going to have a complete revamp of the mans financial responsibility for getting a woman pregnant in these states where abortion gets outlawed?

Also I like the "just carry the baby to term and give it up for adoption" pretending that getting medical care being pregnant is just free or something and that there are zero short and long term health risks from being pregnant even aside from just the potential of dying during childbirth (which in a lot of the states that will ban abortion their mortality rates are at the level of some 3rd world countries).

https://gradynewsource.uga.edu/in-georgi...ave-lives/

There are countless fully legit points both sides can make on the damage Roe did and the damage overturning it could do.

But the most important truth here is that its not in the constitution and never was. And we lied for 50 years and pretended it was.

And that is all this ruling is saying. The truth.

Guessing some of the people on here praising the decision are going to themselves or their kids literally **** around and find out.

Best of luck.

(06-24-2022 12:18 PM)ODUDrunkard13 Wrote:  I'm all for states rights but I'm concerned about what will happen to women with ectopic pregnancies, septate uteruses and unreleased miscarriages. I hope the politicians take these women/illnesses into consideration when they introduce new laws regarding abortion.

Hope so. Each of these are life threatening medical conditions that don't care about your stance on the issue of abortion. Ectopic pregnancies are scary as hell to read about.

(06-24-2022 12:25 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 12:18 PM)ODUDrunkard13 Wrote:  I'm all for states rights but I'm concerned about what will happen to women with ectopic pregnancies, septate uteruses and unreleased miscarriages. I hope the politicians take these women/illnesses into consideration when they introduce new laws regarding abortion.

Hope so. Each of these are life threatening medical conditions that don't care about your stance on the issue of abortion. Ectopic pregnancies are scary as hell to read about.

There are a lot of issues that will have to be dealt with now that its back to the states.

And that is what is best for the country on this issue instead of lying and pretending its in the constitution.

(06-24-2022 09:27 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  I see a lot of Leftist run cities burning down for a couple weeks.........again. Which Demicrat politician will go on camera and cry first. Somebody do a poll. I say Schumer.

It was obama and the dofus.

(06-24-2022 10:15 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:33 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  What happens next? Women will die. Others will be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Children will be born into households that cannot and do not want to take care of them.

Approximately 70 million babies have died under Roe v Wade.

I find it disturbing that people can be concerned about women dying (that's not even factual, it hypothetical) or carrying babies to full term yet not speak on the horror of 70 million ACTUAL aborted babies.

Hypocrisy is just not a big enough word here.

You wither care about life or you don't. You can't pick and choose which lives matter and which do not.

More people die in automobile accidents each year. Let’s hurry up and pass laws to ban automobiles and crush all of them.

There are risks every day we step out the door of our house. Is the number of women dying from childbirth even 1/1000? Probably more like 1/100,000. Weak and sad justification for murder.


Just fool’s talk.

That Biden speech made me cringe... so much disinformation and lies and division.

(06-24-2022 12:24 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 12:17 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Pretty certain there's gotta be some semen from somewhere to get a woman pregnant. So are we going to have a complete revamp of the mans financial responsibility for getting a woman pregnant in these states where abortion gets outlawed?

Also I like the "just carry the baby to term and give it up for adoption" pretending that getting medical care being pregnant is just free or something and that there are zero short and long term health risks from being pregnant even aside from just the potential of dying during childbirth (which in a lot of the states that will ban abortion their mortality rates are at the level of some 3rd world countries).

https://gradynewsource.uga.edu/in-georgi...ave-lives/

There are countless fully legit points both side can make on the damage Roe did and the damage overturning it could do.

But the most important truth here is that its not in the constitution and never was. And we lied for 50 years and pretended it was.

And that is all this ruling is saying. The truth.

Well the supposed "pro life" party now has to deal with the consequences in the states that outlaw abortions. A whole lot of men out there pretending pregnancies are cheap and without health risks. I'll be interested to hear what the states that outlaw abortions are going to propose to ensure low income women who can't afford the exorbitant costs of carrying a child to term in this country are taken care of, I'm sure it's going to be robust since protecting life is the most important thing ever and you wouldn't want women dying because of not being able to afford medical treatment.

(06-24-2022 12:31 PM)BlueDragon Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:15 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:33 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  What happens next? Women will die. Others will be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Children will be born into households that cannot and do not want to take care of them.

Approximately 70 million babies have died under Roe v Wade.

I find it disturbing that people can be concerned about women dying (that's not even factual, it hypothetical) or carrying babies to full term yet not speak on the horror of 70 million ACTUAL aborted babies.

Hypocrisy is just not a big enough word here.

You wither care about life or you don't. You can't pick and choose which lives matter and which do not.

More people die in automobile accidents each year. Let’s hurry up and pass laws to ban automobiles and crush all of them.

There are risks every day we step out the door of our house. Is the number of women dying from childbirth even 1/1000? Probably more like 1/100,000. Weak and sad justification for murder.


Just fool’s talk.

Yes, bringing up banning cars, is fool's talk. Nice self-own...lol

And, you're off. By a lot.

Quote:The maternal mortality rate for 2020 was 23.8 deaths per 100,000 live births compared with a rate of 20.1 in 2019

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/mat...s-2020.htm

(06-24-2022 10:23 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:10 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:09 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:06 AM)solohawks Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:38 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah, mostly. Women of means will also be able to travel to Mexico and other countries to get an abortion.

Simply a false statement.

If the people of a state want to continue the practice they are free to do so

Huh? What?

If they live in a state that bans it nearly completely, yes, they will travel to other states or countries.

How was my statement false?

Abortion is not banned by overturning Roe v Wade

States are now free to make laws

Yeah...and? Many states have already all but banned it or effectively closed nearly every clinic in the state...and many more states will likely follow. So women in those states, who have means, will still travel to other states or countries to get abortions.

Cry me a river. Especially since Lake Mead needs water. Such an inconvenience to have spend your hard earned $$$ to commit
murder.

(06-24-2022 12:33 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  That Biden speech made me cringe... so much disinformation and lies and division.

Speaking of Walking Dead Potus

A few receipts for his followers

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/29/us/po...ights.html



Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

(06-24-2022 12:35 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 12:24 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 12:17 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Pretty certain there's gotta be some semen from somewhere to get a woman pregnant. So are we going to have a complete revamp of the mans financial responsibility for getting a woman pregnant in these states where abortion gets outlawed?

Also I like the "just carry the baby to term and give it up for adoption" pretending that getting medical care being pregnant is just free or something and that there are zero short and long term health risks from being pregnant even aside from just the potential of dying during childbirth (which in a lot of the states that will ban abortion their mortality rates are at the level of some 3rd world countries).

https://gradynewsource.uga.edu/in-georgi...ave-lives/

There are countless fully legit points both side can make on the damage Roe did and the damage overturning it could do.

But the most important truth here is that its not in the constitution and never was. And we lied for 50 years and pretended it was.

And that is all this ruling is saying. The truth.

Well the supposed "pro life" party now has to deal with the consequences in the states that outlaw abortions. A whole lot of men out there pretending pregnancies are cheap and without health risks. I'll be interested to hear what the states that outlaw abortions are going to propose to ensure low income women who can't afford the exorbitant costs of carrying a child to term in this country are taken care of, I'm sure it's going to be robust since protecting life is the most important thing ever and you wouldn't want women dying because of not being able to afford medical treatment.

Its not just the red states, but the blue states will have ripple effects on this decision as well.

No matter how you frame the argument, it does not make it magically appear in the constitution, and that is the bottom line on all of this.

There are no hypothetical or doomsday predictions that change that simple truth.

(06-24-2022 09:34 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:33 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  What happens next? Women will die. Others will be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Children will be born into households that cannot and do not want to take care of them.

Its like some of the low iq people in this nation has never heard of adoption.

Yep, these stupid people think it's more harmful to the newborn to be taken and left at a firestation than to kill it. What's wrong with these people? I know, Satan's got a wrestlers hold on them badly.

(06-24-2022 12:24 PM)Gakusei Wrote:  Guessing some of the people on here praising the decision are going to themselves or their kids literally **** around and find out.

Best of luck.

Grown men are supposed to be responsible. I feel one of the responsibilities I have when I was put on this Earth is to PROTECT the children in my family.

(06-24-2022 12:44 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 12:24 PM)Gakusei Wrote:  Guessing some of the people on here praising the decision are going to themselves or their kids literally **** around and find out.

Best of luck.

Grown men are supposed to be responsible. I feel one of the responsibilities I have when I was put on this Earth is to PROTECT the children in my family.

A bunch of irresponsible ******** all around. A good law would be to force parents to actually take care of the children they pump out. It dumbfounds me how we don't hold parents responsible for their children in this country.

This is still one issue I wish the Republicans didn't care so much about.

Ok so abortions are banned now. Now we're going to get more kids raised by psychotic lunatic far-left women. How is this a good thing? Also means more future Democrat voters.

(06-24-2022 09:40 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:36 AM)Kyle Mack Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:33 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  What happens next? Women will die. Others will be forced to carry unwanted pregnancies to term. Children will be born into households that cannot and do not want to take care of them.

Women with means will still be able to get to blue states to get the operation performed. This includes the mistresses and the daughters of prominent GOP donors and members of congress.

And lastly, hopefully this motivates the 2/3rds of Americans who did not want to see Roe v Wade overturned to show up to the polls. I still think the Dems are going to take a beating in November but this will definitely blunt it IMO.

LOL how many woman died during childbirth last year, 0? It goes back to the states skyscreamer.

Considerably more than zero, 861 in the US in 2020 -

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/mat...s-2020.htm

This will surely go up now, if women who die from unsafe back-alley abortions are classified as maternal deaths.

861 versus millions of dead babies? I'll still take those odds.

Tell me Satan, how many of them would still be alive if they only used contraception during sex? Probably all of them, huh?

Congratulations, you are a proud member of the "Bola de Pendejos Club".

(06-24-2022 12:49 PM)SUisBigEast4ever Wrote:  This is still one issue I wish the Republicans didn't care so much about.

Ok so abortions are banned now. Now we're going to get more kids raised by psychotic lunatic far-left women. How is this a good thing? Also means more future Democrat voters.

Adoption, I mean it shouldnt be too hard for a mother to give up her kid if she didnt want the baby in the first place right?