Foreverandever
Heisman
Posts: 6,886
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 467
I Root For: &
Location:
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-29-2020 03:52 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote: (12-29-2020 04:44 AM)jedclampett Wrote: .
A wee bit of good news:
SMU has moved up to #38 in the Massey Composite.
There are still just 6 AAC teams in the top 100 of the Massey Composite, but USF and ECU are #104 and #108 respectively.
The American (winning percentage: a solid 73%) has settled into its familiar #7 conference ranking.
Other than Houston, AAC men's basketball isn't exactly setting the world on fire, but the conference will gladly take 7th place to help maintain its "Major 7" status.
ECU 107 and USF 112 now. Also 7 in top 100 by my count. Houston, SMU, UCF, Wichita, Tulsa, Memphis, Cincy
The jury is still out on Temple, and Tulane has definitely made improvements. The floor overall is up.
Houston
SMU
WSU
Tulsa
UCF
Memphis
USF
Cincy
ECU
Tulane
Unknown = Temple
|
|
12-30-2020 12:01 AM |
|
IamYourDad
Banned
Posts: 660
Joined: Oct 2018
I Root For: UCF
Location: In your head
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 12:01 AM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-29-2020 03:52 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote: (12-29-2020 04:44 AM)jedclampett Wrote: .
A wee bit of good news:
SMU has moved up to #38 in the Massey Composite.
There are still just 6 AAC teams in the top 100 of the Massey Composite, but USF and ECU are #104 and #108 respectively.
The American (winning percentage: a solid 73%) has settled into its familiar #7 conference ranking.
Other than Houston, AAC men's basketball isn't exactly setting the world on fire, but the conference will gladly take 7th place to help maintain its "Major 7" status.
ECU 107 and USF 112 now. Also 7 in top 100 by my count. Houston, SMU, UCF, Wichita, Tulsa, Memphis, Cincy
The jury is still out on Temple, and Tulane has definitely made improvements. The floor overall is up.
Houston
SMU
WSU
Tulsa
UCF
Memphis
USF
Cincy
ECU
Tulane
Unknown = Temple
I believe we're better than WSU and deserve to be in the same group as SMU. Our only two losses are to ranked teams, and also have a ranked win. Putting us behind WSU, even just based on resume, is disrespectful
|
|
12-30-2020 02:57 PM |
|
rath v2.0
Wartime Consigliere
Posts: 51,361
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 2169
I Root For: Civil Disobedience
Location: Tip Of The Mitt
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
Cincinnati is not very good...but it’s Tulsa at home next and as a scientific proof UC will get healthy against them.
|
|
12-30-2020 03:01 PM |
|
Foreverandever
Heisman
Posts: 6,886
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 467
I Root For: &
Location:
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 02:57 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: (12-30-2020 12:01 AM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-29-2020 03:52 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote: (12-29-2020 04:44 AM)jedclampett Wrote: .
A wee bit of good news:
SMU has moved up to #38 in the Massey Composite.
There are still just 6 AAC teams in the top 100 of the Massey Composite, but USF and ECU are #104 and #108 respectively.
The American (winning percentage: a solid 73%) has settled into its familiar #7 conference ranking.
Other than Houston, AAC men's basketball isn't exactly setting the world on fire, but the conference will gladly take 7th place to help maintain its "Major 7" status.
ECU 107 and USF 112 now. Also 7 in top 100 by my count. Houston, SMU, UCF, Wichita, Tulsa, Memphis, Cincy
The jury is still out on Temple, and Tulane has definitely made improvements. The floor overall is up.
Houston
SMU
WSU
Tulsa
UCF
Memphis
USF
Cincy
ECU
Tulane
Unknown = Temple
I believe we're better than WSU and deserve to be in the same group as SMU. Our only two losses are to ranked teams, and also have a ranked win. Putting us behind WSU, even just based on resume, is disrespectful
You may turn out better. Since the wheaties have got their full team back they have been pretty damn good and have a zero in the conference loss column, something only SMU can also say. SMU is also undefeated overall which is why they get up there with Houston. We beat Houston at home and you didn't so we are above you. This is for right now though. You go out win a couple more games and WSU gets an L then you'll be in front. Personally I'm not sure WSU finishes top four, I think you probably will, but we'll have to see.
Houston is probably the best team in conference, then throw together UCF, Tulsa, SMU, and Wichita to get the top five in some order. Memphis is in front of USF for that sixth spot and Cincy may get in the middle of it all some where or Temple or both could be in a slide. ECU is improved but reminds me of the USF team a few years ago dangerous if you take it lightly, Tulane isn't an auto W any. That's going to be the hardest part for UCF, they will have to prove to be consistent.
|
|
12-30-2020 03:22 PM |
|
IamYourDad
Banned
Posts: 660
Joined: Oct 2018
I Root For: UCF
Location: In your head
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 03:22 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 02:57 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: (12-30-2020 12:01 AM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-29-2020 03:52 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote: (12-29-2020 04:44 AM)jedclampett Wrote: .
A wee bit of good news:
SMU has moved up to #38 in the Massey Composite.
There are still just 6 AAC teams in the top 100 of the Massey Composite, but USF and ECU are #104 and #108 respectively.
The American (winning percentage: a solid 73%) has settled into its familiar #7 conference ranking.
Other than Houston, AAC men's basketball isn't exactly setting the world on fire, but the conference will gladly take 7th place to help maintain its "Major 7" status.
ECU 107 and USF 112 now. Also 7 in top 100 by my count. Houston, SMU, UCF, Wichita, Tulsa, Memphis, Cincy
The jury is still out on Temple, and Tulane has definitely made improvements. The floor overall is up.
Houston
SMU
WSU
Tulsa
UCF
Memphis
USF
Cincy
ECU
Tulane
Unknown = Temple
I believe we're better than WSU and deserve to be in the same group as SMU. Our only two losses are to ranked teams, and also have a ranked win. Putting us behind WSU, even just based on resume, is disrespectful
You may turn out better. Since the wheaties have got their full team back they have been pretty damn good and have a zero in the conference loss column, something only SMU can also say. SMU is also undefeated overall which is why they get up there with Houston. We beat Houston at home and you didn't so we are above you. This is for right now though. You go out win a couple more games and WSU gets an L then you'll be in front. Personally I'm not sure WSU finishes top four, I think you probably will, but we'll have to see.
Houston is probably the best team in conference, then throw together UCF, Tulsa, SMU, and Wichita to get the top five in some order. Memphis is in front of USF for that sixth spot and Cincy may get in the middle of it all some where or Temple or both could be in a slide. ECU is improved but reminds me of the USF team a few years ago dangerous if you take it lightly, Tulane isn't an auto W any. That's going to be the hardest part for UCF, they will have to prove to be consistent.
So you are ignoring WSU’s two losses (one against an unranked team) because “they’re undefeated in conference play”, and ignore Tulsa’s 3 losses (3 unranked teams) because you beat Houston. That was a great game by you guys last night, but a Tulsa fan telling anyone that “they will have to prove to be consistent” is pretty comical. It’s fine though, we agree to disagree
|
|
12-30-2020 03:58 PM |
|
mustangxc
1st String
Posts: 1,448
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 95
I Root For: SMU
Location:
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
1. Houston
2. UCF
3. SMU
4. Wichita State
5. Tulsa
6. Memphis
7. ECU
8. USF
9. Cincinnati
10. Temple
11. Tulane
|
|
12-30-2020 04:07 PM |
|
IamYourDad
Banned
Posts: 660
Joined: Oct 2018
I Root For: UCF
Location: In your head
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 04:07 PM)mustangxc Wrote: 1. Houston
2. UCF
3. SMU
4. Wichita State
5. Tulsa
6. Memphis
7. ECU
8. USF
9. Cincinnati
10. Temple
11. Tulane
Right where I see it right now. I would put you 2A or 2B just out of respect. Best of luck against Houston
|
|
12-30-2020 04:21 PM |
|
Foreverandever
Heisman
Posts: 6,886
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 467
I Root For: &
Location:
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 03:58 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: (12-30-2020 03:22 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 02:57 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: (12-30-2020 12:01 AM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-29-2020 03:52 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote: ECU 107 and USF 112 now. Also 7 in top 100 by my count. Houston, SMU, UCF, Wichita, Tulsa, Memphis, Cincy
The jury is still out on Temple, and Tulane has definitely made improvements. The floor overall is up.
Houston
SMU
WSU
Tulsa
UCF
Memphis
USF
Cincy
ECU
Tulane
Unknown = Temple
I believe we're better than WSU and deserve to be in the same group as SMU. Our only two losses are to ranked teams, and also have a ranked win. Putting us behind WSU, even just based on resume, is disrespectful
You may turn out better. Since the wheaties have got their full team back they have been pretty damn good and have a zero in the conference loss column, something only SMU can also say. SMU is also undefeated overall which is why they get up there with Houston. We beat Houston at home and you didn't so we are above you. This is for right now though. You go out win a couple more games and WSU gets an L then you'll be in front. Personally I'm not sure WSU finishes top four, I think you probably will, but we'll have to see.
Houston is probably the best team in conference, then throw together UCF, Tulsa, SMU, and Wichita to get the top five in some order. Memphis is in front of USF for that sixth spot and Cincy may get in the middle of it all some where or Temple or both could be in a slide. ECU is improved but reminds me of the USF team a few years ago dangerous if you take it lightly, Tulane isn't an auto W any. That's going to be the hardest part for UCF, they will have to prove to be consistent.
So you are ignoring WSU’s two losses (one against an unranked team) because “they’re undefeated in conference play”, and ignore Tulsa’s 3 losses (3 unranked teams) because you beat Houston. That was a great game by you guys last night, but a Tulsa fan telling anyone that “they will have to prove to be consistent” is pretty comical. It’s fine though, we agree to disagree
So getting too big for your britches isn't only a football thing?
We won the league last year and are staying true to form currently, we also got a road win in conference, do you have a road win in conference? You lost to a team we beat and the team we lost to is undefeated in conference. You are going to be awful disappointed if it does take this year for your team to learn all the little lessons to win. So far you have what could just as easily be a fluke win as you do a season defining one. It's my opinion and you're free to disagree. We'll actually watch it all play out on the court so we'll know who ened up being correct.
|
|
12-30-2020 04:22 PM |
|
Foreverandever
Heisman
Posts: 6,886
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 467
I Root For: &
Location:
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
|
|
12-30-2020 04:28 PM |
|
mustangxc
1st String
Posts: 1,448
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 95
I Root For: SMU
Location:
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
A 1 point win at home is much more of a fluke than a 12 point win on the road. Just saying.
|
|
12-30-2020 04:28 PM |
|
IamYourDad
Banned
Posts: 660
Joined: Oct 2018
I Root For: UCF
Location: In your head
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 04:22 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 03:58 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: (12-30-2020 03:22 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 02:57 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: (12-30-2020 12:01 AM)Foreverandever Wrote: The jury is still out on Temple, and Tulane has definitely made improvements. The floor overall is up.
Houston
SMU
WSU
Tulsa
UCF
Memphis
USF
Cincy
ECU
Tulane
Unknown = Temple
I believe we're better than WSU and deserve to be in the same group as SMU. Our only two losses are to ranked teams, and also have a ranked win. Putting us behind WSU, even just based on resume, is disrespectful
You may turn out better. Since the wheaties have got their full team back they have been pretty damn good and have a zero in the conference loss column, something only SMU can also say. SMU is also undefeated overall which is why they get up there with Houston. We beat Houston at home and you didn't so we are above you. This is for right now though. You go out win a couple more games and WSU gets an L then you'll be in front. Personally I'm not sure WSU finishes top four, I think you probably will, but we'll have to see.
Houston is probably the best team in conference, then throw together UCF, Tulsa, SMU, and Wichita to get the top five in some order. Memphis is in front of USF for that sixth spot and Cincy may get in the middle of it all some where or Temple or both could be in a slide. ECU is improved but reminds me of the USF team a few years ago dangerous if you take it lightly, Tulane isn't an auto W any. That's going to be the hardest part for UCF, they will have to prove to be consistent.
So you are ignoring WSU’s two losses (one against an unranked team) because “they’re undefeated in conference play”, and ignore Tulsa’s 3 losses (3 unranked teams) because you beat Houston. That was a great game by you guys last night, but a Tulsa fan telling anyone that “they will have to prove to be consistent” is pretty comical. It’s fine though, we agree to disagree
So getting too big for your britches isn't only a football thing?
We won the league last year and are staying true to form currently, we also got a road win in conference, do you have a road win in conference? You lost to a team we beat and the team we lost to is undefeated in conference. You are going to be awful disappointed if it does take this year for your team to learn all the little lessons to win. So far you have what could just as easily be a fluke win as you do a season defining one. It's my opinion and you're free to disagree. We'll actually watch it all play out on the court so we'll know who ened up being correct.
Have to love the snarky remarks on this forum LMAO I disagree with you, and apparently so do most of the posters on here with their rankings, but it’s okay buddy. We’ll see who is right in due time
|
|
12-30-2020 04:29 PM |
|
Foreverandever
Heisman
Posts: 6,886
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 467
I Root For: &
Location:
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 04:28 PM)mustangxc Wrote: A 1 point win at home is much more of a fluke than a 12 point win on the road. Just saying.
Well home or road is irrelevant when there are no fans or almost none. A court is a court.
Plus just let's say I will be surprised if Florida St turns out to be as good as Houston. Of course we're ranking people in this conference on how they will finish, not based on who they beat ooc so......
|
|
12-30-2020 04:31 PM |
|
mustangxc
1st String
Posts: 1,448
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 95
I Root For: SMU
Location:
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 04:22 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: We won the league last year and are staying true to form currently, we also got a road win in conference, do you have a road win in conference? You lost to a team we beat and the team we lost to is undefeated in conference. You are going to be awful disappointed if it does take this year for your team to learn all the little lessons to win. So far you have what could just as easily be a fluke win as you do a season defining one. It's my opinion and you're free to disagree. We'll actually watch it all play out on the court so we'll know who ened up being correct.
(12-30-2020 04:31 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:28 PM)mustangxc Wrote: A 1 point win at home is much more of a fluke than a 12 point win on the road. Just saying.
Well home or road is irrelevant when there are no fans or almost none. A court is a court.
Plus just let's say I will be surprised if Florida St turns out to be as good as Houston. Of course we're ranking people in this conference on how they will finish, not based on who they beat ooc so......
Which is it? My ratings are based on results to date.
(This post was last modified: 12-30-2020 04:35 PM by mustangxc.)
|
|
12-30-2020 04:34 PM |
|
Foreverandever
Heisman
Posts: 6,886
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 467
I Root For: &
Location:
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 04:29 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:22 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 03:58 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: (12-30-2020 03:22 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 02:57 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: I believe we're better than WSU and deserve to be in the same group as SMU. Our only two losses are to ranked teams, and also have a ranked win. Putting us behind WSU, even just based on resume, is disrespectful
You may turn out better. Since the wheaties have got their full team back they have been pretty damn good and have a zero in the conference loss column, something only SMU can also say. SMU is also undefeated overall which is why they get up there with Houston. We beat Houston at home and you didn't so we are above you. This is for right now though. You go out win a couple more games and WSU gets an L then you'll be in front. Personally I'm not sure WSU finishes top four, I think you probably will, but we'll have to see.
Houston is probably the best team in conference, then throw together UCF, Tulsa, SMU, and Wichita to get the top five in some order. Memphis is in front of USF for that sixth spot and Cincy may get in the middle of it all some where or Temple or both could be in a slide. ECU is improved but reminds me of the USF team a few years ago dangerous if you take it lightly, Tulane isn't an auto W any. That's going to be the hardest part for UCF, they will have to prove to be consistent.
So you are ignoring WSU’s two losses (one against an unranked team) because “they’re undefeated in conference play”, and ignore Tulsa’s 3 losses (3 unranked teams) because you beat Houston. That was a great game by you guys last night, but a Tulsa fan telling anyone that “they will have to prove to be consistent” is pretty comical. It’s fine though, we agree to disagree
So getting too big for your britches isn't only a football thing?
We won the league last year and are staying true to form currently, we also got a road win in conference, do you have a road win in conference? You lost to a team we beat and the team we lost to is undefeated in conference. You are going to be awful disappointed if it does take this year for your team to learn all the little lessons to win. So far you have what could just as easily be a fluke win as you do a season defining one. It's my opinion and you're free to disagree. We'll actually watch it all play out on the court so we'll know who ened up being correct.
Have to love the snarky remarks on this forum LMAO I disagree with you, and apparently so do most of the posters on here with their rankings, but it’s okay buddy. We’ll see who is right in due time
Wait so do we care what other people think or not?
You have disagreed with everything that doesn't hail UCF as great since the start of the season, you bristle at being told to be patient and over thankful on praise. My view on your team has been consistent and I'm not worried about how it will play out
|
|
12-30-2020 04:34 PM |
|
IamYourDad
Banned
Posts: 660
Joined: Oct 2018
I Root For: UCF
Location: In your head
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 04:31 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:28 PM)mustangxc Wrote: A 1 point win at home is much more of a fluke than a 12 point win on the road. Just saying.
Well home or road is irrelevant when there are no fans or almost none. A court is a court.
Plus just let's say I will be surprised if Florida St turns out to be as good as Houston. Of course we're ranking people in this conference on how they will finish, not based on who they beat ooc so......
If a court is just a court why did you make such a big deal about it in your previous post, yelling from the mountain tops how we don’t have a “conference win on the road”? I would say a win on the road at FSU who won 27 straight there is more impressive than an in conference team
|
|
12-30-2020 04:34 PM |
|
Foreverandever
Heisman
Posts: 6,886
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 467
I Root For: &
Location:
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 04:34 PM)mustangxc Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:22 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: We won the league last year and are staying true to form currently, we also got a road win in conference, do you have a road win in conference? You lost to a team we beat and the team we lost to is undefeated in conference. You are going to be awful disappointed if it does take this year for your team to learn all the little lessons to win. So far you have what could just as easily be a fluke win as you do a season defining one. It's my opinion and you're free to disagree. We'll actually watch it all play out on the court so we'll know who ened up being correct.
(12-30-2020 04:31 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:28 PM)mustangxc Wrote: A 1 point win at home is much more of a fluke than a 12 point win on the road. Just saying.
Well home or road is irrelevant when there are no fans or almost none. A court is a court.
Plus just let's say I will be surprised if Florida St turns out to be as good as Houston. Of course we're ranking people in this conference on how they will finish, not based on who they beat ooc so......
Which is it? My ratings are based on results to date.
Are we talking in conference or ooc?
Wait you rating on results to date? Where UCF is 1-1 and 3-2 that up to date UCF team?
|
|
12-30-2020 04:36 PM |
|
IamYourDad
Banned
Posts: 660
Joined: Oct 2018
I Root For: UCF
Location: In your head
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 04:34 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:29 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:22 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 03:58 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: (12-30-2020 03:22 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: You may turn out better. Since the wheaties have got their full team back they have been pretty damn good and have a zero in the conference loss column, something only SMU can also say. SMU is also undefeated overall which is why they get up there with Houston. We beat Houston at home and you didn't so we are above you. This is for right now though. You go out win a couple more games and WSU gets an L then you'll be in front. Personally I'm not sure WSU finishes top four, I think you probably will, but we'll have to see.
Houston is probably the best team in conference, then throw together UCF, Tulsa, SMU, and Wichita to get the top five in some order. Memphis is in front of USF for that sixth spot and Cincy may get in the middle of it all some where or Temple or both could be in a slide. ECU is improved but reminds me of the USF team a few years ago dangerous if you take it lightly, Tulane isn't an auto W any. That's going to be the hardest part for UCF, they will have to prove to be consistent.
So you are ignoring WSU’s two losses (one against an unranked team) because “they’re undefeated in conference play”, and ignore Tulsa’s 3 losses (3 unranked teams) because you beat Houston. That was a great game by you guys last night, but a Tulsa fan telling anyone that “they will have to prove to be consistent” is pretty comical. It’s fine though, we agree to disagree
So getting too big for your britches isn't only a football thing?
We won the league last year and are staying true to form currently, we also got a road win in conference, do you have a road win in conference? You lost to a team we beat and the team we lost to is undefeated in conference. You are going to be awful disappointed if it does take this year for your team to learn all the little lessons to win. So far you have what could just as easily be a fluke win as you do a season defining one. It's my opinion and you're free to disagree. We'll actually watch it all play out on the court so we'll know who ened up being correct.
Have to love the snarky remarks on this forum LMAO I disagree with you, and apparently so do most of the posters on here with their rankings, but it’s okay buddy. We’ll see who is right in due time
Wait so do we care what other people think or not?
You have disagreed with everything that doesn't hail UCF as great since the start of the season, you bristle at being told to be patient and over thankful on praise. My view on your team has been consistent and I'm not worried about how it will play out
I don’t bristle about it at all, I just bristle about it when I’m being taught lessons about consistency from the least consistent team in this conference
|
|
12-30-2020 04:37 PM |
|
Foreverandever
Heisman
Posts: 6,886
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 467
I Root For: &
Location:
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 04:34 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:31 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:28 PM)mustangxc Wrote: A 1 point win at home is much more of a fluke than a 12 point win on the road. Just saying.
Well home or road is irrelevant when there are no fans or almost none. A court is a court.
Plus just let's say I will be surprised if Florida St turns out to be as good as Houston. Of course we're ranking people in this conference on how they will finish, not based on who they beat ooc so......
If a court is just a court why did you make such a big deal about it in your previous post, yelling from the mountain tops how we don’t have a “conference win on the road”? I would say a win on the road at FSU who won 27 straight there is more impressive than an in conference team
Oh dear God are you just copying the guy whose ass you just kissed for putting your seventh placed team near the top? Didn't I just put something up about how you are over praising on positives?
We went to Memphis and beat Memphis at Memphis in a home and home series, a two game series we are now 1-0 in, notice I put us behind WSU who is 1-0 against us and won at our place, should we lose to them again they have tie breaker. You losing at home to Houston will work the same. You winning at Tulsa would work the same for Tulsa as the WSU game.
|
|
12-30-2020 04:41 PM |
|
Foreverandever
Heisman
Posts: 6,886
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 467
I Root For: &
Location:
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 04:37 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:34 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:29 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:22 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 03:58 PM)IamYourDad Wrote: So you are ignoring WSU’s two losses (one against an unranked team) because “they’re undefeated in conference play”, and ignore Tulsa’s 3 losses (3 unranked teams) because you beat Houston. That was a great game by you guys last night, but a Tulsa fan telling anyone that “they will have to prove to be consistent” is pretty comical. It’s fine though, we agree to disagree
So getting too big for your britches isn't only a football thing?
We won the league last year and are staying true to form currently, we also got a road win in conference, do you have a road win in conference? You lost to a team we beat and the team we lost to is undefeated in conference. You are going to be awful disappointed if it does take this year for your team to learn all the little lessons to win. So far you have what could just as easily be a fluke win as you do a season defining one. It's my opinion and you're free to disagree. We'll actually watch it all play out on the court so we'll know who ened up being correct.
Have to love the snarky remarks on this forum LMAO I disagree with you, and apparently so do most of the posters on here with their rankings, but it’s okay buddy. We’ll see who is right in due time
Wait so do we care what other people think or not?
You have disagreed with everything that doesn't hail UCF as great since the start of the season, you bristle at being told to be patient and over thankful on praise. My view on your team has been consistent and I'm not worried about how it will play out
I don’t bristle about it at all, I just bristle about it when I’m being taught lessons about consistency from the least consistent team in this conference
Really? So you didn't call me putting a team six spots in front of you in the conference standings in front of you in my rankings disrespectful?
Did I go out of my way and specifically say hey Iam, look at this ranking?
Naw you just got your panties in a wad because UCF wasn't at the top.
|
|
12-30-2020 04:44 PM |
|
mustangxc
1st String
Posts: 1,448
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 95
I Root For: SMU
Location:
|
RE: Rating the AAC in men's basketball
(12-30-2020 04:36 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:34 PM)mustangxc Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:22 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: We won the league last year and are staying true to form currently, we also got a road win in conference, do you have a road win in conference? You lost to a team we beat and the team we lost to is undefeated in conference. You are going to be awful disappointed if it does take this year for your team to learn all the little lessons to win. So far you have what could just as easily be a fluke win as you do a season defining one. It's my opinion and you're free to disagree. We'll actually watch it all play out on the court so we'll know who ened up being correct.
(12-30-2020 04:31 PM)Foreverandever Wrote: (12-30-2020 04:28 PM)mustangxc Wrote: A 1 point win at home is much more of a fluke than a 12 point win on the road. Just saying.
Well home or road is irrelevant when there are no fans or almost none. A court is a court.
Plus just let's say I will be surprised if Florida St turns out to be as good as Houston. Of course we're ranking people in this conference on how they will finish, not based on who they beat ooc so......
Which is it? My ratings are based on results to date.
Are we talking in conference or ooc?
Wait you rating on results to date? Where UCF is 1-1 and 3-2 that up to date UCF team?
Way to evade the question. You just twist arguments at your convenience with little regard for facts. My ratings are for AAC teams throughout the entire season including non-conference play.
|
|
12-30-2020 04:48 PM |
|