(07-09-2019 10:52 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-09-2019 10:25 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Go to Jester’s twitter. See for yourself

whats your twitter handle?

Nope.

(07-09-2019 10:30 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(07-09-2019 08:42 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(07-08-2019 11:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a). The rapes in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual misconduct; criminal sexual acts in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual abuse in the first, second, and third degrees; and forcible touching (and, on information
2
Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 3 of 10
and belief, predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York law, e.g., NY Penal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and constitute the torts of, inter alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force and serious bodily harm, under New York law. In addition, 18 U.S. Code § 2255 provides Plaintiff with a civil remedy for personal injuries because Plaintiff, while a minor, was a victim of violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2421, 2422(b), and 2423(a) and she suffered personal injury as a result of such violations. Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A hereto; Declaration of Tiffany Doe, Exhibit B hereto; Declaration of Joan Doe, Exhibit C hereto; Jane Doe, Tiffany Doe, and Joan Doe are each pseudonyms as each woman wishes anonymity. Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of Defendant Epstein. Exh. B. Joan Doe, a witness, was a childhood classmate of Plaintiff who, in the 1994-95 school year, was told by Plaintiff that Plaintiff was subject to sexual contact by the Defendants at parties in New York City during the summer of 1994. Exh. C.
8. Courts have discretion to allow proceeding anonymously where the need for privacy outweighs the public’s interest in knowing their identity and any prejudice to the defendants. Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant, 537 F.3d 185, 189 (2d Cir. 2008). This litigation involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature, and identification of Plaintiff would pose a risk of retaliatory physical harm to her and to others. Exh. A. All of the ten factors that the Second Circuit articulated as relevant to this analysis favor anonymity, especially factors 1-4, 7, and 10 (e.g., factors one and two: “whether the litigation involves matters that are ‘highly sensitive and [of a] personal nature,’” and “’whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the ... party [seeking to proceed anonymously] or
3

Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 4 of 10
even more critically, to innocent non-parties’”.), or are neutral with respect to anonymity. Protecting Plaintiff’s anonymity is also appropriate as she is a rape victim.
9. Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. At least four of the parties were attended by Defendant Trump. Exhs. A and B. On information and belief, by this time in 1994, Defendant Trump had known Defendant Epstein for seven years (New York, 10/28/02, “’I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,’' Trump booms from a speakerphone. ‘He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life.’”), and knew that Plaintiff was then just 13 years old. Exhs. A and B.

Yea, funny. Why is it Trumps DOJ Reopening all this while it seemingly took place and was ongoing TAKING PLACE while Bubba was in office and Janet Reno ran justice? Where were they? Hmmmm

Why didn’t the contemptible witHolder reopen any of this when the sentencing came down under his watch? What about Lynch, who clearly had a very soft spot when it came to discussing the grandkids?

Man O Man O Man

This Horowitz/Durham thing about to drop must be real doozy.

Thank you General Barr!

Amazing you guys even admit it. Are you implying Barr would only be reopening this if it incriminates D’s and would not be opening it if it harmed Trump. Like the opposite of blind justice? Your mind I so poisoned you admit it openly. Barr would let him get away with it and wouldn’t reopen it if it implicates Trump. That is a Rubicon statement boys. It’s a cult.

Lol

Uhhhh, no Mr Beam,

Thank you General Barr for doing a LEGITIMATE investigation(s) into what was really going on during the criminal syndicate regime previously in charge.

First you ask if “that is what you are implying”, no, no it’s not. At all. Then one stilted sentence later insist I’m “admitting something openly” when that is not at all what I was saying. Educate yourself


As you say, let the chips fall where they may.

This is gonna be great!

Changing of the guard was really cool. In line to enter Fords theatre at noon. The DC metro is great. You would never need a car. If you visit Washington DC you can’t help but be impressed. It’s too bad we have a traitor in the White House.

I guess Mach wants Epstein to walk free, sad. Team over country.

(07-09-2019 10:54 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(07-09-2019 10:30 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(07-09-2019 08:42 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(07-08-2019 11:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a). The rapes in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual misconduct; criminal sexual acts in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual abuse in the first, second, and third degrees; and forcible touching (and, on information
2
Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 3 of 10
and belief, predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York law, e.g., NY Penal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and constitute the torts of, inter alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force and serious bodily harm, under New York law. In addition, 18 U.S. Code § 2255 provides Plaintiff with a civil remedy for personal injuries because Plaintiff, while a minor, was a victim of violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2421, 2422(b), and 2423(a) and she suffered personal injury as a result of such violations. Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A hereto; Declaration of Tiffany Doe, Exhibit B hereto; Declaration of Joan Doe, Exhibit C hereto; Jane Doe, Tiffany Doe, and Joan Doe are each pseudonyms as each woman wishes anonymity. Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of Defendant Epstein. Exh. B. Joan Doe, a witness, was a childhood classmate of Plaintiff who, in the 1994-95 school year, was told by Plaintiff that Plaintiff was subject to sexual contact by the Defendants at parties in New York City during the summer of 1994. Exh. C.
8. Courts have discretion to allow proceeding anonymously where the need for privacy outweighs the public’s interest in knowing their identity and any prejudice to the defendants. Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant, 537 F.3d 185, 189 (2d Cir. 2008). This litigation involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature, and identification of Plaintiff would pose a risk of retaliatory physical harm to her and to others. Exh. A. All of the ten factors that the Second Circuit articulated as relevant to this analysis favor anonymity, especially factors 1-4, 7, and 10 (e.g., factors one and two: “whether the litigation involves matters that are ‘highly sensitive and [of a] personal nature,’” and “’whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the ... party [seeking to proceed anonymously] or
3

Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 4 of 10
even more critically, to innocent non-parties’”.), or are neutral with respect to anonymity. Protecting Plaintiff’s anonymity is also appropriate as she is a rape victim.
9. Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. At least four of the parties were attended by Defendant Trump. Exhs. A and B. On information and belief, by this time in 1994, Defendant Trump had known Defendant Epstein for seven years (New York, 10/28/02, “’I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,’' Trump booms from a speakerphone. ‘He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life.’”), and knew that Plaintiff was then just 13 years old. Exhs. A and B.

Yea, funny. Why is it Trumps DOJ Reopening all this while it seemingly took place and was ongoing TAKING PLACE while Bubba was in office and Janet Reno ran justice? Where were they? Hmmmm

Why didn’t the contemptible witHolder reopen any of this when the sentencing came down under his watch? What about Lynch, who clearly had a very soft spot when it came to discussing the grandkids?

Man O Man O Man

This Horowitz/Durham thing about to drop must be real doozy.

Thank you General Barr!

Amazing you guys even admit it. Are you implying Barr would only be reopening this if it incriminates D’s and would not be opening it if it harmed Trump. Like the opposite of blind justice? Your mind I so poisoned you admit it openly. Barr would let him get away with it and wouldn’t reopen it if it implicates Trump. That is a Rubicon statement boys. It’s a cult.

Lol

Uhhhh, no Mr Beam,

Thank you General Barr for doing a LEGITIMATE investigation(s) into what was really going on during the criminal syndicate regime previously in charge.

First you ask if “that is what you are implying”, no, no it’s not. At all. Then one stilted sentence later insist I’m “admitting something openly” when that is not at all what I was saying. Educate yourself


As you say, let the chips fall where they may.

This is gonna be great!

Yep Jane Doe number 1 pins Trump.

(07-09-2019 10:56 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Changing of the guard was really cool. In line to enter Fords theatre at noon. The DC metro is great. You would never need a car. If you visit Washington DC you can’t help but be impressed. It’s too bad we have a traitor in the White House.

Go on a tour of the WH, maybe you’ll get a chance to check under the beds to see if Pootey-Poot is hiding out!

(07-09-2019 10:53 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Interesting that you cited the Washington Examiner. I’m in DC as we speak and the examiner is available on corners here for free. That rag isn’t worth the price of the paper it’s printed on. It’s not a news source. More propaganda you guys rely on.

Which has jackschit to do with the story. Are you seriously so far gone that you ignore the story just because it's from a source with which you disagree? I can see one doing that IF the story is bunk. This is simply a factual account of what Barr has done and your go to was to attack the messenger. Typical.

(07-09-2019 10:54 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(07-09-2019 10:52 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(07-09-2019 10:25 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Go to Jester’s twitter. See for yourself

whats your twitter handle?

Nope.

You said to go to Jester's witter, so I was asking you what your twitter handle was...

(07-09-2019 10:56 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Changing of the guard was really cool. In line to enter Fords theatre at noon. The DC metro is great. You would never need a car. If you visit Washington DC you can’t help but be impressed. It’s too bad we have a traitor in the White House.

Did you pack your favorite t shirt?

Oops,

According to a series of bombshell FBI documents released on Thursday, known child predator Jeffrey Epstein had struck a deal with the FBI, which was headed by Robert Mueller in 2008.

“Epstein has also provided information to the FBI as agreed upon,” says one of the FBI documents. “Case agent advised that no federal prosecution will occur in this matter as long as Epstein continues to uphold his agreement with the state of Florida.”
https://newspunch.com/fbi-mueller-pedoph...stein/amp/

https://vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein/Je...%2021/view

(07-09-2019 10:56 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Changing of the guard was really cool. In line to enter Fords theatre at noon. The DC metro is great. You would never need a car. If you visit Washington DC you can’t help but be impressed. It’s too bad we have a traitor in the White House.

News must travel slow for you. The America hating traitor moved out in January 2017. We have a true patriot living there now. Not some dumb big eared Kenyan Muslim

(07-09-2019 10:56 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Changing of the guard was really cool. In line to enter Fords theatre at noon. The DC metro is great. You would never need a car. If you visit Washington DC you can’t help but be impressed.

You can have it. Not a fan. Everywhere I look, I see my tax dollars going to waste.

Quote:It’s too bad we have a traitor in the White House.

Traitor? How so? I mean facts, not unsupported allegations.

(07-09-2019 11:02 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-09-2019 10:53 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Interesting that you cited the Washington Examiner. I’m in DC as we speak and the examiner is available on corners here for free. That rag isn’t worth the price of the paper it’s printed on. It’s not a news source. More propaganda you guys rely on.

Which has jackschit to do with the story. Are you seriously so far gone that you ignore the story just because it's from a source with which you disagree? I can see one doing that IF the story is bunk. This is simply a factual account of what Barr has done and your go to was to attack the messenger. Typical.

TB4E.. there are a LOT of lefties on here who do that every-time they're given a source they don't like.

They ignore the story and attack the messenger/source and then claim "We won this argument, because of your source".

(07-08-2019 09:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I have to believe that this could possibly be something that would get people off the Trump train. He could murder someone in the middle of Manhattan. He could conspire with Putin to win an election but please please for the love of God please denounce this pos if he’s found to be tied to this.
The truth is always stronger in defeat than evil in temporary victory.

Let us know when you get any facts to support your allegations.

Trump is POS. It he’s not a commie, and that’s what your party is offering. Not much in the way of choices.

(07-08-2019 01:29 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  This is going to bring down the right and left. Trump is tied to this too. In line at the smithsonian so I’ll type more later. Ton of quotes from Trumpy on his good buddy Epstein.
You won’t see the left defend anyone who is busted. Let justice be done or the heavens fall.

You mean, like they did with Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton?

It’s team over country on both sides.

Side note

Amazing to me how influential Ohio has been to this place. A lot of statues to Ohioans. Taft, Glenn, Armstrong, Garfield. Ohio the heart of it all!

(07-09-2019 10:58 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  I guess Mach wants Epstein to walk free, sad. Team over country.

What he wants is for Epstein to lie and implicate Trump for a lighter sentence. Wouldn’t be surprised if he was offered “to go live on your little island and don’t come back just give us something on Trump to drop before the election”. The democrats have no moral compass. It’s like war to them. Destroy or kill to get their way is totally acceptable.

8

(07-09-2019 12:06 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Side note

Amazing to me how influential Ohio has been to this place. A lot of statues to Ohioans. Taft, Glenn, Armstrong, Garfield. Ohio the heart of it all!

Wexner, Epstiens only known client.

You aren't good at this Mach but we love yah.

PS. His parents were Russians. Lulz

(07-07-2019 10:54 AM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  

(07-07-2019 08:03 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  I seem to remember when the leftists here scoffed at such a notion and called anyone who believed it crazy. Next they need to prove pizza-gate as well.

Where.are.the.loons.now?

I sure would like you to drag up some of the posts here where people scoffed at the notion. This board has a pretty stout search function so it's not that hard to do.

But if Clinton is involved, he needs to pay the price too. Same with Donald Trump. No one should be spared.

Trump only flew with Epstein once, and not to his (Epstein's) private island. He flew from Florida to NYC. (But I may have misremembered hearing or reading about that. So nevermind. lol)

Trump has his own plane always waiting for him. Surprised he would ever ride on someone else. Back then his would have either been getting service or he had loaned it to the Clinton's.