Geesh, I saw no reports that have Kraft associated with Epstien. The reports are showing that high level politicians and CEOs were involved with Epstien. Would not be surprising that Trump and Clinton actually went to the island to mess with little girls.

(07-09-2019 07:20 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-09-2019 07:16 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The truth is stronger in defeat than evil in temporary victory.

You wouldn't know the truth if it inserted itself up your butthole and announced itself.

Mach is a sick man controlled by hate. He has no purpose in life these days except to hate a man that legally won an election against an evil woman he adored. Just ignore his sorry azz. He isn't worth any thing else.

(07-09-2019 11:43 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Geesh, I saw no reports that have Kraft associated with Epstien. The reports are showing that high level politicians and CEOs were involved with Epstien. Would not be surprising that Trump and Clinton actually went to the island to mess with little girls.

See what you have done CB? Now you will have weak minds repeating your lies and idle talk. Didn’t your momma teach you anything?

(07-10-2019 12:37 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(07-09-2019 11:43 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Geesh, I saw no reports that have Kraft associated with Epstien. The reports are showing that high level politicians and CEOs were involved with Epstien. Would not be surprising that Trump and Clinton actually went to the island to mess with little girls.

See what you have done CB? Now you will have weak minds repeating your lies and idle talk. Didn’t your momma teach you anything?

Wow. It does work. Isn't this the same thing that trump does over and over again with his fake tweets. People repeat them as soon as he posts them. Maybe I should start tweeting.

Lawyers making deals and screwing people over in smoky hotel rooms is another reason they suck.

New Accuser Jennifer Araoz: Jeffrey Epstein Raped Me in His NYC Townhouse When I Was 15

A new accuser has come forward to claim that Jeffrey Epstein sexually assaulted her when she was 14 and then raped her at the age of 15 inside his New York City townhouse.

Jennifer Araoz, now 32, told NBC’s Today show on Wednesday morning that she was first approached in 2001 by a recruiter who brought her to Epstein’s home on the Upper East Side promising that he could help with her career. Once there, she said she was initially treated well, given wine and a tour of the house before being handed $300.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/new-accuse...n-i-was-15

I hope someone quizzes Mueller on his ties to Epstein when he testifies.

(07-10-2019 09:12 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  I hope someone quizzes Mueller on his ties to Epstein when he testifies.

FBI flipped him as some sort of an "asset" and must have gotten a lot of info from him on his "friends". Maybe that is why the FBI/CIA protected the Clintons to the max, they owned them. New Sheriff so the old deal is over.

I noticed that Epstein was arrested after returning from France. France still has no age of consent laws regarding sex with minors?

(07-10-2019 07:12 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  Lawyers making deals and screwing people over in smoky hotel rooms is another reason they suck.

I agree. Weismann, Mueller, Strzok, Paige, Comey, McCabe, Baker and the 13 angry democrats are all scum.....

You people are the people you are against, and you are to ignorant to realize it.

(07-10-2019 09:19 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(07-10-2019 09:12 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  I hope someone quizzes Mueller on his ties to Epstein when he testifies.

FBI flipped him as some sort of an "asset" and must have gotten a lot of info from him on his "friends". Maybe that is why the FBI/CIA protected the Clintons to the max, they owned them. New Sheriff so the old deal is over.

Great deal for the rich and famous. Just have the FBI say he is an asset. Gets him and all of his pedopals off the hook.
Would love to see the precious spy info he provided the FBI BEFORE HE WAS ARRESTED. I’m sure it was ground shaking....

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/h...rtune.html

Not political but I thought Acosta’s account that Epstein was intelligence was interesting.

(07-10-2019 10:17 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/h...rtune.html

Not political but I thought Acosta’s account that Epstein was intelligence was interesting.

All Acosta really revealed is that someone higher up told him "hands off."
Acosta had no first hand knowledge of why he was told to back off.

(07-10-2019 10:22 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(07-10-2019 10:17 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/h...rtune.html

Not political but I thought Acosta’s account that Epstein was intelligence was interesting.

All Acosta really revealed is that someone higher up told him "hands off."
Acosta had no first hand knowledge of why he was told to back off.

Press conference later today.

“ I like younger women
Lived with several a while
Though I ran em away
They’d come back one day
Still could manage a smile
Just takes awhile
Just takes awhile”

Say it ain’t so Jimmy...

(07-10-2019 10:24 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(07-10-2019 10:22 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(07-10-2019 10:17 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/h...rtune.html

Not political but I thought Acosta’s account that Epstein was intelligence was interesting.

All Acosta really revealed is that someone higher up told him "hands off."
Acosta had no first hand knowledge of why he was told to back off.

Press conference later today.

Will he say who told him to back off? Oh please do. I don’t care who it was. Republican or Democrat.
But I know he won’t....

(07-10-2019 11:06 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(07-10-2019 10:24 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(07-10-2019 10:22 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(07-10-2019 10:17 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/h...rtune.html

Not political but I thought Acosta’s account that Epstein was intelligence was interesting.

All Acosta really revealed is that someone higher up told him "hands off."
Acosta had no first hand knowledge of why he was told to back off.

Press conference later today.

Will he say who told him to back off? Oh please do. I don’t care who it was. Republican or Democrat.
But I know he won’t....

Maybe there are many reasons Robert Mueller doesn't want to testify before Congress.

(07-10-2019 11:06 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(07-10-2019 10:24 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(07-10-2019 10:22 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(07-10-2019 10:17 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/h...rtune.html

Not political but I thought Acosta’s account that Epstein was intelligence was interesting.

All Acosta really revealed is that someone higher up told him "hands off."
Acosta had no first hand knowledge of why he was told to back off.

Press conference later today.

Will he say who told him to back off? Oh please do. I don’t care who it was. Republican or Democrat.
But I know he won’t....

I hope he says the FBI brokered the deal. We know who the director was then lol.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world...reddit.com

Acosta spearheading a move to cut agency funding by 80 per cent to the government agency that combats child sex trafficking. The US labor secretary plans to reduce the International Labor Affairs Bureau’s (ILAB) funding from $68m to $18.5m in the Department of Labors' 2020 fiscal year.

(07-10-2019 10:32 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world...reddit.com

Acosta spearheading a move to cut agency funding by 80 per cent to the government agency that combats child sex trafficking. The US labor secretary plans to reduce the International Labor Affairs Bureau’s (ILAB) funding from $68m to $18.5m in the Department of Labors' 2020 fiscal year.

Most of ILAB’s money is spent outside of the US. It is entirely reasonable IMHO to expect the Labor Dept. to spend its funds within the US. It is entirely reasonable to expect conventional law-enforcement agencies with a greater competency handle issues related to human-trafficking, and to steer funds earmarked for that purpose to those agencies.

Also: the $49.5m that (might be) cut from ILAB budget — what would it be used for instead? I greatly doubt that the Labor Dept.’s overall budget is being chopped. Much as I would like it to be.