(07-09-2019 07:16 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The truth is stronger in defeat than evil in temporary victory.

You wouldn't know the truth if it inserted itself up your butthole and announced itself.

(07-09-2019 07:15 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Yep.... that’s my mission.

The fact that you even think you have a mission is telling.

The new Mueller report. I guess we will have to wait how long for the next nothing burger? Reminds me of the old joke when we were kids.....
The left is all hyped up AGAIN by the MSNBC types and primed to pop at any minute. I fear ole Mach won’t be able to mentally handle this one......oh wait......he couldn’t handle the last one come to think about it.

Wile E Coyote just got his new package from Acme. They'll get that Trump, errrr roadrunner, this time!! Such idiots.

(07-09-2019 07:20 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-09-2019 07:16 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The truth is stronger in defeat than evil in temporary victory.

You wouldn't know the truth if it inserted itself up your butthole and announced itself.

I wouldn’t say that. He is trying to hijack a thread about a perverted democratic billionaire with close ties to the clintons. The truth makes dems look bad

what does the Jester say about this situation? He was so spot on about collusion....

(07-09-2019 08:04 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  what does the Jester say about this situation? He was so spot on about collusion....

Quote:Buckle up America!

(07-08-2019 09:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I have to believe that this could possibly be something that would get people off the Trump train. He could murder someone in the middle of Manhattan. He could conspire with Putin to win an election but please please for the love of God please denounce this pos if he’s found to be tied to this.


The truth is always stronger in defeat than evil in temporary victory.

Well, he wasn’t tied to any of your prior fantasies, so I guess we’ll wait and see on this one too.

Rent free. In head.

Sad.

(07-08-2019 11:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a). The rapes in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual misconduct; criminal sexual acts in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual abuse in the first, second, and third degrees; and forcible touching (and, on information
2
Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 3 of 10
and belief, predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York law, e.g., NY Penal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and constitute the torts of, inter alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force and serious bodily harm, under New York law. In addition, 18 U.S. Code § 2255 provides Plaintiff with a civil remedy for personal injuries because Plaintiff, while a minor, was a victim of violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2421, 2422(b), and 2423(a) and she suffered personal injury as a result of such violations. Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A hereto; Declaration of Tiffany Doe, Exhibit B hereto; Declaration of Joan Doe, Exhibit C hereto; Jane Doe, Tiffany Doe, and Joan Doe are each pseudonyms as each woman wishes anonymity. Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of Defendant Epstein. Exh. B. Joan Doe, a witness, was a childhood classmate of Plaintiff who, in the 1994-95 school year, was told by Plaintiff that Plaintiff was subject to sexual contact by the Defendants at parties in New York City during the summer of 1994. Exh. C.
8. Courts have discretion to allow proceeding anonymously where the need for privacy outweighs the public’s interest in knowing their identity and any prejudice to the defendants. Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant, 537 F.3d 185, 189 (2d Cir. 2008). This litigation involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature, and identification of Plaintiff would pose a risk of retaliatory physical harm to her and to others. Exh. A. All of the ten factors that the Second Circuit articulated as relevant to this analysis favor anonymity, especially factors 1-4, 7, and 10 (e.g., factors one and two: “whether the litigation involves matters that are ‘highly sensitive and [of a] personal nature,’” and “’whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the ... party [seeking to proceed anonymously] or
3

Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 4 of 10
even more critically, to innocent non-parties’”.), or are neutral with respect to anonymity. Protecting Plaintiff’s anonymity is also appropriate as she is a rape victim.
9. Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. At least four of the parties were attended by Defendant Trump. Exhs. A and B. On information and belief, by this time in 1994, Defendant Trump had known Defendant Epstein for seven years (New York, 10/28/02, “’I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,’' Trump booms from a speakerphone. ‘He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life.’”), and knew that Plaintiff was then just 13 years old. Exhs. A and B.

Yea, funny. Why is it Trumps DOJ Reopening all this while it seemingly took place and was ongoing TAKING PLACE while Bubba was in office and Janet Reno ran justice? Where were they? Hmmmm

Why didn’t the contemptible witHolder reopen any of this when the sentencing came down under his watch? What about Lynch, who clearly had a very soft spot when it came to discussing the grandkids?

Man O Man O Man

This Horowitz/Durham thing about to drop must be real doozy.

Thank you General Barr!

(07-09-2019 03:58 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  Donald J. Trump thinks Bill Clinton was an innocent victims when women accused him of raping and having affairs with other women who are not named Hillary. He said the exact same thing about Roy Moore and himself. He also defended Epsteen of these things saying he was being railroaded. Why would Trump be where he is today? He knows once Epsteen gets his desserts, Trump would be protected in the White House. When the hammer falls, both Trump and Clinton would be charged with rape on a minor. Trump's own words convict him like he would have sex with his daughter, barging in on Ms. Teen girls while they were naked or half naked, and said to the parents of a girl that he would like to date her if she becomes of age.
Prince Andrew, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Woody Allen, Trump's best buddy the murderous crown prince of Saudi Arabia, Ghislaine Maxwell, Jean-Luc Brunel (modeling company partner), famed attorney Alan Dershowitz (accused of raping a minor by a now grown woman along with Bill Clinton and Donald Trump), Prince Charles, Cyrus Vance, Harvey Weinstein, late Jimmy Savile, late Michael Jackson, Pete Townsend, Ken Starr later defend Epstein, There could be more. Trump is guilty since he knew what Epstein did in Florida that he banned him. Trump covered up a crime by not reported it to law enforcement. Trump is an enabler of Epstein.

Uhhhh, the drumpf called the cops and voluntarily spoke openly to them at the time.

Damn, where do you get your schit?

If he did this, or was involved, fry him. But let’s not try to kavanaugh him over baseless speculation and allegations.

(07-09-2019 06:06 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  For Courtney Wild, who said she was abused by Epstein when she was a young girl, the indictment was long overdue. Wild has been fighting for years, through a lawsuit against the Department of Justice filed in 2008 in which she is identified as Jane Doe #1, to make public the details of the plea deal with government prosecutors that many critics say allowed Epstein to evade justice.

Courtney Wild should be put into protective custody. I fear for her life. Individual 1’s life just got even more embarrassing. To think this is the President is mind blowing. That he has an 85% approval rating amongst Republicans is terrifying.

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/wealthy-financ...ories.html

Interesting.

Why dint zerO admin act on this?

‘94, ‘08, what do these years have in common?
What’s now changed? Lol

(07-09-2019 07:16 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The truth is stronger in defeat than evil in temporary victory.

Is that the new slogan over at huff-huff-pass or DU or something? Almost as dumb as that hysterically hypocritical sloganeering on the washCompost

[/quote]
But let’s not try to kavanaugh him over baseless speculation and allegations.
[/quote]

Good luck with that. These freeloaders want their free stuff and Trump stands in their way. No lie is to big.

In the end Trump knew all of these people (including Hillary and Bill) because they were rich and powerful. So was he. Doesn’t mean a thing that he moved in those circles. Until I see evidence to the contrary I will believe he didn’t participate in this criminal behavior. Just because you don’t like his personality doesn’t mean he’s a child rapist. Takes an idiot to go down that road.

Go to Jester’s twitter. See for yourself

(07-09-2019 08:55 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(07-09-2019 07:16 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The truth is stronger in defeat than evil in temporary victory.

Is that the new slogan over at huff-huff-pass or DU or something? Almost as dumb as that hysterically hypocritical sloganeering on the washCompost

It’s a spin off of a famous person. Google it. Educate yourself.

(07-09-2019 08:42 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(07-08-2019 11:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a). The rapes in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual misconduct; criminal sexual acts in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual abuse in the first, second, and third degrees; and forcible touching (and, on information
2
Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 3 of 10
and belief, predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York law, e.g., NY Penal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and constitute the torts of, inter alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force and serious bodily harm, under New York law. In addition, 18 U.S. Code § 2255 provides Plaintiff with a civil remedy for personal injuries because Plaintiff, while a minor, was a victim of violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2421, 2422(b), and 2423(a) and she suffered personal injury as a result of such violations. Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A hereto; Declaration of Tiffany Doe, Exhibit B hereto; Declaration of Joan Doe, Exhibit C hereto; Jane Doe, Tiffany Doe, and Joan Doe are each pseudonyms as each woman wishes anonymity. Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of Defendant Epstein. Exh. B. Joan Doe, a witness, was a childhood classmate of Plaintiff who, in the 1994-95 school year, was told by Plaintiff that Plaintiff was subject to sexual contact by the Defendants at parties in New York City during the summer of 1994. Exh. C.
8. Courts have discretion to allow proceeding anonymously where the need for privacy outweighs the public’s interest in knowing their identity and any prejudice to the defendants. Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant, 537 F.3d 185, 189 (2d Cir. 2008). This litigation involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature, and identification of Plaintiff would pose a risk of retaliatory physical harm to her and to others. Exh. A. All of the ten factors that the Second Circuit articulated as relevant to this analysis favor anonymity, especially factors 1-4, 7, and 10 (e.g., factors one and two: “whether the litigation involves matters that are ‘highly sensitive and [of a] personal nature,’” and “’whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the ... party [seeking to proceed anonymously] or
3

Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 4 of 10
even more critically, to innocent non-parties’”.), or are neutral with respect to anonymity. Protecting Plaintiff’s anonymity is also appropriate as she is a rape victim.
9. Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. At least four of the parties were attended by Defendant Trump. Exhs. A and B. On information and belief, by this time in 1994, Defendant Trump had known Defendant Epstein for seven years (New York, 10/28/02, “’I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,’' Trump booms from a speakerphone. ‘He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life.’”), and knew that Plaintiff was then just 13 years old. Exhs. A and B.

Yea, funny. Why is it Trumps DOJ Reopening all this while it seemingly took place and was ongoing TAKING PLACE while Bubba was in office and Janet Reno ran justice? Where were they? Hmmmm

Why didn’t the contemptible witHolder reopen any of this when the sentencing came down under his watch? What about Lynch, who clearly had a very soft spot when it came to discussing the grandkids?

Man O Man O Man

This Horowitz/Durham thing about to drop must be real doozy.

Thank you General Barr!

Amazing you guys even admit it. Are you implying Barr would only be reopening this if it incriminates D’s and would not be opening it if it harmed Trump. Like the opposite of blind justice? Your mind I so poisoned you admit it openly. Barr would let him get away with it and wouldn’t reopen it if it implicates Trump. That is a Rubicon statement boys. It’s a cult.

(07-09-2019 10:30 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(07-09-2019 08:42 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(07-08-2019 11:51 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a). The rapes in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual misconduct; criminal sexual acts in the first, second, and third degrees; sexual abuse in the first, second, and third degrees; and forcible touching (and, on information
2
Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 3 of 10
and belief, predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York law, e.g., NY Penal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and constitute the torts of, inter alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force and serious bodily harm, under New York law. In addition, 18 U.S. Code § 2255 provides Plaintiff with a civil remedy for personal injuries because Plaintiff, while a minor, was a victim of violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2421, 2422(b), and 2423(a) and she suffered personal injury as a result of such violations. Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A hereto; Declaration of Tiffany Doe, Exhibit B hereto; Declaration of Joan Doe, Exhibit C hereto; Jane Doe, Tiffany Doe, and Joan Doe are each pseudonyms as each woman wishes anonymity. Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of Defendant Epstein. Exh. B. Joan Doe, a witness, was a childhood classmate of Plaintiff who, in the 1994-95 school year, was told by Plaintiff that Plaintiff was subject to sexual contact by the Defendants at parties in New York City during the summer of 1994. Exh. C.
8. Courts have discretion to allow proceeding anonymously where the need for privacy outweighs the public’s interest in knowing their identity and any prejudice to the defendants. Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant, 537 F.3d 185, 189 (2d Cir. 2008). This litigation involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature, and identification of Plaintiff would pose a risk of retaliatory physical harm to her and to others. Exh. A. All of the ten factors that the Second Circuit articulated as relevant to this analysis favor anonymity, especially factors 1-4, 7, and 10 (e.g., factors one and two: “whether the litigation involves matters that are ‘highly sensitive and [of a] personal nature,’” and “’whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the ... party [seeking to proceed anonymously] or
3

Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 4 of 10
even more critically, to innocent non-parties’”.), or are neutral with respect to anonymity. Protecting Plaintiff’s anonymity is also appropriate as she is a rape victim.
9. Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. At least four of the parties were attended by Defendant Trump. Exhs. A and B. On information and belief, by this time in 1994, Defendant Trump had known Defendant Epstein for seven years (New York, 10/28/02, “’I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,’' Trump booms from a speakerphone. ‘He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life.’”), and knew that Plaintiff was then just 13 years old. Exhs. A and B.

Yea, funny. Why is it Trumps DOJ Reopening all this while it seemingly took place and was ongoing TAKING PLACE while Bubba was in office and Janet Reno ran justice? Where were they? Hmmmm

Why didn’t the contemptible witHolder reopen any of this when the sentencing came down under his watch? What about Lynch, who clearly had a very soft spot when it came to discussing the grandkids?

Man O Man O Man

This Horowitz/Durham thing about to drop must be real doozy.

Thank you General Barr!

Amazing you guys even admit it. Are you implying Barr would only be reopening this if it incriminates D’s and would not be opening it if it harmed Trump. Like the opposite of blind justice? Your mind I so poisoned you admit it openly. Barr would let him get away with it and wouldn’t reopen it if it implicates Trump. That is a Rubicon statement boys. It’s a cult.

Try to keep up Mach,
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/...stein-case

Attorney General William Barr revealed Monday he recused himself from the Justice Department’s prosecution of alleged child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, who was arrested over the weekend and formally charged that morning.

“I’m recused from that matter because one of the law firms that represented Epstein long ago was a firm that I subsequently joined for a period of time,” Barr told reporters in Southern Carolina.

(07-09-2019 10:25 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Go to Jester’s twitter. See for yourself

whats your twitter handle?

Interesting that you cited the Washington Examiner. I’m in DC as we speak and the examiner is available on corners here for free. That rag isn’t worth the price of the paper it’s printed on. It’s not a news source. More propaganda you guys rely on.