Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
Author Message
esayem Offline
Hark The Sound!
*

Posts: 16,659
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 1255
I Root For: Olde Ironclad
Location: Tobacco Road
Post: #201
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-08-2019 05:23 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(06-08-2019 04:41 PM)esayem Wrote:  The universities of North Carolina and Virginia decided that the ACC was the better conference for them. I know their fans agree.

And for all this AAU talk about the Big Ten: Notre Dame is not and was not a member of this prestigious research cohort. Yet, the Big Ten chased them for thirty some years.

04-wine

Well that AAU thing was sort of overlooked for Nebraska since they knew they wouldn't remain AAU when they took them. The Notre Dame allure was in part due to the fact that with them their dominance within their footprint would have been complete and they are a historic brand. I see the ACC had no problem hiking a skirt to take them while you dished out a special deal. So I wouldn't use the Irish to cast aspersions.

The ACC has NEVER claimed a university had to be AAU to join the conference. Maybe the Big Ten never did either and it was all their fans and internet know-it-alls. I’m not sure.

The ACC (or at least a few presidents) wanted Notre Dame instead of Boston College 16 years ago. Years later, the “special deal” helped ensure the future of the conference in its current form.

My main point is some conferences are better for some schools than others; the ACC is the BEST conference in the eyes of UNC, UVa, and Notre Dame.
(This post was last modified: 06-09-2019 09:22 AM by esayem.)
06-09-2019 09:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
westwolf Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 825
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 8
I Root For: CFB
Location:
Post: #202
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
When the Big takes Oklahoma and Texas, they will have to abrogate their contiguous states rule. Doubt they want Kansas.
06-09-2019 09:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ArQ Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,076
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 32
I Root For: Pitt/Louisville
Location: Most beautiful place
Post: #203
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 09:06 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  
(06-07-2019 09:37 PM)cuseroc Wrote:  
(06-07-2019 04:23 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  
(06-06-2019 10:03 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(06-06-2019 09:01 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  UMD is closer to NYC than Cuse. They don't have that much a NYC market besides their LIRR alumni. You people are funny

Hasn't Rutgers been relegated to 1-AA? I swore I read that somewhere.

No one cares about Rutgers in NYC. You had your one night miracle moment back when current recruits were preschoolers. Rutgers is irrelevant in 2019. Your season ticket base has eroded down to less than 15K...you are probably one of the few who still drives on the turnpike with your Block R magnet.

Cool! Our one night was still bigger than any you'll have in NYC. The Empire State building isn't lighting up Orange for the Cuse. No on in NYC gives a rats ass about anything north of Westchester including you guys.

Still very much butthurt that we ended up in a better conference and better division than you. Better hope no one poaches your coach after this season, gonna suck to go back to your 3-9 seasons again huh? Oh and look out Jimmy B is getting up there, then just a few years away from being UConn post Calhoun. At least the Huskies have multiple championships to keep them satisfied.

Its both sad and funny seeing a Rutgers fan living vicariously thru Uconn so that he can talk smack to a Syracuse fan about winning. Its embarrassing. Why dont you try posting something thats worthwhile some time instead of constantly hurling insults at folks? I know other Rutgers fans wish you would quit.

Okay once you Cuse losers quit it i'll stop responding in kind.

I don't know what your definition of "loser" is. But Rutgers sure lost a lot of games in court and field.
06-09-2019 09:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GE and MTS Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 3,656
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 83
I Root For: Liberty/Penn St
Location: FBS!!!
Post: #204
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
I think it boils down to the Big Ten being losers if you expected them to add Notre Dame, Texas, and/or UNC. Instead of a grand slam, they hit a two-run double where they are in a position to keep the rally going.
06-09-2019 10:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TexanMark Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 25,698
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 1331
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Post: #205
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 09:16 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  
(06-07-2019 10:41 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(06-07-2019 04:23 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  
(06-06-2019 10:03 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(06-06-2019 09:01 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  UMD is closer to NYC than Cuse. They don't have that much a NYC market besides their LIRR alumni. You people are funny

Hasn't Rutgers been relegated to 1-AA? I swore I read that somewhere.

No one cares about Rutgers in NYC. You had your one night miracle moment back when current recruits were preschoolers. Rutgers is irrelevant in 2019. Your season ticket base has eroded down to less than 15K...you are probably one of the few who still drives on the turnpike with your Block R magnet.

Cool! Our one night was still bigger than any you'll have in NYC. The Empire State building isn't lighting up Orange for the Cuse. No on in NYC gives a rats ass about anything north of Westchester including you guys.

Still very much butthurt that we ended up in a better conference and better division than you. Better hope no one poaches your coach after this season, gonna suck to go back to your 3-9 seasons again huh? Oh and look out Jimmy B is getting up there, then just a few years away from being UConn post Calhoun. At least the Huskies have multiple championships to keep them satisfied.

Mmmm they lit up the Empire State Bldg Syracuse Orange...BFD in fact it was done a couple times. I know your sports history is one night back in 2006 but try to stay up.

BTW, Dino signed an extension after last season...try again. Cuse in hoops will be fine after Boeheim...elite programs usually don't stay down long after an icon leaves.

Wrong again: the vast majority of Syracuse fans are not wishing to be in the Big Ten. As stated numerous times our school fits in much better with the ACC. Our fans and Alumni live near the Atlantic Seaboard not in the Midwest.

Better conference? The one that gets paid more isn't showing it in championships won. If you are happy as a Rutgers fan getting paid eventually a full share and losing badly enjoy your better division and be happy. All I see is a declining fan base watching bad football in a nearly empty stadium. Cuse is on their way adding close to 10K new season ticket holders for 2019 and Rutgers might keep a total of 12-15K season ticket holders this year. Congrats

HAHAHAHAHAHA they lit up the Empire State building for Syracuse...and the other three teams who made the final four that year. Yeah, so not really specifically for you but hey you got it lit up on one side of the building!

https://cuse.com/news/2013/4/6/EmpireState4613.aspx

Quote:At sunset on Saturday, ESB displayed the school colors of Final Four teams:
North Side: Syracuse University (orange) East Side: University of Michigan (navy blue and yellow) South Side: University of Louisville (red and white) West Side: Wichita State (yellow and black)

Oh wait...you shared the empire state building with another team!

https://cuse.com/news/2010/12/28/FB_1228102957.aspx

Quote:The Empire State Building will split its world-famous tower lights for Syracuse and Kanas State on Wednesday, Dec. 29 to celebrate the first-ever New Era Pinstripe Bowl

So they don't actually lit it up FOR you but the events you take part in. Cool.

Oh yeah and coaches contracts are written in stone right? No one ever broke one of those before have they? Glad you finally hired a decent coach after 20 years of sucking.

Made claims, proved wrong comes back rationalizing.

No one here really believes you are happy we hired Dino Babers. Dino can now sell NJ recruits the reality of playing for a Top 25 team vs playing in Piscataway for a win challenged program.

BL:. You talk of all this money like it will be your savior in 5 years. My retort: Rutgers is still going to Rutgers. It is in your DNA
06-09-2019 10:28 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Statefan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,511
Joined: May 2018
I Root For: .
Location:
Post: #206
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-08-2019 09:41 PM)BruceMcF Wrote:  
(06-08-2019 04:41 PM)esayem Wrote:  The universities of North Carolina and Virginia decided that the ACC was the better conference for them. I know their fans agree.

And for all this AAU talk about the Big Ten: Notre Dame is not and was not a member of this prestigious research cohort. Yet, the Big Ten chased them for thirty some years.
The AAU is a convenient proxy for schools that will be considered OK for the majority of faculty politicians in the upper rungs of University administrations who don't give a damn about sports but who live or die by academic prestige. Some schools are prestigious enough without having massive research budgets. EG, The dean of your college of Engineering might not be impressed by Notre Dame, but the dean of your Law School will be.

And adding the standard disclaimer that academic prestige is not a reason for expansion, it's a hurdle to get over when a school otherwise presents some reason to be invited. And it's Notre Dame we are talking about ... as long as you can find enough advocates for its quality as an institution and they have some ammunition to make a case, you are going to go ahead and take a school with the media value of Notre Dame.

Correct, AAU is a red herring because the real metrics of the Big 10 are high impact and high dollar research.

https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/profiles/site?...ce&ds=herd


This list if from the National Science Foundation - this list is very transitive realative to AAU in addition to the old boy clubs and the purpose of AAU which is to lobby US Senators in Washington.

1. Johns Hopkins
2. Michigan
3. UC San Francisco
4. Penn
5. Washington
6. Wisky
7. UC SB
8. Duke
9. Harvard
10. Stanford
11. UNC
1[b][i][b][b][b]2. UCLA
13. Cornell
14. MIT
1[i][b]5. Yale

16. Pitt
17. Minnesotta
18. NYU
19. Texas A&M
[b][i][i][b]20. Colorado
[/b][/b]
[/b]
22. Ohio State
23. Penn State
24. Georgia Tech

26. Cal[/b][/i]
27. USC
28. Washington St Louis

29. Northwestern
30. Cal - Davis
31. Vandy
32. Michigan State[/color]
33. Rutgers
34. Emory
35. Texas
36. Illinois

37. [color=#800000]Purdue
[/b][/i][/b][/i][/i][/b]
41. UAB
42. U South Florida
43. MD
44. Arizona State
45. Indiana
46. Virginia Tech
47. NC State

[i][b]48. Colorado
49. Iowa
51. Virginia
[/i[/b]]
53. Georgia
54. Cincinatti
55. Chicago
56. MD - Baltimore County *
57. Boston
58. Case Western
59. Suny Buffalo
60. Cal Tech
61. Utah
62. Kentucky
64. Miami
65. Cal Irvine
66. Washington State
70. Colorado State
71. Carnegie Mellon
[i][b]73. Iowa State
[/b][/i]
76. Dartmouth
77. Nebraska
[i][b]79. Kansas[/b][/i]
80. Hawaii
82. FSU
84. Oklahoma
85. Temple
86. UConn
87. Oregon State
88. LSU
90. Mizzou
94 Miss State
95 Stoney Brook
96 UC Santa Barbara
97. VCU
98. U Central Florida
101. Notre Dame
102. Georgetown
103. Bama
104. UMass
106. South Carolina
107. Tennessee
109 K-State
111 Clemson
113 Texas Tech
115 Auburn
117 West Va
121 Wake Forest
122 Louisville
125 Houston
132 Syracuse
139 Ok State

Those in red are B10. Those in blue ACC. Those in Bold are in the AAU club - a club limited to 62 of which two are Toronto and McGill. The club is designed to promote the federal research dollars needed to fund these institutions. Your various metrics and political pull in Washington matter. It's almost impossible to get in or stay in if you do not control and govern your own medical school.

GT and Boston took Nebraska and Syracuse's place. NC State, VT, and Cincy (and I assume others) were up for those same votes, but you need 47 positive votes so you can be blackballed, especially another in-state school.

Anyone on this list under 75 can get into AAU if the stars align and someone below them drops back like Syracuse, Nebraska, and two more whose names I can't remember. Kansas is who should be sweating bullets and a few of the really small schools that included for political only reasons that I will not name. VT, NC State, Cincy, USF and UAB will all get a chance. UAB has screwed up governance and is under Bama's thumb. They also don't have a robust undergrad component so they are screwed for the next 30 years. Cincy is under Ohio State's thumb and there are academic politics with some of the MAC like Miami Ohio and the B10 and the States of Ohio, etc. They will have a tough go. USF has to get a stamp of approval from Florida. That stamp of approval then puts USF in the ACC or perhaps the SEC as a mid range byproduct. Does UF want that? That leaves the twins VT and NC State. VT has gone around the normal system to partner with Wake Forest and Carrilion to make their own private med school. NC State does not have that freedom. I think VT has a slight edge over NC State should Kansas get kicked to the curb.


But this entire exercises is to say that when the Big 10 says AAU - they might as well be saying bull ****, or baking flour - it's a dodge to keep MAC and some other AAC schools from harassing their boards of Trustees.

The Big 10 is NOT the AAU. The AAU is it's own club that the B10 has been able to dominate at times (especially Mary Sue Coleman at UM).

The way you learn about what the AAU really does is to make friends with retired old presidential farts, the very old lady who handles his or her phone - not the new kid. and read the Chronicle of Higher Education. You didn't have to be in the banquet room to figure out what happened and with time, info sometimes leaks out.

To say Delany botched B10 expansion is a big statement. He's not superman, just a UNC-Ch grad up against other UNC-Ch and Duke grads who know him. Delany never held 4 Aces - he just talked and bluffed that way. Demographically the best play after Nebraska was two schools in the growing east coast, and one in the growing west - Colorado, MD, and one of VT or NC State. At that 14 he can wait an see what happens VT or NC State - the one not moving first and he has a more culturally viable bridge toward Texas and or GT.

That would have been my play and for it to work, UNC and UVa and Duke would have to be kept in the dark.
(This post was last modified: 06-09-2019 12:06 PM by Statefan.)
06-09-2019 10:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,194
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2427
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #207
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 09:22 AM)esayem Wrote:  My main point is some conferences are better for some schools than others; the ACC is the BEST conference in the eyes of UNC, UVa, and Notre Dame.

I wouldn't necessarily include Notre Dame, as their clear preference is "no conference". Also, we don't know if Notre Dame actually preferred the ACC to say the B1G or Big 12 in an "all things even" sense, it may be the ACC was just willing to give them more than those conferences were. Remember, Notre Dame preferred the Big East over the ACC - until the ACC destroyed the Big East with the 2011 raids.

As for UVA and UNC, that's undoubtedly correct. The ACC is obviously their preferred home, and the ACC would have to deteriorate significantly for that to change.
(This post was last modified: 06-09-2019 12:15 PM by quo vadis.)
06-09-2019 12:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RutgersGuy Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,127
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation: 152
I Root For: Rutgers
Location:
Post: #208
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 10:28 AM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(06-09-2019 09:16 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  
(06-07-2019 10:41 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(06-07-2019 04:23 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  
(06-06-2019 10:03 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  Hasn't Rutgers been relegated to 1-AA? I swore I read that somewhere.

No one cares about Rutgers in NYC. You had your one night miracle moment back when current recruits were preschoolers. Rutgers is irrelevant in 2019. Your season ticket base has eroded down to less than 15K...you are probably one of the few who still drives on the turnpike with your Block R magnet.

Cool! Our one night was still bigger than any you'll have in NYC. The Empire State building isn't lighting up Orange for the Cuse. No on in NYC gives a rats ass about anything north of Westchester including you guys.

Still very much butthurt that we ended up in a better conference and better division than you. Better hope no one poaches your coach after this season, gonna suck to go back to your 3-9 seasons again huh? Oh and look out Jimmy B is getting up there, then just a few years away from being UConn post Calhoun. At least the Huskies have multiple championships to keep them satisfied.

Mmmm they lit up the Empire State Bldg Syracuse Orange...BFD in fact it was done a couple times. I know your sports history is one night back in 2006 but try to stay up.

BTW, Dino signed an extension after last season...try again. Cuse in hoops will be fine after Boeheim...elite programs usually don't stay down long after an icon leaves.

Wrong again: the vast majority of Syracuse fans are not wishing to be in the Big Ten. As stated numerous times our school fits in much better with the ACC. Our fans and Alumni live near the Atlantic Seaboard not in the Midwest.

Better conference? The one that gets paid more isn't showing it in championships won. If you are happy as a Rutgers fan getting paid eventually a full share and losing badly enjoy your better division and be happy. All I see is a declining fan base watching bad football in a nearly empty stadium. Cuse is on their way adding close to 10K new season ticket holders for 2019 and Rutgers might keep a total of 12-15K season ticket holders this year. Congrats

HAHAHAHAHAHA they lit up the Empire State building for Syracuse...and the other three teams who made the final four that year. Yeah, so not really specifically for you but hey you got it lit up on one side of the building!

https://cuse.com/news/2013/4/6/EmpireState4613.aspx

Quote:At sunset on Saturday, ESB displayed the school colors of Final Four teams:
North Side: Syracuse University (orange) East Side: University of Michigan (navy blue and yellow) South Side: University of Louisville (red and white) West Side: Wichita State (yellow and black)

Oh wait...you shared the empire state building with another team!

https://cuse.com/news/2010/12/28/FB_1228102957.aspx

Quote:The Empire State Building will split its world-famous tower lights for Syracuse and Kanas State on Wednesday, Dec. 29 to celebrate the first-ever New Era Pinstripe Bowl

So they don't actually lit it up FOR you but the events you take part in. Cool.

Oh yeah and coaches contracts are written in stone right? No one ever broke one of those before have they? Glad you finally hired a decent coach after 20 years of sucking.

Made claims, proved wrong comes back rationalizing.

No one here really believes you are happy we hired Dino Babers. Dino can now sell NJ recruits the reality of playing for a Top 25 team vs playing in Piscataway for a win challenged program.

BL:. You talk of all this money like it will be your savior in 5 years. My retort: Rutgers is still going to Rutgers. It is in your DNA

You act like Cuse has the DNA of a champion, you're an also-ran like us. At least we know who we are.

|Oh and you didn't prove me wrong. You were on the ESB along with Witchta State and Kansas State. Not the same as having the whole building lit up just for you. So your claims weren't correct but you spin spin spin.
06-09-2019 12:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Statefan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,511
Joined: May 2018
I Root For: .
Location:
Post: #209
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 12:14 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(06-09-2019 09:22 AM)esayem Wrote:  My main point is some conferences are better for some schools than others; the ACC is the BEST conference in the eyes of UNC, UVa, and Notre Dame.

I wouldn't necessarily include Notre Dame, as their clear preference is "no conference". Also, we don't know if Notre Dame actually preferred the ACC to say the B1G or Big 12 in an "all things even" sense, it may be the ACC was just willing to give them more than those conferences were. Remember, Notre Dame preferred the Big East over the ACC - until the ACC destroyed the Big East with the 2011 raids.

As for UVA and UNC, that's undoubtedly correct. The ACC is obviously their preferred home, and the ACC would have to deteriorate significantly for that to change.

Notre Dame has wanted to be an ACC member for at least 40 years. The ACC would not allow ND the special favor of a curtailed football schedule for decades. That was the rub. The Big East was just a place to park their other sports. Don't take my word for it, give Boo Corrigan a ring over at State and ask him what his daddy told him about ND. Sometimes it takes a long time for a couple to make enough adjustments to walk down the aisle.

ND does not play 3 ACC football games a year and is not eligible for the ACC title game. That's it - the only caveat. Just like Syracuse not fielding a baseball team.
(This post was last modified: 06-09-2019 02:00 PM by Statefan.)
06-09-2019 01:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
adcorbett Offline
This F'n Guy
*

Posts: 14,325
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 368
I Root For: Louisville
Location: Cybertron
Post: #210
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 12:14 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  
(06-09-2019 10:28 AM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(06-09-2019 09:16 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  
(06-07-2019 10:41 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(06-07-2019 04:23 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  Cool! Our one night was still bigger than any you'll have in NYC. The Empire State building isn't lighting up Orange for the Cuse. No on in NYC gives a rats ass about anything north of Westchester including you guys.

Still very much butthurt that we ended up in a better conference and better division than you. Better hope no one poaches your coach after this season, gonna suck to go back to your 3-9 seasons again huh? Oh and look out Jimmy B is getting up there, then just a few years away from being UConn post Calhoun. At least the Huskies have multiple championships to keep them satisfied.

Mmmm they lit up the Empire State Bldg Syracuse Orange...BFD in fact it was done a couple times. I know your sports history is one night back in 2006 but try to stay up.

BTW, Dino signed an extension after last season...try again. Cuse in hoops will be fine after Boeheim...elite programs usually don't stay down long after an icon leaves.

Wrong again: the vast majority of Syracuse fans are not wishing to be in the Big Ten. As stated numerous times our school fits in much better with the ACC. Our fans and Alumni live near the Atlantic Seaboard not in the Midwest.

Better conference? The one that gets paid more isn't showing it in championships won. If you are happy as a Rutgers fan getting paid eventually a full share and losing badly enjoy your better division and be happy. All I see is a declining fan base watching bad football in a nearly empty stadium. Cuse is on their way adding close to 10K new season ticket holders for 2019 and Rutgers might keep a total of 12-15K season ticket holders this year. Congrats

HAHAHAHAHAHA they lit up the Empire State building for Syracuse...and the other three teams who made the final four that year. Yeah, so not really specifically for you but hey you got it lit up on one side of the building!

https://cuse.com/news/2013/4/6/EmpireState4613.aspx

Quote:At sunset on Saturday, ESB displayed the school colors of Final Four teams:
North Side: Syracuse University (orange) East Side: University of Michigan (navy blue and yellow) South Side: University of Louisville (red and white) West Side: Wichita State (yellow and black)

Oh wait...you shared the empire state building with another team!

https://cuse.com/news/2010/12/28/FB_1228102957.aspx

Quote:The Empire State Building will split its world-famous tower lights for Syracuse and Kanas State on Wednesday, Dec. 29 to celebrate the first-ever New Era Pinstripe Bowl

So they don't actually lit it up FOR you but the events you take part in. Cool.

Oh yeah and coaches contracts are written in stone right? No one ever broke one of those before have they? Glad you finally hired a decent coach after 20 years of sucking.

Made claims, proved wrong comes back rationalizing.

No one here really believes you are happy we hired Dino Babers. Dino can now sell NJ recruits the reality of playing for a Top 25 team vs playing in Piscataway for a win challenged program.

BL:. You talk of all this money like it will be your savior in 5 years. My retort: Rutgers is still going to Rutgers. It is in your DNA

You act like Cuse has the DNA of a champion, you're an also-ran like us. At least we know who we are.

This isn’t my fight, but Cuse has a few banners hanging up on the carrier dome in football, lacrosse, and one in basketball, with a couple of runner ups in all...
06-09-2019 02:18 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TexanMark Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 25,698
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 1331
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Post: #211
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 02:18 PM)adcorbett Wrote:  
(06-09-2019 12:14 PM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  
(06-09-2019 10:28 AM)TexanMark Wrote:  
(06-09-2019 09:16 AM)RutgersGuy Wrote:  
(06-07-2019 10:41 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  Mmmm they lit up the Empire State Bldg Syracuse Orange...BFD in fact it was done a couple times. I know your sports history is one night back in 2006 but try to stay up.

BTW, Dino signed an extension after last season...try again. Cuse in hoops will be fine after Boeheim...elite programs usually don't stay down long after an icon leaves.

Wrong again: the vast majority of Syracuse fans are not wishing to be in the Big Ten. As stated numerous times our school fits in much better with the ACC. Our fans and Alumni live near the Atlantic Seaboard not in the Midwest.

Better conference? The one that gets paid more isn't showing it in championships won. If you are happy as a Rutgers fan getting paid eventually a full share and losing badly enjoy your better division and be happy. All I see is a declining fan base watching bad football in a nearly empty stadium. Cuse is on their way adding close to 10K new season ticket holders for 2019 and Rutgers might keep a total of 12-15K season ticket holders this year. Congrats

HAHAHAHAHAHA they lit up the Empire State building for Syracuse...and the other three teams who made the final four that year. Yeah, so not really specifically for you but hey you got it lit up on one side of the building!

https://cuse.com/news/2013/4/6/EmpireState4613.aspx

Quote:At sunset on Saturday, ESB displayed the school colors of Final Four teams:
North Side: Syracuse University (orange) East Side: University of Michigan (navy blue and yellow) South Side: University of Louisville (red and white) West Side: Wichita State (yellow and black)

Oh wait...you shared the empire state building with another team!

https://cuse.com/news/2010/12/28/FB_1228102957.aspx

Quote:The Empire State Building will split its world-famous tower lights for Syracuse and Kanas State on Wednesday, Dec. 29 to celebrate the first-ever New Era Pinstripe Bowl

So they don't actually lit it up FOR you but the events you take part in. Cool.

Oh yeah and coaches contracts are written in stone right? No one ever broke one of those before have they? Glad you finally hired a decent coach after 20 years of sucking.

Made claims, proved wrong comes back rationalizing.

No one here really believes you are happy we hired Dino Babers. Dino can now sell NJ recruits the reality of playing for a Top 25 team vs playing in Piscataway for a win challenged program.

BL:. You talk of all this money like it will be your savior in 5 years. My retort: Rutgers is still going to Rutgers. It is in your DNA

You act like Cuse has the DNA of a champion, you're an also-ran like us. At least we know who we are.

This isn’t my fight, but Cuse has a few banners hanging up on the carrier dome in football, lacrosse, and one in basketball, with a couple of runner ups in all...

Plus only four schools with more NFL HoF'ers, playing at the highest levels in Football since the early 1900's, one of the highest bowl win %, top 20 in wins, Heisman trophy winner...yes exactly like Rutgers who has had one win on a Thursday night and played a rugby/soccer game in 1869
06-09-2019 02:59 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
adcorbett Offline
This F'n Guy
*

Posts: 14,325
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 368
I Root For: Louisville
Location: Cybertron
Post: #212
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
Ahem, easy on that Thursday night thing. We were on the living end of that :(
06-09-2019 04:47 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,834
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3315
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #213
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 01:56 PM)Statefan Wrote:  
(06-09-2019 12:14 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(06-09-2019 09:22 AM)esayem Wrote:  My main point is some conferences are better for some schools than others; the ACC is the BEST conference in the eyes of UNC, UVa, and Notre Dame.

I wouldn't necessarily include Notre Dame, as their clear preference is "no conference". Also, we don't know if Notre Dame actually preferred the ACC to say the B1G or Big 12 in an "all things even" sense, it may be the ACC was just willing to give them more than those conferences were. Remember, Notre Dame preferred the Big East over the ACC - until the ACC destroyed the Big East with the 2011 raids.

As for UVA and UNC, that's undoubtedly correct. The ACC is obviously their preferred home, and the ACC would have to deteriorate significantly for that to change.

Notre Dame has wanted to be an ACC member for at least 40 years. The ACC would not allow ND the special favor of a curtailed football schedule for decades. That was the rub. The Big East was just a place to park their other sports. Don't take my word for it, give Boo Corrigan a ring over at State and ask him what his daddy told him about ND. Sometimes it takes a long time for a couple to make enough adjustments to walk down the aisle.

ND does not play 3 ACC football games a year and is not eligible for the ACC title game. That's it - the only caveat. Just like Syracuse not fielding a baseball team.
Notre Dame talked to the Big 10 throughout the 90s. They signed a deal to join the Big 10 as a full member in 1999. The faculty approved it overwhelmingly. The president approved. But it got killed by the trustees who wanted to keep independence.
06-09-2019 04:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TexanMark Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 25,698
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 1331
I Root For: Syracuse
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Post: #214
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 04:47 PM)adcorbett Wrote:  Ahem, easy on that Thursday night thing. We were on the living end of that :(

And got screwed on a bad call as I remember too!
06-09-2019 05:11 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
XLance Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,394
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 788
I Root For: Carolina
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #215
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 10:39 AM)Statefan Wrote:  
(06-08-2019 09:41 PM)BruceMcF Wrote:  
(06-08-2019 04:41 PM)esayem Wrote:  The universities of North Carolina and Virginia decided that the ACC was the better conference for them. I know their fans agree.

And for all this AAU talk about the Big Ten: Notre Dame is not and was not a member of this prestigious research cohort. Yet, the Big Ten chased them for thirty some years.
The AAU is a convenient proxy for schools that will be considered OK for the majority of faculty politicians in the upper rungs of University administrations who don't give a damn about sports but who live or die by academic prestige. Some schools are prestigious enough without having massive research budgets. EG, The dean of your college of Engineering might not be impressed by Notre Dame, but the dean of your Law School will be.

And adding the standard disclaimer that academic prestige is not a reason for expansion, it's a hurdle to get over when a school otherwise presents some reason to be invited. And it's Notre Dame we are talking about ... as long as you can find enough advocates for its quality as an institution and they have some ammunition to make a case, you are going to go ahead and take a school with the media value of Notre Dame.

Correct, AAU is a red herring because the real metrics of the Big 10 are high impact and high dollar research.

https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/profiles/site?...ce&ds=herd


This list if from the National Science Foundation - this list is very transitive realative to AAU in addition to the old boy clubs and the purpose of AAU which is to lobby US Senators in Washington.

1. Johns Hopkins
2. Michigan
3. UC San Francisco
4. Penn
5. Washington
6. Wisky
7. UC SB
8. Duke
9. Harvard
10. Stanford
11. UNC
1[b][i][b][b][b]2. UCLA
13. Cornell
14. MIT
1[i][b]5. Yale

16. Pitt
17. Minnesotta
18. NYU
19. Texas A&M
[b][i][i][b]20. Colorado
[/b][/b]
[/b]
22. Ohio State
23. Penn State
24. Georgia Tech

26. Cal[/b][/i]
27. USC
28. Washington St Louis

29. Northwestern
30. Cal - Davis
31. Vandy
32. Michigan State[/color]
33. Rutgers
34. Emory
35. Texas
36. Illinois

37. [color=#800000]Purdue
[/b][/i][/b][/i][/i][/b]
41. UAB
42. U South Florida
43. MD
44. Arizona State
45. Indiana
46. Virginia Tech
47. NC State

[i][b]48. Colorado
49. Iowa
51. Virginia
[/i[/b]]
53. Georgia
54. Cincinatti
55. Chicago
56. MD - Baltimore County *
57. Boston
58. Case Western
59. Suny Buffalo
60. Cal Tech
61. Utah
62. Kentucky
64. Miami
65. Cal Irvine
66. Washington State
70. Colorado State
71. Carnegie Mellon
[i][b]73. Iowa State
[/b][/i]
76. Dartmouth
77. Nebraska
[i][b]79. Kansas[/b][/i]
80. Hawaii
82. FSU
84. Oklahoma
85. Temple
86. UConn
87. Oregon State
88. LSU
90. Mizzou
94 Miss State
95 Stoney Brook
96 UC Santa Barbara
97. VCU
98. U Central Florida
101. Notre Dame
102. Georgetown
103. Bama
104. UMass
106. South Carolina
107. Tennessee
109 K-State
111 Clemson
113 Texas Tech
115 Auburn
117 West Va
121 Wake Forest
122 Louisville
125 Houston
132 Syracuse
139 Ok State

Those in red are B10. Those in blue ACC. Those in Bold are in the AAU club - a club limited to 62 of which two are Toronto and McGill. The club is designed to promote the federal research dollars needed to fund these institutions. Your various metrics and political pull in Washington matter. It's almost impossible to get in or stay in if you do not control and govern your own medical school.

GT and Boston took Nebraska and Syracuse's place. NC State, VT, and Cincy (and I assume others) were up for those same votes, but you need 47 positive votes so you can be blackballed, especially another in-state school.

Anyone on this list under 75 can get into AAU if the stars align and someone below them drops back like Syracuse, Nebraska, and two more whose names I can't remember. Kansas is who should be sweating bullets and a few of the really small schools that included for political only reasons that I will not name. VT, NC State, Cincy, USF and UAB will all get a chance. UAB has screwed up governance and is under Bama's thumb. They also don't have a robust undergrad component so they are screwed for the next 30 years. Cincy is under Ohio State's thumb and there are academic politics with some of the MAC like Miami Ohio and the B10 and the States of Ohio, etc. They will have a tough go. USF has to get a stamp of approval from Florida. That stamp of approval then puts USF in the ACC or perhaps the SEC as a mid range byproduct. Does UF want that? That leaves the twins VT and NC State. VT has gone around the normal system to partner with Wake Forest and Carrilion to make their own private med school. NC State does not have that freedom. I think VT has a slight edge over NC State should Kansas get kicked to the curb.


But this entire exercises is to say that when the Big 10 says AAU - they might as well be saying bull ****, or baking flour - it's a dodge to keep MAC and some other AAC schools from harassing their boards of Trustees.

The Big 10 is NOT the AAU. The AAU is it's own club that the B10 has been able to dominate at times (especially Mary Sue Coleman at UM).

The way you learn about what the AAU really does is to make friends with retired old presidential farts, the very old lady who handles his or her phone - not the new kid. and read the Chronicle of Higher Education. You didn't have to be in the banquet room to figure out what happened and with time, info sometimes leaks out.

To say Delany botched B10 expansion is a big statement. He's not superman, just a UNC-Ch grad up against other UNC-Ch and Duke grads who know him. Delany never held 4 Aces - he just talked and bluffed that way. Demographically the best play after Nebraska was two schools in the growing east coast, and one in the growing west - Colorado, MD, and one of VT or NC State. At that 14 he can wait an see what happens VT or NC State - the one not moving first and he has a more culturally viable bridge toward Texas and or GT.

That would have been my play and for it to work, UNC and UVa and Duke would have to be kept in the dark.

Colorado and NC State/Va Tech would be excellent additions to the B1G.
06-09-2019 07:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
IWokeUpLikeThis Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,863
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation: 1470
I Root For: NIU, Chicago St
Location:
Post: #216
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
Colorado-to-the-B1G feels like the hidden-in-plain-sight move we all miss after Oklahoma/ACC schools turn down the B1G.
06-09-2019 07:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,251
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7956
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #217
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 07:29 PM)IWokeUpLikeThis Wrote:  Colorado-to-the-B1G feels like the hidden-in-plain-sight move we all miss after Oklahoma/ACC schools turn down the B1G.

Colorado / Oklahoma to the Big 10 is the counter to Texas / Tech to the SEC.
06-09-2019 07:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
XLance Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,394
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation: 788
I Root For: Carolina
Location: Greensboro, NC
Post: #218
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 07:29 PM)IWokeUpLikeThis Wrote:  Colorado-to-the-B1G feels like the hidden-in-plain-sight move we all miss after Oklahoma/ACC schools turn down the B1G.


Oklahoma turned down the B1G?
06-09-2019 07:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,251
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7956
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #219
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 07:29 PM)IWokeUpLikeThis Wrote:  Colorado-to-the-B1G feels like the hidden-in-plain-sight move we all miss after Oklahoma/ACC schools turn down the B1G.

Colorado / Oklahoma to the Big 10 is the counter to Texas / Tech to the SEC.
06-09-2019 08:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Statefan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,511
Joined: May 2018
I Root For: .
Location:
Post: #220
RE: Jim Delany botched the 2010-2013 Big Ten Expansion
(06-09-2019 04:53 PM)bullet Wrote:  
(06-09-2019 01:56 PM)Statefan Wrote:  
(06-09-2019 12:14 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(06-09-2019 09:22 AM)esayem Wrote:  My main point is some conferences are better for some schools than others; the ACC is the BEST conference in the eyes of UNC, UVa, and Notre Dame.

I wouldn't necessarily include Notre Dame, as their clear preference is "no conference". Also, we don't know if Notre Dame actually preferred the ACC to say the B1G or Big 12 in an "all things even" sense, it may be the ACC was just willing to give them more than those conferences were. Remember, Notre Dame preferred the Big East over the ACC - until the ACC destroyed the Big East with the 2011 raids.

As for UVA and UNC, that's undoubtedly correct. The ACC is obviously their preferred home, and the ACC would have to deteriorate significantly for that to change.

Notre Dame has wanted to be an ACC member for at least 40 years. The ACC would not allow ND the special favor of a curtailed football schedule for decades. That was the rub. The Big East was just a place to park their other sports. Don't take my word for it, give Boo Corrigan a ring over at State and ask him what his daddy told him about ND. Sometimes it takes a long time for a couple to make enough adjustments to walk down the aisle.

ND does not play 3 ACC football games a year and is not eligible for the ACC title game. That's it - the only caveat. Just like Syracuse not fielding a baseball team.
Notre Dame talked to the Big 10 throughout the 90s. They signed a deal to join the Big 10 as a full member in 1999. The faculty approved it overwhelmingly. The president approved. But it got killed by the trustees who wanted to keep independence.

Really?

Notre Dame Gives Thumbs Down to Big Ten
From Associated Press
Notre Dame will stand alone in football, as it has for more than a century.

The university rejected an invitation to join the Big Ten on Friday, intent on preserving its unique national identity and fearing the move would hurt football recruiting.

University trustees followed the recommendation of President Edward Malloy and nine senior university officials and voted unanimously against the Big Ten's overture.

The storied football program, independent for 111 years, features a coast-to-coast schedule and impassioned alumni across the country.

"Notre Dame has a distinct identity that is the product of more than a century and a half of institutional independence," Malloy said.

Football Coach Bob Davie said the decision was bigger than football.

"It involved a reinforcement of the heritage and culture of the institution--not only looking back into the past, but also projecting where Notre Dame expects to be in the future," he said.

Malloy presented the Big Ten proposal in October to the 55-member board and said the issue had drawn the most interest of any during his term as president. The school's alumni association reported 99.5% of its members opposed changing Notre Dame's "brand name."

Although the move was opposed by students, alumni and the athletic department, it had some support in academic circles.

The Big Ten affiliation would have made the South Bend, Ind., school a member of the Committee on Intercollegiate Cooperation, a consortium of all 11 Big Ten schools and one-time conference member the University of Chicago.

In October, the school's Faculty Senate voted 25-4 in favor of joining the CIC, but made no mention of the Big Ten.

"It wasn't a slam dunk by any stretch of the imagination," said Rev. William Beauchamp, the school's executive vice president.

By joining the Big Ten, Athletic Director Mike Wadsworth said the Irish would have received between $1 million and $4 million less in income in 2007--the first year they would have played a full Big Ten schedule.

But Wadsworth said that loss would have been "inconsequential" in a budget projected to be $500 million in 2007.

Wadsworth said the move would have hurt football recruiting.

"We talk so much internally about recruiting and the nature of our admissions requirements and being a smaller school," Wadsworth added. "One of the things we always had as an advantage is the selling of the national program, that and television exposure."

The Big Ten is expected to woo other schools--with Syracuse or Missouri reportedly the likely candidates--to give the conference 12 members.


The faculty vote was to join CIC, not the Big 10. People forget that.
(This post was last modified: 06-09-2019 09:28 PM by Statefan.)
06-09-2019 09:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread:


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.