(11-27-2018 06:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL

But of course, many of those who have an issue with the mother in this case have no issue whatsoever about gassing kids at the border or separating them from their families...but then again, those kids aren't white, I suppose.

Really it isn't about the kid, its about the father. Its always about the male in here.

Mods go ahead and give me a warning.

Tom this same old bull**** from you is beyond tiring. What the fvck does using tear gas (NOT "GASSING" as you are intentionally trying to draw comparisons between Assad and Trump) to turn back people trying to enter the country illegally, or detaining illegal immigrants have to do with what appears to be a mother intentionally confusing her kid with regards to his gender??? For fvcks sake, you managed the liberal trifecta in your bull****- comparing Trump to a dictator, racism, and sexism. What a miserable life you must live to always view the world as you do.

(11-27-2018 06:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL

But of course, many of those who have an issue with the mother in this case have no issue whatsoever about gassing kids at the border or separating them from their families...but then again, those kids aren't white, I suppose.

Really it isn't about the kid, its about the father. Its always about the male in here.

It is perfectly ok to gas American kids within our borders though, right?

(11-28-2018 08:21 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-27-2018 06:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL

But of course, many of those who have an issue with the mother in this case have no issue whatsoever about gassing kids at the border or separating them from their families...but then again, those kids aren't white, I suppose.

Really it isn't about the kid, its about the father. Its always about the male in here.

It is perfectly ok to gas American kids within our borders though, right?

"Gassing" was also acceptable a mere 2 years ago when Obama was president.

(11-28-2018 08:53 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-28-2018 08:21 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-27-2018 06:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL

But of course, many of those who have an issue with the mother in this case have no issue whatsoever about gassing kids at the border or separating them from their families...but then again, those kids aren't white, I suppose.

Really it isn't about the kid, its about the father. Its always about the male in here.

It is perfectly ok to gas American kids within our borders though, right?

"Gassing" was also acceptable a mere 2 years ago when Obama was president.

Clinton and Obama gas their own people. Don't the democrats and the neocons use that premise for regime change?

(11-27-2018 07:16 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-27-2018 05:23 PM)q5sys Wrote:  

(11-27-2018 04:40 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  This is what we worrry about????

"...chemical castration at age 8..."
Yes... this is something that is worrying.

Come on, Mach. Is this something to be worried about or not? A batshit crazy woman wants to chemically castrate her 8 year old.

A Machavellian bump

(11-28-2018 08:00 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-27-2018 06:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL

But of course, many of those who have an issue with the mother in this case have no issue whatsoever about gassing kids at the border or separating them from their families...but then again, those kids aren't white, I suppose.

Really it isn't about the kid, its about the father. Its always about the male in here.

Mods go ahead and give me a warning.

Tom this same old bull**** from you is beyond tiring. What the fvck does using tear gas (NOT "GASSING" as you are intentionally trying to draw comparisons between Assad and Trump) to turn back people trying to enter the country illegally, or detaining illegal immigrants have to do with what appears to be a mother intentionally confusing her kid with regards to his gender??? For fvcks sake, you managed the liberal trifecta in your bull****- comparing Trump to a dictator, racism, and sexism. What a miserable life you must live to always view the world as you do.

He is one twisted, sick puppy

I can handle people with strange or different views, but his comments are flat out disgusting.

(11-27-2018 06:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL
But of course, many of those who have an issue with the mother in this case have no issue whatsoever about gassing kids at the border or separating them from their families...but then again, those kids aren't white, I suppose.
Really it isn't about the kid, its about the father. Its always about the male in here.

IMO the mother in this case is abusing the child.

As for "gassing kids at the border," those kids were very simply being used as human shields by those attempting to force their way in illegally. In that case, again IMO those mothers were abusing those kids too. Perhaps that assumes that the adults with those children are their parents. In many cases, I would guess the parents are hundreds if not thousands of miles away. In that case, that's abuse of a different sort.

The whole human shields practice is going to continue until we show the guts to go ahead and do what needs to be done and not back down at the sight of women and children. If that sounds hard-nosed, that's because it is. And intentionally so. And if that provokes a hue and cry about how terrible it is to "murder" women and children, just consider this: Those women and children are going to keep being used in that way until we show the willingness to take care of business instead of cowering.

(11-27-2018 03:54 PM)q5sys Wrote:  http://thefederalist.com/2018/11/26/mom-...sagreeing/

Quote:Six-year-old James is caught in a gender identity nightmare. Under his mom’s care in Dallas, Texas, James obediently lives as a trans girl named “Luna.” But given the choice when he’s with dad, he’s all boy — his sex at birth.

In their divorce proceedings, the mother has charged the father with child abuse for not affirming James as transgender, has sought restraining orders against him, and is seeking to terminate his parental rights. She is also seeking to require him to pay for the child’s visits to a transgender-affirming therapist and transgender medical alterations, which may include hormonal sterilization starting at age eight.

If you EVER needed proof about how f'd up and rotten to the core progressive liberalism is.....

THIS IS IT.

The fact that people are actually defending this woman just proves western society is in total decline.

(11-28-2018 10:11 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-27-2018 06:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL
But of course, many of those who have an issue with the mother in this case have no issue whatsoever about gassing kids at the border or separating them from their families...but then again, those kids aren't white, I suppose.
Really it isn't about the kid, its about the father. Its always about the male in here.

IMO the mother in this case is abusing the child.

This.

(11-27-2018 09:04 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  The only victim here is the boy. He will have to live with the stupidly immoral womans decision. I can only hope that the boy gets a second chance at a normal and brave judge to stop this woman before he wrecks her sons life.

How sad that we live in this era of perverted people with so much power (PC) in their hands.

The mentally perverted are becoming more and more normalized.

We already have some psychologists saying pedophilia is not a mental disorder.

(11-28-2018 10:11 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-27-2018 06:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL
But of course, many of those who have an issue with the mother in this case have no issue whatsoever about gassing kids at the border or separating them from their families...but then again, those kids aren't white, I suppose.
Really it isn't about the kid, its about the father. Its always about the male in here.

IMO the mother in this case is abusing the child.

As for "gassing kids at the border," those kids were very simply being used as human shields by those attempting to force their way in illegally. In that case, again IMO those mothers were abusing those kids too. Perhaps that assumes that the adults with those children are their parents. In many cases, I would guess the parents are hundreds if not thousands of miles away. In that case, that's abuse of a different sort.

The whole human shields practice is going to continue until we show the guts to go ahead and do what needs to be done and not back down at the sight of women and children. If that sounds hard-nosed, that's because it is. And intentionally so. And if that provokes a hue and cry about how terrible it is to "murder" women and children, just consider this: Those women and children are going to keep being used in that way until we show the willingness to take care of business instead of cowering.

Was listening to NPR yesterday....

Apparently in the caravan in Tijuana (and these are THEIR numbers, and while not over the top, they are ABSOLUTELY left leaning) there are 4,000 men, 1,000 women and 1,000 children. Of course the math here too can be fuzzy... in that in many LA countries you're a 'man' as young as 12-14, but here I've heard 19 year olds referred to as 'children' by left leaning media. And at least a few men admitted to reporters that they were traveling to the US because they had been put in jail in their countries. MAYBE it was for political beliefs... or MAYBE it was for an actual crime. With no documentation, how would we know?

As far as the 'this is what we worry about' comment.

I suppose we could instead be parsing every word and tweet that comes out of the Trump camp as if it is ALL somehow policy.

I'm LGBT, but have to agree this is wrong. People should not be allowed to transition until they are legally an adult even if they have a parent's permission. It even bothers me when parents parade around their "gay" adolescent children. These kids won't begin to understand those kinds of feelings until they reach puberty and have a better understanding of what they are. It's clear this mother has some problems, especially because the boy chooses to be a boy when he's with his dad. Messing with a child's hormones before he goes through puberty could seriously mess his body up, and it should not be legal to castrate an 8 year old period. That's just plain wrong.

(11-28-2018 11:11 AM)TrueBlueDrew Wrote:  I'm LGBT, but have to agree this is wrong. People should not be allowed to transition until they are legally an adult even if they have a parent's permission. It even bothers me when parents parade around their "gay" adolescent children. These kids won't begin to understand those kinds of feelings until they reach puberty and have a better understanding of what they are. It's clear this mother has some problems, especially because the boy chooses to be a boy when he's with his dad. Messing with a child's hormones before he goes through puberty could seriously mess his body up, and it should not be legal to castrate an 8 year old period. That's just plain wrong.

Unfortunately, our courts recently ruled that the federal ban on female genital mutilation is unconstitutional.

so castration sounds like it's a go.

“As it was in the days of Noah ".................


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

There is no way a 6 year old could make the decision that they are Trans. They can barely communicate effectively at 6. The kid by be a raging sissyboy and turn out gay. We have all seen this. That's fine..Let nature take its course. To force castration on this child is pure evil and the mother should be locked up for child abuse.

(11-28-2018 11:20 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-28-2018 11:11 AM)TrueBlueDrew Wrote:  I'm LGBT, but have to agree this is wrong. People should not be allowed to transition until they are legally an adult even if they have a parent's permission. It even bothers me when parents parade around their "gay" adolescent children. These kids won't begin to understand those kinds of feelings until they reach puberty and have a better understanding of what they are. It's clear this mother has some problems, especially because the boy chooses to be a boy when he's with his dad. Messing with a child's hormones before he goes through puberty could seriously mess his body up, and it should not be legal to castrate an 8 year old period. That's just plain wrong.

Unfortunately, our courts recently ruled that the federal ban on female genital mutilation is unconstitutional.

so castration sounds like it's a go.

The court ruled that Congress did not have the right to ban female genital mutilation using the commerce clause but the states can individually ban it.

James is a twin. The mother tries to keep him apart from his brother.

Moms trying to play god and just proves that mothers do not always know what is best for their kids.

(11-27-2018 07:01 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  MY only issue is the claim that when given his choice, he identifies as a male.

If that's the case and you DON'T have an issue with the mother, then you're one twisted piece of work. If it's not and the child identifies as Luna, more power to the mom and screw the POS dad.

I absolutely agree with this. If the kid wants to identify as male, Mom needs to step off. If the kid wants to identify as female, Dad does.

However, I wonder how many on here (outside of Ham, it seems) would be as tough on the Dad as they are with this Mom if the kid identified as Luna?

While I agree it SEEMS that the Mom is the one out of line here, it's also entirely possible that the kid is making choices with his Dad based on what he thinks he wants to hear - it also seems that the writer also had an issue with a grandmother dressing him as a girl, as well as his own gender experience that may be affecting how much of the "other side" of the story is being told as well.

(11-28-2018 12:49 PM)tigergreen Wrote:  

(11-27-2018 07:01 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  MY only issue is the claim that when given his choice, he identifies as a male.

If that's the case and you DON'T have an issue with the mother, then you're one twisted piece of work. If it's not and the child identifies as Luna, more power to the mom and screw the POS dad.

I absolutely agree with this. If the kid wants to identify as male, Mom needs to step off. If the kid wants to identify as female, Dad does.

However, I wonder how many on here (outside of Ham, it seems) would be as tough on the Dad as they are with this Mom if the kid identified as Luna?

While I agree it SEEMS that the Mom is the one out of line here, it's also entirely possible that the kid is making choices with his Dad based on what he thinks he wants to hear - it also seems that the writer also had an issue with a grandmother dressing him as a girl, as well as his own gender experience that may be affecting how much of the "other side" of the story is being told as well.

At the age of 6 for any child’s mental health, they should be treated as the gender they are born with. They are too young for anything else, and switching would just lead to confusion in their fragile mind..


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

(11-27-2018 09:14 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(11-27-2018 06:02 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  LOL

But of course, many of those who have an issue with the mother in this case have no issue whatsoever about gassing kids at the border or separating them from their families...but then again, those kids aren't white, I suppose.

Really it isn't about the kid, its about the father. Its always about the male in here.

This^^^^