(01-25-2018 03:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 03:31 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 03:21 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Now the alt-left house dems are writing their own memo in attempt to muddy the waters/cover up for deep state.

Sick.

You expect us to believe your biased version?

Posted without a hint of irony. You gotta love their hubris.

Keep doubling down.

(01-25-2018 03:31 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 03:21 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Now the alt-left house dems are writing their own memo in attempt to muddy the waters/cover up for deep state.

Sick.

You expect us to believe your biased version?

And the lefts version will be unbiased, right?

This is about controlling the narrative. The Dems have been trying to block this thing from being released but I'm willing to bet theirs will hit the street first via "leak".

(01-25-2018 01:47 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Wonder why it'd be reckless?

Simple answer.

The memo was drafted from a classified IC report. Nunes then took that report and pulled what he wanted out of it to paint a narrative and then made fiery claims about it.

So to recap:
1. He could be potentially revealing classified information.
2. He would not be providing a complete and total picture of the assessment from the IC.
3. etc.

Need we really go on? Or have you forgotten already how up in arms the right was about classified information when it pertained to H? I believe it had something to do with perp walks and orange jump suits.

(01-25-2018 01:47 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Wonder why it'd be reckless?

Seriously you don't know?

(01-25-2018 03:43 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 03:39 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 03:31 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 03:21 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Now the alt-left house dems are writing their own memo in attempt to muddy the waters/cover up for deep state.

Sick.

You expect us to believe your biased version?

Posted without a hint of irony. You gotta love their hubris.

Keep doubling down.

What am I doubling down on other than facts?

I'm all for releasing the report from the IC. I'm not in favor of a partisan republican putting forth his biased view of it. Would you be in favor of a Democratic version of the assessment? Of course you wouldn't. Why are you guys so bent on making yourselves look moronic?

I love it. With every passing day, the conservatives on this forum go more and more the way of Alex Jones.

Before the first nothing burger.



After the second nothing burger.

(01-25-2018 03:53 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I love it. With every passing day, the conservatives on this forum go more and more the way of Alex Jones.

Quoted for when President Trump is exonerated and I bump all your muh russia conspiracy theory threads.

(01-25-2018 03:58 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 03:53 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I love it. With every passing day, the conservatives on this forum go more and more the way of Alex Jones.

Quoted for when President Trump is exonerated and I bump all your muh russia conspiracy theory threads.

I look forward to it.

(01-25-2018 03:53 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I love it. With every passing day, the conservatives on this forum go more and more the way of Alex Jones.

Do you think that a 4 page memo, backed by about 384 pages of documentation does not exist? Wow

(01-25-2018 04:01 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 03:53 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I love it. With every passing day, the conservatives on this forum go more and more the way of Alex Jones.

Do you think that a 4 page memo, backed by about 384 pages of documentation does not exist? Wow

I'm not talking about the memo. I have no doubt that Nunez cherry picked information and put it in some memo.

I'm talking about the notion that there is a Deep State conspiracy against Trump.

(01-25-2018 03:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 01:47 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Wonder why it'd be reckless?

Simple answer.

The memo was drafted from a classified IC report. Nunes then took that report and pulled what he wanted out of it to paint a narrative and then made fiery claims about it.

So to recap:
1. He could be potentially revealing classified information.
2. He would not be providing a complete and total picture of the assessment from the IC.
3. etc.

Need we really go on? Or have you forgotten already how up in arms the right was about classified information when it pertained to H? I believe it had something to do with perp walks and orange jump suits.

Yet you seem eager to believe whatever it is the Dems will be putting out. Why is that?

I'm just curious if the liberals get tired of getting kicked in the nuts daily by the Trump administration. Literally everything they say will happen, the exact opposite does. Can one of you clowns tell me who will win the Super Bowl so that I can bet every cent to my name on the other team????????

(01-25-2018 04:08 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  I'm just curious if the liberals get tired of getting kicked in the nuts daily by the Trump administration. Literally everything they say will happen, the exact opposite does. Can one of you clowns tell me who will win the Super Bowl so that I can bet every cent to my name on the other team????????

Have you found Obama's real birth certificate yet?

(01-25-2018 04:17 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 04:08 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  I'm just curious if the liberals get tired of getting kicked in the nuts daily by the Trump administration. Literally everything they say will happen, the exact opposite does. Can one of you clowns tell me who will win the Super Bowl so that I can bet every cent to my name on the other team????????

Have you found Obama's real birth certificate yet?

I have not seen it.

(01-25-2018 04:06 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 04:01 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 03:53 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I love it. With every passing day, the conservatives on this forum go more and more the way of Alex Jones.

Do you think that a 4 page memo, backed by about 384 pages of documentation does not exist? Wow

I'm not talking about the memo. I have no doubt that Nunez cherry picked information and put it in some memo.

I'm talking about the notion that there is a Deep State conspiracy against Trump.

Jesus Christ they used a bogus report to tap the mobile phones of the inner circle of a Presidential candidate.

(01-25-2018 04:06 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 04:01 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 03:53 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I love it. With every passing day, the conservatives on this forum go more and more the way of Alex Jones.

Do you think that a 4 page memo, backed by about 384 pages of documentation does not exist? Wow

I'm not talking about the memo. I have no doubt that Nunez cherry picked information and put it in some memo.

I'm talking about the notion that there is a Deep State conspiracy against Trump.

I don't believe in the conspiracy angle either. There's now plenty of evidence that it exists.

(01-25-2018 04:08 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 03:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 01:47 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Wonder why it'd be reckless?

Simple answer.

The memo was drafted from a classified IC report. Nunes then took that report and pulled what he wanted out of it to paint a narrative and then made fiery claims about it.

So to recap:
1. He could be potentially revealing classified information.
2. He would not be providing a complete and total picture of the assessment from the IC.
3. etc.

Need we really go on? Or have you forgotten already how up in arms the right was about classified information when it pertained to H? I believe it had something to do with perp walks and orange jump suits.

Yet you seem eager to believe whatever it is the Dems will be putting out. Why is that?

When did I ever say that? Actually, I hope the dems do not put something out. They'll look as foolish as Nunes looks now. Best to just let Nunes, Johnson, et. al. look like the morons we all know they are.

(01-25-2018 04:41 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 04:08 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 03:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-25-2018 01:47 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Wonder why it'd be reckless?

Simple answer.

The memo was drafted from a classified IC report. Nunes then took that report and pulled what he wanted out of it to paint a narrative and then made fiery claims about it.

So to recap:
1. He could be potentially revealing classified information.
2. He would not be providing a complete and total picture of the assessment from the IC.
3. etc.

Need we really go on? Or have you forgotten already how up in arms the right was about classified information when it pertained to H? I believe it had something to do with perp walks and orange jump suits.

Yet you seem eager to believe whatever it is the Dems will be putting out. Why is that?

When did I ever say that? Actually, I hope the dems do not put something out. They'll look as foolish as Nunes looks now. Best to just let Nunes, Johnson, et. al. look like the morons we all know they are.

Before you start calling the R's names maybe you should start with your side* first. I don't seem to recall you calling Adam Schiff a moron. Why is that?

* - your side would be the liberal/progressive side.

(01-25-2018 04:26 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Jesus Christ they used a bogus report to tap the mobile phones of the inner circle of a Presidential candidate.

Don't recall which of our looney lefties it was, perhaps the guy who was a big UCF fan, almost crying one day because "there's a possibility that a presidential campaign met with the Russians and discussed trading the lifting of sanctions for help in winning the election"......or something very close to that.

But the FBI using a dubious piece of "intelligence" to ask a FISA judge for permission to spy on not just Americans, but an American running for the office of president, and they all look the other way. Meh.

If I was a cynic, which I'm not........