(04-19-2016 06:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 06:41 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 01:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Breaking

The Fourth Circuit just ruled that a school district in Virginia violated Title IX when they denied a teen access to the restroom consistent with his gender identity.

Fourth Circuit covers North Carolina as well.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politic...37592.html

Yup, no chance deviant and immature high school boys will exploit this law for activities that VIOLATE the privacy of young women who don't want anyone by anatomical females in the restroom with them.

is that really a problem gripping America?

we can't solve crime in major cities...but lets go after the transsexuals...smdh

Not my or America's problem to validate others feelings. If the LGBTQ gaystapo was interested in protecting feelings they'd insist on a bathroom labeled private use (one toilet, one sink) that anyone who doesn't want to use the gender specific bathrooms could use. It's the stupidity of LGBTQ and liberals to think deviants won't exploit the law to invade the privacy of others. So trannies feelings are spared at the expense of a woman's privacy. Interesting liberals use a woman's right to privacy to defend abortion but not to protect them from sexual predators that will definitely use this law to violate the privacy of women.

(04-19-2016 07:33 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 06:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 06:41 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 01:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Breaking

The Fourth Circuit just ruled that a school district in Virginia violated Title IX when they denied a teen access to the restroom consistent with his gender identity.

Fourth Circuit covers North Carolina as well.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politic...37592.html

Yup, no chance deviant and immature high school boys will exploit this law for activities that VIOLATE the privacy of young women who don't want anyone by anatomical females in the restroom with them.

is that really a problem gripping America?

we can't solve crime in major cities...but lets go after the transsexuals...smdh

Not my or America's problem to validate others feelings. If the LGBTQ gaystapo was interested in protecting feelings they'd insist on a bathroom labeled private use (one toilet, one sink) that anyone who doesn't want to use the gender specific bathrooms could use. It's the stupidity of LGBTQ and liberals to think deviants won't exploit the law to invade the privacy of others. So trannies feelings are spared at the expense of a woman's privacy. Interesting liberals use a woman's right to privacy to defend abortion but not to protect them from sexual predators that will definitely use this law to violate the privacy of women.

If it doesn't happen in Memphis, UofMemphis gives zero f**ks about you and yours.

There is a religious Muslim man. One of the worst violations of his religious tenets is for a (biological) female not his wife to see his willy.

The American government is going to be violating his human rights and causing grave cultural offense against him with this law.

Zero respect for his Muslim culture.

Its my opinion that rock stars should refuse to play in the USA until his cultural right to a segregated halal bathroom is met.

(04-19-2016 01:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Breaking

The Fourth Circuit just ruled that a school district in Virginia violated Title IX when they denied a teen access to the restroom consistent with his gender identity.

Fourth Circuit covers North Carolina as well.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politic...37592.html

Proof of my contention that it isn't 'the right' who is pushing for laws establishing a standard.

(04-19-2016 06:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  we can't solve crime in major cities...but lets go after the transsexuals...smdh

Who's "we," kimosabe?

Chicago.
Newark.
Detroit.
New Orleans.
Stockton.
Oakland.
Baltimore.
Memphis.

Seems like your side of the aisle has the crime problem in Democratic party controlled cities......

Real trans people aren’t all around us and no one is going after them.

Trans people are a rhetorical one-in-a-million rarity. The odds against a genuine trans person wanting to shower with the girls in the local high school are right up there with winning the lottery but liberals are losing their motherfvcking minds because of a possible insult to a hypothetical victim who conceivably might someday exist, against those one-in-a-hundred-million odds and the reality that many a pervert is going to see how far they can take this law.

It's your bed, liberals. You lie in it.

(04-20-2016 09:23 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 06:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  we can't solve crime in major cities...but lets go after the transsexuals...smdh

Who's "we,"

Americans.

I've visited the very conservative (see rankings) Hattiesburg MS for many Memphis vs USM athletic events...it's a very dangerous small town, full of crime, and conservatives.

but you keep spewing your BS

https://www.crowdpac.com/games/lookup/ho...burg,%20MS

http://hattiesburg.areaconnect.com/crime1.htm

(04-20-2016 09:23 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 06:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  we can't solve crime in major cities...but lets go after the transsexuals...smdh

Who's "we," kimosabe?

Chicago.
Newark.
Detroit.
New Orleans.
Stockton.
Oakland.
Baltimore.
Memphis.

Seems like your side of the aisle has the crime problem in Democratic party controlled cities......

Real trans people aren’t all around us and no one is going after them.

Trans people are a rhetorical one-in-a-million rarity. The odds against a genuine trans person wanting to shower with the girls in the local high school are right up there with winning the lottery but liberals are losing their motherfvcking minds because of a possible insult to a hypothetical victim who conceivably might someday exist, against those one-in-a-hundred-million odds and the reality that many a pervert is going to see how far they can take this law.

It's your bed, liberals. You lie in it.

Pacify the mentally fragile person as they may slit their wrists if not allowed in the bathroom of the opposite sex. Guarantee making them feel good.........at the expense of all the women that don't want males in the restroom with them.

I guess the LBGTQ warriors are now having a "war on women"

How appropriate.

(04-19-2016 09:15 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 07:33 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 06:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 06:41 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 01:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Breaking

The Fourth Circuit just ruled that a school district in Virginia violated Title IX when they denied a teen access to the restroom consistent with his gender identity.

Fourth Circuit covers North Carolina as well.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politic...37592.html

Yup, no chance deviant and immature high school boys will exploit this law for activities that VIOLATE the privacy of young women who don't want anyone by anatomical females in the restroom with them.

is that really a problem gripping America?

we can't solve crime in major cities...but lets go after the transsexuals...smdh

Not my or America's problem to validate others feelings. If the LGBTQ gaystapo was interested in protecting feelings they'd insist on a bathroom labeled private use (one toilet, one sink) that anyone who doesn't want to use the gender specific bathrooms could use. It's the stupidity of LGBTQ and liberals to think deviants won't exploit the law to invade the privacy of others. So trannies feelings are spared at the expense of a woman's privacy. Interesting liberals use a woman's right to privacy to defend abortion but not to protect them from sexual predators that will definitely use this law to violate the privacy of women.

If it doesn't happen in Memphis, UofMemphis gives zero f**ks about you and yours.

(04-20-2016 10:09 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 09:15 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 07:33 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 06:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 06:41 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  Yup, no chance deviant and immature high school boys will exploit this law for activities that VIOLATE the privacy of young women who don't want anyone by anatomical females in the restroom with them.

is that really a problem gripping America?

we can't solve crime in major cities...but lets go after the transsexuals...smdh

Not my or America's problem to validate others feelings. If the LGBTQ gaystapo was interested in protecting feelings they'd insist on a bathroom labeled private use (one toilet, one sink) that anyone who doesn't want to use the gender specific bathrooms could use. It's the stupidity of LGBTQ and liberals to think deviants won't exploit the law to invade the privacy of others. So trannies feelings are spared at the expense of a woman's privacy. Interesting liberals use a woman's right to privacy to defend abortion but not to protect them from sexual predators that will definitely use this law to violate the privacy of women.

If it doesn't happen in Memphis, UofMemphis gives zero f**ks about you and yours.

yep, lying is a typical conservative tactic...I'm not shocked you would turn to lying to try and make a point...you dishonor yourself with your lies.

UK foreign office announces a travel warning covering Mississippi and North Carolina. More cancellations have followed. Meanwhile the Title IX ruling in the fourth circuit raises the specter of more lawsuits (and losses). McCrory continues to drop in the polls.

(04-20-2016 10:20 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  UK foreign office announces a travel warning covering Mississippi and North Carolina. More cancellations have followed. Meanwhile the Title IX ruling in the fourth circuit raises the specter of more lawsuits (and losses). McCrory continues to drop in the polls.

Travel Warning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The State Department alerts U.S. citizens to potential risks of travel to and throughout Europe following several terrorist attacks, including the March 22 attacks in Brussels claimed by ISIL. Terrorist groups continue to plan near-term attacks throughout Europe, targeting sporting events, tourist sites, restaurants, and transportation.
https://travel.state.gov/content/passpor...alert.html

Bathrooms Vs. Terrorists

(04-19-2016 06:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  we can't solve crime in major cities...but lets go after the transsexuals...smdh

who is 'going after them'?

This is a false narrative. They are demanding laws about bathrooms. They're not generally getting the laws they want.... but THEY demanded them.

(04-20-2016 10:37 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 06:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  we can't solve crime in major cities...but lets go after the transsexuals...smdh

who is 'going after them'?

This is a false narrative. They are demanding laws about bathrooms. They're not generally getting the laws they want.... but THEY demanded them.

presenting your BS opinion as fact does not make it so...

(04-20-2016 10:39 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-20-2016 10:37 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 06:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  we can't solve crime in major cities...but lets go after the transsexuals...smdh

who is 'going after them'?

This is a false narrative. They are demanding laws about bathrooms. They're not generally getting the laws they want.... but THEY demanded them.

presenting your BS opinion as fact does not make it so...

It does for him as that's basically all he ever does.

Trigger warning..

(04-20-2016 11:35 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Trigger warning..

LOL That Video is awesome...

(04-20-2016 11:32 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2016 10:39 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-20-2016 10:37 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 06:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  we can't solve crime in major cities...but lets go after the transsexuals...smdh

who is 'going after them'?

This is a false narrative. They are demanding laws about bathrooms. They're not generally getting the laws they want.... but THEY demanded them.

presenting your BS opinion as fact does not make it so...

It does for him as that's basically all he ever does.

LMFAO

Exactly what IS my opinion on this?

You two don't even know...
I asked a simple question and you won't answer it...

These laws are the result of 'requests' by the trans-gendered to address their issues to avoid discrimination... I fully understand that the responses are often bad ones, but there is ZERO reason for a bill to be brought up with regard to bathroom issues except that the trans-gendered want it addressed.

If all lawmakers wanted to do was discriminate, they certainly wouldn't make rules that even if you disagree with them, would create grounds for discrimination lawsuits. It seems rather self-evident to anyone with a brain that the easiest way to discriminate against the trans-gendered was to say they aren't a man so they can't use the men's, and they aren't a woman so they can't use the women's. That's what they did, and there wasn't a law to address it so they got away with it... so TG's demanded rules. They don't like the ones they are sometimes being presented with... but it is still a response to their request.

If you think that's BS, then you tell me why someone looking to discriminate against TGs would write ANY law that gave ANY way to prosecute someone for discrimination, no matter how remote the required circumstances. You can't. It makes no sense... and you know it.

FTR, I'm repeatedly on record as being in favor of their opinion, though with concern over the legitimate, not overblown concerns that exist.

My 'BS opinion' is that they should be allowed to use the restroom of the gender they present themselves as... which is (as I understand it) exactly what they want as well. I guess THEY have BS opinions as well. I am 100% against requiring someone who regularly presents as a woman to use the men's, simply because they are pre-op when the medical community has required them to do just that. SInce mine is BS< what is yours? It is ONLY tempered by the concerns about safety from predators, and I've suggested a very reasonable compromise that is consistent with how we've addressed issues for the disabled in this country... and I don't think it a stretch to argue that being physically born one gender but in all other respects, the other could be viewed as a disability. It's certainly a challenge/difference. I guess you think ADA accommodations and compliance directives are BS as well?

(04-20-2016 03:15 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(04-20-2016 11:32 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-20-2016 10:39 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(04-20-2016 10:37 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 06:55 PM)UofMemphis Wrote:  we can't solve crime in major cities...but lets go after the transsexuals...smdh

who is 'going after them'?

This is a false narrative. They are demanding laws about bathrooms. They're not generally getting the laws they want.... but THEY demanded them.

presenting your BS opinion as fact does not make it so...

It does for him as that's basically all he ever does.

LMFAO

Exactly what IS my opinion on this?

You two don't even know...
I asked a simple question and you won't answer it...

These laws are the result of 'requests' by the trans-gendered to address their issues to avoid discrimination... I fully understand that the responses are often bad ones, but there is ZERO reason for a bill to be brought up with regard to bathroom issues except that the trans-gendered want it addressed.

If all lawmakers wanted to do was discriminate, they certainly wouldn't make rules that even if you disagree with them, would create grounds for discrimination lawsuits. It seems rather self-evident to anyone with a brain that the easiest way to discriminate against the trans-gendered was to say they aren't a man so they can't use the men's, and they aren't a woman so they can't use the women's. That's what they did, and there wasn't a law to address it so they got away with it... so TG's demanded rules. They don't like the ones they are sometimes being presented with... but it is still a response to their request.

If you think that's BS, then you tell me why someone looking to discriminate against TGs would write ANY law that gave ANY way to prosecute someone for discrimination, no matter how remote the required circumstances. You can't. It makes no sense... and you know it.

FTR, I'm repeatedly on record as being in favor of their opinion, though with concern over the legitimate, not overblown concerns that exist.

My 'BS opinion' is that they should be allowed to use the restroom of the gender they present themselves as... which is (as I understand it) exactly what they want as well. I guess THEY have BS opinions as well. I am 100% against requiring someone who regularly presents as a woman to use the men's, simply because they are pre-op when the medical community has required them to do just that. SInce mine is BS< what is yours? It is ONLY tempered by the concerns about safety from predators, and I've suggested a very reasonable compromise that is consistent with how we've addressed issues for the disabled in this country... and I don't think it a stretch to argue that being physically born one gender but in all other respects, the other could be viewed as a disability. It's certainly a challenge/difference. I guess you think ADA accommodations and compliance directives are BS as well?

Where is your husband, dear?

Another good response

(04-20-2016 11:35 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Trigger warning..

It's funny cause it's true.