(04-14-2016 08:15 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  The perp could have claimed that God told him to do what he did. Criminals do that all the time. Does that mean that we should ban religion?

The perp wasn't transgendered.

Who has said anything about banning trangendered people? You don't make a good argument when you are forced to engage in such obviously false analogy. This is about the ordinance to address the requests/demands of TG people, not tg people themselves. Of course you know that, but it doesn't sell your story.

(04-14-2016 08:17 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  ACTUALLY NO I'm not. You completely missed my point!!! I'm not saying transgendered will commit the crimes in most cases, I'm saying bad people will exploit gender neutral bathrooms to their advantage, that's what predators do.

Yep. TOM is the one being intellectually dishonest because he doesn't want to admit that 'what he wants' opens up these doors and that needs to be addressed.

(04-15-2016 09:21 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Yet another example of "small government" republicans passing laws as an attempt to prevent something that almost never happens.

Another false argument. It isn't 'small government' republicans who are demanding that the needs of the LBGT community be addressed here. Are you suggesting that there shouldn't be any rules whatsoever about whom uses what bathroom? Let's just take down all the men/women signs and let ALL people choose whichever bathroom they'd like to use... I mean if it's 'fair' for the transgendered, it should be fair for everyone else, right?

That won't cause any problems. /sarcasm

As I've repeatedly said, honest and decent and 'non-bigoted' people can disagree on 'which' bathroom is appropriate for transgendered people to use and that might even change as time passes... I'm not even sure there is 100% agreement within that community... but it is only the left engaging in this 'war' on trying to address the issue.

MOST Republicans aren't 'Small government Republicans' these days, but for those of us who are, we would be more than happy to let men continue to use men's restrooms and women, women's.... the question is, at what point does/should the law recognize a transgendered person as the 'previous' and 'current' gender? I've repeatedly expressed my opinion that they should use the bathroom that they 'present' themselves as... but that still means you have to choose one... and the truth is that there are many now who don't want to choose either. They want to be 'both', which is fine with me personally, but certainly creates a problem in fair application of our laws. Surely you wouldn't think it fair for someone to be able to pick and choose based on the situation, do you? I'm female because it makes my car insurance cheaper and male because it allows me to weigh more and still meet the physical requirements for something.

And don't tell me it shouldn't matter, unless you commonly share a bathroom (at the same time) with your sibling of the same gender.

(04-14-2016 08:59 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Trannys are freaks. No need to cater to them.

Thank you for proving what the real motivating factor is here.

(04-18-2016 04:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-14-2016 08:59 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Trannys are freaks. No need to cater to them.

Thank you for proving what the real motivating factor is here.

Much easier to place a label on something you don't understand then to actually try and understand it.

(04-18-2016 04:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-14-2016 08:59 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Trannys are freaks. No need to cater to them.

Thank you for proving what the real motivating factor is here.

Thank you for painting 'everyone' with the opinions of a misguided few

(04-18-2016 04:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-14-2016 08:59 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Trannys are freaks. No need to cater to them.

Thank you for proving what the real motivating factor is here.

yep.

I am eagerly awaiting the opportunity to have to use a women's restroom because the men's is closed, and marching in saying "Fvck you I self-identify as a woman!"

No seriously. I sort of want to do this.

(04-19-2016 11:55 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  I am eagerly awaiting the opportunity to have to use a women's restroom because the men's is closed, and marching in saying "Fvck you I self-identify as a woman!"

No seriously. I sort of want to do this.

It's open season now.........I'll be feeling that feminine itch every time I have to cut a big log in a public place............just stink up the ladies room till fumes roll out under the door......

(04-15-2016 09:49 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Non-discrimination laws don't prevent every bad thing from happening. But they do provide strong motivations for businesses and government actors to not discriminate

"strong motivations" is SJW speak for jail time, a fine, and reeducation camps...

(04-14-2016 08:16 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(04-14-2016 06:50 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  Predators don't care about sexual identity, they will however use gender neutral bathrooms to their advantage.

California Man Dressed as Woman Busted Videoing- Women's Bathroom

Perv caught filming women in TN

Another Perv in Washington

In the space of one month THREE caught how many were not?

Any evidence that LBGTs are being assaulted or otherwise endangered for using the bathroom that matches their anatomical gender?

None of that matters. The only thing that matters to the degenerates and their enablers is for them to get a false sense of normalcy in their tortured, demented, unnatural lives.

Must be good to be perfect, or something.

(04-19-2016 11:55 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  I am eagerly awaiting the opportunity to have to use a women's restroom because the men's is closed, and marching in saying "Fvck you I self-identify as a woman!"

No seriously. I sort of want to do this.

I suspect you've probably already done it. Pretended to be Ayn Rand or somebody.

(04-19-2016 12:27 PM)gsu95 Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 11:55 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  I am eagerly awaiting the opportunity to have to use a women's restroom because the men's is closed, and marching in saying "Fvck you I self-identify as a woman!"

No seriously. I sort of want to do this.

I suspect you've probably already done it. Pretended to be Ayn Rand or somebody.

Are you questing how I self-identify? Who gives you the right to tell me I am not Ayn Rand? Also, I am Chinese.

(04-19-2016 12:36 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 12:27 PM)gsu95 Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 11:55 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  I am eagerly awaiting the opportunity to have to use a women's restroom because the men's is closed, and marching in saying "Fvck you I self-identify as a woman!"

No seriously. I sort of want to do this.

I suspect you've probably already done it. Pretended to be Ayn Rand or somebody.

Are you questing how I self-identify? Who gives you the right to tell me I am not Ayn Rand? Also, I am Chinese.

Breaking

The Fourth Circuit just ruled that a school district in Virginia violated Title IX when they denied a teen access to the restroom consistent with his gender identity.

Fourth Circuit covers North Carolina as well.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politic...37592.html

(04-18-2016 04:45 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-18-2016 04:25 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(04-14-2016 08:59 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Trannys are freaks. No need to cater to them.

Thank you for proving what the real motivating factor is here.

Much easier to place a label on something you don't understand then to actually try and understand it.

Yep, just like playing the race card.

So as this progresses do we send males to female prisons because at sentencing they claim to "self identify" as female? Do males get to play on female sports teams since they self identify as females?

(04-19-2016 01:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Breaking

The Fourth Circuit just ruled that a school district in Virginia violated Title IX when they denied a teen access to the restroom consistent with his gender identity.

Fourth Circuit covers North Carolina as well.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politic...37592.html

RALEIGH
A transgender teen persuaded the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that banning him from using the boys’ bathroom at his high school in rural Virginia

Floyd also ruled that the boy’s discrimination lawsuit could move forward and sent the case to the lower court to be reheard.

THE SOLUTION!!! Admit one creature at a time!

(04-19-2016 01:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Breaking

The Fourth Circuit just ruled that a school district in Virginia violated Title IX when they denied a teen access to the restroom consistent with his gender identity.

Fourth Circuit covers North Carolina as well.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politic...37592.html

Yup, no chance deviant and immature high school boys will exploit this law for activities that VIOLATE the privacy of young women who don't want anyone by anatomical females in the restroom with them.

(04-19-2016 06:41 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(04-19-2016 01:11 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  Breaking

The Fourth Circuit just ruled that a school district in Virginia violated Title IX when they denied a teen access to the restroom consistent with his gender identity.

Fourth Circuit covers North Carolina as well.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politic...37592.html

Yup, no chance deviant and immature high school boys will exploit this law for activities that VIOLATE the privacy of young women who don't want anyone by anatomical females in the restroom with them.

is that really a problem gripping America?

we can't solve crime in major cities...but lets go after the transsexuals...smdh