(11-30-2015 02:57 PM)stever20 Wrote: Case in point- look at your Oklahoma City team....
2007 #2 Durant
2008 #4 Westbrook
2009 #3 Harden
to be fair the NBA is a bit different. There are only 2 rounds, and after a certain pick it becomes very difficult to find someone who can even start. If you don't get a top 5 pick it becomes very difficult to find a game changer. It's literally impossible to build a contender if you're constantly picking around #15. Right now there's a clear line of demarcation between the Top 4 teams in the league and the next tier, and the best players from each of those teams were top 7 picks.
As different as the NBA is, baseball is even moreso. The distance between the draft and debuting in the Major Leagues is so vast as to render much of the draft a crap shoot. That said, it still helps to get a top 10 pick. Harper, Posey, Correa, Bryant, Kershaw, Price, Gordon, Harvey, etc. And in baseball you there's an extra incentive for having a top 10 pick
And I never expected the Giants to get a top 10 pick. But just like I was glad the Thunder missed the playoffs last year, I'd rather have the Giants get something like the 10th pick than the 20th. That said, I'd rather make the playoffs and get the 20th pick, than miss it and get like #15.
But the thing the Giants need the most is health. They were missing 4 of their starting OL yesterday, and the only healthy one is a rookie playing out of position at LT. Of course there's also a complete lack of talent, especially int he pass rush and LB core