3. Back to the Pirates. Joe referenced this in his weekly “Late Hits” column earlier this week. Did the ACC make a mistake by not adding ECU?
Carter: What's the old saying about hindsight? ECU, right now, is better than a lot of ACC schools in football. The Pirates would enhance the ACC's football brand. The problem is everything else. Like the fact that Greenville doesn't add anything to ACC's TV footprint. And basketball. The Pirates would win some ACC games in basketball – heck, they played Duke, UNC and N.C. State tough in their most recent trips there – but in terms of history and tradition, ECU would be the worst basketball program in the ACC. But football drives all of this. And if the ACC ever needs a 16th team, if Notre Dame joins, full-time, would you rather have ECU or, say, Connecticut? Bring on the Pirates.
DeCock: If the ACC had paid attention to what really worked from the first round of expansion, East Carolina would have been a no-brainer. Virginia Tech's natural rivalry with Virginia and geographic fit made for a seamless transition to the ACC. But television drives the bus, and the bus does not go through Greenville. (It didn't help that the Pirates spent so many years in the basketball wilderness; a more robust resume would have changed the equation.) But if (when?) Notre Dame joins the ACC as a full member, the conference need look no further for a 16th school.
Giglio: There are so many levels to this answer. But let me hit two:
1) Expansion was supposed to be about football. Who would you rather be in a football conference with: Boston College and Pitt or West Virginia and East Carolina?
2) The ACC is very proud of its academic prestige, and seemingly added teams to enhance this instead of football. But crying "academics" as an excuse to ignore ECU and West Virginia went out the window when they added Louisville.
I know this: ECU's gameday environment would be a welcomed change. The vapid atmospheres at Boston College, Pitt and Miami drag the ACC down to Sun Belt levels.
Keeley: Well, for all the talk of "student-athletes" (that might be the least true phrase we print) and academics, the ACC went an added an academic outlier with the University of Louisville. Who is to say ECU isn't on a similar upward trajectory? And the Pirates are in the real ACC footprint, not the made-for-TV one. Of course, there's no comparison with Louisville basketball and ECU basketball, but this expansion stuff is all about football money anyhow. If all the powers that be could evaluate college athletics as just a business — and not some mythical quasi-moral more than just a game thing — then, yeah, perhaps ECU would have been a nice feather in the ACC's cap. The Pirates have a nice gameday atmosphere, too.
Read more here:
http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/09/26/4...rylink=cpy