These numb nuts don’t even believe it when they hear and see it come out of Trump’s mouth. Let alone a decorated military officer. You know one of the best hired by Trump.

Idiots

(08-19-2024 06:42 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  These numb nuts don’t even believe it when they hear and see it come out of Trump’s mouth. Let alone a decorated military officer. You know one of the best hired by Trump.

They believe 3rd hand and 4th hand piles of garbage to where the day is long when it runs to Trump or against anyone opposing Trump.

When it comes to non-disavowed direct comments from Trump's longest serving chief of staff, and flipping Lt General prior that when the comments run against Orange Donny -- they screech in unison "Lie" and "play the audio".

Yep, a 47 year career Marine officer at the Lt General spot, having held director of OHS, followed by Chief of Staff -- nothing but a lowly liar.

Pretty astounding. Lolz.

Link the audio

(08-19-2024 07:19 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Link the audio

Your TDS is critical.

(08-19-2024 07:30 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(08-19-2024 07:19 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Link the audio

Your TDS is critical.

And your EEG is flat lined.

(08-19-2024 07:33 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(08-19-2024 07:30 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(08-19-2024 07:19 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Link the audio

Your TDS is critical.

And your EEG is flat lined.

Link the audio!!!

The funny thing 'teet, is that earlier in this same thread you scream "You are fat. You are ugly" to someone else.

I guess you are a liar by your own stupid ass standard you demand. Lolz.

Yep, quite the warrior way there. To impliedly state that a 47 year Marine Lt General is a liar. To screech "You are fat. You are ugly", and just a few posts later *demand* audio proof of the thing that gets you maddy poo.

The above is just stunningly idiotic.

General Kelly stated that. He hasnt disavowed it. You, with no counter evidence, scream and cry and whine that Kelly is a liar. All the while screaming and whining (ostensibly with zero evidence whatsoever) that someone you dont like is "fat" and "ugly".

Lolz. My seven year old snotty ADHD nephew does better than you here. But please keep going. Double lolz.

Toodles, 'teet

The problem is I'm speaking to you in English and you're listening to me in Liberal.

tanq your opinion is just as worthless here as mine is. You're just too vain to realize it.

Kelly said it happened. Others say it didn't. Both have axes to grind. Neither are objective observers.

(08-19-2024 08:56 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Kelly said it happened. Others say it didn't. Both have axes to grind. Neither are objective observers.

Yep. Several others said it didn't happen. Kelly and Trump had an unhappy parting of the ways, so it is by no means a definitive fact that Trump even said it. Regardless of Kelly being the one who said it.

(08-19-2024 09:16 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-19-2024 08:56 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Kelly said it happened. Others say it didn't. Both have axes to grind. Neither are objective observers.

Yep. Several others said it didn't happen. Kelly and Trump had an unhappy parting of the ways, so it is by no means a definitive fact that Trump even said it. Regardless of Kelly being the one who said it.

So everyone on the right is full of . Got it.

(08-19-2024 06:42 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  These numb nuts don’t even believe it when they hear and see it come out of Trump’s mouth. Let alone a decorated military officer. You know one of the best hired by Trump.

Really? Being a decorated soldier exempts one from lying? How about General Screwup Miley who stated that the departure from Afghanistan went smoothly. Did he lie? Of course not, not in your eyes for sure.

(08-19-2024 09:16 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-19-2024 08:56 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Kelly said it happened. Others say it didn't. Both have axes to grind. Neither are objective observers.

Yep. Several others said it didn't happen. Kelly and Trump had an unhappy parting of the ways, so it is by no means a definitive fact that Trump even said it. Regardless of Kelly being the one who said it.

That's what I was gonna say. There are conflicting reports on whether or not it happened. Based on that, it's safe to say that it's a rumor and nothing more.

(08-19-2024 05:02 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-19-2024 04:28 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(08-19-2024 04:09 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  He merely called fallen soldiers 'losers' and 'suckers'.

JFC tanq, you're not this stupid. That is such a proven lie. I try to have a little respect for you but this is too much.

General Kelly is quoted as saying this happened, Teet.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administrat...-war-dead/

Yep, quite the lie.

The flight crew of the Marine One helicopter recommended against traveling to the event that day because of the weather conditions. That's why their visit was cancelled that day.

Several people that were with him in France stated that Trump never said what the Atlantic article accused him of saying. Yep, quite the lie.

https://libertydispatch.com/debunked-tru...ticle19027

https://nypost.com/2020/09/08/us-ambassa...ns-losers/

https://www.foxnews.com/media/john-bolto...75586666ee

So we'll see your General Kelly and raise you about half a dozen other people.

(08-20-2024 12:24 AM)TripleA Wrote:  So we'll see your General Kelly and raise you about half a dozen other people.

NY Post story --

Im glad to discern that the US Ambassador to France was with Trump in at least equal time or more than his Chief of Staff. Seems like a really odd allocation of time.

"LIberty Dispatch" (lmao) story --

First they say 'oh nose', the Atlantic used 'anonymous sources', then immediately rely on comments in the exact same manner.

Huckabee Sanders is relating to the issue that Trump didnt want to go to the cemetery because of the rain. Not calling the soldiers losers on day, and not even addressing the time of 'suckers'. Secondly, I am glad she was with the President more than his chief of staff, apparently.

Pompeo -- maybe read what he says. "Pompeo said. “I’ve never heard the president use the language that assertively is said in that article about him calling military suckers and losers. I’ve never seen that" Non-dispositive on whether Kelly heard that, or whether Trump had ever said it.

Bolton -- "Bolton makes no mention of Trump disparaging the troops." Uhh.... not what you all claim, is it?

Fox News article --

"I can’t prove the negative that he never said those things," Bolton told host Martha MacCallum.

Seriously folks -- read the words and content of the articles. Those articles *do not* say what you claim they say.

The issue is what Kelly explicitly states he heard. None of those items refute that. None of them touch on that in any way. By their own words. But please adhere to them like Bible passages and denoting that the speakers are saying something that they do not actually say. Lol. Do you all bother to actually read the articles you have posted?

As opposed to TripleA's comment of "I'll see your General Kelly and raise you about a half dozen other", the reality based on the people's own words int he articles you proffer -- it should be "I cant counter your General Kelly directly, and throw on the table about a half dozen others that either do not, or cannot, say that Trump didnt ever say that in Kelly's presence."

(08-20-2024 12:24 AM)TripleA Wrote:  So we'll see your General Kelly and raise you about half a dozen other people.

Of the dozens of people who worked in Trump’s first admin, only 4 want to work with him again. That is a whooping 91% that do not want to work for him again. NINETY ONE PERCENT of his former admin does not want to get in that crazy train again

(08-20-2024 04:24 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-20-2024 12:24 AM)TripleA Wrote:  So we'll see your General Kelly and raise you about half a dozen other people.

NY Post story --

Im glad to discern that the US Ambassador to France was with Trump in at least equal time or more than his Chief of Staff. Seems like a really odd allocation of time.

"LIberty Dispatch" (lmao) story --

First they say 'oh nose', the Atlantic used 'anonymous sources', then immediately rely on comments in the exact same manner.

Huckabee Sanders is relating to the issue that Trump didnt want to go to the cemetery because of the rain. Not calling the soldiers losers on day, and not even addressing the time of 'suckers'. Secondly, I am glad she was with the President more than his chief of staff, apparently.

Pompeo -- maybe read what he says. "Pompeo said. “I’ve never heard the president use the language that assertively is said in that article about him calling military suckers and losers. I’ve never seen that" Non-dispositive on whether Kelly heard that, or whether Trump had ever said it.

Bolton -- "Bolton makes no mention of Trump disparaging the troops." Uhh.... not what you all claim, is it?

Fox News article --

"I can’t prove the negative that he never said those things," Bolton told host Martha MacCallum.

Seriously folks -- read the words and content of the articles. Those articles *do not* say what you claim they say.

The issue is what Kelly explicitly states he heard. None of those items refute that. None of them touch on that in any way. By their own words. But please adhere to them like Bible passages and denoting that the speakers are saying something that they do not actually say. Lol. Do you all bother to actually read the articles you have posted?

As opposed to TripleA's comment of "I'll see your General Kelly and raise you about a half dozen other", the reality based on the people's own words int he articles you proffer -- it should be "I cant counter your General Kelly directly, and throw on the table about a half dozen others that either do not, or cannot, say that Trump didnt ever say that in Kelly's presence."

No. They actually do refute that - i.e. what Kelly said which was the basis of the article.

Bolton clearly states in the video of the Fox News link that the claims of the Atlantic hit piece that Trump made disparaging remarks are false. It is right at the 4-minute mark of the video where Bolton said, "I was just responding to what I thought was the main part of the article where at the critical point where the critical point was made not to go to Anmar that he made the disparaging remarks, and he did not".

In the written text of the Fox News link is the following -

"According to what that article said, the president made disparaging remarks about soldiers and people buried in the cemetery in connection with the decision for him not to go to the ceremony that was planned that afternoon, and that was simply false," Bolton said.

It's not enough to have someone - the Ambassador to France - come forward and state that she was with the president and that he never said those things. You have to insinuate that she is lying and wasn't with the president as she has claimed in an attempt to dispute her comments.