(05-26-2022 02:00 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:36 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:34 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  you are really really stupid. i pity you.

your prog filth brethren. well done virginia filth



these all have something in common. you figure it out

Not everyone can live where there are more tumble weeds then people

democrats should voluntarily surrender their firearms. prove they believe in the cause. especially prog filth in cities.

go for it.

For someone taking about “the cause”, you come across very authoritarian.

reading is fundamental.

Switzerland...

8.2 million people
2 million guns

21 years since the last mass shooting

https://www.buzzworthy.com/switzerland-gun-laws/

Mandated Gun Ownership

In Switzerland, men aged 18-34 who are “fit for service” are all trained and conscripted into the Swiss military, and women who are of age can also choose to enlist. Military personnel are provided with a Swiss Army gun and trained to use it, and the weapon becomes theirs for the duration of their service. They undergo mandatory training when they are 18 and then considered to be part of the Swiss militia until they reach the age of 35, with shorter periods of mandatory training in between to freshen their minds on tactics and safety. Historians say that this tradition of keeping their civilians armed is largely what kept the Nazis from invading Switzerland in WWII.

(05-26-2022 01:51 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:36 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:34 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  you are really really stupid. i pity you.

your prog filth brethren. well done virginia filth



these all have something in common. you figure it out

Not everyone can live where there are more tumble weeds then people

democrats should voluntarily surrender their firearms. prove they believe in the cause. especially prog filth in cities.

go for it.

Ooof

Good point

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

They should voluntarily walk or ride their bikes, own no guns, and voluntarily pay a 75% tax rate.

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

That's not true, I don't have one...yet.

(05-26-2022 01:24 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Find a chart that excludes suicides.

The situation isn't much different.



https://www.kdnuggets.com/2012/12/new-po...rship.html

(05-26-2022 01:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  you are really really stupid. i pity you.

your prog filth brethren. well done virginia filth



these all have something in common. you figure it out

Those are the areas with the highest numbers of guns per capita. Exactly my point. If those areas were empowered to be able to reduce the number of guns, the number of deaths would proportionally go down.

(05-26-2022 02:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:00 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:36 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:34 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  you are really really stupid. i pity you.

your prog filth brethren. well done virginia filth



these all have something in common. you figure it out

Not everyone can live where there are more tumble weeds then people

democrats should voluntarily surrender their firearms. prove they believe in the cause. especially prog filth in cities.

go for it.

For someone taking about “the cause”, you come across very authoritarian.

reading is fundamental.

So is understanding history and how authoritarian regimes rise.

(05-26-2022 02:25 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:00 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:36 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:34 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Not everyone can live where there are more tumble weeds then people

democrats should voluntarily surrender their firearms. prove they believe in the cause. especially prog filth in cities.

go for it.

For someone taking about “the cause”, you come across very authoritarian.

reading is fundamental.

So is understanding history and how authoritarian regimes rise.

im watching it through the Biden* regime.

(05-26-2022 02:27 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:25 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:00 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:36 PM)shere khan Wrote:  democrats should voluntarily surrender their firearms. prove they believe in the cause. especially prog filth in cities.

go for it.

For someone taking about “the cause”, you come across very authoritarian.

reading is fundamental.

So is understanding history and how authoritarian regimes rise.

im watching it through the Biden* regime.

What rights have you lost?

Let’s count up the rights lost due to Biden vs GOP controlled state legislatures.

(05-26-2022 02:32 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:27 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:25 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:00 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  For someone taking about “the cause”, you come across very authoritarian.

reading is fundamental.

So is understanding history and how authoritarian regimes rise.

im watching it through the Biden* regime.

What rights have you lost?

Let’s count up the rights lost due to Biden vs GOP controlled state legislatures.

ive surrendered none of my rights nor will i. were you asleep during covid? i can absolutely promise you, without a doubt, the government will not take my guns.

(05-26-2022 02:25 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:00 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:36 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:34 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Not everyone can live where there are more tumble weeds then people

democrats should voluntarily surrender their firearms. prove they believe in the cause. especially prog filth in cities.

go for it.

For someone taking about “the cause”, you come across very authoritarian.

reading is fundamental.

So is understanding history and how authoritarian regimes rise.

The argument that guns in the hands of the population prevent an overpowering government works when the people have the same level of weapons as the government. That was the case at our country's founding and probably up through the 1800's. But the whole situation changed in the 1900's. From that point forward, the weapons governments have and fight with were no longer comparable to anything you can own at home. It's just not practical, or safe for the population at large in civilian hands.

Take Ukraine for instance. They might be able to hold Russia back for a little while in urban warfare with guns. That is until they level the city. They are no match to Russia unless we send in the same tanks, artillery, fighter jets and heavy weaponry to match what Russia has on the field. None of this can be owned at home or in any conceivable way by civilians.

So anyone who claims arming citizens puts any kind of check on government power is delusional and arguably has a terrorist mentality. Elon Musk recently claimed this, and I immediately felt sorry for him for awkwardly having to tweet Republican garbage. But notably, he did say "historically" that was the case. And he is right on that. But it's no longer the case.

Scorpius talking about others being delusional just cracks me up.

(05-26-2022 02:46 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Scorpius talking about others being delusional just cracks me up.

he aint wired right

(05-26-2022 02:44 PM)scorpius Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:25 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:00 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:36 PM)shere khan Wrote:  democrats should voluntarily surrender their firearms. prove they believe in the cause. especially prog filth in cities.

go for it.

For someone taking about “the cause”, you come across very authoritarian.

reading is fundamental.

So is understanding history and how authoritarian regimes rise.

The argument that guns in the hands of the population prevent an overpowering government works when the people have the same level of weapons as the government. That was the case at our country's founding and probably up through the 1800's. But the whole situation changed in the 1900's. From that point forward, the weapons governments have and fight with were no longer a match to anything you can own at home even if you wanted to.

Take Ukraine for instance. They might be able to hold them back for a little while in urban warfare with guns. That is until they level the city. They are no match to Russia unless we send in the same tanks, artillery, fighter jets and heavy weaponry to match what Russia has on the field. None of this can be owned at home or in any conceivable way by civilians.

So anyone who claims arming citizens puts any kind of check on government power is delusional and arguably has a terrorist mentality.

The Viet Cong did pretty well against superior weaponry in Vietnam. The Mugahideen managed to outlast the Russians as well.
You also assume that our military would fight it's own people. Some might, the majority however likely would not.

You last sentence is utter nonsense which seems to be your MO lately.

(05-26-2022 02:55 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:44 PM)scorpius Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:25 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:00 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  For someone taking about “the cause”, you come across very authoritarian.

reading is fundamental.

So is understanding history and how authoritarian regimes rise.

The argument that guns in the hands of the population prevent an overpowering government works when the people have the same level of weapons as the government. That was the case at our country's founding and probably up through the 1800's. But the whole situation changed in the 1900's. From that point forward, the weapons governments have and fight with were no longer a match to anything you can own at home even if you wanted to.

Take Ukraine for instance. They might be able to hold them back for a little while in urban warfare with guns. That is until they level the city. They are no match to Russia unless we send in the same tanks, artillery, fighter jets and heavy weaponry to match what Russia has on the field. None of this can be owned at home or in any conceivable way by civilians.

So anyone who claims arming citizens puts any kind of check on government power is delusional and arguably has a terrorist mentality.

The Viet Cong did pretty well against superior weaponry in Vietnam. The Mugahideen managed to outlast the Russians as well.
You also assume that our military would fight it's own people. Some might, the majority however likely would not.

You last sentence is utter nonsense which seems to be your MO lately.

Biden* was forced to escape a country full of goat humpers.

Plus these idiots think our own troops will attack us. They are us. It wont go like the filth think.

"Gun Ownership WAY Too High"

(05-26-2022 02:20 PM)scorpius Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:24 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Find a chart that excludes suicides.

The situation isn't much different.



https://www.kdnuggets.com/2012/12/new-po...rship.html

So looks like roughly 2/3 off all gun deaths are suicides around the world. Can you find a state by state graph of homicides versus gun ownership? I don't have time to look at work.

(05-26-2022 01:34 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 01:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  you are really really stupid. i pity you.

your prog filth brethren. well done virginia filth



these all have something in common. you figure it out

Not everyone can live where there are more tumble weeds then people

Well, then don’t shoot anyone?

Problem solved.

Gun taint gonna do it on its own, silly.

Why are we looking at "gun deaths" as a category rather than "gun murders"? I'd imagine a huge number of "gun deaths" are justified self defense killings. Statistically more people are killed by hammers or bare fists than rifles every year.

(05-26-2022 02:51 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(05-26-2022 02:46 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Scorpius talking about others being delusional just cracks me up.

he aint wired right

Short circuit near the brain pan?