(02-18-2021 01:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 12:15 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 11:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 10:10 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  And this is exactly why Democrats oppose cleaning up voter rolls across the country.

This doesn't even make sense.

Not aware of anyone opposed to removing dead or nonresidents from any state voter rolls as long as they actually left the state or the earth.

Good Lord your either incredibly dumb or flat out dishonest...or both (most likley). Democrats block move to purge the rolls of dead or non-residents every single time its tried.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/politics/...index.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...ter-rolls/

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/28...ate-451820

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-c...SKBN1J71QQ

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/poli...465158002/

I could literally post links for hours.

I only looked at the first link, but that is not for the same thing as was done in Michigan!

Geez.

Those rolls were not purged of dead or voters that had moved...but rather inactive voters. Apples and oranges.

But please...provide more links to other topics.

Im not going to hunt around for even MORE links to prove your idiocy wrong. You can google and you know that any search will just find more crap where Democrats oppose any effort to cleanse the rolls of dead and non-resident voters. Ive already proven you wrong. Move along or sell your propaganda to someone more gullible.

(02-18-2021 05:18 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 01:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 12:15 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 11:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 10:10 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  And this is exactly why Democrats oppose cleaning up voter rolls across the country.

This doesn't even make sense.

Not aware of anyone opposed to removing dead or nonresidents from any state voter rolls as long as they actually left the state or the earth.

Good Lord your either incredibly dumb or flat out dishonest...or both (most likley). Democrats block move to purge the rolls of dead or non-residents every single time its tried.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/politics/...index.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...ter-rolls/

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/28...ate-451820

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-c...SKBN1J71QQ

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/poli...465158002/

I could literally post links for hours.

I only looked at the first link, but that is not for the same thing as was done in Michigan!

Geez.

Those rolls were not purged of dead or voters that had moved...but rather inactive voters. Apples and oranges.

But please...provide more links to other topics.

Im not going to hunt around for even MORE links to prove your idiocy wrong. You can google and you know that any search will just find more crap where Democrats oppose any effort to cleanse the rolls of dead and non-resident voters. Ive already proven you wrong. Move along or sell your propaganda to someone more gullible.

Tell him that one of the links talks about the court ordered audit in antrim county and watch him crap his pants.

(02-18-2021 05:18 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 01:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 12:15 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 11:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 10:10 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  And this is exactly why Democrats oppose cleaning up voter rolls across the country.

This doesn't even make sense.

Not aware of anyone opposed to removing dead or nonresidents from any state voter rolls as long as they actually left the state or the earth.

Good Lord your either incredibly dumb or flat out dishonest...or both (most likley). Democrats block move to purge the rolls of dead or non-residents every single time its tried.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/politics/...index.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...ter-rolls/

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/28...ate-451820

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-c...SKBN1J71QQ

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/poli...465158002/

I could literally post links for hours.

I only looked at the first link, but that is not for the same thing as was done in Michigan!

Geez.

Those rolls were not purged of dead or voters that had moved...but rather inactive voters. Apples and oranges.

But please...provide more links to other topics.

Im not going to hunt around for even MORE links to prove your idiocy wrong. You can google and you know that any search will just find more crap where Democrats oppose any effort to cleanse the rolls of dead and non-resident voters. Ive already proven you wrong. Move along or sell your propaganda to someone more gullible.

I posted a few in post #16 toward the bottom of page 1.

(02-18-2021 07:53 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 05:18 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 01:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 12:15 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 11:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This doesn't even make sense.

Not aware of anyone opposed to removing dead or nonresidents from any state voter rolls as long as they actually left the state or the earth.

Good Lord your either incredibly dumb or flat out dishonest...or both (most likley). Democrats block move to purge the rolls of dead or non-residents every single time its tried.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/politics/...index.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...ter-rolls/

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/28...ate-451820

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-c...SKBN1J71QQ

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/poli...465158002/

I could literally post links for hours.

I only looked at the first link, but that is not for the same thing as was done in Michigan!

Geez.

Those rolls were not purged of dead or voters that had moved...but rather inactive voters. Apples and oranges.

But please...provide more links to other topics.

Im not going to hunt around for even MORE links to prove your idiocy wrong. You can google and you know that any search will just find more crap where Democrats oppose any effort to cleanse the rolls of dead and non-resident voters. Ive already proven you wrong. Move along or sell your propaganda to someone more gullible.

Tell him that one of the links talks about the court ordered audit in antrim county and watch him crap his pants.

Tell me again lying troll, how one guy in Michigan single handedly reviewed 68% of votes rejected by a dominion machine and then without supervision filled out replacement ballots...all for Biden apparently even though trump won the county by the same percentage as in 2016...and then rescanned them and then destroyed all the original ballots in violation of state law and nobody reported it or said a word?

AGAIN, I'LL ASK YOU TO PROVIDE THE PROOF, CLOWN!

You're a fraud of the highest order. I called you out time and time again on this, but you still refuse to admit that you just ******* made this up out of whole cloth. Not to mention you ran away from that thread...something you've accuse me of time and time again but have yet to provide a link to one thread where I did.

I don't know what's more sad, your continual lying nonsense...or the other sycophantic posters here who ignore it and keep kissing your lying troll ass.

(02-18-2021 05:18 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 01:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 12:15 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 11:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 10:10 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  And this is exactly why Democrats oppose cleaning up voter rolls across the country.

This doesn't even make sense.

Not aware of anyone opposed to removing dead or nonresidents from any state voter rolls as long as they actually left the state or the earth.

Good Lord your either incredibly dumb or flat out dishonest...or both (most likley). Democrats block move to purge the rolls of dead or non-residents every single time its tried.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/politics/...index.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...ter-rolls/

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/28...ate-451820

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-c...SKBN1J71QQ

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/poli...465158002/

I could literally post links for hours.

I only looked at the first link, but that is not for the same thing as was done in Michigan!

Geez.

Those rolls were not purged of dead or voters that had moved...but rather inactive voters. Apples and oranges.

But please...provide more links to other topics.

Im not going to hunt around for even MORE links to prove your idiocy wrong. You can google and you know that any search will just find more crap where Democrats oppose any effort to cleanse the rolls of dead and non-resident voters. Ive already proven you wrong. Move along or sell your propaganda to someone more gullible.

Did you even bother to read those links you posted...or did you post the results of the google search?

Those cases all have nuances. What I said is that no one is opposed to removing actual dead registered voters or voters that actually did move.

The links you posted I read all deal with things like relying on bad data to do blanket purges, etc. Those things tend to disenfranchise voters...and they end up mostly effecting low income and minority voters...and are frequently done by the GOP for that very reason. Of course democrats are going to fight and oppose them. Just as republicans would do if democrat legislatures would propose things that would effect rich white guys.

(02-19-2021 10:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 05:18 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 01:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 12:15 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 11:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  This doesn't even make sense.

Not aware of anyone opposed to removing dead or nonresidents from any state voter rolls as long as they actually left the state or the earth.

Good Lord your either incredibly dumb or flat out dishonest...or both (most likley). Democrats block move to purge the rolls of dead or non-residents every single time its tried.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/politics/...index.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...ter-rolls/

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/28...ate-451820

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-c...SKBN1J71QQ

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/poli...465158002/

I could literally post links for hours.

I only looked at the first link, but that is not for the same thing as was done in Michigan!

Geez.

Those rolls were not purged of dead or voters that had moved...but rather inactive voters. Apples and oranges.

But please...provide more links to other topics.

Im not going to hunt around for even MORE links to prove your idiocy wrong. You can google and you know that any search will just find more crap where Democrats oppose any effort to cleanse the rolls of dead and non-resident voters. Ive already proven you wrong. Move along or sell your propaganda to someone more gullible.

Did you even bother to read those links you posted...or did you post the results of the google search?

Those cases all have nuances. What I said is that no one is opposed to removing actual dead registered voters or voters that actually did move.

The links you posted I read all deal with things like relying on bad data to do blanket purges, etc. Those things tend to disenfranchise voters...and they end up mostly effecting low income and minority voters...and are frequently done by the GOP for that very reason. Of course democrats are going to fight and oppose them. Just as republicans would do if democrat legislatures would propose things that would effect rich white guys.

That whole last paragraph is just talking points BS. If a person hasn’t voted in any election in 10 years, or some other determined time frame, they should be purged and have to re-register. It’s the best way to make sure you don’t pile up dead and relocated voters on the rolls.

Of course, if you did that, it significantly reduces the opportunity for fraud. If you want to fill out fake ballots the prime route is to fill out ballots for people who likely won’t be voting, which is why the dems love rolls filled with inactive voters.

BTW, you seemed to have missed the democrats becoming the party of all the really rich white guys, so update you biases.

(02-19-2021 11:42 AM)banker Wrote:  

(02-19-2021 10:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 05:18 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 01:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 12:15 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  Good Lord your either incredibly dumb or flat out dishonest...or both (most likley). Democrats block move to purge the rolls of dead or non-residents every single time its tried.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/politics/...index.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...ter-rolls/

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/28...ate-451820

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-c...SKBN1J71QQ

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/poli...465158002/

I could literally post links for hours.

I only looked at the first link, but that is not for the same thing as was done in Michigan!

Geez.

Those rolls were not purged of dead or voters that had moved...but rather inactive voters. Apples and oranges.

But please...provide more links to other topics.

Im not going to hunt around for even MORE links to prove your idiocy wrong. You can google and you know that any search will just find more crap where Democrats oppose any effort to cleanse the rolls of dead and non-resident voters. Ive already proven you wrong. Move along or sell your propaganda to someone more gullible.

Did you even bother to read those links you posted...or did you post the results of the google search?

Those cases all have nuances. What I said is that no one is opposed to removing actual dead registered voters or voters that actually did move.

The links you posted I read all deal with things like relying on bad data to do blanket purges, etc. Those things tend to disenfranchise voters...and they end up mostly effecting low income and minority voters...and are frequently done by the GOP for that very reason. Of course democrats are going to fight and oppose them. Just as republicans would do if democrat legislatures would propose things that would effect rich white guys.

That whole last paragraph is just talking points BS. If a person hasn’t voted in any election in 10 years, or some other determined time frame, they should be purged and have to re-register. It’s the best way to make sure you don’t pile up dead and relocated voters on the rolls.

Of course, if you did that, it significantly reduces the opportunity for fraud. If you want to fill out fake ballots the prime route is to fill out ballots for people who likely won’t be voting, which is why the dems love rolls filled with inactive voters.

BTW, you seemed to have missed the democrats becoming the party of all the really rich white guys, so update you biases.

as a comparative, in the 'sip, not only do we have stringent voting standards, but if you move, they'll find yo' arse 'quick like

@racistDumDumState

FOKKK MICHIGA(I)NERS

edit: take a gander how a state with a majority minority plays out....yeah....

(02-19-2021 12:12 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  as a comparative, in the 'sip, not only do we have stringent voting standards, but if you move, they'll find yo' arse 'quick like

@racistDumDumState

FOKKK MICHIGA(I)NERS

edit: take a gander how a state with a majority minority plays out....yeah....

Hot damn I missed you

(02-19-2021 12:25 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(02-19-2021 12:12 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  as a comparative, in the 'sip, not only do we have stringent voting standards, but if you move, they'll find yo' arse 'quick like

@racistDumDumState

FOKKK MICHIGA(I)NERS

edit: take a gander how a state with a majority minority plays out....yeah....

Hot damn I missed you

#irony

I once made the mistake of referring to memphians as midwestern....it was during the post cusa 2.0 era....

I was only wrong in geo.....dipshite commietommie proves it by the day.. .

(02-19-2021 10:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 07:53 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 05:18 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 01:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 12:15 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  Good Lord your either incredibly dumb or flat out dishonest...or both (most likley). Democrats block move to purge the rolls of dead or non-residents every single time its tried.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/politics/...index.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...ter-rolls/

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/28...ate-451820

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-c...SKBN1J71QQ

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/poli...465158002/

I could literally post links for hours.

I only looked at the first link, but that is not for the same thing as was done in Michigan!

Geez.

Those rolls were not purged of dead or voters that had moved...but rather inactive voters. Apples and oranges.

But please...provide more links to other topics.

Im not going to hunt around for even MORE links to prove your idiocy wrong. You can google and you know that any search will just find more crap where Democrats oppose any effort to cleanse the rolls of dead and non-resident voters. Ive already proven you wrong. Move along or sell your propaganda to someone more gullible.

Tell him that one of the links talks about the court ordered audit in antrim county and watch him crap his pants.

Tell me again lying troll, how one guy in Michigan single handedly reviewed 68% of votes rejected by a dominion machine and then without supervision filled out replacement ballots...all for Biden apparently even though trump won the county by the same percentage as in 2016...and then rescanned them and then destroyed all the original ballots in violation of state law and nobody reported it or said a word?

AGAIN, I'LL ASK YOU TO PROVIDE THE PROOF, CLOWN!

You're a fraud of the highest order. I called you out time and time again on this, but you still refuse to admit that you just ******* made this up out of whole cloth. Not to mention you ran away from that thread...something you've accuse me of time and time again but have yet to provide a link to one thread where I did.

I don't know what's more sad, your continual lying nonsense...or the other sycophantic posters here who ignore it and keep kissing your lying troll ass.

The ONE COUNTY they were able to audit showed this happening.

Maricopa county has been trying to do it, and the dems keep trying to stop them. Wonder why?

I'm not going to keep hitting you over the head on this. A court ordered an audit. You provided a link to the ruling that said the word "audit" never appeared. I then gave you the page and paragraph where it was located. You then blamed your spellchecker and then crapped your pants and went off on a tangent.

Also, if MI had over a HALF MILLION returned ballots due to address issues, why arent they removing them?

(02-19-2021 02:35 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-19-2021 10:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 07:53 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 05:18 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 01:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I only looked at the first link, but that is not for the same thing as was done in Michigan!

Geez.

Those rolls were not purged of dead or voters that had moved...but rather inactive voters. Apples and oranges.

But please...provide more links to other topics.

Im not going to hunt around for even MORE links to prove your idiocy wrong. You can google and you know that any search will just find more crap where Democrats oppose any effort to cleanse the rolls of dead and non-resident voters. Ive already proven you wrong. Move along or sell your propaganda to someone more gullible.

Tell him that one of the links talks about the court ordered audit in antrim county and watch him crap his pants.

Tell me again lying troll, how one guy in Michigan single handedly reviewed 68% of votes rejected by a dominion machine and then without supervision filled out replacement ballots...all for Biden apparently even though trump won the county by the same percentage as in 2016...and then rescanned them and then destroyed all the original ballots in violation of state law and nobody reported it or said a word?

AGAIN, I'LL ASK YOU TO PROVIDE THE PROOF, CLOWN!

You're a fraud of the highest order. I called you out time and time again on this, but you still refuse to admit that you just ******* made this up out of whole cloth. Not to mention you ran away from that thread...something you've accuse me of time and time again but have yet to provide a link to one thread where I did.

I don't know what's more sad, your continual lying nonsense...or the other sycophantic posters here who ignore it and keep kissing your lying troll ass.

The ONE COUNTY they were able to audit showed this happening.

Maricopa county has been trying to do it, and the dems keep trying to stop them. Wonder why?

I'm not going to keep hitting you over the head on this. A court ordered an audit. You provided a link to the ruling that said the work "audit" never appeared. I then gave you the page and paragraph where it was located. You then blamed your spellchecker and then crapped your pants and went off on a tangent.

Also, if MI had over a HALF MILLION returned ballots due to address issues, why arent they removing them?

as an irrelevant side bar, cali is now verifying all sigs to remove new-shun paid faggoo....

@coincidenc

#naught

(02-19-2021 02:43 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-19-2021 02:35 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-19-2021 10:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 07:53 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 05:18 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  Im not going to hunt around for even MORE links to prove your idiocy wrong. You can google and you know that any search will just find more crap where Democrats oppose any effort to cleanse the rolls of dead and non-resident voters. Ive already proven you wrong. Move along or sell your propaganda to someone more gullible.

Tell him that one of the links talks about the court ordered audit in antrim county and watch him crap his pants.

Tell me again lying troll, how one guy in Michigan single handedly reviewed 68% of votes rejected by a dominion machine and then without supervision filled out replacement ballots...all for Biden apparently even though trump won the county by the same percentage as in 2016...and then rescanned them and then destroyed all the original ballots in violation of state law and nobody reported it or said a word?

AGAIN, I'LL ASK YOU TO PROVIDE THE PROOF, CLOWN!

You're a fraud of the highest order. I called you out time and time again on this, but you still refuse to admit that you just ******* made this up out of whole cloth. Not to mention you ran away from that thread...something you've accuse me of time and time again but have yet to provide a link to one thread where I did.

I don't know what's more sad, your continual lying nonsense...or the other sycophantic posters here who ignore it and keep kissing your lying troll ass.

The ONE COUNTY they were able to audit showed this happening.

Maricopa county has been trying to do it, and the dems keep trying to stop them. Wonder why?

I'm not going to keep hitting you over the head on this. A court ordered an audit. You provided a link to the ruling that said the word "audit" never appeared. I then gave you the page and paragraph where it was located. You then blamed your spellchecker and then crapped your pants and went off on a tangent.

Also, if MI had over a HALF MILLION returned ballots due to address issues, why arent they removing them?

as an irrelevant side bar, cali is now verifying all sigs to remove new-shun paid faggoo....

@coincidenc

#naught

yep, and I bet they reject more than .02% or whatever ridiculously low number they did during the election.

(02-19-2021 02:35 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-19-2021 10:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 07:53 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 05:18 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 01:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I only looked at the first link, but that is not for the same thing as was done in Michigan!

Geez.

Those rolls were not purged of dead or voters that had moved...but rather inactive voters. Apples and oranges.

But please...provide more links to other topics.

Im not going to hunt around for even MORE links to prove your idiocy wrong. You can google and you know that any search will just find more crap where Democrats oppose any effort to cleanse the rolls of dead and non-resident voters. Ive already proven you wrong. Move along or sell your propaganda to someone more gullible.

Tell him that one of the links talks about the court ordered audit in antrim county and watch him crap his pants.

Tell me again lying troll, how one guy in Michigan single handedly reviewed 68% of votes rejected by a dominion machine and then without supervision filled out replacement ballots...all for Biden apparently even though trump won the county by the same percentage as in 2016...and then rescanned them and then destroyed all the original ballots in violation of state law and nobody reported it or said a word?

AGAIN, I'LL ASK YOU TO PROVIDE THE PROOF, CLOWN!

You're a fraud of the highest order. I called you out time and time again on this, but you still refuse to admit that you just ******* made this up out of whole cloth. Not to mention you ran away from that thread...something you've accuse me of time and time again but have yet to provide a link to one thread where I did.

I don't know what's more sad, your continual lying nonsense...or the other sycophantic posters here who ignore it and keep kissing your lying troll ass.

The ONE COUNTY they were able to audit showed this happening.

Maricopa county has been trying to do it, and the dems keep trying to stop them. Wonder why?

I'm not going to keep hitting you over the head on this. A court ordered an audit. You provided a link to the ruling that said the word "audit" never appeared. I then gave you the page and paragraph where it was located. You then blamed your spellchecker and then crapped your pants and went off on a tangent.

Bull.
****.

(01-26-2021 03:11 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  The forensic audit turned up that 68% of the ballots scanned by that machine were rejected and went to adjudication. Adjudication is a manual process where the original ballots are sent to a single unmonitored workstation where an employee attempts to determine voter intent. That one unmonitored person then corrects the ballot, reprints the ballot corrected, and sends the original ballot to be destroyed.

NONE of the bolded happened in Antrim Co. You simply made it up.

Nobody gives two ***** whether the court order an audit or whether I missed the word auditing in a pdf file. And my initial assertion was that it was not an independent audit, which it wasn't. It was done by the plaintiffs using a discredited company with little to no expertise in elections.

You're a clown.

Joe stole the election, no need to be all pizzed off about it. Just own it.

BTW, what’s your whiteness level?

(02-19-2021 03:15 PM)banker Wrote:  Joe stole the election, no need to be all pizzed off about it. Just own it.

BTW, what’s your whiteness level?

commietom probably identifies as yellow.

(02-19-2021 03:15 PM)banker Wrote:  Joe stole the election, no need to be all pizzed off about it. Just own it.

You're an idiot. Own it.

(02-19-2021 02:46 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-19-2021 02:43 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(02-19-2021 02:35 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(02-19-2021 10:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-18-2021 07:53 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Tell him that one of the links talks about the court ordered audit in antrim county and watch him crap his pants.

Tell me again lying troll, how one guy in Michigan single handedly reviewed 68% of votes rejected by a dominion machine and then without supervision filled out replacement ballots...all for Biden apparently even though trump won the county by the same percentage as in 2016...and then rescanned them and then destroyed all the original ballots in violation of state law and nobody reported it or said a word?

AGAIN, I'LL ASK YOU TO PROVIDE THE PROOF, CLOWN!

You're a fraud of the highest order. I called you out time and time again on this, but you still refuse to admit that you just ******* made this up out of whole cloth. Not to mention you ran away from that thread...something you've accuse me of time and time again but have yet to provide a link to one thread where I did.

I don't know what's more sad, your continual lying nonsense...or the other sycophantic posters here who ignore it and keep kissing your lying troll ass.

The ONE COUNTY they were able to audit showed this happening.

Maricopa county has been trying to do it, and the dems keep trying to stop them. Wonder why?

I'm not going to keep hitting you over the head on this. A court ordered an audit. You provided a link to the ruling that said the word "audit" never appeared. I then gave you the page and paragraph where it was located. You then blamed your spellchecker and then crapped your pants and went off on a tangent.

Also, if MI had over a HALF MILLION returned ballots due to address issues, why arent they removing them?

as an irrelevant side bar, cali is now verifying all sigs to remove new-shun paid faggoo....

@coincidenc

#naught

yep, and I bet they reject more than .02% or whatever ridiculously low number they did during the election.

like back strap done proper, the kkkunts willfully bow....

addendum: lean can be mean

(02-18-2021 10:10 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  Michigan purges voter rolls of 177,000 names after the election.

Michigan Removed 177,000 Voters from Voter Rolls in January After Certifying Biden Won Michigan by 154,000 Votes in November

Quote:The Michigan secretary of state removed 177,000 inactive voters from the state’s voter rolls after settling a legal challenge.

The stateremoved the names from the voter rolls in late January because the voters no longer live in the state or did not respond to the state’s inquiries about their addresses, according to a Tuesday district court announcement. The state performed the post-election audit during a legal battle with the Honest Elections Project, an election watchdog.

And this is exactly why Democrats oppose cleaning up voter rolls across the country.

How many of them are in the military, family members of military or work outside of the state but still actually lives there? There are exceptions to these people which is called absentee ballots.

Biden won, tRUMP lost. Get over it.

Another libtard invades... bye.