Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
OT: WAC Football pretty much official
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Troy_Fan_15 Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 210
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 7
I Root For: Troy
Location:
Post: #21
RE: OT: WAC Football pretty much official
Would be a great move for UTA. WAC does need a 14th member if they want an even number of teams.
(This post was last modified: 01-14-2021 01:16 PM by Troy_Fan_15.)
01-14-2021 01:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 37,373
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 496
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #22
RE: OT: WAC Football pretty much official
(01-14-2021 01:14 PM)Troy_Fan_15 Wrote:  Would be a great move for UTA. WAC does need a 14th member if they want an even number of teams.

Lets be clear, I don't believe Sun Belt rules allow UTA to play football in the WAC. If they started football, it has to be FBS football...or they have to leave the conference.
01-14-2021 07:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Usajags Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 7,179
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 147
I Root For: South Alabama
Location: Jaguar Nation
Post: #23
RE: OT: WAC Football pretty much official
(01-14-2021 07:44 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(01-14-2021 01:14 PM)Troy_Fan_15 Wrote:  Would be a great move for UTA. WAC does need a 14th member if they want an even number of teams.

Lets be clear, I don't believe Sun Belt rules allow UTA to play football in the WAC. If they started football, it has to be FBS football...or they have to leave the conference.

That’s the idea, they would join the WAC, start football and play FCS with them until the conference makes the move. How did you get lost by that???

To be clear, in this scenario, UTA would no longer be a member of the SBC. 01-wingedeagle
01-14-2021 07:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Troy_Fan_15 Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 210
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 7
I Root For: Troy
Location:
Post: #24
RE: OT: WAC Football pretty much official
(01-14-2021 07:44 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(01-14-2021 01:14 PM)Troy_Fan_15 Wrote:  Would be a great move for UTA. WAC does need a 14th member if they want an even number of teams.

Lets be clear, I don't believe Sun Belt rules allow UTA to play football in the WAC. If they started football, it has to be FBS football...or they have to leave the conference.

Yeah I was referring to them joining the WAC with full membership.
01-14-2021 07:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 37,373
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 496
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #25
RE: OT: WAC Football pretty much official
(01-14-2021 07:47 PM)Usajags Wrote:  
(01-14-2021 07:44 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(01-14-2021 01:14 PM)Troy_Fan_15 Wrote:  Would be a great move for UTA. WAC does need a 14th member if they want an even number of teams.

Lets be clear, I don't believe Sun Belt rules allow UTA to play football in the WAC. If they started football, it has to be FBS football...or they have to leave the conference.

That’s the idea, they would join the WAC, start football and play FCS with them until the conference makes the move. How did you get lost by that???

To be clear, in this scenario, UTA would no longer be a member of the SBC. 01-wingedeagle

Oh, I didn't realize we were all okay with letting UTA go. If that's the case then, awesome.
01-14-2021 07:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Usajags Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 7,179
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 147
I Root For: South Alabama
Location: Jaguar Nation
Post: #26
RE: OT: WAC Football pretty much official
(01-14-2021 07:52 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(01-14-2021 07:47 PM)Usajags Wrote:  
(01-14-2021 07:44 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(01-14-2021 01:14 PM)Troy_Fan_15 Wrote:  Would be a great move for UTA. WAC does need a 14th member if they want an even number of teams.

Lets be clear, I don't believe Sun Belt rules allow UTA to play football in the WAC. If they started football, it has to be FBS football...or they have to leave the conference.

That’s the idea, they would join the WAC, start football and play FCS with them until the conference makes the move. How did you get lost by that???

To be clear, in this scenario, UTA would no longer be a member of the SBC. 01-wingedeagle

Oh, I didn't realize we were all okay with letting UTA go. If that's the case then, awesome.

If they decided to leave, not like we can stop them. I do think it’s a good option for UTA if they wanted to restart football with less demand then needing to go direct from zero to FBS.
01-14-2021 08:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2021 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2021 MyBB Group.